Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/DOI:10.31579/2578-8868/397
Michel Bourin Neurobiology of Anxiety and mood disorders, Nantes University, 98 rue Joseph Blanchart, 44100 Nantes. France.
*Corresponding Author: Michel Bourin, Michel Bourin Neurobiology of Anxiety and mood disorders, Nantes University, 98 rue Joseph Blanchart, 44100 Nantes. France.
Citation: Michel Bourin, (2026), The Diagnostic Complexity of Bipolar II Disorder: Energy Dysregulation, Mitochondrial Dysfunction, and the Role of Therapeutic Probes, J. Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, 19(01); DOI:10.31579/2578-8868/397
Copyright: © 2026, Michel Bourin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Received: 12 January 2026 | Accepted: 19 January 2026 | Published: 27 January 2026
Keywords: Keywords: bipolar II disorder; energy dysregulation; mitochondrial dysfunction; hypomania; depression; therapeutic probe; mood stabilizers; circadian rhythm
Bipolar II disorder (BD-II) represents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in contemporary psychiatry, characterized by alternating depressive and hypomanic episodes. Besides influencing mood, BD-II is frequently viewed as a condition marked by fluctuating energy levels, leading to periods of both low and high mental and physical vitality. Recent evidence implicates mitochondrial dysfunction as a core biological substrate underlying these energy alterations, influencing neurocognitive performance, circadian rhythm stability, and vulnerability to mood destabilization. This review synthesizes clinical, neurobiological, and therapeutic perspectives, highlighting how mitochondrial impairment can inform both the dimensional diagnosis of BD-II and individualized treatment strategies. In cases of diagnostic uncertainty, therapeutic probes using mood stabilizers may serve dual purposes, elucidate underlying energy dysregulation, and guide clinical management. Integrating mitochondrial function into the clinical and conceptual framework of BD-II may improve diagnostic precision, personalize treatment, and provide novel avenues for biomarker-driven interventions.
Bipolar II disorder (BD-II) affects 0.8–1.1% of the global population [1], yet it remains underrecognized and frequently misdiagnosed, often as unipolar depression or anxiety disorders [2,3]. BD-II was once described as requiring at least one hypomanic episode and one major depressive episode, but no episodes of full mania [4]. These days, it is commonly understood as a disorder marked by problems with regulating energy, not just changes in mood.
Energy fluctuations in BD-II manifest across cognitive, affective, and physical domains, including fatigue, psychomotor slowing, hypersomnia, hyperactivity, and creative overdrive. These clinical observations parallel emerging evidence of mitochondrial dysfunction, which impairs cellular energy metabolism, disrupts neuronal signaling, and contributes to both depressive and hypomanic phenotypes [5–8]. Mitochondrial impairment also affects circadian rhythm regulation, oxidative stress homeostasis, and synaptic plasticity, all of which are central to BD-II pathophysiology [9–12].
This manuscript proposes an integrative model in which energy dysregulation and mitochondrial dysfunction underpin the clinical heterogeneity of BD-II. By combining clinical observations, molecular insights, and therapeutic strategies, this review highlights the potential of therapeutic probes and energy-focused interventions to improve diagnosis and individualized treatment.
2.1 DSM-5-TR Criteria and Limitations
According to DSM-5-TR, BD-II diagnosis requires a major depressive episode (MDE) and a hypomanic episode, with no history of full mania [4]. Major depressive episodes involve persistent low mood, anhedonia, fatigue, psychomotor changes, and cognitive dysfunction. Hypomanic episodes involve elevated or irritable mood, increased energy, decreased need for sleep, and heightened goal-directed activity.
Clinical practice shows that many BD-II patients have subthreshold or atypical episodes that do not fully meet DSM criteria [6]. These include:
These nuanced energy patterns are frequently mistaken for characteristics like personality traits, unipolar depression, or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) [7].
2.2 The Energy Dysregulation Perspective
Recent models conceptualize BD-II along an energy continuum, where both mental and physical energy fluctuate independently of mood [8]. Low-energy states may include fatigue, hypersomnia, and psychomotor retardation, while high-energy states manifest as restlessness, and excessive goal-directed activity. Mixed states, combining mental overactivation with physical fatigue, further illustrate the spectrum nature of energy dysregulation [9]. Mitochondrial dysfunction provides a biological basis for these energy fluctuations, impairing ATP production, increasing oxidative stress, and disrupting neuronal excitability [5,10]. These cellular-level deficits manifest clinically as the energy extremes characteristic of BD-II.
3.1 Evidence from Peripheral and Neuroimaging Studies
Peripheral biomarkers indicate mitochondrial impairments in BD-II patients. Studies demonstrate:
Neuroimaging studies further support mitochondrial involvement:
3.2 Molecular Mechanisms
Mitochondria regulate cellular energy via oxidative phosphorylation. In BD-II:
Electron transport chain dysfunction reduces ATP availability, impairing neuronal signaling and synaptic plasticity [10].
2.Reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation damages proteins, lipids, and DNA, contributing to neuroinflammation [15,19].
3.Calcium homeostasis disruption affects neurotransmitter release and neuronal excitability, leading to mood instability [20].
4.Impaired mitochondrial dynamics (fusion/fission imbalance) compromises energy distribution in neurons [21].
Together, these mitochondrial deficits offer a mechanistic explanation for both low- and high-energy states, as ATP deficits produce fatigue and hypoactivation, whereas compensatory hypermetabolism in certain neural circuits may underlie hypomanic or creative surges [5,22].
3.3 Circadian Rhythm and Mitochondrial Coupling
Mitochondrial function is tightly linked to circadian regulation. BD-II patients often display sleep disturbances and irregular activity patterns. Mitochondrial dysfunction can:
This underscores the convergence of energy, mitochondrial, and circadian dysregulation in BD-II pathophysiology.
4.1 Energy-Focused Evaluation
Effective BD-II assessment should evaluate both subjective and objective energy patterns:
Incorporating mitochondrial biomarkers, such as peripheral ATP levels, oxidative stress markers, or MRS-based brain energy measurements, may eventually complement clinical assessment [11,16].
4.2 Differential Diagnosis
Energy-focused assessment aids in distinguishing BD-II from:
When energy dysregulation is prominent but hypomanic episodes are subtle, therapeutic probes may clarify diagnosis [26].
A monitored trial of these agents can indicate latent bipolarity if energy fluctuations normalize, whereas lack of response may suggest alternative etiologies.
6.1 Pharmacological strategies targeting mitochondrial and energy dysfunction
6.2 Psychotherapy and lifestyle interventions
7.1 Biomarker Development
Integrating mitochondrial biomarkers, including ATP/ADP ratios, mtDNA copy number, and oxidative stress indices, could allow objective monitoring of energy dysregulation and predict treatment response [11,12,14].
7.2 Digital Phenotyping
Wearable devices and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) can track real-time energy fluctuations, circadian patterns, and activity levels, offering a dynamic, personalized approach to BD-II management [37].
7.3 Translational Research
Longitudinal studies linking mitochondrial function, energy dysregulation, and clinical outcomes will clarify whether BD-II represents a distinct mitochondrial endophenotype, informing precision psychiatry strategies [10,22].
7.4 Personalized Treatment
Characterizing individual energy phenotypes, such as low energy versus hyperactivated subtypes, may guide pharmacologic selection, lifestyle interventions, and timing of therapeutic probes for maximal benefit [8,9].
Bipolar II disorder can be understood primarily as a condition involving disrupted energy regulation, where mitochondrial dysfunction plays a central biological role. Recognizing energy fluctuations both deficits and surges enhance diagnostic sensitivity beyond traditional mood-focused criteria. Therapeutic probes with mood stabilizers can clarify diagnosis and guide individualized management. Integrating mitochondrial biomarkers and energy-centered assessments promises more precise, personalized, and biologically informed care, bridging clinical phenomenology with underlying cellular pathophysiology.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,