Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/921
1Department of Nutrition, Mihama Katori Clinic, Seijinkai Medical Corporation, Chiba, Japan.
2Department of Nutrition, Mihama Hospital, Seijinkai Medical Corporation, Chiba, Japan.
3Department of Clinical Engineering, Mihama Hospital, Seijinkai Medical Corporation, Chiba, Japan.
4Dialysis Department, Mihama Katori Clinic, Seijinkai Medical Corporation, Chiba, Japan.
5Dialysis Department, Mihama Hospital, Seijinkai Medical Corporation, Chiba, Japan.
*Corresponding Author: Keita Sugai, Department of Nutrition, Mihama Katori Clinic, Seijinkai Medical Corporation, Chiba, Japan 2-9-3 Tamatsukuri, Katori City, Chiba Prefecture, Japan.
Citation: Keita Sugai, Chihiro Sakurai, Akari Fujita, Yuika Akai, Etsuko Shitara, et al., (2025), The Changes in Cholinesterase During Overhydration in Hemodialysis Patients, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, 28(5); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/921
Copyright: © 2025, Keita Sugai. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 16 July 2025 | Accepted: 23 July 2025 | Published: 29 August 2025
Keywords: maintenance hemodialysis; overhydration; serum cholinesterase; dry weight
Background/Aim: Overhydration is a serious complication of maintenance hemodialysis patients. Various predictive factors of overhydration have been mentioned, but the role of nutritional condition has not been fully established. We have encountered several cases whose nutritional indices, especially serum cholinesterase (ChE) and serum albumin (Alb), declined one to two months before the onset of overhydration.
Then, among cases suffering from overhydration, two groups were divided according to the changes of ChE during before and after 3 months from overhydration attack and were certified the features of both groups concerning cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) and blood pressure as well as body weight changes.
Subjects: The subjects were 20 patients suffering from overhydration during maintenance hemodialysis and were hospitalized.
Methods: Monthly changes of ChE, Alb, post-dialysis weight, CTR, and blood pressure for 3 months before and after overhydration.
Results: Among the 20 patients, 14 had a decrease in ChE values during overhydration, and 6 did not. The ChE-decreased groups tended to have lower BMI, Alb, and ChE than the non-ChE-decreased groups. In the ChE-decreased groups, CTR tended to increase, and ChE and Alb decreased significantly from two months before the onset of overhydration and further increase in CTR (P=0.026) and further decreases in ChE (P<0.001) and Alb (P=0.005) were observed at overhydration attack.
Conclusions: In patients with overhydration, there were two types; one is ChE-decreased groups (70%), and the other is non-ChE-decreased groups (30%). Both groups increased CTR and NT-proBNP at overhydration. The former decreased Alb, but latter did not. These results suggested that a decrease in food intake might be the main risk of overhydration and decrease in ChE might be sensitive warning signs for overhydration.
HD: Hemodialysis
ChE : Serum cholinesterase
Alb : Serum albumin
CTR : Cardiothoracic ratio
DW : Dry weight
NT-proBNP: N-terminal fragment of human brain natriuretic peptide precursor
1.Introduction
Overhydration is one of the serious complications frequently encountered during hemodialysis treatment. In addition to severe subjective symptoms such as chest discomfort and shortness of breath in the acute phase, overhydration itself is also known to have a poor prognosis. Therefore, overhydration should be avoided [1].
Usually, enhanced cardiothoracic ratio (CTR), high blood pressure, and subjective symptoms such as dyspnea and discomfort were paid attention to find overhydration. However, CTR can fluctuate if insufficient air is inhaled during X-ray imaging, especially in elderly patients, and high blood pressure is not always observed before overhydration. Then it is not easy to find signs and symptoms predicting overhydration.
In recent years, it has been reported that human brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal fragment of BNP precursor (NT-proBNP) are useful indicators for congestive heart failure even in hemodialysis patients [2]. And it might be expected to be a good marker for predicting overhydration [2]. In addition, monitoring of body water volume using bioelectrical impedance method [3] and Fluid indices calculated from the distribution balance of urea and uric acid are also expected to be useful [4], but a comprehensive clinical evaluation is necessary, as one alone is not necessarily sufficient. As for nutritional factors, overeating and excessive water intake are generally thought to be the main cause of overhydration [1].
Whereas, we have often encountered cases whose nutritional factors such as serum cholinesterase (ChE) and serum albumin (Alb) were decreased at the onset of overhydration. Alb is well known as an indicator of protein in the body [5], ChE is generally considered to be an indicator of liver function. And ChE shows high values in patients with fatty liver, obesity, nephrotic syndrome, and hyperthyroidism, and low values in patients with malignant tumors, liver cirrhosis, and organophosphate drug poisoning [6]. As for the relationship with nutritional condition, it is reported that ChE correlates with energy intake in healthy young men [7].
Recently, ChE has been reported to be a prognostic indicator for patients with heart failure and after surgery, but little has been reported about its significance in hemodialysis patients [8,9,10,11].
However, ChE reflects the increase in protein synthesis and lipid metabolism accompanying the influx of energy components into the liver and therefore can also be an indicator of food intake.[6] We also believe that ChE may be an indicator of dry weight (DW) adjustment by predicting weight gain or loss in dialysis patients.
Furthermore, we hypothesize that overhydration accompanied by a decrease in ChE is not due to overeating or drinking, but rather that overhydration is due to the DW setting not keeping up with the patient's actual weight loss.
In this study, we aimed to observe changes in various factors, mainly ChE, in dialysis patients who had experienced overhydration, to clarify the relationship between the occurrence of overhydration and ChE, and to examine whether ChE can be used as an adjustment indicator for the setting of DW.
2.1. Subjects
The subjects were all 20 cases who were taking maintenance hemodialysis therapy and suffered from overhydration. They were all hospitalized at Mihama Hospital between September 1, 2020. and August 31, 2022. The diagnosis of overhydration was based on the increased CTR, the presence of pleural effusion and symptoms of respiratory distress. Additionally, Pleural effusion occurring at the time of the initiation of emergency dialysis in patients with conservative renal failure and pleural effusion associated with malignant tumors and acute heart disease were excluded from this study.
The clinical background of all subjects at the time of admission is shown in Table 1. The clinical background (median [IQR]) was age 80.5 [72.5-82.25] years old, years of dialysis was 5.8 [3.7-10.2] years, and BMI 21.17 [18.42-23.35] kg/m2.
At the time of admission, patient’s DW was set to be 53.75 [43.5-63.63] kg, whereas the patient's weight after the last dialysis just before overhydration was 55.9 [44.9-63.95] kg. After removal water during hospitalization, the patient’s body weight was 51.1 [40.23-60.75] kg. All patients recovered and discharged after improvement of signs and symptoms.
Among patients suffering from overhydration, there were ChE decreasing patients and ChE increasing patients. Then, those patients were separated shown as follows. Patients 1 to 14 were cases whose ChE decreased at overhydration attack, compared to 3 months before. Patients 15 to 20 were cases whose ChE increased or did not change at overhydration attack, comparing 3 months before.
2.2. Study Design and Data Collection
The changes of ChE, Alb, CTR, post-dialysis weight, and intradialytic systolic blood pressure (start, median, and end values) were investigated monthly from 3 months before to 3 months after overhydration attack. NT-proBNP were measured at before 3 months, just overhydration attack and after 3 months.
Regarding the timing of data collection, blood test data were pre-dialysis test values on the regular blood draw day two days after dialysis and on the blood draw day at the time of overhydration hospitalization, post-dialysis weight was the value on the same day, and CTR was the value for the same month. The systolic blood pressure during dialysis was calculated as the average of three dialysis sessions during the regular blood sampling week each month and the average of three dialysis sessions immediately before overhydration and was used as the representative value for each individual.
In addition, post-dialysis weight and blood pressure were also collected immediately overhydration treatment was corrected.
The study design was observational, and all data were retrospectively collected using medical records.
2.3. Statical Analysis
BellCurveⓇ for Excel ver4.01 (Social Survey Research Information Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was used as statistical software, and the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare data from three months prior to the overhydration with data from each subsequent month.
In addition, Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was calculated to examine the correlation between the decrease in ChE (U/L) from 3 months before overhydration to the time of onset of overhydration and the amount of weight loss from 3 months before overhydration after correction of overhydration.
The significance level was set at less than 0.05 in all cases.
3.1. Comparison of clinical backgrounds between ChE-decreased groups and non-ChE-decreased groups
Table 1 showed the background of 20 cases who suffered from overhydration. The means of various clinical features at overhydration were shown in the bottom. Actually, among those 20 cases, there were two groups: one is ChE-decreased groups (No. 1-14 cases, 70%), and the other is non-ChE-decreased groups (No. 15-20 cases, 30%). The main features of two groups were shown in Table 2. The changes of each factor between 3months before and just at overhydration were shown.
| Cases | Sex | Age | Years of dialysis | Primary Disease of dialysis | Dry weight (kg) | Weight after the last dialysis just before overhydration(kg) | BMI (kg/m2) | Weight adjusted for inpatient treatment(kg) | CTR (%) | Alb (g/dL) | BUN (mg/dL) | Cre (mg/dL) | ChE (U/L) | NT-proBNP (pg/mL) | EF (%) |
| A-1 | F | 87 | 1.3 | Unclear | 38.0 | 37.4 | 15.2 | 36.6 | 60.4 | 2.9 | 50.3 | 5.53 | 150 | 36100 | 89.4 |
| A-2 | F | 88 | 2.7 | Diabetic nephropathy | 46.0 | 46.6 | 21.8 | 40.9 | 54.9 | 3.3 | 73.9 | 6.19 | 170 | 337000 | 42.6 |
| A-3 | F | 73 | 23.1 | Chronic nephritic syndrome | 38.5 | 38.6 | 15.4 | 38.0 | 55.7 | 3.1 | 74.7 | 4.53 | 152 | 134000 | 39.0 |
| A-4 | M | 82 | 5.9 | Diabetic nephropathy | 61.5 | 60.8 | 23.2 | 56.6 | 52.7 | 3.7 | 24.9 | 5.13 | 147 | 54300 | 48.0 |
| A-5 | F | 81 | 11.6 | Diabetic nephropathy | 52.0 | 56.7 | 23.9 | 50.7 | 66.8 | 3.3 | 50.4 | 3.62 | 166 | 109000 | 34.4 |
| A-6 | M | 54 | 0.4 | Diabetic nephropathy | 63.5 | 63.6 | 21.5 | 60.0 | 46.1 | 3.3 | 60.5 | 11.67 | 193 | 10200 | 55.4 |
| A-7 | F | 71 | 6.6 | Preeclampsia | 47.0 | 47.2 | 21.3 | 45.6 | 61.7 | 3.7 | 49.0 | 6.46 | 251 | 22600 | 60.8 |
| A-8 | M | 83 | 9.6 | Diabetic nephropathy | 39.0 | 39.0 | 15.0 | 38.2 | 44.4 | 2.6 | 29.7 | 6.05 | 120 | 36700 | 51.5 |
| A-9 | M | 69 | 10.5 | Diabetic nephropathy | 66.0 | 65.3 | 20.6 | 63.0 | 53.2 | 3.4 | 24.6 | 5.94 | 149 | 31000 | 33.0 |
| A-10 | M | 82 | 4.9 | Diabetic nephropathy | 55.5 | 55.1 | 17.7 | 51.5 | 63.8 | 3.8 | 40.6 | 5.39 | 252 | 87800 | 21.0 |
| A-11 | M | 77 | 5.7 | Diabetic nephropathy | 75.0 | 77.3 | 27.1 | 74.0 | 47.6 | 3.4 | 57.2 | 12.30 | 181 | 4300 | 48.8 |
| A-12 | M | 96 | 0.6 | Nephrosclerosis | 47.0 | 47.6 | 18.7 | 43.0 | 48.7 | 2.5 | 48.9 | 4.73 | 146 | 61900 | 43.5 |
| A-13 | M | 82 | 4.3 | Polycystic kidney disease | 57.5 | 57.8 | 21.5 | 53.1 | 47.7 | 2.4 | 26.7 | 4.35 | 141 | 34200 | 57.8 |
| A-14 | M | 80 | 10.1 | Diabetic nephropathy | 45.0 | 46.9 | 20.0 | 45.6 | 52.6 | 3.7 | 51.4 | 8.85 | 234 | 34600 | 53.6 |
| B-1 | M | 54 | 9.0 | Diabetic nephropathy | 95.5 | 96.3 | 30.0 | 94.0 | 45.5 | 3.9 | 49.7 | 14.57 | 356 | 777 | 60.7 |
| B-2 | M | 79 | 22.6 | Diabetic nephropathy | 64.0 | 65.0 | 25.1 | 63.3 | 64.0 | 3.6 | 58.2 | 8.46 | 83 | 66400 | 35.2 |
| B-3 | M | 77 | 5.3 | Diabetic nephropathy | 74.0 | 74.4 | 25.3 | 72.0 | 53.5 | 3.8 | 52.8 | 8.09 | 253 | 56900 | 26.7 |
| B-4 | M | 82 | 2.9 | Diabetic nephropathy | 59.5 | 59.6 | 21.0 | 57.0 | 47.5 | 3.6 | 51.7 | 8.75 | 181 | 28600 | 62.1 |
| B-5 | F | 71 | 3.9 | Diabetic nephropathy | 38.5 | 39.8 | 19.5 | 37.0 | 55.4 | 3.0 | 54.0 | 6.77 | 225 | 38200 | 49.3 |
| B-6 | F | 83 | 22.8 | Chronic nephritic syndrome | 33.0 | 33.0 | 17.6 | 32.5 | 58.1 | 2.5 | 55.8 | 4.53 | 161 | 15100 | 63.8 |
median [IQR]
| M/F =13/7 | 80.5 [72.5-82.25] | 5.8 [3.7-10.2] | Diabetic nephropathy/Others =14/6 | 53.75 [43.5-63.63] | 55.9 [44.9-63.95] | 21.17 [18.42-23.35] | 51.1 [40.23-60.75] | 53.35 [47.68-58.68] | 3.35 [2.98-3.7] | 50.9 [43.83-56.15] | 6.12 [5.03-8.53] | 168 [148.5-227.25] | 37450 [30400-71750] | 49.05 [38.05-58.53] |
Table 1: Clinical background of the subjects at the time of admission.
| All cases | [A] ChE-decreased groups | [B] non-ChE-decreased groups | |||||||||
| n | 20 | 14 | 6 | ||||||||
| Sex(M/F) | 13/7 | 9/5 | 4/2 | ||||||||
| Age | 80.5 [72.5-82.25] | 81.5 [74-82.75] | 78 [72.5-81.25] | ||||||||
| Years of dialysis | 5.8 [3.7-10.2] | 5.79 [3.06-9.96] | 7.17 [4.27-19.19] | ||||||||
Primary disease of dialysis (Diabetic nephropathy / Others) | 14/6 | 9/5 | 5/1 | ||||||||
| EF (%) | 49.05 [38.05-58.53] | 48.4 [39.9-54.95] | 55 [38.73-61.75] | ||||||||
| 3M before | Overhydration at onset | p-value | 3M before | Overhydration at onset | p-value | 3M before | Overhydration at onset | p-value | |||
| ChE(U/L) | 194.5 [168-247.75] | 168 [148.5-227.25] | 0.033 | 205.5 [171.5-249.25] | 159 [147.5-190] | <0> | 185.5 [127.75-209.5] | 203 [166-246] | 0.028 | ||
| NT-proBNP(pg/mL) | 30000 [8755-37800] | 37450 [30400-71750] | <0> | 30000 [8225-38200] | 36400 [31800-81325] | 0.002 | 25900 [11900-32625] | 47550 [31000-64025] | 0.028 | ||
| Alb(g/dL) | 3.6 [3.3-3.725] | 3.35 [2.975-3.7] | 0.011 | 3.6 [3.325-3.378] | 3.3 [2.95-3.625] | 0.005 | 3.5 [3.175-3.6] | 3.6 [3.15-3.75] | 0.285 | ||
| Post-dialysis weight(kg) | 58.3 [44.85-64.75] | 55.4 [44.4-64.1] | 0.016 | 52.3 [46.03-62.95] | 51.35 [46.68-60.05] | 0.048 | 62.4 [46.28-72.53] | 62.3 [44.75-72.05] | 0.208 | ||
| CTR (%) | 51.2 [47.55-57.5] | 53.35 [47.68-59.8] | 0.022 | 50 [47.28-56.48] | 52.95 [47.95-59.23] | 0.026 | 53.9 [48.75-58.23] | 54.45 [49-58.55] | 0.529 | ||
(median [IQR])
Comparisons were made using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, with the significance level set at less than 0.05.
Table 2: Changes in indicators 3 months before and at the time of overhydration.
Usually, overhydration is thought to be due to over-drinking water or eating too much, and insufficient water removal during hemodialysis. Actually, No. 14-20 cases in Table2 showed a not change in body weight at overhydration, accompanying with increased CTR, in addition to an increase in ChE and Alb. The increases in the last two factors are usually due to the result of over drinking and or overeating. Whereas, No. 1-14 cases showed a decrease in body weight, ChE, and Alb, which means that 70% of cases suffered from overhydration were associated with a decrease in food intake.
From these results, the mechanism by which overhydration occurred might be different in both groups. Those two groups were different. Then we analyzed the features of the two groups separately as follows.
3.2. Changes in ChE, Alb, NT-proBNP, CTR, post-dialysis weight, and intradialytic systolic blood pressure (start, median, and end values) 3 months before and after the onset of overhydration in the ChE-decreased groups
The trends (median [p-value]) of ChE, Alb, NT-proBNP, CTR, post-dialysis weight, and intradialytic systolic blood pressure (start value, median value, and end value) in the ChE-decreased groups 3 months before overhydration, 2 months before overhydration, 1 month before overhydration, at the time of overhydration onset, 1 month after overhydration, 2 months after overhydration, and 3 months after overhydration are shown in Figure 1. Numbers in the text and figures indicate median values and p-value compared with baseline 3 months before overhydration.

n=14, median[p-value] Using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, the data from three months prior to the overhydration was used as the base period, and comparisons were made with each subsequent month. The significance level was set at a risk level of less than 0.05.
Figure 1: Changes in various factors before and after the onset of overhydration in the ChE-decreased groups.
3.2.1. Changes in pre-dialysis serum ChE values
Pre-dialysis serum ChE value (U/L) decreased from 205.5 three months before the overhydration to 177.5 [0.079] the following month, and continued to decrease thereafter, further decreasing to 159 [less than 0.001] at the time of the onset of overhydration. One month after the overhydration, the value remained at 149 [0.002], but then rose again, reaching 188 [0.019] three months after the overhydration.
3.2.2. Changes in pre-dialysis serum Alb values
Pre-dialysis serum Alb value (g/dL) was 3.6 three months before overhydration and decreased significantly to 3.35 [0.031] the following month, and at the time of the onset of overhydration, it had decreased to 3.3 [0.005]. It then dropped to 3.2 [0.003] one month after the overhydration. Three months after overhydration, it had risen to 3.4 [0.068].
3.2.3. Changes in pre-dialysis NT-proBNP values
Pre-dialysis NT-proBNP (pg/mL) values were shown for the values within 3 months before the overhydration, the values at the time of the onset of the overhydration, and the values within 3 months after the overhydration. The value of 30,000 before overhydration significantly increased to 36,400 [0.002] at the time of the onset of overhydration and showed a tendency to decrease to 22,800 [0.638] after overhydration treatment.
3.2.4. Changes in CTR
The CTR (%) tended to increase from 50 three months before overhydration to 52.6 [0.875] the following month, and at the time of the onset of overhydration, there was a significant increase to 52.95 [0.026]. After overhydration, the weight was corrected, and the index fell to 50.6 [0.136] but then rose to 54.85 [0.042].
3.2.5. Changes in post-dialysis weight
Post-dialysis weight (kg) tended to decrease from 52.3 three months before the onset of overhydration to 51.6 [0.255] the following month, and at the time of the onset of overhydration it had significantly decreased to 51.35 [0.048], and ChE and Alb values had also decreased, while NT-proBNP and CTR had increased. Post-dialysis weight after overhydration treatment was temporarily corrected to 48.15 [less than 0.001], then rose again and remained almost flat, but ChE and Alb values rose again, and NT-proBNP and CTR values decreased.
3.2.6. Changes in intradialytic systolic blood pressure
Intradialytic systolic blood pressure (mm/Hg) 3 months before the overhydration was 145.33 at the start of dialysis, 144.17 in the middle, and 157.92 at the end. There was a tendency for the end to be higher than the start, and this tendency was observed throughout the entire period, but there was no significant change compared to 3 months before the overhydration. Immediately after overhydration treatment, a decrease was observed in all areas, with a significant decrease of 130 [0.009] in the start blood pressure.
3.3. Changes in ChE, Alb, NT-proBNP, CTR, post-dialysis weight, and intradialytic systolic blood pressure (start, median, and end values) 3 months before and after the onset of overhydration in the non-ChE-decreased groups
The trends (median [p-value]) of ChE, Alb, NT-proBNP, CTR, post-dialysis weight, and intradialytic systolic blood pressure (start value, median value, and end value) in the non-ChE-decreased groups 3 months before overhydration, 2 months before overhydration, 1 month before overhydration, at the time of overhydration onset, 1 month after overhydration, 2 months after overhydration, and 3 months after overhydration are shown in Figure 2. Numbers in the text and figures indicate median values and p-value compared with baseline 3 months before overhydration.
3.3.1. Changes in pre-dialysis serum ChE values
Pre-dialysis serum ChE value (U/L) was 185.5 three months before the overhydration and decreased to 171 [0.465] the following month, a non-significant decrease, and continued to decrease thereafter, but at the time of the onset of overhydration, there was a significant increase to 203 [0.028].One month after the overhydration, the value dropped to 150.5 [0.753], but then increased slightly, reaching 160 [0.686] three months after the overhydration.
3.3.2. Changes in pre-dialysis serum Alb values
The pre-dialysis serum Alb value (g/dL) was 3.5 3 months before the onset of overhydration but had increased to 3.6 [0.285] at the time of the onset of overhydration. The value then showed a decreasing trend to 3.4 [0.500] one month after the overhydration but increased to 3.55 [0.893] three months after the overhydration.
3.3.3. Changes in pre-dialysis NT-proBNP values
Pre-dialysis NT-proBNP (pg/mL) values were shown for the values within 3 months before the overhydration, the values at the time of the onset of the overhydration, and the values within 3 months after the overhydration. The value of 25,900 before the overhydration significantly increased to 47,550 [0.028] at the time of the onset of overhydration and showed a tendency to decrease to 30,850 [0.249] after overhydration treatment.
3.3.4. Changes in CTR
The CTR (%) showed an increasing trend, increasing from 53.9 three months before the overhydration to 54.45 [0.529] at the time of the onset of overhydration. After the overhydration, the dry weight was corrected and dropped to 51.1 [0.345], but three months after the overhydration it rose to 53.3 [0.345].
3.3.5. Changes in post-dialysis weight
Post-dialysis body weight (kg) was 62.4 kg 3 months before the overhydration and remained almost unchanged at 62.3 [0.208] at the time of the onset of overhydration. After overhydration treatment, a non-significant downward trend was observed.
3.3.6. Changes in intradialytic systolic blood pressure
Intradialytic systolic blood pressure (mm/Hg) 3 months before overhydration was 126.17 at the start of dialysis, 128.17 at the middle, and 121 at the end, showing a tendency for it to be higher at the middle than at the start. No significant changes were observed in any period compared to three months prior to overhydration. At the time of the onset of overhydration, there was a tendency for the values to increase, although not significantly, from 147.5 [0.345] at the start, to 132.83 [0.345] at the middle, to 126.58 [0.753] at the end, which was particularly noticeable at the start.
3.4. Correlation between the amount of ChE reduction and the amount of weight loss during 3 months just before overhydration attack in ChE-decreased groups.
The correlation between the amount of ChE reduction and the amount of weight loss during 3 months just before overhydration attack in ChE-decreased groups in 13 cases is shown in Figure 3. Decreased in ChE (U/L) from 3 months before overhydration to the time of overhydration onset and the amount of weight loss from 3 months before overhydration after overhydration were corrected, and found a positive correlation (r=0.595, p=0.032).

n=6, median[p-value] Using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, the data from three months prior to the overhydration was used as the base period, and comparisons were made with each subsequent month. The significance level was set at a risk level of less than 0.05
Figure 2: Changes in various factors before and after the onset of overhydration in the non-ChE-decreased groups.

Correlation was calculated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, with the significance level set at less than 0.05.
One patient was excluded from the analysis because his weight loss was a statistical outlier.
Figure 3: Correlation between the amount of ChE reduction and the amount of weight loss during 3 months just before overhydration attack in ChE-decreased groups.
We observed the changes in weight, blood pressure, CTR, NT-proBNP, as well as ChE and Alb in 20 dialysis patients who were hospitalized for treatment of overhydration. The observation period was three months before and after hospitalization for treatment of overhydration. We found ChE-decreased groups (70%) and non-ChE-decreased groups (30%). In the ChE-decreased groups, ChE showed a tendency to decrease from 2 months before overhydration compared to 3 months before overhydration and was further decreased at the time of the onset of overhydration.
Compared to the ChE-decreased groups, the non-ChE-decreased groups had relatively good nutritional conditions and cardiac function indices such as Alb, ChE, BMI, and EF. And at the time of the onset of overhydration, CTR and NT-proBNP were elevated while ChE was also elevated, suggesting that the increase in body fluids due to overeating and increased fluid intake caused of overhydration. In other words, they were relatively in good nutritional condition.
On the other hand, the ChE-decreased groups had relatively poor nutritional status and cardiac function, and in such cases, ChE and Alb decreased further, and a significant decrease was observed at the time of the onset of overhydration.
ChE is generally considered an indicator of liver function, but it is also considered an indicator of nutritional intake status [7]. This is also confirmed by the correlation between ChE changes and boby weight-changes at show in figure 3. From the above, it is suggested that continuous measurement and observation of ChE in hemodialysis patients, might be useful in predicting overhydration caused by a decrease in food intake. Then, in the cases whose ChE began to decrease, nutritional intervention and adjust DW (figure 4) might be needed to prevent overhydration.

Figure 4: Schematic of net weight loss and dry weight adjustment.
Alb showed almost the same trends as ChE, but the changes in ChE appeared to be more sensitive markers for nutritional conditions. Because, ChE has a short half-life of approximately 10 days and a large molecular weight of 340,000, making it unlikely to leak through the dialysis membrane. This makes it useful as a nutritional indicator for predicting and evaluating weight changes in dialysis patients [6]. Alb has a relatively long half-life of 15 to 20 days and a molecular weight of 66,000. Therefore, it is possible that Alb leaks from dialyzers, which have high waste removal capabilities, and that its levels fluctuate due to the effects of dialysis itself [5,12].
Single-center study and the number of cases was small, a study with a larger number, of cases is needed.
When hemodialysis patients developed overhydration, ChE had been decreasing for the two months prior in 70 percentage cases in addition to an increase in CTR and NT-proBNP. These results suggest that watching ChE decrease may be useful to predict overhydration caused by actual weight loss and in adjusting DW for hemodialysis patients. To prevent overhydration, it might be important to intensify fluid removal by considering a decrease of ChE in addition to an increase in CTR and NT-proBNP.
K.S. (Keita Sugai) and K.S. (Kohji Shirai) contributed to the study design, and K.S. (Keita Sugai), C.S., A.F., and Y.A. contributed to data collection and interpretation. K.S. (Keita Sugai) performed the analyses, K.S. (Kohji Shirai) supervised the study, and K.S. (Keita Sugai) drafted the initial manuscript. E.S., J.U., T.S., and M.M. contributed to the analysis and critical revision of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published manuscript.
This study received no external funding.
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Mihama Hospital, Seijinkai Medical Corporation (approval code number:22-003; 23 January 2023).
Only routine medical care data was obtained and anonymized to prevent identification of individuals, and then a retrospective analysis was performed.
We would like to thank our colleagues Keiko Miyamoto, Natsuko Hiroki, Manami Nihei, Honoka Wada, Izuki Mizuguchi, Rina Ogihara, and Mio Ishida (Department of Nutrition, Mihama Hospital, Seijinkai Medical Corporation) for their great help in utilizing the theory presented in this paper and in publishing it.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,