The Basic Principles of Biomedical and Medical Science Study Designs

Short Communication | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2639-4162/090

The Basic Principles of Biomedical and Medical Science Study Designs

  • Alphonsus Ogbonna Ogbuabor *
  • Edwin Obiorah Ohotu
  • Luke Jideofor Ugwu

Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Enugu State, Nigeria.

*Corresponding Author: Alphonsus Ogbonna Ogbuabor, Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Enugu State, Nigeria.

Citation: Alphonsus O. Ogbuabor, Edwin O. Ohotu, Luke Jidefor Ugwu, (2023), The Basic Principles of Biomedical and Medical Science Study Designs, J. General Medicine and Clinical Practice. 6(2); DOI:10.31579/2639-4162/090

Copyright: © 2023, Alphonsus Ogbonna Ogbuabor. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 13 March 2023 | Accepted: 30 March 2023 | Published: 14 April 2023

Keywords: research; beginners; medicine

Abstract

In biomedical and medical research studies, useful conclusions can only be inferred from data derived using a valid study design. Therefore, the selection of an appropriate study design is pertinent in providing unbiased, error free and scientific evaluation of the hypothesis. The present review is intended to serve as a guide to our teaming beginners in Biomedical and Medical Science research

Introduction

Study design is the set of evidence-based procedures that provide the framework for conducting research. They could be generally classified into two broad groups, namely descriptive and analytical studies. [1-3]

Descriptive Studies: these are studies which describes specific characteristics in a population of interest. The most common forms are (a) case reports; in which we discuss our experience with a particular patients’ presentations and management (b) case series; in which we discuss our experience with several patients with similar presentations and their management as a group. [4]

Analytical Studies: these are sub-classified into two groups, namely experimental studies and observational studies. Experimental studies are studies we conduct with interventions using randomization or blinding.  Randomization refers to the process of assigning subjects randomly to either the treatment or control groups to equally distribute the demographic and clinical variables in the study subjects. Blinding on the other hand, is a process that prevents subjects and the research team from having prior knowledge about the interventions in the subjects. [4-6]. A good example of experimental study design are pre-clinical trials (experimental studies involving animals) and clinical trials (experimental studies involving humans). The primary advantage of experimental studies over observational studies is that it provides a stronger evidence of an association and potential causality between outcome and predictor variables through randomization or blinding. [4] On the other hand, observational studies are studies that we conduct without interventions. The subtypes of observational studies include (a) cross-sectional studies; in which case, the researcher takes a specific sample at a specific time without any follow-up. This allows researchers to determine the frequency of disease (prevalence) or the frequency of a risk factor.  For example, if we want to determine the frequency of lung cancer in a population, we can conduct a cross-sectional study whereby we take a sample from the population and calculate the numbers of individual who were diagnosed positive for lung cancer in the population. (b) Cohort study; in which two samples from the study population are compared by the researcher. One sample is with a risk factor while the other lacks the risk factor.  Those with the risk factor are compared to those without the risk factor. For example, to find out the relative risk for developing lung cancer among smokers, we take a sample including smokers and non-smokers. Then we calculate the number of individuals with lung cancer among both. Cohort studies may take a prospective approach (where we follow the subjects in the future to know who develop the disease) or retrospective approach (where we look to the past using some data such as hospital medical records to know who developed the disease).6 (c) Case control studies; in which case the researcher identifies the odds of having a risk factor or an exposure if an individual has a specific disease (odds ratio). We conduct this type of study by comparing two groups (i) one group with the disease (cases) and (ii) another group without the disease (control). For example, if we want to identify the odds of being a smoker among hypertensive lung cancer patients compared to healthy individuals. To achieve this, we choose a group of patients diagnosed with lung cancer and another group of healthy individuals that serves as control. We then study their smoking history to find out if there is a correlation. [7-10].

                               
 

Conclusion

Identifying the most appropriate study design are critical for generating the best evidence to support or refute a hypothesis.  A well-designed study will clearly identify a range of variables including the subjects, the population, the intervention of interest and the outcomes to be investigated. Understanding the various study designs is important not only in devising a new study but also for critically reviewing published studies. 

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova