AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Mini Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2641-0419/167
*Corresponding Author: Ehsan Khalilipur, M.D, Cardiovascular intervention research center, Rajaie cardiovascular medical and research center, Iran university of medical sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Citation: Zahra Khajali, Ata Firouzi, Zahra Hosseini, Ehsan Khalilipur (2021) The Appropriate Approach to Dual Drainage Partial Anomalous Pulmonary Venous Connection. J. Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, 4(10); Doi:10.31579/2641-0419/167
Copyright: © 2021 Ehsan Khalilipur, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 17 April 2021 | Accepted: 10 May 2021 | Published: 14 May 2021
Keywords: partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection; vascular plug
Partial Anomalous Pulmonary Venous Connection (PAPVC) is a remarkably unusual congenital disorder in which the venous circulation is connected with one or more pulmonary veins. Approximately 90% of all PAPVCs start from the right lung, 7% start from the left lung, and 3% of patients are found to have two-side PAPVCs. Occasionally, PAPVC can be treated percutaneously employing an occlusion device, with regard that when there is a dual drainage PAPVC. Here, we want to share our experience in 5 dual drainages PAPVC patients whose 2 right-sided PAPVC's with dual drainage closure were unsuccessful. We also reviewed all published cases which were tried to treat percutaneously to build a pathway in which percutaneous closure is more feasible in addition to inhibit futile efforts.
Partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection (PAPVC) is an amazingly uncommon congenital condition where one or more of the pulmonary veins are associated with venous circulation. Its prevalence inside the common population is 0.4%–0.7% [1]. Roughly 90% of all PAPVCs begin from the right lung, 7% begin from the left lung, and 3% of patients are found to have two-sided PAPVCs beginning from both lungs interfacing to the superior vena cava (SVC), inferior vena cava (IVC), the right chamber, or the innominate vein [2,3]. PAPVCs are frequently related to the atrial septal defect and are once in a while related to other congenital anomalies [4,5].
Echocardiography is the initial methodology of choice for noninvasive detection of PAPVC but cardiac MRI or CT guides physicians for more detailed diagnosis [5–7]. For the most part, patients with a PAPVC, in case symptomatic or showing noteworthy left-to-right shunting, are treated with surgery [8]. Occasionally, it is conceivable to treat PAPVC percutaneously by implies occlusion devices, although this is feasible when there is a dual drainage pathway to both systemic veins and left atrium [9]. To our information, as it were few such cases have been depicted within the latest publications [10]. Here, we want to share our experience in 5 dual drainages PAPVC patients and we also reviewed all published cases which were tried to treat percutaneously.
Dual drainage PAPVC- types and review of literature
The regular arrangement of pulmonary veins consists of four partitioned pulmonary veins: right and left superior and inferior veins, which drain exclusively into the left atrium. This anatomical categorization is found in 60%–70% of the general population [11]. PAPVC is the abnormal connection of at least one but not all pulmonary veins into the right-sided venous system or right atrium. Right-sided atypical drainage happens into any central vein. The foremost common frame of PAPVD is the bizarre seepage of the RSPV into the superior vena cava (SVC). This anomalous drainage frequently happens at the junction of SVC and RA. Occasionally, drainage happens at a higher level at the intersection between the SVC and brachiocephalic vein over the level of the azygos vein [12].
The most common pattern on the left side is the connection of LSPV to the brachiocephalic vein [13].
The conventional classification of PAPVC does not categorize “dual drainage” independently and these variations, with a combination of supracardiac and cardiac PAPVC, are amazingly uncommon with exceptionally few previous case reports experienced [10, 14]. Moreover, the genuine rate of PAPVC cases with double drainage is troublesome to assess, since patients are regularly asymptomatic and elude detection.
Cautious investigation of the pulmonary veins is mandatory and the distinguishing proof of less than four pulmonary veins connected to the left atrium ought to alarm the clinician to a diagnosis of PAPVC. In the presence of a left-to-right shunt, enlargement of the right chambers happens due to expanded volume overload. Besides, the vessel receiving the atypical vein would be enlarged and there may be asymmetry of the pulmonary veins [15,16]. What has been reported in cases of transcatheter closure of dual drainage PAPVC and what we have experienced in our center are these anatomical variations:
- right-sided PAPVC with connection to SVC at the level of RA junction with a distinguished connection to LA: in this rare variation in a 60-year-old lady with a complaint of dyspnea on exertion and right-sided chambers dilatation, we decided to occlude the abnormal pathway with ventricular septal occluder device but because of the very short pathway between PAPVC and SVC junction to RA release of the device was not feasible and the procedure was terminated (figure-1).
We also experienced this variation with another patient in whom he was a 70-year-old man referred for more evaluation because of RV failure symptoms. He was diagnosed with a dual drainage PAPVC at the SVC and RA junction and a closure try with a VSD device was unsuccessful. Theoretically, it was amenable to deploy a stent graft in the distal part of the SVC to occlude the ominous pathway, but the long-term patency of this graft in this scenario is vague.
- right-sided PAPVC with a vertical vein connection to left SVC and left atrium [17]: it was reported in a 27-year-old lady with a recent DOE, which had a vertical vein PAPVC with drainage into the left SVC which was occluded percutaneously using a vascular plug without any complication (figure-2).
- right-sided PAPVC with the existence of a left vertical vein connection to the left innominate vein (20): the patient was A 43-year-old lady with a prior therapeutic history of aortic coarctation surgically repaired at the age of 3 years using an end-to-end anastomosis, displayed with 2 years complain of dyspnea and weakness with exercise and palpitations. Work-up revealed (PAPVC) with “dual drainage” with the communication of right-sided PV’s into the left innominate vein with the existence of a left vertical vein. She was effectively treated through percutaneous implantation of a vascular plug occluding the vertical connection of the innominate vein redirecting the stream to the left atrium (figure-3).
- right pulmonary vein anomalous connection to IVC and LA [9]: in this case-report in a 43-year-old lady with paroxysmal AF and recent DOE, there was a right-sided PAPVC with scimitar vein, which had some collaterals into the LA. Here, the anomalous connection was occluded using a vascular plug without any complication (figure-4).
- right-sided PV connection to SVC within 25mm from SVC junction to RA with the existence of left SVC and a connection to LA [19]: in this case-report in a 32-year-old man with a presenting symptom of brain abscess, right upper pulmonary vein, and right middle pulmonary vein connected to SVC; and there was left SVC with drainage into the right atrium. The right SVC was occluded with a Ventricular Septal Defect occluder inferior to the azygous vein, but superior to right-sided abnormal right pulmonary vein drainage. This redirected the right superior caval vein stream to the IVC system through the azygos vein in a retrograde way and permitted the right upper pulmonary vein and right middle pulmonary vein stream to deplete into the left chamber ordinarily, accomplishing the avoidance of right-to-left shunting and permitting ordinary seepage of pulmonary veins into the left chamber (figure-5).
- left-sided PAPVC with the existence of a left vertical vein connection to the left innominate vein and LA [10]:
In this case report in a 67-year-old lady with symptoms of dyspnea and right-sided heart failure, there was a PAPVC with the connection of right PV’s into the left innominate vein. She was managed percutaneously using simultaneous vascular plug and coils. During embolizing the coils, a balloon was inflated as a safety backstop device to deliver the coils in the right place (figure-6).
We experienced three cases in this category in which patients were tried occluding the vertical vein with a VSD occluder device in one and duct occluder device in the other two patients with successful results.
PAPVC is the abnormal connection of at least one but not all pulmonary veins into the right-sided venous system or right atrium. PAPVC from the right lung is twice as frequent as PAPVC from the left lung. The foremost common form of PAPVC is one in which a right upper pulmonary vein connects to the right atrium or the superior vena cava. This shape is almost always related to a sinus venosus type of atrial septal defect (ASD). The right pulmonary veins can moreover deplete into the inferior vena cava. The left pulmonary veins can drain into the innominate vein, the coronary sinus, and, seldom, the cavae, right atrium, or left subclavian vein [2,3,21].
There is some categorization of PAPVC and most anomalous connections are coexistent with secondum type ASD. In case there is an isolated PAPVC, it is most prevalent as a PAPVC of right upper PV which drains into the SVC (22). Left-sided PAPVC has been more reported in adults than children, which might be due to more symptomatic manifestation of the right-sided PAPVC with earlier detection in children [23].
The routine classification of PAPVC does not categorize “dual drainage” freely and these varieties, with a combination of supracardiac and cardiac PAPVC, are incredibly exceptional especially since few past case reports have been published. Besides, the genuine rate of PAPVC cases with double drainage is troublesome to evaluate, since patients are routinely asymptomatic and may escape discovery [10,14,24]. In these anomalies, because of bizarre systemic venous associations, left-to-right shunting is subtle in most cases and if it is hemodynamically significant might lead to right-sided volume overload and longer-term duration would result in right-sided heart failure. The possibility of right-to-left shunting in these patients is scarce and when patients are symptomatic, anatomical correction of this anomaly is, for the most part, recommended at the time of determination. Surgical rectification is the standard choice of treatment [25].
We reviewed all published dual drainage PAPVC cases so far which were tried to manage transcutaneously. Primarily, we decided to categorize these patients into the left or right-sided PAPVC, and second, we defined the feasible anatomical feature of the dual drainage PAPVC. There were a total of five groups of patients in which we could summarize them into the following categories (table-1):
Recently, the three-dimensional printed model is progressively used for the care of patients with congenital heart disease. The 3D printed model permits clinicians to understand the complexity of the anatomy and figure out how to treat these anomalies. It is vital to note that on a 3D-printed model vascular versatility could not be considered and ought to be translated carefully [26,27].
After affirmation of dual drainage PAPVC, transcatheter occlusion may be considered. The world experience detailed by Luciano et al. shows with a satisfactory choice of patients, the interventional methods to divert the anomalous stream only to the left atrium have been successful in embedding both different coils and self-expandable devices [28]. As it has been depicted in this review, vascular plug, VSD occluder, duct occluder, and coils have been the devices to divert the anomalous drainage with the selection depending on the size and type of the dual drainage PAPVC’s. Despite some case reports recommendations to monitor pulmonary pressure increment with balloon inflation, since there is only one anomalous pulmonary venous connection that has a dual drainage pathway, we believe this “balloon inflation” evaluation is not mandatory [9]. Other considerations are detailed device size selection to prevent device embolization and there might be a low risk of thrombotic events related to the device thrombus formation following device deployment [29].
Dual drainage PAPVC is a rare anomaly that is an orphan topic in adult congenital heart disease. With a detailed assessment of this anomaly and selection of left PAPVC with a vertical vein, transcatheter closure is more likely and it flawlessly obviates surgical repair.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
