Mini Review | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9759/010
*Corresponding Author: Aamir Jalal Al-Mosawi. Advisor in Pediatrics and Pediatric Psychiatry Children Teaching Hospital of Baghdad Medical City.
Citation: Al-Mosawi A J. (2020) Symptomatic childhood uremic pericardial effusion: An echocardiography image. Journal of Cardiology Research and Reports, 2(2): Doi: 10.31579/2692-9759/010
Copyright: © 2020. : Aamir Jalal Al-Mosawi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 09 September 2020 | Accepted: 15 September 2020 | Published: 21 September 2020
Keywords: Uremia; symptomatic pericardial effusion; pericardiocentesis
Large childhood symptomatic pericardial effusion demanding pericardio-centesis and pericardial drainage is rare and symptomatic childhood uremic pericardial effusion is even rarer. The aim of this paper is to report the rare occurrence of childhood uremic symptomatic pericardial effusion. A seven year old boy with the most extreme form of end-stage renal disease (anuric with no renal function). The patient developed large childhood symptomatic pericardial effusion which was diagnosed by echocardiography.
Large childhood symptomatic pericardial effusion demanding pericardiocentesis and pericardial drainage is rare, and symptomatic childhood uremic pericardial effusion is even rarer [1, 2].
De la Morena Pardo (1989) studied twelve children with symptomatic pericardial effusion and diagnosed four of them as having idiopathic pericardial effusions. Other causes of symptomatic pericardial effusions were chronic renal failure, viral infection, cardiac surgery, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis and chronic myelocytic leukemia [1].
Guven et al (2007) studied 10 (6 male, 4 female) children (mean age: 8.05 +/- 4.4 yr) large symptomatic pericardial effusion needing pericardiocentesis and pericardial drainage. They found three patients had tuberculosis, one patient had uremic pericarditis; one patient had bacterial pericarditis; one patient had post-pericardiotomy syndrome; two patients had malignancy and two patients had no identifiable cause.
Guven et al suggested that tuberculosis is the most important cause of large symptomatic pericardial effusion particularly in the developing countries [2].
A seven year old boy with the most extreme form of end-stage renal disease (anuric with no renal function). The patient developed large childhood symptomatic pericardial effusion which was diagnosed by echocardiography (Figure-1) demanding pericardiocentesis and pericardial drainage during treatment with intermittent peritoneal dialysis and conservative medical treatment (low protein diet and fluid restriction). He was treated with peritoneal dialysis sessions intermittently whenever became symptomatic with marked nausea, tachypnea (acidotic breathing), and generalized edema from fluid overload.

Figure-1: A seven year old boy with the most extreme form of end-stage renal disease (anuric with no renal function). The patient developed large childhood symptomatic pericardial effusion which was diagnosed by echocardiography.
Uremic pericarditis without pericardial effusion was considered a common complication of renal failure during the 1950s ad 1960s. It generally the result of an aseptic inflammation associated with fibrin formation, and little or no fluid [3, 4, 5]. The occurrence of large symptomatic uremic pericardial effusion was rarely reported in adult’s patients during the 1950s and 1960s [3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. Fishberg (1954) reported the occurrence of considerable serous or hemorrhagic effusion [3].
Goodner and Brown (1956) reported the deaths of two young male’s patients with chronic renal disease because of large symptomatic uremic pericardial effusion. Postmortem studies of the two patients revealed 800 and 850 ml of blood-stained fluid were present in the pericardial cavities [6].
Lowry and Boyd (1960) studied 227 cases of uremic pericarditis, and found 58 patients with hydropericardium and 3 with massive hemopericardium [10].
Rappaport (1962) reported the occurrence of large symptomatic uremic pericardial effusion in a ten year old girl.
Large symptomatic uremic pericardial effusion is a very rare condition during childhood [11, 12, and 13].
This paper documented the rare occurrence of large symptomatic uremic pericardial effusion requiring drainage during childhood.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,