AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2578-8868/344
1Neurosurgeon Consultant, Neurosurgery Department, Policlínica Juaneda Miramar, Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain.
2Neurosurgeon Consultant, Neurosurgery Department, Policlínica Nuestra Señora del Rosario, Ibiza, Balearic Islands, Spain.
3Chairman of the Neurosurgery Department, Policlínica Juaneda Miramar, Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain.
4Chairman of the Neurosurgeon Department, Policlínica Nuestra Señora del Rosario, Ibiza, Balearic Islands, Spain.
*Corresponding Author: Gonçalo Januário, Neurosurgeon Consultant, Neurosurgery Department, Policlínica Juaneda Miramar, Palma de Mallorca and Neurosurgeon Consultant, Neurosurgery Department, Policlínica Nuestra señora del Rosario, Ibiza, Balearic Islands, Spain.
Citation: Gonçalo Januario, Pedro Llinas, (2024), Surgical management of intraventricular subependymoma, review the state of the art, J. Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, 14(9); DOI:10.31579/2578-8868/344
Copyright: ©, 2024, Gonçalo Januário. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Received: 25 October 2024 | Accepted: 13 November 2024 | Published: 06 December 2024
Keywords: subependymoma; glial tumors; lateral ventricle; microneurosurgery;, gross total resection; magnetic resonance
Ependymomas are glial tumors with ependymal differentiation. Represent the most common spinal cord primary tumor in adults and the third most common in pediatric population central nervous system. Although as a group they represent less than 10% of all neuroepithelial tumors.The age distribution is bimodal, first peak incidence around 5-6 years of age when infratentorial lesions predominate, a second peak in the 3th-4th decades, at which time spinal examples are most common.This group of neoplasms include subependymoma (World Health Organization [WHO] grade I), myxopapillary ependymoma (WHO grade I), ependymoma (WHO grade II), and anaplastic ependymoma (WHO grade III). The ependymoma, RELA fusion-positive, is a entity codified in the revised 4th edition of the WHO classification, present aggressive behavior and include the majority of supratentorial ependymomas.Supratentorial ependymal tumors, including ependymomas and subependymomas, more frequently arise in the lateral ventricles.We describe a clinical case of a 59 years old female that presented headache and memory disturb. The computerized tomography (CT) showed a lesion in left frontal lateral ventricle, without paraventricular extension. In magnetic resonance images (MRI) the lesion showed a isohypodensity with minimal enhancement, hypointensity on T1-weighted and hyperintensity on T2-weighted images. With a micro-craniotomy and transcortical approach was obtained a total resection of the tumor. The histological study present a diagnosis of subependymoma.The patient presented a good evolution without complication and no tumor recurrence during the follow up.
Intraventricular neuroepithelial tumors (IVT) are rare lesions that account for 2–7% of intracranial tumors and comprise different pathological entities such as ependymomas, subependymomas, central neurocytoma and glioependymal cysts.[1]
Most of the cases present benign lesions that arise from the ventricular wall or the choroid plexus.[2,3,4]
Subependymomas are rare, indolent neoplasms that are histologically classified as low grade World Health Organization (WHO) grade 1 and represents only 0.2–0.7% of all central nervous system tumours.[5,6,7,8]
This tumour, in adult population, occur in both sexes and all age groups but most frequently in the middle-aged to older individuals, typically in the fifth and sixth decade of life.[9]
The majority of cases are asymptomatic, sometimes the symptoms caused by hydrocephalus or spontaneous tumor hemorrhage may occur associated with larger tumors in the fourth, lateral and third ventricles, septum pellucidum and less commonly the spinal cord.[10]
Despite its benign nature can occur tumor recurrence and metastasis within the central nervous system following surgical resection.[11]
Compared to other intracranial tumors, there is a relative paucity of published series on subependymoma focusing on long-term post-operative outcomes. A better understanding of the long-term outcomes would not only benefit patients but also reduce health care costs.[12]
Actually the duration of follow-up required for these patients is not clear, but we recommend minimum 1 time per year during 5-10 years a clinical control and magnetic resonance images (MRI).
The surgical resection presents the treatment of choice, IVTs are regularly not targetable by radiation or systemic therapy.[13]
The aims of this study were to describe a clinical case of intracranial subependymoma treated by surgical resection and also review the literature.
A 59‐year‐old female, consulted because of 6 weeks of moderate headache, and episodic memory lapse, gait ataxia and dysarthria of several minutes’ duration. When observed presented highlighted a psychomotor slowdown affection.
In this context were made a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which showed a lesion located in the left lateral ventricle isointense to gray matter on T1-weighted images and hyperintense on T2-weighted images. The lesion caused expansion and scalloping of the left lateral ventricle because a partial obstruction in the foramen of Monro thus creating ipsilateral mild hydrocephalus. The third and fourth ventricles were of normal size. Also founded a bilateral atrophy of cerebral parenchyma (Figure 1, 2).
Figure 1: axial slices T1-weighted, FLAIR, DWI, present a lesion located in the left lateral ventricle.
Figure 2: coronal T2-weighted and sagital T1-weighted slices, lesion located in the left lateral ventricle that cause partial obstruction in the foramen of Monro wit ipsilateral mild hydrocephalus
The patient was hospitalized in our department for further management. A few days after under general anesthesia and intraoperative monitoring we did a left parietal craniotomy and a gross total resection of the lesion was achieved, and there were no postoperatorative complications.
Histological samples were interpreted as rounded nuclei and scarce cytoplasm, and cell groups surrounded by abundant fibrillary matrix and
cystic areas. Immunohistochemistry was positive for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and negative for neurospecific enolase, which was compatible with grade I subependymoma, according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification. The patient is currently asymptomatic of his neurosurgical condition, with complete resolution of his speech and gait ataxia disorders. Postoperative imaging shows no tumor recurrence a year after the surgery (Figure 3).
Figure 3: MRI T1-weighted with gadolinium contrast, axial, coronal and sagital slices, without tumor recurrence, no hydrocephalus or other complication.
Subependymoma is a rare, benign, slow-growing tumor that was described by Scheinker in 1945. This tumors arising from the subependymal cell plate and are commonly located in the fourth and lateral ventricles, also been reported in the third ventricle, septum pellucidum and spinal cord.[14,15]
Due to its rarity and variable imaging characteristics, reliable pre-operative diagnosis remains challenging.[16]
These tumors usually are asymptomatic and occurs more often in males. The symptoms present a directly correlation with tumor size and the majority of symptomatic subependymomas measuring 3–5 cm or greater in size. In these cases, the occurrence is also related with the tumor location particularly the supratentorial lesions more often symptomatic than fourth-ventricle tumors. The most frequent symptoms are headache, gait ataxia, vertigo or dizziness, nausea and vomiting.[17,18]
The clinical signs in small size tumors are caused for the obstruction of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pathway.[19]
The natural history and the pathophysiology of subependymoma was less well understood and there has been a paradigm shift in the management of these tumors over the time.[20]
During the diagnosis process the clinical symptoms are important but not specifics for this pathology, actually the MRI its the gold standard for the diagnosis. Radiologically, subependymomas are typically well demarcated, non-enhancing, nodular lesions usually in the fourth ventricle. On pre-contrast MRI studies, they are generally hypo- or isointense to grey matter in T1 signal intensity and hyperintense on T2 modality.[21,22]
Presence of contrast enhancement is not typical for subependymoma, but rather is more frequently seen in cases of ependymoma. There were too few cases in our study to undertake any analysis of MRI features to predict the likelihood of complete resection or to develop post-operative hydrocephalus.
Actually the surgery is established as the treatment of choice for symptomatic subependymoma. Due to the technical evolution of all microneurosurgical techniques aided by neuronavigation ensure an efficient and safer approach for maximal tumor excision.[23]
With all the developments and methods have also led to a significant reduction in complication rates from 23.5–33% in the 1990s to 0–15% in more recent surgical series.[24,25]
Previous cohorts, described that hydrocephalus was the most common complication with rates between 7-23% following subependymoma resection with patients requiring treatment with ventriculoperitoneal shunt within 1 month or an endoscopic third ventriculostomy. The majority of cases still stable WHO performance status throughout follow-up and with low morbidity.[26]
During the last decades many different approaches was described to enter the lateral and/or third ventricle a variety including the frontal-transcortical, anterior/posterior interhemispheric-transcallosal and the contralateral interhemispheric-transfalcine-transprecuneal. [27,28,29,30,31,32]
The possibility to approach intraventricular tumors in patients without hydrocephalus does not alone preclude endoscopic management. In fact, the current results offer strong credence to the contention that patients traditionally considered poor candidates for a less invasive and potentially advantageous procedure should be offered an endoscopic alternative. The procedure in this clinical setting is effective in achieving the intended surgical goal and does not significantly differ from the results in patients with hydrocephalus.[33]
The approach depend like in all surgical treatments the center and surgical team experience, craniotomy and microdissection is an option, the lack of hydrocephalus in patients with intraventricular tumors does not exclude endoscopic management.[34]
The less invasive and potentially advantageous procedure should be offered an endoscopic alternative should be considered hypothetically in all the cases.[35]
Tumor location and extend of resection are the most important prognostic factors as recurrence has only been reported in case of subtotal resection.[36] Their growth rate tends to be slow. Rarely, aggressive tumors invading brain parenchyma or showing CSF dissemination are described as well.[37]
As radiation or systemic treatment do not apply for subependymomas, surgery remains the only viable option in this entity. The surgical strategy focusses on maximal but safe resection, resulting in permanent absence of the tumor. In the majority of reports, gross total resection could be achieved in >70% of patients, with low rates of mortality and morbidity.[38,39, 40]
The cases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been successfully particularly for small diameter subependymoma with no tumor recurrence reported in a case following 54 months of follow-up. The SRS is a potentially important option for intracranial ependymoma patients. The overall survival after SRS was 86% at 1 yr, 50% at 3 yr, and 44% at 5 yr. Smaller total tumor volume was associated with longer overall survival (P = .006). Twenty-two patients (grade 2: n = 9, grade 3: n = 13) developed additional recurrent ependymomas in the craniospinal axis. The progression-free survival in cases treated with SRS was 71% at 1 yr, 56% at 3 yr, and 48% at 5 yr. Adult age, female sex, and smaller tumor volume indicated significantly better progression-free survival. Symptomatic adverse radiation effects were seen in 8% of cases.[41]
Actually, SRS provides another management option for residual or recurrent progressive intracranial ependymoma patients who have failed initial surgery and RT, we recommend consider this option in your cases
The intraventricular subependymomas are rare benign tumors. Depend on location and size they become symptomatic due to CSF outflow obstruction causing hydrocephalus.
The ideal treatment for a symptomatic subependymoma is total resection safe and feasible, if this is not possible, debulking of the tumor followed by SRS or radiation therapy.
Tumor resection is required for symptomatic tumors or where there is radiological uncertainty. The good neurological outcomes can be achieved with microneurosurgery or endoscopic Surgical extirpation without postoperative radiotherapy results in excellent postoperative survival and functional outcomes for this type of tumors, particularly after gross total resection. Satisfying long-term survival and also cure is possible by complete removal. Some patients will require shunting for unresolved hydrocephalus after the resection surgical procedure.
Is recommended a large follow up for this patient, with clinical and radiological control to evaluate tumor recurrence.
To the patients, particularly the patient presented in this manuscript, also to all my colleagues during my career. Also, to all members of my family for the support.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
