Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1897/285
Ibirapuera avenue, 981, Indianópolis, São Paulo. Postal Code: 04029-000. mSão Paulo, SP, Brazil.
*Corresponding Author: Rafael de Athayde Soares, Ibirapuera avenue, 981, Indianópolis, São Paulo. Postal Code: 04029-000. mSão Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Citation: Sidnei J.G, Natália R.M, João W.T, Marina R.M, Leonardo Cardoso B.O., et al, (2026), Successful Management of Arteriovenous Graft Stenosis and Structural Rupture with Endovascular Stent Graft Reinforcement: A Case Report, J, Surgical Case Reports and Images, 9(1); DOI:10.31579/2690-1897/285
Copyright: © 2026, Rafael de Athayde Soares. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 09 November 2025 | Accepted: 17 December 2025 | Published: 02 January 2026
Keywords: hemodialysis; vascular access; stenosis; arteriovenous graft; endoprosthesis
Chronic kidney disease is a global public health issue affecting over 10% of the population and necessitating kidney replacement therapy as it progresses to kidney failure. Hemodialysis, the most common form of kidney replacement therapy, requires well-functioning vascular access. When arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are not viable due to multiple failed accesses or vascular disease, arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) are often used as an alternative. This case report describes a 27-year-old female with chronic kidney disease, likely secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus, who had been on hemodialysis since the age of 14. The patient experienced thrombosis and structural rupture of an AVG. A pharmacomechanical thrombectomy was performed, followed by angioplasty to treat arterial stenosis. Due to residual thrombus and compromised graft integrity, a cell-impermeable endoprosthesis was placed within the arteriovenous graft. The patient successfully resumed hemodialysis 48 hours post-procedure
Chronic kidney disease is a public health problem that affects over 10% of the global population [1]. As chronic kidney disease progresses from its early stages to kidney failure, morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs increase, and life expectancy is markedly reduced unless kidney replacement therapy is initiated [2]. Nearly 4 million people globally rely on kidney replacement therapy, with hemodialysis being the most common modality [3].
Effective hemodialysis depends on well-functioning vascular access to the patient's blood circulation. An arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is currently the access of choice for hemodialysis due to its superior long-term patency and lower complication rates compared to other access types [4–6]. However, AVFs are not always viable for all patients, particularly those with multiple failed accesses or significant vascular disease 7. When AVFs fail or are not feasible, an arteriovenous graft (AVG) is often employed as the next option, as recommended by the NKF-DOQI guidelines [4]. The use of grafts becomes necessary, especially in patients who have been on hemodialysis for several years and have exhausted other vascular access options. The most common complication of AVG is the development of stenosis, which can impair the effectiveness of hemodialysis and potentially lead to AVG thrombosis [8]. The management of these complications often requires endovascular interventions. This article presents the case of a patient with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis who experienced thrombosis and structural rupture of the AVG. It details the endovascular techniques used to preserve vascular access and ensure the continuity of hemodialysis treatment, highlighting an innovative approach to address these complications: placing a cell-impermeable endoprosthesis inside a previously implanted graft.
A 27-year-old female patient with chronic kidney disease, probably secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus, had been in a hemodialysis program since the age of 14. She had previously undergone two failed deceased-donor kidney transplants and experienced failure of AVF in the right upper limb. A new vascular access was created using an AVG (Haemodialysis Reliable Outflow [HeRO]; Merit Medical Systems, Inc., South Jordan, Utah, USA) in the left upper limb. HeRO is a mixed AVG that combines an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) body with central drainage through a siliconized catheter. A titanium connector links the ePTFE body to the silicone catheter.
Following a hemodialysis session, the patient experienced localized swelling at the AVG puncture site, accompanied by bleeding from the puncture wound. A Doppler ultrasound of the vascular access was performed, showing findings consistent with an AVG rupture at the puncture site, with the possibility of endovascular treatment
The endovascular treatment was performed with the patient under general anesthesia. A 0.035 hydrophilic guidewire was used to cross the lesion site, advancing from the superior vena cava through the lesion in the venous axis. An initial puncture was performed under ultrasound guidance to gain retrograde access near the arterial anastomosis, allowing the guidewire to advance through the lesion. A pharmacomechanical thrombectomy was performed using the AngioJet™ Thrombectomy system (Solent™ 6F; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA), with the aim of clearing residual parietal thrombi from the proximal venous axis and the HeRO graft. A total of 10mg of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator was administered using a pulse spray technique before proceeding with thrombus aspiration. After the initial thrombectomy, an angioplasty of the cephalic vein was performed using a 6 x 120 balloon (Oceanus 35; Life Vascular Devices Biotech, Barcelona, Spain).
Due to residual thrombus in the cephalic vein, a subsequent puncture was performed to gain anterograde access, allowing for a second pharmacomechanical thrombectomy of the distal venous axis and the arteriovenous anastomosis. An angiography following the thrombectomy revealed stenosis at the arteriovenous anastomosis and brachial artery. A 6 x 120 balloon (Oceanus 35; Life Vascular Devices Biotech, Barcelona, Spain) was used, successfully opening the anastomosis. However, intraoperative angiographic images showed residual thrombus in the AVG bo

Figure 1: Angiography before and after treatment.
a) Intraoperative angiographic image before treatment showing residual thrombus in the AVG body and signs of compromised graft integrity, including a pseudoaneurysm of the arteriovenous graft (indicated by the arrow in the image). b) Post-treatment angiographic image showing the reopened AVG.
To address these findings and restore graft function, a cell -impermeable endoprosthesis (Wrapsody™; Merit Medical Systems, Inc., South Jordan, Utah, USA) was placed in the AVG body (within the previously implanted HeRO graft), effectively managing the complication without the need for surgical removal of the HeRO graft. Final angiography confirmed the successful opening of the venous pathway and complete anastomosis patency (Figure 1B). The patient returned to the hemodialysis regimen, undergoing a session 48 hours after the procedure. She has been followed up quarterly since then, and at her most recent visit, 10 months after the intervention, the vascular access remained patent.

Figure 2: Intraoperative Doppler ultrasound.
a) Immediate intraoperative Doppler ultrasound showing increased blood flow and graft patency. b) Doppler ultrasound confirming the success of the treatment, as evidenced by the increased and adequate blood flow in the graft.
This case demonstrates that non-traditional treatment options are available for managing vascular access failures, such as occlusions and ruptures, especially when conventional options are limited. The placement of a cell-impermeable endoprosthesis within a previously implanted graft, as in this case, provides a viable solution that avoids graft surgical removal and allows for the preservation of vascular access. This approach supports the early return to hemodialysis treatment (two days after the procedure), minimizing interruption and improving patient outcomes. Moreover, this method aligns with the NKF-DOQI's emphasis on maximizing the use of available access sites, especially in patients with limited vascular options due to multiple failed accesses [4].
The NKF-DOQI guidelines also advocate for individualized patient care, recognizing that no single approach fits all scenarios [4]. In this case, the innovative use of an endoprosthesis exemplifies this tailored approach, providing a customized solution that accommodates the patient's unique clinical situation, thereby optimizing their overall treatment experience and outcomes. This case also highlights the importance of continued innovation and flexibility in managing vascular access, encouraging practitioners to consider all available options to achieve the best possible patient care.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,