Subaortic stenosis due to fibromuscular shelf diagnosed in a 64 years woman with dyspnea

Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2641-0419/386

Subaortic stenosis due to fibromuscular shelf diagnosed in a 64 years woman with dyspnea

  • V Mineo
  • E Rebulla
  • P Camarda
  • MCE Valerio
  • EV Castelluccio
  • G D’Ardia
  • P Candela *

Cardiology department – Clinica Candela – Palermo

*Corresponding Author: P Candela, Cardiology department – Clinica Candela – Palermo.

Citation: V Mineo, E Rebulla, P Camarda, MCE Valerio, EV Castelluccio, G D’Ardia, P Candela, (2024), Subaortic stenosis due to fibromuscular shelf diagnosed in a 64 years woman with dyspnea, J Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, 7(9); DOI: 10.31579/2641-0419/386

Copyright: © 2024, P Candela. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 24 May 2024 | Accepted: 30 July 2024 | Published: 12 August 2024

Keywords: prevalence; population; cardiovascular risk; SCORE scale

Abstract

Subaortic stenosis is the second most common form of left ventricolare out flow obstruction. It occurs whe the flow of blood from the heart’s pumping chambre or left ventricle is restricted. This obstruction is in the area of the heart under the aortic valve. There are three types of subaortic stenosis; two of them are associated with congenital heart disease (CHD). Subaortic membrane is the most common type. It is a shelf-like membrane that forms under the aortic valve.

Introduction

Subaortic stenosis is the second most common form of left ventricolare out flow obstruction. It occurs whe the flow of blood from the heart’s pumping chambre or left ventricle is restricted. This obstruction is in the area of the heart under the aortic valve. There are three types of subaortic stenosis; two of them are associated with congenital heart disease (CHD). Subaortic membrane is the most common type. It is a shelf-like membrane that forms under the aortic valve. It causes obstruction to the flow of blood from the left ventricle into the aorta. This results in blood going trough turbulence. A doctor hears this as a heart murmur. The subaortic membrane is twice as common in males. It has been reported in family clusters. It is more severe when diagnosed in children, rather than in adults. When detected in childhood it commonly worsens over time.  About 50% of patients with a subaortic membrane also have leakage of the aortic valve.

Case report

In april 2024, a 64 years old woman was hospitalized in our department for dyspnea and occasional episodes of palpitation. She had history of hypertension, dyslipidemia and type II diabetes.
On the 2th of April she went to the Emergency Department for intense palpitation, with evidence at the ECG of newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response, which was effectively cardioverted with endovenous amiodarone. On the 4th of April she had a cardiology consult in our institution and, since the evidence of dyspnea and a 3/6 systolic ejection murmur at right sternal border, she was hospitalized.

Tha patient presented into NYHA class IV, without clinical signs of congestion.

  • Body weight ad admission 57 Kg
  • NT pro BNP at admission 453 pg/ml
  • Blood gas analysis: pH 7.56, pO2 112mmHg, pCO2 25mmHg Na+ 135 mmol/l, K+ 3.5 mmol/l, Cl- 105mmol/l, Lac 1.9 mmol/l, Hb 12.1 g/dl; Be 0.2 mmol/l, HCO3- 22.4, satO2 100%.
  • Renal function: presence of stage II chronic kidney disease, stable during the hospital stay (creatinine at discharge 0,58 mg/dl)
  • ECG: sinus rhythm (57 bpm)
  • Electrocardiographic monitoring: sinus bradycardia with heart rate trend of 55 bpm

On the echocardiogram: left ventricle of normal size (LVEDV 55 ml/mq) with concentric hypertrophy (IVS 13 mm, LVMI 114 g/mq, RWT 0,54); no obvious segmental kinesis anomalies; normal systolic function (EF 60%); aorta of regular size where explorable; aortic valve morphology not evaluable (poor acoustic window) with regular opening but color Doppler features of sever aortic stenosis (Pvel 4 m/sec, MG 40 mmHg) and moderate aortic regurgitation; evidence of subaortic shelf; mild mitralic regurgitation; mildly enlarged left atrium (36 ml/mq); diastolic pattern with estimated normal filling pressures (average E/e' 13); mildly enlarged right atrium; right ventricle of normal size with reduced longitudinal systolic function indices (TAPSE 16 mm, S’ at TDI 9 cm/sec); mild tricuspid regurgitation; normale size and collapse of IVC; undamaged pericardium (see figure 1).

We also performed transoesophageal echocardiogram during hospitalization: tricuspid aortic valve with normal opening; evidence of subaortic fibromuscular shelf causing sever obstruction to the flow of blood from the 

left ventricle to the aorta; moderate aortic regurgitation, due to the fibrosis of the aortic cusps, probably caused by the turbulence of the flow (see figure 2-5)

Discussion

The patient we present show a case of subvalvular aortic stenosis presenting with dyspnea and an episode of atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricolar response. Transthoracic echocardiogram show a normal opening aortic valve, with color doppler data suggestive of severe aortic stenosis. Transoesophageal echocardiogram allowed to recognize the presence of a subaortic fibromuscular shelf, responsible for the sever obstruction to the blood flow into the aorta. In addition the turbulence of the flow caused fibrotic degeneration of the aortic cusps resulting into moderate aortic regurgitation. The patient will be evaluated by a cardiac surgeon in order to decide whether the fibromuscular shelf should be surgically removed.

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova