Spinal Extradural Arachnoid cyst: Review of Literature

Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1897/020

Spinal Extradural Arachnoid cyst: Review of Literature

  • Siddharth Verma 1*
  • Reena Soni, 1

1* Department of Neurosurgery, Mittal hospital & research center, Ajmer (Rajasthan), India.

*Corresponding Author: Siddharth Verma, Department of Neurosurgery, Mittal hospital & research center, Ajmer (Rajasthan), India.

Citation: Verma S, Soni R. (2020) Spinal Extradural Arachnoid Cyst: Review of Literature. Journal of Surgical Case Reports and Images, 3(2): Doi: 10.31579/2690-1897/020

Copyright: © 2020. Siddharth Verma. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 05 February 2020 | Accepted: 14 February 2020 | Published: 18 February 2020

Keywords: thoracic spine ;symptomatic cysts require surgery

Abstract

Spinal arachnoid cysts are mostly intradural. Spinal extradural arachnoid cyst (SEAC) is very rare condition accounting for only 1% cases of spinal tumors. [1,2,3] SEAC is mostly found in males in their second to fifth decades. Most common location of SEAC is thoracic spine

Introduction

Spinal arachnoid cysts are mostly intradural. Spinal extradural arachnoid cyst (SEAC) is very rare condition accounting for only 1

Review of Literature

SEAC is a rare cause of compressive myelopathy, which accounts for only 1% of all spinal tumors [1, 2, and 3]. It is more common in males in their 20s [3]. Thoracic spine is most common location [1, 2, and 3].SEAC results from herniation of arachnoid membrane through the tiny dural defect [1, 2]. These cysts communicate with subarachnoid space through which CSF accumulates [1, 6]. Rarely, the cyst does not have any communication with subarachnoid space12.  Etiology of these dural defects still remains unclear. These defects can be congenital or acquired [1, 2, 4]. Acquired causes can be trauma, infection or inflammation [1, 2, 4]. It may be associated with dural ectasia, Marfan syndrome [1]. In this condition, organization of collagen is defective, which results in decreased tensile strength of ligamentous structures and other supporting tissues [8]. Dural stretching can lead to dural thinning to such an extent that it becomes ectatic and may be deficient in areas [8]. Although there is still debate in determining the etiology of SEACs, the theory of congenital dural defect is widely accepted [8]. Dural defect is often present near the nerve root sleeves. Proposed reason is that tension across the movable dural sac and relatively fixed roots can predispose such dural defects2.  Outpouching of arachnoid takes place through these small defects [1, 2]. These herniations become enlarge with time during exercise or Valsalva [1, 6]. It explains the symptomatic fluctuation during exercise and Valsalva maneuvers. Based on this, pulsatile CSF flow dynamic theory was proposed by many authors to explain enlargement of cyst [1, 2, 9].  These defects may act like valve as defects are small and arachnoid herniates beyond their margins. Rootlets may also get trapped and it again act like a valve2. As enlargement continues, a SEAC can aggravate spinal cord compression or nerve root compression, which leads to myelopathy or radiculopathy [2, 3, 4]. Nabors et al. classified in to 3 categories [10].

  1. Type 1: Extradural cyst without nerve tissue.

1A-Extradural meningeal cyst, 1B- Sacral meningocele.

  1. Type 2: Extradural cyst containing nerve tissue.
  2. Type 3: Spinal cyst.

MRI is the most useful tool to diagnose a SEAC [3] Radiological studies report that a SEAC appears similar to cerebrospinal fluid [2, 3, 7] A CT myelography is also a useful diagnostic tool as it can more reliably detect the anatomical location of the cyst [2] In addition, a myelogram and CT myelography can help locate the Dural defective site [2, 4]. CSF flow MRI can identify the pulsating turbulent flow void of a defective site [1].
Symptomatic cyst needs surgical treatment [1, 2, and 7]. There is a consensus among surgeons to repair the dural defect in the treatment of a SEAC. However, there is still disagreement regarding the treatment of the cyst [2, 3, 4].  Diverse surgical techniques have been described and complete microsurgical resection of SEACs with meticulous repair of dural defect has been advocated as treatment of choice for SEACs [2, 9]. Long segment laminectomy and complete excision of cyst may be associated with complications like bleeding, post-operative kyphotic deformity and instability [1, 3, 4, 7, 8]. Alternative surgical techniques have been described to avoid these complications. Payer et al described selective interlaminar fenestration at communication site with repair of dural tear. Communication site was identified as flow void seen on preoperative cine MRI [9]This technique has an advantage of minimal laminotomy but requires very precise localization of Dural defect that may not be possible every time. Woo et al described laminectomy at defect site, penetration of cyst and Dural repair [11]. But they had to extent their laminectomy because of spatial limitation or not finding dural defect. Won Choi et al described tailored laminectomy, fenestration and closure of dural defect [1]. Javier Quillo-Olvera et al did evacuatory puncture of cyst and concluded that if the patient has mild symptoms, clinical observation is recommended [13].

Conclusion

SEACs are rare cause of compressive myelopathy but should be kept in mind as they respond very well after surgery. Various surgical techniques have been described. Meticulous repair of dural defect is necessary to prevent recurrence.

■ The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

 

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova