Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-8808/316
*Corresponding Author: Rahul Hajare, Sandip university Nashik India.
Citation: Rahul Hajare, (2026), Single Coronary Ostium: Successful Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Subacute Coronary Syndrome: A Case Report, J, Clinical Case Reports and Studies, 7(6); DOI:10.31579/2690-8808/316
Copyright: ©, 2026, Rahul Hajare. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 24 March 2026 | Accepted: 10 April 2026 | Published: 20 May 2026
Keywords: the four seasons; the four galactic seasons; the four micro seasons; anthropocene; dinosaur family; milky way galaxy; law of matryoshka doll of russia
Coronary artery anomalies are rare but clinically significant conditions that may complicate diagnosis and interventional procedures. Among these, the anomalous origin of the left coronary artery (LCA) from the right coronary cusp (RCC) is extremely uncommon. We report a case of an 86-year-old female presenting with subacute coronary syndrome and a rare single coronary ostium, in which both the LCA and right coronary artery (RCA) originated from the right sinus of Valsalva. Coronary angiography revealed a high-grade proximal RCA stenosis. Despite technical challenges in catheter engagement, successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with balloon angioplasty and drug-eluting stent implantation was achieved using a specialized guiding catheter approach. This case highlights the importance of procedural adaptability and individualized interventional strategies in managing complex coronary anomalies.
Coronary artery anomalies represent a diverse group of congenital abnormalities, with a reported incidence ranging from 0.1% to 1.3% in angiographic studies. Among these, the anomalous origin of the LCA from the right sinus of Valsalva is particularly rare, with an incidence of approximately 0.017%. Although many anomalies remain clinically silent, some are associated with myocardial ischemia, acute coronary syndromes, and sudden cardiac death [1,2]. The presence of such anomalies poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, especially during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), where catheter selection and vessel engagement become technically demanding. This report presents a rare case of a single coronary ostium with anomalous LCA origin, successfully managed with PCI in the setting of subacute coronary syndrome [3,4].
An 86-year-old female with a history of hypertension and hyperlipidemia presented with progressive exertional dyspnea and left-sided chest pain over 1–2 weeks. On admission, her blood pressure was 165/85 mmHg and heart rate was 77 beats per minute. Electrocardiography revealed sinus rhythm with T-wave inversions in leads II, III, and aVF, suggestive of inferior ischemia [5,6]. Echocardiography demonstrated reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (40%) with hypokinesia of the inferior wall. High-sensitivity troponin levels were elevated, peaking at 41.91 pg/mL. Coronary angiography revealed a single coronary ostium arising from the right sinus of Valsalva, with separate origins of the LCA and RCA. A critical stenosis was identified in the proximal RCA. Due to advanced age and comorbidities, surgical intervention was deferred in favor of PCI. Initial attempts to cannulate the RCA using standard guiding catheters (JR 4.0, Amplatz, AR I/II) were unsuccessful. Ultimately, an XB RCA guiding catheter enabled successful engagement. A 0.014-inch coronary guidewire was advanced across the lesion, followed by balloon angioplasty using a 2.5 × 12 mm balloon. Subsequently, two drug-eluting stents (3.0 × 12 mm and 2.75 × 9 mm) were deployed, achieving optimal revascularization with no residual stenosis on final angiography [7,8,9]. The patient was stabilized on guideline-directed medical therapy and discharged with referral for cardiac rehabilitation.
Coronary artery anomalies, though rare, have important clinical implications. Most are discovered incidentally; however, certain variants, particularly anomalous origins from the opposite sinus, may predispose to ischemia, arrhythmias, or sudden cardiac death. Additionally, these anomalies can significantly complicate interventional procedures due to atypical vessel orientation and difficulty in catheter engagement. In this case, the anomalous origin of the LCA from the RCC with a shared or closely located ostium represents a rare anatomical variant. The presence of high-grade proximal RCA stenosis was the primary cause of the patient’s symptoms, while the anomaly itself was likely incidental. Successful PCI in such cases requires careful planning, appropriate catheter selection, and operator expertise. The use of a non-conventional guiding catheter (XB RCA) proved crucial in achieving stable engagement and procedural success. Similar cases reported in the literature emphasize the importance of flexibility and individualized approaches in managing such anatomical challenges. Furthermore, elderly patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors often present with complex coronary pathology, necessitating minimally invasive strategies such as PCI over surgical intervention.
This case highlights a rare coronary anomaly involving a single coronary ostium with anomalous LCA origin from the right coronary cusp, presenting with subacute coronary syndrome. Despite technical challenges, successful PCI was achieved using an adapted catheterization strategy. Recognition of coronary anomalies and appropriate procedural planning are essential for optimal outcomes. This report underscores the feasibility and effectiveness of PCI in complex coronary anatomy and contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting individualized interventional approaches in high-risk patients.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,