AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2693-4779/110
St. Paul’s Hospital, Hong Kong
*Corresponding Author: John SM Leung
Citation: John SM Leung. (2022) Sévère exacerbation of mixed campylobacter and cryptosporidium enteritis following bnt162b vaccination against covid-19 – a vaccine and gut microbiota interaction that unveils à long-hidden disorder. Clinical Research and Clinical Trials. 6(3) ; DOI :10.31579/2693-4779/110
Copyright: © 2022 John SM Leung, this is an open access article distributed Under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
Received: 23 August 2022 | Accepted: 21 September 2022 | Published: 11 October 2022
Keywords: COVID-19 vaccine; gut microbiota; vaccine-gut microbe interaction; vaccine off-target benefits
A young man with a propensity to short spells of mild self-limiting diarrhea presented with severe watery diarrhea after the first dose of BNT-162b2 anti-COVID-19 vaccine. It persisted for over two weeks and was refractory to treatment with fluoroquinolone, spasmolytic and probiotic preparation. At the end of two weeks, he became very ill with dehydration and was admitted through the accident and emergency department to a special unit in a tertiary hospital. His Multiplex panel revealed Campylobacter and Cryptosporidium species. Antibiotics were changed to azithromycin and nitazoxanide with prompt recovery. He was followed up for the next 12 months and remained well with no relapse of diarrhea. In addition, he was cleared of his previous mild recurrent diarrhea. The significance of interaction between gut microbiota and vaccination is discussed and its potential benefit emphasized.
In our fight against the COVID-19 pandemic, one of the most important measures is vaccination. With over 5 billion people vaccinated worldwide,1 it is conceivable that some adverse effects, no matter how rare, would invariably occur, and vaccine opponents are quick to exploit such incidents to justify their stand. Much has been reported on the adverse effects of vaccines against COVID-19. In order not to cause any negative effect on the promotion of vaccination, such reports are usually quick to point out the rarity of such side effects and often due to medical problems other than vaccination. This is followed by stressing of the overwhelming benefits of the vaccines in controlling the pandemic.2 While such an argument is irrefutable, it is rather defensive and we need to pack in more punch for the vaccination drive. One way is to reduce the alarms over adverse effects by understanding their mechanistic causation, another way is to demonstrate that not all side effects are necessarily detrimental and that some effects of vaccination, though off label, could be surprisingly beneficial. The following case report illustrates both points.
The patient is a 23year old male trainee in a law firm. He was prone to diarrhea since childhood which his mother blamed on “weak digestion” and “food allergy”. It was never severe and usually cleared up after two or three days. He never sought medical advice or treatment and accepted his diarrhea predisposition as part of his constitution. He grew up with a frail stature and a BMI of 19.1/M2.
In summer, 2021, the patient took his first dose of BNT162b2 vaccine given to the left deltoid muscle. This was followed immediately by severe pain and weakness around the left shoulder joint. Next day, the pain eased off a little but he started to run a fever of 38.3oC and developed severe diarrhea, over 10 times a day, and more severe than he had ever experienced. It was watery, with no blood or mucus, rather reminiscent of the “rice water diarrhea” described in cholera. After 10 days with no signs of improvement, he came to seek medical advice.
Physical examination revealed a frail thin young man. His temperature was 37.1oC, pulse rate 96 and respiratory rate 18 per minute, regular, BP 140/86, SpO2 97% on room air. He was mildly dehydrated, with a scaphoid abdomen, no tenderness, no enlargement of liver, spleen or kidneys, but very active bowel sounds. There were no palpable enlarged lymph nodes and no abnormalities detected in the heart and lungs. His left shoulder remained in pain since the vaccine injection and shoulder movements were limited both by the pain and proximal muscle weakness.
Laboratory investigations showed Hb 14.8g/dL, HCT 43.8%, MCV 89.8/fL, RBC 4.88M/uL, WBC 13K/uL, N 88.9%, L 6.2%, M 4.6%, E 0.1%, B 0.2%, platelets 264K/uL, ESR 4mm/hr, CRP 16.4mg/L, hsTroponin-I 0.01, D-dimer 0.403ug/mL, NT-proBNP 29.3pg/mL. Stool was sent for culture and following ongoing laboratory “guidelines” culture was directed towards Salmonella, Shigella, Shiga, Vibrio and Campylobacter all of which turned out with negative results. Meanwhile, he was put on empirical ciprofloxacin 250mg b.i.d., hyoscine butyl bromide 20mg t.i.d., and a Lactobacilli probiotic preparation (Lacteol® Fort) b.i.d. and urged to replenish his fluid loss with oral fluid intake.
For five days he was monitored by tele-communication and seemed to respond, at least partially, with the diarrhea reduced to two or three times a day and semi-solid in consistency. On the 6th day he relapsed with the diarrhea worse than before. He was seen to be in marked dehydration and rushed to the accident and emergency department for admission to the special vaccine complication centre for intravenous fluid replacement, intensive monitoring and resuscitation if needed. Before we sent him off, we took a second stool specimen for the Multiplex molecular panel of gastro-intestinal pathogenic antigens. The report came out as positive for both Campylobacter and Cryptosporidium. The report was immediately sent by facsimile to the vaccine complication centre, where the management had changed the patient’s antibiotics to ceftriaxone but still with no response. He was switched to azithromycin 500mg daily and Nitazoxanide 500mg b.i.d. and his diarrhea was completely relieved within 24 hours. Remarkably, he was cured of his previous “weak digestion and food allergy” and never had another attack of diarrhea. For the first time in his adult life, he was regularly having one bowel motion a day with always formed stools. He started to gain weight, climbing from below 50 Kg to 54 Kg six months later, an all-time high record for him. His left shoulder also made a complete recovery. 12 months later a telephone follow-up confirmed that he remained fully recovered with no relapse.
According to the Centers of Disease Control (U.S.A.) official records, moderate to moderately severe diarrhea following COVID-19 vaccination is rather uncommon, ranging from zero to 1.4%, and not much different from placebo. There were no severe grade 4 diarrhea defined as requiring emergency department visit and/or hospital admission.3 However, Akaishi et al. in a case report and review of medical literature collected 9 other cases of prolonged diarrhea following COVID-19 vaccination lasting up to several months. No conclusive explanation was given by these authors and most of them were given a diagnosis of “post-vaccine non-specific intestinal inflammation.” Remarkably the stool culture was usually reported as normal flora in these reports. The present case’s stool culture was also reported as negative for the usual pathogens and the fastidious Campylobacter and Cryptosporidium only showed up in the Multiplex antigen panel. The fact that in this case the diarrhea resolved dramatically with the appropriate antibiotics is strong evidence of the pathogenic role of these organisms.
This case illustrates several important features. First, telecommunication plays a very important role in these days of pandemic lockdown, enabling us to keep close contact with the patient and our colleagues to expedite teamwork and rapid exchange of information to produce optimal management. Second, certain intestinal microbes might lie outside the conventional laboratory capabilities and guidelines and could be missed out in a routine culture study. Even if they were being cultured, their cultural requirements might be so fastidious as to yield a false negative result. In such cases, the molecular antigen panel, e.g., Multiplex, is critical to detect the culprit within a short time. Third, on rare occasions, vaccination can interact with gut microbiota in such a way as to cause the flare up of an occult chronic intestinal infection into an acute and severe form of entero-colitis. Fourth, such a side effect, though unpleasant, might reveal a long-standing health problem, hitherto hidden or neglected, and bring on its definitive treatment and lasting cure. These last two points deserve further elaboration
The gut microbiota has now been well-recognized as an important player in health and disease. [4] In particular, an interaction has been demonstrated between gut microbiota and COVID-19 vaccination [5]. showing that abundance of Bifidobacterium adolescenti is associated with higher neutralizing antibodies induced by the inactivated virus vaccine CoronaVac while abundance of Riseburia faecis correlates with higher neutralizing antibodies following BNT162b. Furthermore, abundance of Prevotella copri, Megamonas funiformis and M. hypermegale seem to reduce the side effects of both vaccines. On the other hand, vaccination is found to be followed by reduced alpha diversity of species and shifts in beta diversity in gut microbiota [5]. with increased Bacterioides caccae and Alistipes shahii following BNT162b but only increased B. caccae following CoronaVac. Thus, there appears to be a bi-directional interaction between vaccination and the gut microbiota, and the present case is another example illustrating such interaction.
BNT162b induces a number of cytokines in order to expedite an immune response with adequate levels of neutralizing antibodies against the virus. Chief among this cytokine signature are IFN- γ, IL-15 and CXCL [10][6]. Cryptosporidium infection leads to watery diarrhea but is usually self-limiting except in immuno-deficient subjects. It involves cytokines like IFN-γ, IL-15, IL-1, CXCL-10, TNF-α. [7] Campylobacter infection is capable of inducing pro-inflammatory cytokines like IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-8 and TNF-α. [8] Therefore, all three agents, one vaccine and two bacteria are capable of inducing various inflammatory cytokines especially IFN-γ. Further downstream, IFN-γ activates substance P and prostaglandin E2 which upregulate the major mechanisms of diarrhea – cAMP, NO synthase, CFTR, CaCC and, importantly, disruption of the tight interepithelial cell junction.[8] Campylobacter species, were once considered commensals in the gut, only causing significant infection when spreaded to the urinary tract or other parts of the body. Indeed, as intracellular organisms their intestinal activities are limited by difficulties to penetrate the intestinal epithelial barrier which consists of [1] a two-tier cover of mucus comprising a superficial loose layer and a dense deep mucin layer immediately overlying the intestine epithelial cells, and [2] the tight intercellular junction between the intestinal epithelial cells. Normally, the organisms are unable to penetrate the dense mucin layer and kept in the outer loose mucus layer.[9] However, co-infection with Cryptosporidium species will cause massive loss of chlorides and water via CFTR and CaCC channels on the luminal side of colonic epithelial cells, loosening the overlying dense mucin layer. Furthermore, intestinal intercellular tight junction, exposed to high levels of IFN-γ (in this case reinforced by both Campylobacter infection and BNT162b vaccination), would become disrupted and susceptible to penetration by Campylobacter species. Once Campylobacter infection is established, the capsular polysaccharide of the bacteria may provide protection against host immunity not only for itself but also for other organisms.[10] Conceivably, synergism in Campylobacter and Cryptosporidium co-infection had been demonstrated decades ago.[11] In the present case, the addition of vaccination and further cytokine upregulation contributed to a severe exacerbation of diarrhea. The vicious cycle was only broken when appropriate antibiotics put an end to the activities of the two pathogens.
This adverse effect turned out to be a blessing in disguise. The patient was prone to diarrhea ever since he could remember. As a result, he had been under-weight all his life. He could have carried the two pathogenic organisms further on for many years. His immune system was competent enough to keep the symptoms largely at bay. Yet, a certain amount of synergism could have kept the double infection lingering on at a smoldering pace. The increase in proinflammatory cytokines, especially IFN- γ, after vaccination tipped the balance and the diarrhea escalated to a formidable level that demanded more searching investigation and appropriate treatment resulting in dramatic response, even clearing up the original dual infection. This is not an isolate example where vaccination has led to off label benefits. A well-known example is the use of BCG in the treatment of bladder cancer [12]. In another context, this author had earlier reported a case of facial palsy of nine years’ duration recovering almost completely after two doses of BNT162b vaccination [13]. Report on such unusual but beneficial vaccination side effect not only boost the morale of health workers working hard on the vaccination drive, it might help to counter the numerous negative arguments of vaccine opponents. Stretching the imagination further, it might even further the field of vaccine-based therapeutics well beyond that of BCG to benefit other disorders.
This study suffers from the usual limitations of a single case report. Most remarks tend to be anecdotal and need further support from more cases. Due to constraints in the pandemic, investigations had to be kept to a minimum and much of the cytokine levels could not be assessed. Due to the alarming severity of the reactions to the first dose, we were unable to persuade the patient to go through the second dose. Yet, he survived the next two waves of COVID-19 infection, delta and omicron, with his daily rapid antigen test never for once turned positive. Possibly, his severe vaccine reaction might have conferred particularly strong and durable protection, but he has declined to go through further booster doses.
I am grateful to the patient for permission to publish this case report.
I declare no conflict of interest in any form. This work has received no sponsorship or subsidy of any kind.
BCG, Bacille (Bacillus) Calmette-Guërin
BMI, body mass index
CaCC, calcium-activated chloride channel
cAMP, cyclic adenosine 3’,5’-mono-phosphate
CFTR, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductancenregulator
CXCL10, C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10
IFN- γ, interferon-gamma
IL-1, interleukine-1
IL-15, interleukine-15
NO, nitric oxide
TNF-α, tumour necrotizing factor alpha
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
