Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9562/078
1 Assistant Professor, Oto-Rhinolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Amir-almomenin Hospital, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
2 Assisstant Professor of Otolaryngology, Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
3 Professor of Otolaryngology, Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
*Corresponding Author: Sevil Nasirmohtaram: Assistant Professor, Oto-Rhinolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Amir-almomenin Hospital, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Citation: Sevil Nasirmohtaram,Maliheh Akbarpour, Mir-Mohammad Jalali (2023), Septorhinoplasty Outcome in Male and Female, Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology 5x(4); DOI: 10.31579/2692-9562/078
Copyright: © 2023 Sevil Nasirmohtaram. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
Received: 20 March 2023 | Accepted: 29 March 2023 | Published: 11 April 2023
Keywords: rhinoplasty; outcom; aesthetics; satisfaction; cosmetic
Objective: Evaluating the results of septorhinoplasty, one of the most commonly performed aesthetic surgeries, is necessary. This study aimed to compare the outcomes in men and women.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 40 patients (20 male and 20 female) were assessed before and after septorhinoplasty using the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation questionnaire.
Results: The ROE score before surgery was15.1±2.29 in the female group, which turned into 17.85±2.39 in the 3-months follow-up visit (p<0.001). The male group's mean ROE score before surgery was 12.95±3.05 and 17.0 ± 2.07 after surgery (p<0.001). However, the ROE score changes were insignificant between the two groups(p=0.015).
Conclusion: Although the mean ROE score was lower in the male group before surgery, both groups reported significant improvement after septorhinoplasty. It seems that gender differences do not have a prominent role in outcomes.
Septorhinoplasty is the most common aesthetic surgical procedure performed worldwide and is the most challenging. The surgeon is supposed to be accomplished to evaluate and enhance outcomes. [1,2] The face has a distinguishing role in personal identity, and the nose in the central part is the most prominent structure.[3] The main goal in septorhinoplasty is to reconstruct the nose from cosmetic and functional perspectives. Assessment of surgical outcomes and comparing results of different techniques enables the surgeon to select the most proper procedure.
There are some subjective and objective tools to evaluate results, e.g., patient-reported questionnaires, each focusing on specific viewpoints. [4,5]
In recent decades, in Asian countries, the preponderance of septorhinoplasty has been significant, especially the number of surgeries performed in Iran is remarkable.[6] Surprisingly, the tendency in the male population is also rising significantly, especially in Northern Iran. We decided to evaluate the outcome differences in male and female candidates using a rhinoplasty outcome evaluation (ROE) questionnaire.
In this prospective study, 40 patients (18 to 50 years old) with nasal deformity candidates for septorhinoplasty, operated in a governmental university hospital in Rasht, Iran, during a season period in 2022 were included.
Patients, divided into male and female groups, were matched for age. Those with a history of drug and substance abuse, addiction to alcohol, known cases of cognitive or psychologic diseases, and a history of anti-depressant/ anxiolytic usage were ruled out.
During the pre-operation visit, detailed history was taken, and a physical examination was performed. After taking informed consent to join the study, a checklist of personal data and outcome assessment was recorded based on the ROE questionnaire by a third person for more convenience.
All patients were operated on via open septorhinoplasty. The post-operative evaluation was done after 3 months. Additionally, patient satisfaction was recorded in each group before and after surgery as poor(low), good(moderate), and excellent(high).
ROE is a reliable and valid questionnaire that evaluates patient satisfaction from functional and aesthetic perspectives. (14) It consists of six easy questions about breathing and appearance and may also rate social, psychological, and emotional parameters. Each question consists of 5 options, scored 0-4. The result may be reported as a percentage. Before starting the study, we assessed the validity and reliability of the acceptable Persian form of the test.
The results were compared using paired t-test. P-value <0>
In this cross-sectional study, 20 female and 20 male patients were assessed and compared from March to July 2022 in a university hospital in Rasht, northern Iran.
The difference between mean age, level of education, marriage, and regular exercise were not statistically significant among the two groups, while tobacco smoking was more prevalent in men(p=0.003). Most the patients (97.5%) thought surgical costs in this particular hospital were proper and even low. Pre-operation measures and scheduling were easy and appropriate, according to 92.5% of patients.
In the male group mean ROE score (of 24) before surgery was 12.95±3.05 (53%) (minimum:5 to maximum:18), and 17.0 ± 2.07 (70%) (minimum:13 to maximum:20) after surgery, and the difference was significant (p<0 values=0.15).>
Before surgery, 40% of men had a low level of appearance satisfaction, and 60% were moderately satisfied. Meanwhile, satisfaction levels increased by 25% in men with both low and moderate satisfaction levels, after septorhinoplasty, as opposed to a 75% improvement in low-satisfied and 40% in moderately- satisfied women. Before surgery level of satisfaction in the female group was 20% poor, 75% good, and in 5% excellent before septorhinoplasty, which changed to 55% moderate and 45% high 3 months after surgery. Improvement in satisfaction level was significantly better after surgery in the female group. None of the patients reported worsening satisfaction levels post-operatively.
Discussion:
Septorhinoplasty is one of the surgeries performed by oto-rhino-laryngologists and plastic surgeons frequently, but there is still no standard method of reporting outcomes. Some questionnaires are available to be reported by patients considering different perspectives of nasal function and appearance.[5] Psychosocial evaluation of patients preoperatively, counseling, and meticulous patient selection are important in achieving more realistic expectations and improved results. [3,7] Sara Sena Esteves and colleagues reported an outcome study on 107 rhinoplasty patients after 3 and 6 months of follow-up utilizing an ROE questionnaire. Although improvement in results was observed (p<0 p=0.05).>
Chavan and colleagues reported average pre-operation satisfaction of 26.8% in females and 32.2% in males. These measures were 63% and 84.3%, respectively, after surgery. [7] In contrast to this data, we didn’t notice the difference in pre-operation satisfaction level in the male group compared to the female. Additionally, there was a greater improvement in results after surgery in women (an average of 57.5%, in contrast to 25% in men). These differences reveal the variance of results in different societies strongly related to cultural and psychosocial factors in different countries, which should be regarded in pre-operation counseling.
Conclusion:
Facial appearance satisfaction and expectations may be totally different between males and females. Although the mean ROE score was lower in the male group before surgery according to the study, both groups reported significant improvement after septorhinoplasty. Also, the changes in ROE score were not statistically different between groups, which emphasizes the importance of pre-operation counseling and proper surgical techniques rather than gender differences.
Disclosure statement: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding: this research is not granted by any person or an organization
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,