AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Chat with us
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2693-4779/099
1 Topmed Medical Center, Tîrgu Mureș, Romania.
2 Resident Laboratory srl, Oradea, Romania.
*Corresponding Author: Corina Florica Ioniță, Topmed Medical Center, Tîrgu Mureș, Romania.
Citation: Corina Florica Ioniță, Adriana Gomotîrceanu, Daniela Cojocaru, Florin Costea, Ovidiu Pop. (2022) Seminal vesicle adenocarcinoma associated with Zinner Syndrome: case report and literature review. Clinical Research and Clinical Trials. 6(1); DOI:10.31579/2693-4779/099
Copyright: © 2022 Corina Florica Ioniță. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 03 May 2022 | Accepted: 18 May 2022 | Published: 25 May 2022
Keywords: zinner syndrome; seminal vesicle carcinoma
The Zinner Syndrome is a rare congenital malformation represented by a triad of characteristics: ipsilateral renal agenesis, seminal vesicle cysts and ejaculatory duct obstruction. The aim of this study is to present a 69 year old man case, with seminal vesicle adenocarcinoma developed in association with Zinner Syndrome.First off all, patient presented with severe urinary retention. Had clinical and imaging examinations: ultrasound scan, computed tomography of the chest, abdomen and pelvis, abdominal-pelvic MRI and biochemical evaluation: PSA. As a result, diagnosis of Zinner Syndrome has been established and was suspected a carcinoma of seminal vesicle. The pacient underwent robotic removal of the tumoral cyst. The postoperative evolution of the patient was uneventful. The diagnosis of seminal vesicle adenocarcinoma was confirmed by immunohistochemistry, staining negative for PSA and positive for CK7. Seminal vesicle carcinomas are particularly rare. Their occurrence in patients with Zinner Syndrome is exceptional, but should be considered in differential diagnosis of pelvic tumors.
PSVA: Primary seminal vesicle adenocarcinoma
MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging
CT: Computer tomography
PSA: Prostate specific antigen
CK: Cytokeratin
AMACR(p504s): Alpha methyacyl CoA racemase
Primary seminal vesical adenocarcinoma (PSVA) is a rare malignancy, of the male genito-urinary system which sporadically occurs, with only 60 documented cases in literature [1,2]. Because of the fact that the symptoms are not specific and because it is difficult to diagnose, most cases are discovered in extensive stage or metastatic, with prostate invasion or lung metastases, therefore the prognostic is poor [3]. Despite the fact that there are no standard guidelines, basic treatment is considered to be surgical intervention with seminal vesiculectomy. Due to the anatomical features and because many cases are late diagnosed, frequently post intervention there is residual disease which needs further adjuvant treatment. Immunohistochemistry plays an important role in differentiation of the primary tumor and documentation of the origin’s site. Adjuvant treatment consist in radiotherapy, chemotherapy or both, and in some cases anti-androgen therapies [4].
Zinner Syndrome is characterized by unilateral renal agenesis, seminal vesicle cysts and obstruction of the ejaculatory ducts, due to developmental disorders of the intrauterine life in 2-4 weeks of gestation [5]. The purpose of this study is to present a rare case of seminal vesicle adenocarcinoma associated with Zinner Syndrome.
A 69 year old man presented with constipation, unspecific pain in the lower region of the abdomen and urinary retention and was admitted in our service. He had no important medical history. Abdominal ultrasound revealed a pelvic cystic tumor of 11 cm diameter, first misdiagnosed as the bladder. A urinary catheter was inserted and urine was eliminated, but the cyst’s dimension remained the same, therefore suspicion of a pelvic tumor was raised. The digital rectal examination revealed the existence of a tumor of about 10 cm, which was coming in contact with the anterior rectal wall, without being able to specify the organ belonging, taking into consideration the intimate contact with the prostate.
In order to elucidate the diagnosis, it was decided to practice abdominal-pelvic MRI, using a GE Signa Explorer 1.5T device, 2019.
The MRI confirmed the pelvic cyst of 11 belonging to the right seminal vesicle, with a polypoid proliferation of 15 mm attached to the inner slope of the wall with a wide implantation base, without lymph node involvement or spread to the other organs, without apparent extension in or beyond the cystic wall.
It also highlighted renal unilateral right agenesis and ejaculatory right duct obstruction, so the patient had been diagnosed with Zinner Syndrome. Preoperative value of PSA was double than normal, testosterone level was normal.
On august 2021, it was performed robotic excision of the tumor cyst. The postoperative evolution was favorable, patient being discharged on the 4th postoperative day. The anathomopatological examination confirmed a seminal vesicle tumor cyst with friable papillary projections over an area of 3/3 cm on the inner wall represented by an adenocarcinoma predominant papillary architecture, focally tubular. The tumor invades the wall of the cyst focal in the area of intersection with the prostate and infiltrates the prostate stroma over short distances.
Histological examination indicated negative surgical margins, without perineural or angiolymphatic invasion, The IHC (immunohistochemically) study revealed positivity for CK7, AMACR (p504s), GATA3, and negativity for PSA, CDX-2, p63, AR and NKX3.1, that is why the diagnosis of primary seminal vesicle adenocarcinoma was confirmed.
PSA values increased slightly in the postoperative period, therefore suspicion of prostatitis was raised, which is why treatment with antibiotics and anti-inflammatory drugs was prescribed. Postoperative levels of CEA and ACE were within the normal range.
Postoperative abdominal-pelvic MRI and PET-CT (positron emission computed tomography) made at one, respectively two month from surgical intervention did not give evidence of residual disease.
Patient did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy, because there was not lymph node involvement or positive margins at the histopathological exam of the surgical specimen. Adjuvant radiotherapy was established within the multidisciplinary commission, because of the cystic volume and high risk of recurrence.
Patient performed 5 weeks of postoperative radiotherapy sessions with Elekta Infinity Device, type 2020, VMAT-SIB technique (volumetric modulated arc therapy - simultaneous integrated boost) up to 56Gray/25fractions, 2.24 Gray/fractions at tumor bed, prostate and at pelvic lymph nodes.
Treatment was well tolerated, with no side effects during the radiotherapy sequences. Patient is due follow-up appointments every 3 months in the first year and then every 6 months for another 4 years. So far the patient has show no signs of recurrence.
Adenocarcinomas of the seminal vesicles is the most common malignant primary neoplasm of the seminal vesicles. The first adenocarcinoma of the seminal vesicles was reported in literature by O. Lyons in 1925[6]. It can occurs at different ages from 19 to 90 years old [7]. There are a small number of cases of bilateral PSVA [2,8]. Uncommon neoplasm of the seminal vesicles are sarcomas, neuroendocrine carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma or yolk salk tumor.
Because there are not specific symptoms, male usually are diagnosed at advanced stages [9-12]. Most frequently the symptoms are hematuria, dysuria, haematospermia, unspecific pelvic pain. Digital rectal examination can indicate the presence of a tumor in the seminal vesicles in up to 30% of cases. CT and MRI give the best evidence of the extent of the tumor. However, there have been cases cited in the literature in which imaging examinations were inconclusive (including endorectal ultrasound), which is why the definite diagnosis is based on biopsy [13].
Based on imagistic findings, there must be a differential diagnostic between malignancies of the seminal vesicles and the prostate cancer, bladder cancer, rectal cancer. Due to the anatomical location the most difficult difference is with prostate cancer, but the PSA level is defining
It should be noted that all tumors derived from the seminal vesicles are cystic. By association, these malignant tumors can be considered cystic malignancies, so we could say that this is a case of cystadenocarcinoma, but we didn’t find literature data to support this.
Because of the cystic appearance of this tumor it was necessary to discriminate it from a benign tumor, such as cystadenoma or a cystic malignancy like cystosarcoma, but in our case these diagnostics were invalidated by histological examination [14]. The existence of intracystic proliferation in this case, observed in imaging examinations, may represent a suspicious sign of malignancy. If it is possible to demonstrate the presence of vascularization in the proliferation by CEUS for example it will be a strong argument for a malignancy.
Immunohistochemistry is very important for the histological diagnosis. Stains are usually positive for CA-125 , CK7, CEA, while PSA and CK20 should be negative.
Given the small number of cases published in the literature, there is no consensus on staging. Due to the fact that the tumor was intracystic, with extension focally in the wall of the cyst and infiltrates the prostate stroma over short distances, we can consider it a stage III.
The prognosis is poor, given the fact that most patients die within 3 years, probably due to the advanced stage in the moment of diagnosis. The most important contribution for survival is the quality of the surgical resection, which usually is difficult to perform due to the local anatomy and cystic structure [3]. It is unclear if it is necessary prophylactically to resect the draining lymph nodes, especially if they are negative on imagistic findings. Radiotherapy is often used for residual tumors or tumors with positive margins after surgery [15,16].
The role of chemotherapy is unclear. It is though recommended in patients with metastases or with residual tumor. The most frequent combination is Gemcitabine plus Cisplatinum in fit patients, followed by radiotherapy [2]. In patient with metastases, usually chemotherapy convert to a lower stage.
Anti-androgen therapy is used as an adjuvant or palliative treatment for androgen-dependent PSVA, but the results are unclear [17]. In our case, testosterone levels serum were normal, so there was no recommendation for such therapy.
The Zinner Syndrome is a rare congenital malformation, frequently associated with infertility. Surgery is the main treatment, especially on symptomatic patients [18]. The appearance of Zinner Syndrome is due to abnormalities in the development of Muller's duct in men.
Zinner Syndrome diagnosis is common in men between the 2nd and 4th decade of their life, and is usually asymptomatic until this age. Recently, the number of cases cited in the literature had increased significantly with accuracy of imaging methods [19]. Due to the fact that approximately 45% of patients with Zinner Syndrome are infertile, diagnosis is sometimes given during infertility investigations [20]. Therefore, in patients with confirmed infertility, the existence of renal agenesis or obstruction of the deferent duct requires the exclusion of the existence of Zinner Syndrome.
Frequently, seminal vesicle cysts are difficult to diagnose given surrounding anatomical structures, often being confused with ureters or diverticula of the bladder. As a therapeutic attitude, in some cases the conservatory attitude is preferred. If patients become symptomatic, surgical excision of the seminal vesicle cysts is recommended by open, classic or laparoscopic surgical approach, respectively robotic. Cases have been reported in the literature of patients who have had a puncture of these cysts, but they frequently recur [21].
The occurrence of seminal vesicle cancer in patients with Zinner Syndrome is particularly rare, with very few cases being mentioned in the literature. The most frequently cases were adenocarcinomas or squamous cell carcinomas [22]. There are also mentioned cases of patients with Zinner Syndrome who have been diagnosed with clear prostate cell carcinoma [23].
The particularity of the presented case is represented by the appearance of a seminal vesicle carcinoma in a patient with Zinner Syndrome.
The belonging of a cyst in the lower abdomen, should raise the suspicion of a seminal vesicle cyst.
Seminal vesicle adenocarcinomas are particularly rare, but must be taken into account in the diagnosis of pelvic tumors. They are an even rarer occurrence in patients with Zinner Syndrome. So when a patient is discovered with Zinner Syndrome probably he must be imagistic monitored for the detection of intracystic proliferation.
The patient agreed to publish this manuscript.
None
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
