AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2578-8949/074
Resident Dermatology (final year Postgraduate)
Senior professor and head, Department of dermatology, MDM hospital, Jodhpur, India
Senior professor and head, Department of dermatology, MDM hospital, Jodhpur, India
*Corresponding Author: Dilip kachhawa, senior professor and head, MDM bungalow no 3, Outside gate 3, MDM campus, Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur, India.
Citation: H Narasimhan, Pankaj Rao, D Kachhawa. (2021) Selection of anti-depressants in geriatric dermatoses- A questionnaire study of dermatologists in Western Rajasthan, India. Journal of Dermatology and Dermatitis. 6(1); Doi:10.31579/2578-8949/074
Copyright: © Dilip Kachhawa, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons. Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 03 May 2021 | Accepted: 14 May 2021 | Published: 17 May 2021
Keywords: geriatric dermatoses; antidepressants; polypharmacy; risk-benefit analysis
Background:
The Global Wealth Migration Review 2019 report, published by New World Wealth, estimated that 48% of India's total wealth was held by high-net worth individuals.
Distinct factors dominate the prescription of anti-depressants in the geriatric population. Accordingly, the intention of pharmacotherapy in geriatric psycho dermatoses is deciphered in the study. .
Objective: To survey and analyze the selection of anti-depressants by the dermatologists in the practice of geriatric pharmacotherapy.
Methods:
A questionnaire was designed and circulated among ninety-three dermatologists in three sessions and the data collected was analyzed through the cross-sectional study statistics.
Results:
The typical senior people attending the specialist were 25-50%. A sizeable familiarity of psycho cutaneous disturbance was attributed to dermatophyte infections, lichen simplex chronic, and Prurigo in descending order. The largely established primary disorder was neurotic excoriation. The prescription pattern was classified and 51.9% dermatologists are customary with psychotropic agent Doxepin over other agents. The discipline of the multidisciplinary approach was also studied.
Limitation: Small sample size, uniregional study, prevalence study.
Conclusions: The survey aids in evaluating mental health in cutaneous dermatoses of the elderly and assists the dermatologists to offer understated economical options and amend existing guidelines.
* Geriatric dermatoses are a mystery to the attending specialists who were surveyed to decipher the prescription of choice for individual dermatoses in daily practice in western Rajasthan, India.
* Understanding the geriatric dermatoses and newer management strategies is crucial to avoid unstructured polypharmacy and emphasizes risk: benefit analysis as needed.
* The data assists in the conformation of the existing approaches, thus refining the principles of geriatric pharmacotherapy in the skin.
Psycho-cutaneous biology is the region of dermatology that entails the intricate interactions between the skin, brain, immune system, and cutanous nerves [1]. This has expanded the responsibility of the attending specialist in sustaining the reliance of the clients. For example, a patient who cannot halt the itch-scratch cycle might lose confidence in his dermatologist, who did not foresee the coexisting psychological commotion of persistent disease.
Therefore, an expert poll was attempted in the locality of Western Rajasthan to comprehend the preference pattern of anti-psychiatric drugs in the common skin disorders of elderly The results retrieved will be extrapolated to understand the current structure of therapy.
* To understand the psychopharmacology for dermatoses of the elderly.
* To survey the preferences and alternatives of anti-psychiatric drugs by practicing Dermatologists
* To analyze the intention behind the chosen drug and to correlate with the existing policies.
The study began after ethical authorization to devise a questionnaire on anti-psychiatric agents needed in psycho-cutaneous disorders based on the existing literature. The questionnaire comprised 16 queries including the geriatric population, disease, chronicity, and preferred agent, the rationale for the options, unfavorable effects, and cure. The study group included ninety-three dermatologists working in various government colleges, private practitioners, final-year residents, and senior residents from all hospitals in Western Rajasthan. Various means were used to approach the doctors all of which were manual in a hard copy format. An appropriate elaboration was delivered before the study and written consent was obtained before participation. The study was conducted between August and September 2019.The data was collected and compiled for analysis. The results are as follows.
The all-around respondents were 90.3% (n=84), of which 3.5% did not practice psycho-pharmacotherapy.
The standard day-to-day geriatric outpatient attendance was documented to be around 25-50%. Thirty-seven percent of dermatologists claim that maximum clients used to complain about a secondary psychiatric illness and 23.5% specialists met patients with mutually dependent psychiatric and dermatologic illnesses.
The frequency prevalence of the common psycho-physiologic dermatomes experienced every day is illustrated in Figure 1, with descending frequency from dermatophyte infections (45.7% ;n=37), Lichen simplex chronicus (22.2%; n=18), Prurigo nodularis (18.5%; n=15), Urticaria (11.1%; n=9) and Psoriasis (4.9%; n=4).The primary psychiatric disorder dealt in descending commonness were neurotic excoriation (76.5%, n=62), fictitious dermatitis (14.8%; n=12), Delusional parasitosis (7.4%; n=6) and Trichitillomania (1.3%). They alleged secondary psychiatric diseases to originate from Obesity (28.4%; n=23), Androgenetic alopecia (27.2%; n=22), Acne scars (18.5%; n=15), Vitiligo (17.3%; n=14), Alopecia areata (4.9%; n=4), Keloids (2.5%; n=2) and post-burn scars (1.2%; n=1). Last, the sensory disorders acknowledged were Itching (100%; n=81), burning (63%; n=51) and both (37%; n=30).
Familiar tricyclic antidepressant among study group was Doxepin (51.9%; n=42), nominated for Psychogenic prorates (85.2%; n=69) than depression (14.8%; n=12). Aftermaths are depicted in Table 3 with sedation (85.2%) and abdominal complaints (14.8%). The non-psychotropic antidepressant was inferred as being Amitriptyline (50.6%; n=41) and indicated for secondary depression (46.9%; n=38) and their adverse effects are tabulated in table 3.
Commonest SSRI was fluoxetine (56.8%; n=46) > paroxetine (28.4%; n=23) used in secondary depression (60.5%; n=49). We divulge the conclusions on Figure 1 and 2.
Multi-disciplinary attitude: Dermatologists who preferred to suggest the client to a psychiatrist at the initial visit were 86.4% (n=70).
The proficiency of fundamental psycho-cutaneous disorders is decisive in practice. We can categorize these as,
1. Psycho-physiologic skin diseases like psoriasis, LSC, Hyperhidrosis that contributes to stigma and stress
2. Primary psychiatric disorders like Neurotic excoriations, delusions, fictitious dermatitis, Trichotillomania, etc.
3. Secondary psychiatric disorders like vitiligo, alopecia areata, obesity, androgenetic alopecia which are induced because of stress
4. Cutaneous sensory disorders like burning and crawling.
Psychopathology conditions- anxiety, depression, Obsession & compulsive disorder, Psychoses should be primarily managed by a psychiatrist and might often exclusively need dermatological assistance [4]
Standard regimens and their known adverse reactions are provided in Table 1. It illustrates the therapeutic ladders for specific conditions in Table 2 [3 4].
Geriatric dermatoses are the dermatoses of the aged (> or equal to 60 years of age). Yosipovitch et al., discriminated neuropathic itch from psychogenic itch which is defined as “an itching disorder where the itch is at the center of the symptomatology and where psychological factors show an obvious role in the provoking or persistence of the pruritus” [7, 11] from the survey, the structure of popular geriatric dermatoses and the established agents used by dermatologists of the locality of Western Rajasthan are analyzed and we decipher the outcomes. The customary size of the geriatric population witnessed existed from 25% to 50% which compels a promising awareness on the management of the elderly. Over 60.5% of old people attending the skin clinic might require an appropriate exam of mental health as described by Capoore and workers [1].
Commonest psycho-physiologic diseases of this era were Dermatophyte infections identified before Lichen simplex chronicus, Prurigo, Urticaria, and psoriasis. Patrol and panda deduced that dermatophyte infections move beyond its territory as investigators anticipate fungal infections as a menace to the psychological fitness of the patients [9]. Tinea is one of the most common infections experienced in our dermatological practice. Wine et al., in his study, remarks the necessity to appreciate the pattern of disease for realistic reasons [3]. For instance, the continual despair of everyday life in developing countries might be causal in impeding the recovery in an elderly man with tinea cruris, who labor in sweltering environments.
Park et al., ascribed a tool of analyses on geriatric depression and these patients should be referred to a psychiatrist after receiving the history, evaluating the co-morbidities, and gauging the emotional state based on subjective judgments [8]. Patient displaying insignificant, subsyndromal or atypical traits are extensively under-diagnosed in preliminary visits [10]. Hence, a satisfying “itch remedy” can mean a deep sense in practice. Now that a wholesome business has sprouted from the existing deadlock to determine the standard agent, the management with several over-the-counter products has led to abominable effects which is an emerging catastrophe.
The quest is to learn the idealistic parameters for an agent that is safe and psychotropic, but there is none. The patient’s dependability on the drugs is greater than the doctor’s. Thus, the agent should ease itch or provide faster clearance rates. Thus for empirical reasons, dermatologists imply in amending the textbook management for Dermatophyte using agents such as Doxepin as it is claimed to curtail the monetary and systemic burden of anti-fungal agents besides ameliorating the symptoms [1]
Some disorders are causal to the clients’ altered psyche such as Psoriasis and some are triggered e.g., Lichen simplex and Prurigo, which are familiar as age advances. Adding an SSRI (35.8%) or Doxepin (51.9%) is offered as a competent accessory [3]. the largely seen primary psycho-cutaneous disorders were neurotic excoriations (76.5% answers). The survey of antidepressants desirable to this section was SSRI (39.5%) and TCA (49.4%) but primary psychiatric illness should be referred to a psychiatrist who can benefit the patient. A pointer here is to treat the skin and refer. TCA like Amitriptyline was selected despite their speculative hazard of cardiotoxicity, reasoning that these agents are safe in practice and the probability for such consequences is diminutive (32.1% answers). Hence it is relatively a risk: benefit setting according to the pharmacological practice by Lee and his workers [5]. While the comparable safety of Fluoxetine is better than TCA, fluoxetine 20mg is determined all-around as an ideal agent (35.8%) only second to Doxepin [6].
Cases of fictitious dermatitis and Trichitillomania should also be suitably referred to Psychiatrist (86.4%). Stress donates to common secondary psycho-dermatoses like Obesity, Androgenetic alopecia, and Alopecia areata. The psychopharmacologic therapy documented by Gupta et al., indicates that adding an SSRI is not a profitable option for obesity as weight gain is overseen. Thus, suggesting to a psychiatrist who might start them on drugs like Bupropion sounds appropriate [6]. Adding a BZD or SSRI is an intriguing alternative for the rest of the illnesses [5, 7] The common antidepressants used as a psychotropic agent was Doxepin, while Benzodiazepine in Urticaria, Prurigo, and lichen simplex chronicus, SSRI in Psychogenic itch, and Amitriptyline in neuropathic itch were preferred. This also corresponds to literature.
Psychogenic itch is diagnosed after eliminating other factors of itching. For this, Co-morbidities and systemic causes should be evaluated after history and exam as discussed by Tactic and his colleagues [10]. This is crucial because diseases such as cutaneous T cell lymphoma in its premalignant stage can drive refractory prorates hence require an ethical evaluation. It was observed that Dermatologists (86.4%) are inclined to multidisciplinary referrals as and when necessary or sometimes mandatory i.e., while starting the drug while tapering and while withdrawal.
Small sample size, Uni-regional census, and prevalence study. This has to be expanded nationwide and transnational for farther awareness of prescription used around the globe. The study was a cross-sectional survey of current trends. This can be further experimented by providing a pre and postscholastic questionnaire to improve the prevailing trends and discern the readiness and aptitude of dermatologists.
The information on the structure of geriatric dermatoses and the selection of antidepressants/ psychotropic agents preferred by dermatologists is intensified in this study. There is no systematic review on this subject which broadens prospectively. This analysis also enhances the subsisting information in the practice of safer psychotropic agents and antidepressants. It comprehends the proper rationale for usage and insists on the importance of history taking, exam, investigation, and asking for help as the four cornerstones of Hippocratic practice. Similarly, psychiatrists’ hand in dealing with geriatric dermatoses is mandatory while following up and during withdrawal.
1. The primary outcome of the study is restricted to the patterns of disease and the preferred line of management
2. The secondary outcome measures were to find out the rationale behind the choice of agent. E.g., Doxepin had overall been mostly used along with SSRI (fluoxetine) and Amitriptyline hence are idealistic additional agents in prescription.
BDD- body dysmorphic disorder
BZD- benzodiazepines
EPS- extrapyramidal symptoms
GAD- generalized anxiety disorder
OCD – obsessive-compulsive disorder
PTSD- post-traumatic stress disorder
QT – wave in ECG
SSRI- selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors
TIA transient ischemic attack
TCA- tricyclic antidepressants
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
