Second Autologous Stem Cell Implantation in Patients with Chronic Spinal Cord Injuries.

Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/IJBR-2021/045

Second Autologous Stem Cell Implantation in Patients with Chronic Spinal Cord Injuries.

  • Alberto Benitez Herrera 1
  • Pedro Rolando López Rodríguez 2*

1Profesor Consultante, Professor Titular, Especialista en Primero y Segundo Grado en Ortopedia y Traumatología.

2Profesor Consultante  ,Profesor Auxiliary ,Especialista en Primero y Segundo Grado en Cirugía General  e Investigador Auxiliar

*Corresponding Author: Pedro Rolando López Rodríguez, Department of Legal Medicine, Toxicology and Forensic Medicine, Jordan University of Science & Technology, Jordan.

Citation: Alberto B. Herrera, Pedro R.L. Rodríguez (2022) Second Autologous Stem Cell Implantation in Patients with Chronic Spinal Cord Injuries J. International Journal of Biomed Research 2(2); DOI: 10.31579/IJBR-2021/045

Copyright: © 2022 Pedro Rolando López Rodríguez, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 27 September 2021 | Accepted: 25 October 2021 | Published: 05 January 2022

Keywords: implant ; stem cells ; regenerative medicine

Abstract

Introduction: Since the beginning of the last century, multiple investigations have been carried out in the field of Regenerative Medicine. Stem cells obtained by different routes have been implanted in different injured tissue in order to achieve its regeneration. Objective: To demonstrate the feasibility and safety of the implantation of autologous MO-CMA by subarachnoid puncture.Method: A study is carried out by implanting autologous stem cells by subarachnoid puncture in five patients who had undergone a first open implant due to a neurological lesion of traumatic etiology. January 2016 to December 2018, at the Enrique Cabrera General Teaching Hospital. Results: The second implant was completed in 5 patients and the following advantages were obtained: less surgical time, less possibility of sepsis, no blood loss, less hospital stay and fewer complications. Conclusions: The feasibility and safety of stem cell implantation by subarachnoid puncture without complications is demonstrated in this study.

Introduction

In recent years there has been an extraordinary advance in knowledge related to different biomedical branches, including cell biology. This has given a remarkable boost to a new branch of medicine called regenerative medicine, which has been considered a "New Revolution in Medicine". This medical discipline has been based primarily on new knowledge about stem cells and their ability to become cells of different tissues and whose objective is to stimulate or regenerate cells, tissues or organs in order to restore or establish normal function [1 -5]

Methods

We have carried out a descriptive observational cross-sectional study in thirty patients with a first open implant of autologous adult stem cells obtained from bone marrow (ACM-MO) in patients with chronic spinal cord injury of traumatic etiology with encouraging results.

We have recently practiced a second implant in 5 cases of stem cells by subarachnoid puncture, from January 2016 to 2018 at the Enrique Cabrera General Teaching Hospital.

Description of the technique

The patient is admitted with the corresponding investigations and approval for anesthesia, two days before the implant, stimulation with leukocin (growth factor of granulocyte colonies) begins at a rate of 5 mg / kg of weights every 12 hours until 4 doses are applied.

Stem cells are obtained from peripheral blood by the centrifugation method in the laboratory.

In the operating room in a sitting position, after washing the area with soap and water, antisepsis is performed with iodinated alcohol, field cloths are placed and the intervertebral space corresponding to the spinal cord injury is located, skin wheal is performed with lidocaine 1 % and then it infiltrates deeper planes.

Following the anterior scar and under radiographic control, a subarachnoid puncture with trocar # 22 is performed above and below the lesion, implanting 5cc stem cells in each intervertebral space, confirming the location of the space with the previous aspiration of cerebrospinal fluid. Trocar and the rest of stem cells are administered by IV route in 100cc of physiological saline for 30 minutes.

Results

Patient relationship:

Patient Diagnosis 2nd Implant Complications

E.PR Spinal cord injury T-12 6/29/2016 No

MJ.GC Spinal cord injury T11-T12 10/31/2016 No

JA.OP Spinal cord injury T10-T11 11/22/2016 No

Y.GC Spinal cord injury T8-T9 3/28/2018 No

Y.MC Spinal cord injury C5-C6 11/21/2018 No

This technique has the following advantages:

Less surgical time

Less chance of sepsis.

No blood loss.

Less hospital stay

Fewer anesthetic complications.

In all cases it has been possible to carry out the procedure without great difficulties and there have been no complications.

Discussion

Regenerative Medicine is based on the potential of stem cells to become cells of different tissues. [6-10]

Autologous adult stem cells used to treat spinal cord injury patients have several advantages.

First: Problems associated with immune rejection or graft-versus-host reactions can be avoided. [11-13]

Second: CMA-MO transplantation is considered a safe method since its association with carcinogenesis has not been reported. [14, 15]

Third: There is great experience with the use of transplantation of these cells in hematological diseases. [16]

Conclusions

The feasibility and safety of stem cell implantation by subarachnoid puncture is demonstrated. None of our cases have presented complications that could put this technique at risk.

Conflicts of interest

The authors do not declare any conflicts of interest.

Authors' contributions

Alberto Benitez Herrera: he reviewed the literature on the subject looking for epidemiological data worldwide, designed the study methodology, classified the research, processed the information and limited the bibliographic references according to Vancouver standards. He wrote the document.

Pedro Rolando López Rodríguez: he declared the objectives of the study, selected and triangulated the variables and carried out the translation into English and the final revision of the manuscript. He performed the statistical processing. He contributed to the preparation of the article.

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova