Scope of integrating Homeopathy with ‘Watchful Waiting Approach’ in the Treatment of Adenoid Hypertrophy – an Evidence-based Case Report

Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9562/051

Scope of integrating Homeopathy with ‘Watchful Waiting Approach’ in the Treatment of Adenoid Hypertrophy – an Evidence-based Case Report

  • Vinitha Edavattath Ramanan 1*
  • Sreejith M 2

1 ENT Institution: NHRIMH Kottayam, Under CCRH
2 Xiray Institution: NHRIMH Kottayam, Under CCRH

*Corresponding Author: Vinitha Edavattath Ramanan, ENT Institution: NHRIMH Kottayam, Under CCRH

Citation: Vinitha Edavattath Ramanan, Sreejith M. (2022). Scope of integrating Homeopathy with ‘Watchful Waiting Approach’ in the Treatment of Adenoid Hypertrophy – an Evidence-based Case Report Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology 4(3); DOI: 10.31579/2692-9562/051

Copyright: © 2022 Vinitha Edavattath Ramanan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 23 April 2022 | Accepted: 13 May 2022 | Published: 25 May 2022

Keywords: homeopathy; watchful waiting approach; adenoid hypertrophy

Abstract

Frequent respiratory tract infections can result in adenoid hypertrophy and secondary eustachian tube dysfunction resulting in Otitis media. Conventionally Adenoidectomy is indicated for recurrent respiratory tract infections, obstructive sleep apnea, and otitis media with effusion. It is the commonest paediatric surgery world-wide. The size of adenoids starts to reduce by eight to ten years of age. A randomized controlled study has concluded that immediate surgery had no benefits over the 'Watchful waiting approach'. There are many published studies in peer-reviewed indexed journals on the efficacy of homeopathic medicinal products in reducing recurrent respiratory tract infections in children. 

A seven-year-old female child presented with chronic nasal congestion, snoring, mouth breathing, and increased salivation at night during August 2019. The Adenoid Nasopharynx [A/N] ratio was calculated as 0.71 before starting the treatment. The obstructive symptoms started reducing within two months of initiating homeopathic treatment. The A/N ratio reduced to 0.63 after 2 years. The modified Naranjo Criteria score of +9/11 suggests a positive causal attribute between the medicine prescribed and the treatment outcome. Hence, it is suggested to explore the scope of integrating homeopathy with a watchful waiting approach for the treatment of Adenoid hypertrophy in children.

Introduction

The Waldeyer’s ring of lymphoid tissue is composed of adenoids, palatine, tubal, and lingual tonsils [1]. Adenoids are in the nasopharynx and are constantly exposed to allergens, bacteria, and viruses. They protect the body from the invading antigens [2]. Frequent infections can result in adenoid hypertrophy and secondary eustachian tube dysfunction resulting in Otitis media [3]. The common symptoms of Adenoid hypertrophy are snoring, mouth breathing, nasal discharge, hyponasal speech, and sleep apnea. Adenoidectomy is indicated for recurrent respiratory tract infections, obstructive sleep apnea, and otitis media with effusion. It is the most common pediatric surgery worldwide [2]. Airway obstruction during sleep with disruption of normal sleep pattern called sleep-disordered breathing is caused mainly by tonsillitis and adenoid hypertrophy [1]. Conventional non-surgical treatment includes intranasal steroids. Adenoids and tonsils produce immunoglobulins and help in defence mechanisms. 

Studies in literature have different views regarding the benefits and risks of adenoidectomy in children [2]. The size of adenoids starts to reduce by eight to ten years of age [2]. An open randomized controlled trial on 111 children aged 1-6 years with recurrent respiratory tract infections in eleven general hospitals and two academic centers reported 7.91 episodes of upper respiratory tract infections in the adenoidectomy group and 7.84 in the watchful waiting group. Two children developed complications after adenoidectomy. The study concluded that immediate surgery had no benefits over the 'Watchful waiting approach' [4].

There are many published studies in peer-reviewed indexed journals on the efficacy of homeopathic medicinal products in reducing recurrent respiratory tract infections in children [5,6,7,8]. The present case report highlights the usefulness of homeopathic medicines in reducing recurrent respiratory tract infections and the need to integrate them with the watchful waiting approach for adenoid hypertrophy.

Case profile

A seven-year-old female child presented with chronic nasal congestion, snoring, mouth breathing, and increased salivation at night during August 2019. She had these symptoms for a year. On examination, the nasal turbinates, posterior cervical lymph nodes, and tonsils were enlarged, and the right tonsil was congested. She used to take conventional medications with relief during the acute episodes. Since the symptoms recurred, her parents decided to take homeopathic treatment from the ENT OPD of the National Homoeopathic Research Institute in Mental Health Kerala. 

The presenting features suggested obstructive symptoms due to Adenoid Hypertrophy. A lateral view radiograph of soft tissue Nasopharynx was taken, and the Adenoid/Nasopharynx ratio [A/N] was calculated as 0.71.

Radiography technique of skull lateral view for A/N ratio calculation [9]

The procedure was explained, and consent was obtained from the parents.

Patient preparation

All radio-opaque materials were removed from the area of interest.

Positioning of the Child and cassette

The child was positioned for the lateral view of the skull. To reduce the time of exposure and radiation exposure to the child non-bucky images were taken. The child is standing or sitting with median sagittal plane parallel and inter-orbital lines perpendicular to the cassette. The shoulders were rotated slightly to allow the correct position. The mouth is closed during exposure. The beam was collimated to include the post-nasal air space, nasopharynx, oropharynx, laryngopharynx, and external occipital protuberance.

Centering of the X-ray beam

The X-ray beam is centered at the angle of the jaw.

Technical factors

Ø Exposure

· kVp- 60-65

· mAs-30

Ø FFD- 180 cm

Ø Cassette size – 10x8 Inches

Ø Grid – Absent

The landmarks, the tip of the hard palate, sphenoid basi -occipital synchondrosis, and external occipital protuberance were identified for the A/N ratio calculations.

The adenoids had an enlarged size of 19.43 mm as per the above landmarks. The A/N ratio revealed an obstruction of 71% which accounted for the obstructive symptoms.

Homoeopathic Treatment, Follow-Up, And Outcome
Case taking was done in detail, emphasizing the general symptoms of the child apart from common symptoms due to hypertrophied adenoids. Considering the symptom totality and constitution of the child, homeopathic medicine Phosphorus 200C was administered at an interval of one month for ten months.
The child reported relief from the obstructive symptoms after initiating homeopathic medications. The recurrent respiratory tract infections were also relieved. So the parents discontinued the treatment. There were no respiratory infections or obstructive symptoms for about a year after discontinuing treatment. By the end of 2021, the child again started developing respiratory infections. The obstructive symptoms also reappeared, although in less severity when compared to the previous episodes. The medicine Phosphorus was started and repeated at fixed intervals with relief for the symptoms.

Results

The size of enlarged Adenoids and tonsils reduced after Homeopathic treatment. The obstructive symptoms started reducing within two months. The A/N ratio reduced to 0.63 after 2 years of initiating homeopathic treatment during March 2022. [Table 1, Figure 1]

Table 1: Radiology report before and after treatment
Figure 1: Baseline X-ray Follow up X-ray

Discussion

Recurrent episodes of respiratory tract infections are frequently associated with hypertrophied adenoids in children and increased risk of Asthma in children in school-going children [1]. In 2000, 1.9 million children died from acute respiratory infection worldwide. 70% of them were from Africa and Southeast Asia [2].

Conventionally Adenoidectomy is indicated in children for recurrent respiratory infections, otitis media, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, adenoid hypertrophy, and orofacial growth disturbance [2,12].

The present case report explores the scope of homeopathy as an alternative to adenoidectomy.

In an observational study of 30 children with Recurrent Upper Respiratory Tract Infections, homeopathic individualized medicines proved effective in reducing the recurrence of infections [5].

In a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open clinical trial on 200 children, complex homeopathic products reduced the rate of Upper Respiratory tract infections and the use of antibiotics [6].

The results of homeopathic treatment for recurrent Upper respiratory tract infections were favorable, with a faster resolution, reduction in antibiotics usage, and possible long-term benefits [7].

A pragmatic randomized controlled parallel-group clinical trial comparing individualized homeopathic care and waiting-list control revealed a clinically relevant effect of individualized homeopathic care in the prevention of Upper respiratory tract infection in children [8].

The above studies indicate the scope of homeopathy in reducing the rate of upper respiratory tract infections in children. In the present case report, there is a clinically meaningful reduction in the rate of respiratory tract infection with a reduction in the size of the hypertrophied adenoids with the homeopathic medicine Phosphorus 200C.

The medicine Phosphorus was proved and introduced into homeopathic medical Literature by Dr. Samuel Hahnemann. Phosphorus is indicated for respiratory tract infections based on the symptom similarity. The 200C potency possesses 1/10200 part of the original drug substance.[13] The modified Naranjo Criteria score of +9/11 suggests a positive causal attribute between the medicine prescribed and the treatment outcome [14]. [Table 2]

Table 2: MONARCH Inventory (Maximum possible score per case is 13) [14]

The usefulness of homeopathic medicines in reducing recurrent respiratory tract infections in children is already proven clinically and published in peer-reviewed journals. Recurrent respiratory infections are one of the essential criteria for adenoidectomy in children. Hence it is suggested to explore the scope of integrating homeopathy with a watchful waiting approach for the treatment of Adenoid hypertrophy in children

Conclusion

The child had a clinically meaningful reduction in the rate of respiratory tract infections and the obstructive symptoms due to hypertrophied adenoid after homeopathic treatment.

Acknowledgments

We express our sincere gratitude to Asst. Director NHRIMH Kottayam, Dr. K. C. Muraleedharan, for providing the Institutional support. We thank Prof. Dr. K. Sudheer, MD, FRCR, Consultant Radiologist, for evaluating the x-ray films before and after treatment. We also thank the parents for their consent to publish the treatment result.

References

Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.

img

Virginia E. Koenig

Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.

img

Delcio G Silva Junior

Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.

img

Ziemlé Clément Méda

Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Mina Sherif Soliman Georgy

We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.

img

Layla Shojaie

The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.

img

Sing-yung Wu

Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.

img

Orlando Villarreal

Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.

img

Katarzyna Byczkowska

Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.

img

Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo

Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.

img

Pedro Marques Gomes

Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.

img

Bernard Terkimbi Utoo

This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.

img

Prof Sherif W Mansour

Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.

img

Hao Jiang

As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.

img

Raed Mualem

International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.

img

Andreas Filippaios

Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.

img

Dr Suramya Dhamija

Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.

img

Bruno Chauffert

I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!

img

Baheci Selen

"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".

img

Jesus Simal-Gandara

I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.

img

Douglas Miyazaki

We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.

img

Dr Griffith

I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.

img

Dr Tong Ming Liu

I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.

img

Husain Taha Radhi

I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.

img

S Munshi

Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.

img

Tania Munoz

“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.

img

George Varvatsoulias