case report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1897/234
1303, Laxmi Durga Housing Society, Krushna Nagar, 90 ft road, opp to PNB bank, Mumbai 400072.
2Institute: Department of General Surgery, Maharashtra Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (MPGIMER) and District Civil Hospital, Nashik.
*Corresponding Author: Shweta Nalawade, 303, Laxmi Durga Housing Society, Krushna Nagar, 90 ft road, opp to PNB bank, Mumbai 400072.
Citation: Shweta Nalawade, Mohammed Asad, Ganesh Chaudhari, (2025), Schwannoma of Accessory Nerve – A Differential of Neck Swellings, J, Surgical Case Reports and Images, 8(4); DOI:10.31579/2690-1897/234
Copyright: © 2025, Shweta Nalawade. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 12 March 2025 | Accepted: 31 March 2025 | Published: 14 April 2025
Keywords: sleep disorders; restlessness; sleep interruption of activity; type of encephalitis; circadian rhythm; restive poles disease; polysomnography; cognitive-behavior therapy; CPAP; sleep well-being
Introduction: Intracranial schwannomas comprise approximately 8% of primary intracranial tumours, and more than 90% of intracranial schwannomas originate from vestibular nerves. Schwannomas originating from non-vestibular cranial nerves are very rare, particularly arising from accessory nerve. Accessory nerve schwannomas constitute only 6.66% of all non-vestibular intracranial schwannomas. The most recent substantial review of literature reports only 44 total cases of accessory nerve schwannoma.
Case Report: We report a rare case of right accessory nerve schwannoma in a young male (genetic predisposition-unknown), not associated with neural deficit, presented with visible neck swelling and discomfort, assessed clinically and evaluated by CT scan, managed by surgical resection without residual weakness of muscle, diagnosis confirmed by histopathological examination.
Discussion: Schwannomas, arising from accessory nerve, are relatively uncommon, and only a few of cases have been reported so far. Patients with accessory nerve schwannoma locating in extracranial site present with a gradually increasing neck mass that draw less attention. It is challenging for surgeons on how to evaluate extracranial/cervical spinal accessory nerve schwannomas by radiography. However, it is insensitive to make a definite diagnosis for schwannoma, and to identify the nerve origins of tumours. Enhanced CT scans can help us to diagnose schwannomas.
Conclusion: Though a rare diagnosis, peripheral nerve Schwannoma should be included in differential diagnosis of neck swellings having ruled out other conditions, easily evaluated by CT/MRI and successfully managed by surgical resection.
Intracranial schwannomas comprise approximately 8% of primary intracranial tumours, and more than 90% of intracranial schwannomas originate from vestibular nerves[1]. Schwannomas originating from non vestibular cranial nerves are very rare[2], particularly arising from accessory nerve[3]. Accessory nerve schwannomas constitute only 6.66% of all non-vestibular intracranial schwannomas[2]. The most recent substantial review of literature reports only 44 total cases of accessory nerve schwannoma[4].
A 27year/male, ECOG-0, cigarette smoker and occasional alcohol drinker, BMI 22.03kg/m2, having no significant family history, resident of Nashik, presented to General Surgery OPD with chief complaint of visible swelling on right side of neck since past 18 months associated with discomfort, starting smaller in size when noticed and gradually increased to present size of 4X4 cms not having any signs of inflammation and having no constitutional symptoms of tuberculosis or malignancy. Having skin tattoo over the same site can be a mere coincidence as it was done much earlier. On clinical examination the swelling was a single, limited to right carotid triangle in retro muscular (Right SCM) plane, 4X4 cms, globular, well defined margins and regular surface, tense cystic consistency, transmitted pulsations present without expansile pulsations, non tender, non mobile in vertical and having limited mobility in horizontal planes. Both sides trapezius and SCM were equal in tone and power. Patient evaluated by preliminary investigation like Ultrasound and FNA Cytology suggestive of Spindle Cell Tumour having isoechoic picture, situated in upper part of right side of neck posterior to right SCM medial to internal jugular vein and lateral to right carotid arteries. Findings were consistent on CT scan neck with isodense 4X4cms mass in right upper neck having hypo-dense areas (of necrosis) related to internal jugular vein and carotid arteries as described. Though MRI is advisable in supra- hyoid swellings[5], CT was done due to financial constraint. Surgical resection was done uneventfully under General Anaesthesia without postoperative right trapezius and right SCM muscle weakness or vocal paralysis. Diagnosis of schwannoma was confirmed on Histopathological examination described as a well circumscribed tumour with compact hyper cellular (Antoni A) and myxoid hypo cellular (Antoni B). The hyper cellular show nuclear palisading around fibrillary processes (Verocay bodies). The hypo cellular areas are myxoid and show thick walled blood vessels. Cells are elongated, narrow, wavy, with tapered edges. Tumour cells have ill defined cytoplasm and wavy nuclei. There are few collagen fibres and thick walled blood vessels. No atypia/malignancy in the material studied. Immuno-histo-chemical analysis for positivity for S-100 [6] was not done due to unavailability at our hospital and financial constraint.

Figure 1: Clinical picture.


Figure 2: CT images depicting the mass with hypodense areas.


Figure 3: Histopathology images showing Antoni A and Antoni B pattern with Verocay bodies.

Figure 4: Intraoperative image showing Schwanomma (pointed by the finger) over Accessory nerve (structure over the probe)
A schwannoma is a relatively slow growing tumour of the nerve sheath, which is composed of the schwann cells, which normally produce the insulating myelin sheath which covers the peripheral nerves. They are homogenous tumours and they always stay on the outside of the nerve and may push the nerve aside or against the bony structure7. The schwannomas which occur in the head and neck region mostly originate from the vagus nerve or from the sympathetic nervous system8. Schwannomas, arising from accessory nerve, are relatively uncommon, and only a few of cases during operation have been reported so far. The accessory nerve consists of a cisternal,a foramen jugular, and an extracranial section. Tumors can grow from anywhere along the path of this nerve. It is challenging for surgeons how to evaluate extracranial/cervical spinal accessory nerve schwannomas by radiography[9]. However, it is insensitive to make a definite diagnosis for schwannoma, and to identify the nerve origins of tumors[10]. Enhanced CT (ECT)scans can help us to diagnose of schwannomas[11].
The diagnosis of schwannoma is confirmed by combining clinical suspicious, observation in surgery and pathologic evaluation. Accessory nerve schwannomas are histologically classified as two distinct alternating structure types, named as Antoni A and Antoni B. Antoni A tissue is characterized by compactly arrayed spindle cells, which have long oval nuclei with their long axes being parallel to each other. Antoni B tissue consists of spindle cells arranged by a loose way without forming a distinct pattern. Although an entire tumor may be composed of either type of tissue, both types are more commonly intermixed[12]. S-100 protein, a neural create marker antigen, is specific as a marker of schwannomas, broadly used as immunohistochemical marker[13]. A gross total resection remains the treatment of choice for these tumours, because they are radio resistant[14]. The other treatment option is sterotactic radiosurgery (SRS). SRS is gaining popularity, but it depends on many factors, which include the size and the location of the Schwanoma and the age of the patient. Whenever it is possible, SRS should be avoided in young patients[15].
Though a rare diagnosis, peripheral nerve Schwannoma should be included in differential diagnosis of neck swellings have ruled out other conditions, easily evaluated by CT/MRI and successfully managed by surgical resection
None
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,