AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9562/091
Professor of Otorhinolaryngology, Omar Almoukhtar University, ELbyda, Libya.
*Corresponding Author: Khalid Mohamed Bofares, Professor of Otorhinolaryngology, Omar Almoukhtar University, ELbyda, Libya.
Citation: Khalid Mohamed Bofares (2023), Role of Postoperative Intravenous Administration of Dexamethasone on Outcomes of Tonsillectomy Procedure: as Comparative Prospective Audit, J Clinical Otorhinolaryngology, 5(5); DOI:10.31579/2692-9562/091
Copyright: © 2023, Khalid Mohamed Bofares. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
Received: 28 April 2023 | Accepted: 19 June 2023 | Published: 28 June 2023
Keywords: post- tonsillectomy dexamethasone administration; post-tonsillectomy antinociception; post-tonsillectomy analgesia; post- tonsillectomy complications
Back ground and aims:
Tonsillectomy is considered as the most common surgical procedure in specialty of otorhinolaryngology. Therefore, there are frequent thoughts regarding this procedure to improve its conditions from different aspects, indications, time of surgery, techniques, safety measures, and postoperative care. One of big issues regarding this procedure is the post-operative sequel and complications namely post-operative pain, hemorrhage, nausea and vomiting, dehydration, metabolic as well as nutritional deficiencies, and air way obstruction. Therefore, this study was conducted prospectively to confirm the effect of intravenous administration of dexamethasone on outcomes of this procedure as compared to the effect of rectal administration of indomethacin as well as oral administration of paracetamol after tonsillectomy in children.
Patients and methods:
One-thousand, five-hundred, sixty-four (1564) cases of patients aged from 8 months to 85 years presented at ENT department- ALTAWRA central teaching hospital, and ALTRAHOM private clinic – ELByeda – Libya as well as ALNGAH private clinic –DARNA- Libya, at period from September 2005 to September 2022. The patients presented as cases of chronic tonsillitis (with or without adenoid enlargement among childhood patients), with different varieties of surgical indications for tonsillectomy. These indications were snoring and apnea attacks, persistent secretory otitis media, frequent attacks of acute suppurative otitis media, failure to thrive among children, repetitive attacks of chest infection, mal-occlusive dental deformity, recurrent attacks of acute tonsillitis (according to Paradise's criteria), and unilateral enlarged tonsils with high suspicious of neoplastic changes for tonsillectomy-biopsy. The patients were divided into two groups, group-A including seven-hundred, eighty-two patients, and remaining half of patients was representing the group-B. The patients among group-A were administrated with intravenous dexamethasone, while the other group receiving just paracetamol. As prospective analytic study, two groups compared in relation to significant postoperative complications risk, which were in form of post-tonsillectomy pain, bleeding, nausea and vomiting, respiratory distress, dehydration, post-adeno-tonsillectomy negative pressure pulmonary edema, and metabolic as well as nutritional deficiencies. In addition, these groups compared for any significant difference regarding the period of postoperative hospitalization, which can be used as objective indicator to measure the postoperative morbidity rate.
Results:
Dexamethasone administration caused significant improvement in pain intensity and thus improving the postoperative oral intake as compared to paracetamol group. From the other view, there was significant reduction in the incidence of post-tonsillectomy upper air way obstruction, nausea and vomiting, dehydration, bleeding, and metabolic as well as nutritional deficiencies among group-A as compared to group-B.
Conclusion:
Dexamethasone can be considered as potent analgesic drug after tonsillectomy procedure and in same time, it plays significant rule in the improvement of outcomes of this common procedure as compared to the other commonly used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
Tonsillectomy procedure (with or without adenoidectomy) is the most common surgical procedure in the specialty of otorhinolaryngology[1,2]. Post-operative pain is a significant problem that continues to be untreated in the pediatric population. Post-adenotonsillectomy pain can be in the form of sore throat, odynophagia, otalgia or trismus [1-3,5]. The presence of post- tonsillectomy pain especially in the form of sore throat, or severe odynophagia may restrict swallowing and lead to severe dehydration and weight loss [1-3,5]. Thus post-tonsillectomy pain can be considered as the most significant contributing factor for other post- tonsillectomy complications namely bleeding, air way obstruction, dehydration, metabolic as well as nutritional deficiencies therefore by proper control of post-operative pain, the other complications incidence will be reduced [1-4,5]. For this reason there is continuous research for potent anti-nociceptive agent to be used post-operatively after tonsillectomy procedure. Although many studies have been carried out to evaluate the effect of diclofenac sodium as well as paracetamol and indomethacin on post-tonsillectomy pain [1,3,5,7], it was felt at the time of initiating this study that there is a lack of data and information regarding the effectiveness of intravenous administration of dexamethasone after tonsillectomy. The specific aims of the study were (a): To assess the analgesic efficacy of dexamethasone on post-tonsillectomy pain and oral intake. (b): To compare the analgesic efficacy of dexamethasone with that of indomethacin and paracetamol as most common analgesic drugs used after adeno-tonsillectomy. (c): To postulate the effect of intravenous administration of dexamethasone on outcomes of tonsillectomy procedure as compared to indomethacin and paracetamol.
Patients and Methods
One-thousand, five-hundred, sixty-four (1564) cases of patients aged from 8 months to 85 years presented at ENT department- ALTAWRA central teaching hospital, and ALTRAHOM private clinic – ELByeda – Libya as well as ALNGAH private clinic –DARNA- Libya, at period from September 2005 to September 2022. The patients presented as cases of chronic tonsillitis (with or without adenoid enlargement among childhood patients), with different varieties of surgical indications for tonsillectomy. These indications were snoring and apnea attacks, persistent secretory otitis media, frequent attacks of acute suppurative otitis media, failure to thrive among children, repetitive attacks of chest infection, mal-occlusive dental deformity, recurrent attacks of acute tonsillitis (according to Paradise's criteria), and unilateral enlarged tonsils with high suspicious of neoplastic changes for tonsillectomy-biopsy. Patients with renal disease, gastrointestinal disease, chronic pain states or daily intake of NSAID were excluded. Informed consent was obtained from the patients as well as patients' relatives for participation at the study. All patients were admitted one day prior to surgery after normal routine investigations. The patients were divided into two groups, group-A including seven-hundred, eighty-two patients, and remaining half of patients was representing the group-B. The patients among group-A were administrated with intravenous dexamethasone, while the other group receiving just paracetamol. In accordance, by simple random sampling, each group contains variety of ages from selected age spectrum. Group-A patients were administrated by intravenous dexamethasone (4mg-8mg\ dose) as three doses first dose was administrated intra-operatively. Group-B patients were received oral paracetamol (10-15 mg/kg) in four divided doses first dose after two hours from surgery. Inhalation anesthesia with was used and supplemented with intravenous Fentanyl 200-400mg, and intubation either performed by oral endotracheal or naso-tracheal tube insertion.
Adenoidectomy was carried out by curette, while tonsillectomy by simple dissection method. Homeostasis was secured by Bipolar Electrocautery, ligation or by pack pressure. All patients underwent extubation in the operative room then transferred to the recovery station, vital signs were assessed and after appropriate care in recovery room, the patients were transferred to the in- patient ward. During this period, any instances of crying, vomiting or agitation were recorded. The patients were assessed 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours after surgery to see whether they required pain medication. The pain was assessed subjectively using visual analog scale (VAS) by looking to facial expression of the patient during swallowing process. Time of first oral intake and quantity was recorded; temperature, nausea and vomiting were also recorded. Although there were some cases attained some degree of improvement in pain after administration of analgesic drug, they were considered as having pain, while those who improved completely were considered as having no pain. As prospective analytic study, two groups compared in relation to significant postoperative complications risk namely post-tonsillectomy pain, bleeding, nausea and vomiting, respiratory distress evidences, dehydration, post-adeno-tonsillectomy negative pressure pulmonary edema, and metabolic as well as nutritional deficiencies. In addition, these groups compared for any significant difference regarding the period of postoperative hospitalization, which can be used as objective indicator to measure the postoperative morbidity rate.
Data were presented by using descriptive analysis as means ± standard error of mean (s.e.m) and percentages. Test of significance was measured; using chi-square test and two-way analysis of variance ~.A probability less than 0.05 was considered as significant, the degree of significance was determined by using level of standard deviation test. Student — t — test was used for dependent sample, as well as contingency coefficient was calculated as measurement of association between studied variables.
As can be illustrated at figure-1, the results presented significant reduction in post tonsillectomy throat pain and otalgia after administration of dexamethasone in comparison to paracetamol (P<0>
In fact there was no any significant difference between two groups regarding the occurrence of post-tonsillectomy airway obstruction (P>0.5) i.e. there was no any post- operative air way obstruction cases recorded by this presented study. By same manner, there was no any significant difference between two groups regarding the appearance of post-tonsillectomy metabolic or nutritional deficiencies (P>0.5). In addition, there was no any significant difference between two groups in relation to post-operative hospitalization time, all patients among two groups were discharged from the hospital after 12 hours maximum from time of the surgery performance (P>0.5).
Figure-1: the illustration of the significant difference (P<0>
Figure-2: the illustration of the significant difference (P<0>
Adeno-tonsillectomy and tonsillectomy procedures are considered as the most common surgical procedures in the specialty of (ENT). Post-operative pain is a significant problem that continues to be untreated in the pediatric population, which leads to the inability to tolerate oral intake and unplanned hospitalization [1,2,3-5].
Prostaglandins contribute to pain and inflammation after tissue injury and the anti-nociceptive action of Non Steroidal Anti Inflammatory Drugs is attributed usually to the peripheral inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis [1-7].
It has been demonstrated that the administration of diclofenac sodium decreases postoperative pain results in a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting, and increases oral intake as compared to paracetamol[3,5-7]. In the same study, it has been shown that by the administration of diclofenac sodium still there is risk of post tonsillectomy complications. Whereas among 80 children; there were one child developed reactionary hemorrhage and one child developed secondary hemorrhage, this is most probably due to platelets dysfunction which may be caused by the administration of diclofenac sodium [3,5,7,8].
On the other hand; it was found that indomethacin given (1-3mg/kg) in three divided doses after tonsillectomy reduces pain, increases liquid intake in the first 24 hours and resulted in earlier discharge from hospital. Although indomethacin was given earlier with less frequency, but still it is showing more potent analgesic effect as compared to paracetamol. This can be explained by longer duration of action of indomethacin as compared to paracetamol [1]
In addition, it was found that the intra-operative as well as postoperative intravenous administration of dexamethasone would help in the maintenance of airway as patent as much as possible due to the potent anti-inflammatory action of this agent. In same manner the systemic administration of dexamethasone was approved to relief the post-tonsillectomy throat pain thus, it helps in the recovery of normal swallowing mechanism as soon as possible, and due to platelets aggregation stimulating effect of dexamethasone, its systemic administration was found to reduce the risk of post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage [9-14]. The protocol of dexamethasone administration which applied in this presenting study was 4-8 mg administered intravenously at time of anesthesia induction then followed by 4-8 mg administered intravenously every eight hours postoperatively for first 24 hours and after that the child will continue with oral administration of dexamethasone as 1 mg \ kg \ day for 7-14 days accordingly [9-14]
Although there were multiple factors which usually affect severity of pain and tolerance of the patients to pain intensity, one of them is the age factor. The adult patients can tolerate pain more than children. Other factor is the technique for bleeding control, the use of bipolar electrocautery and ligation technique create more painful situation as compared to pack pressure technique [2-8]. However, the effects of these factors on the results of the study were overcame by random selection of the patients participated in each group. Moreover, each group was including all age varieties in the presenting study. In addition, the random distribution of patients in each group was made regarding the technique which was used intra-operatively for control of bleeding.
On the other hand, the vomiting tendency can be correlated with the pain intensity, that the pain severity is directly proportionate to the induction of vomiting tendency [4,6-9]. This can be explained by the relationship between the pain and vasovagal attack i.e. the pain is an important inducing factor of vasovagal attack, thus the stimulation of vasovagal attack will induce vomiting [4,6-9]. This may explain the significant reduction of vomiting tendency after administration of dexamethasone as compared to paracetamol.
Dexamethasone can be considered as potent analgesic drug after tonsillectomy procedure and in same time, it plays significant rule in the improvement of outcomes of this common procedure as compared to the other commonly used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. However, the tonsillectomy is a commonest procedure in ENT specialty that creates the interest of the all levels of ENT surgeons, including juniors as well as seniors, thus continuous research activities are recommended to resolve all the issues and problems, which can be associated with this common procedure.
Ethical approval: the administrator of ALTAWRA central teaching hospital- ELByeda- Libya approved the research ethically.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
