AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Chat with us
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2641-0419/035
1 Faculty of Medicine, Tetovo Republic of North Macedonia.
2 Department of Internal Medicine Faculty of Medicine, Tetovo Republic of North Macedonia.
3 Department of Cardiology Faculty of Medicine"Ss Kiril and Metodij" University Skopje Republic of North Macedonia
4 Department of Cardiology Faculty of Medicine M. Teresa Tirana Republic of Albania.
6 Department of Cardiology Medical Center Dures Republic of Albania.
8 Private Health Institute of family medicine "Florenc "Tetovo Republic of North Macedonija.
10 Private Health Institute”Rostusha”Debar Republic of North Macedonia.
11 Faculty of Medicine, Tetovo Republic of North Macedonia.
*Corresponding Author: Ylber Jani, Faculty of Medicine,Tetovo Republic of North Macedonia.
Citation: ani Y., Rexhepi A., Pocesta B., Kamberi A., Ferati F., et al. (2020) Role of inflammation on the control of the arterial hypertension among patients with metabolic syndrome. J. Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, 3(3); Doi:10.31579/2641-0419/035
Copyright: © 2020 Ylber Jani, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 21 January 2021 | Accepted: 03 February 2021 | Published: 07 February 2021
Keywords: C-reactive protein; control of BP in patient with Metabolic Syndrome.
BACKGROUND: It is widely accepted that hypertension is a pro-inflammatory disease and that the immune system plays a vital role in mediating hypertensive outcomes, end organ damages . and modulation of hypertensive pathology [2]. Patient with MetS usually present increased levels of C-reaktive protein (CRP) wich is a prototypic marker of inflammation [5], however the data of the influence of incresed levels of CRP on the control of the aterial hypertension in patients with MetS, are scarce.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the incresed CRP levels influence on the control of the aterial hypertension in patients with MetS.
METHODS: We conducted a multicenter observational cross-sectional study. The study population recruited from a coule of outpatient clinic between june 2018 and june 2019. The population study consisted of 420 patients with MetS aged ≥ 18 years, divided in two groups:211 with level of CRP>3mg/l , and 209 participans with CRP level <3mg/l.
RESULTS: Among those with CRP level > 3mg/l(N=211) controlled BP according to evidence and current guidelines, was achieved in 23.6% of participans, whereas among those with CRP level <3mg/l(N=209) controlled BP was achived in 48.3%; p=0.000). There was independent association of CRP levels >3mg/l with uncontrolled BP (OR=3.1, 95%CI 2.06 - 4.75). There were signifiacant association of uncontrolled BP with: uncontrolled glycemia (OR =1.4,95%CI 0.97-1.84); increased BMI (OR=4.4; 95%CI 3.02-4.05) and five risk factors for MetS.(OR=2.3, 95%CI 1.93-2.81).
CONCLUSIONS: We think,we brought some good evidence,in our present study ,that patients with MetS and higher CRP level have a higher prevalence of unconrolled BP.
We conducted a multicenter observational cross-sectional study. The study population was recruited from our outpatient clinic between juni 2018 and juni 2019. Subjects who fulfilled the criteria for MetS according to the results of recent laboratory tests were prospectively evaluated.
The population consisted of 420 patients with MetS aged ≥ 18 years, divided in two groups: 211 participans (100 females and 111 males) with level of CRP>3mg/l, and 209 participans (104 females and 105 males) with level of CRP<3mg/l).
All participants underwent a comprehensive medical history and physical examination. Resting ECG, anthropometrics, measuring of blood pressure according to standard protocol (obtained after 10 min of rest in the sitting position, expressed as the average of 3 consecutive measurements), the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure recording during the study period, were calculated. Hypertension was defined be current ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension as office systolic blood pressure (SBP) values ≥140 mmHg, and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) values ≥90 mmHg and/or current anti-hypertensive therapy [6]. Uncontroled BP, was defined defined be current ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension [5]. The blood pressure was considered to be controlled if the calculated mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure recording during the study period was found to be less than 140/90mmHg. Among adults younger than 60 years and less than 150/90mmHg.in general population aged ≥60 years. Diabetes mellitus was defined as a fasting serum glucose level ≥126 mg/dL and/ or current medical therapy with an oral hypoglycemic agent and/or insulin6.Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by the square of the height (m2).Weight was measured with weight balance scales, and height with stadiometer. Waist circumferenceWCi, was reported in cm.
An overnight fasting blood sample, was drawn from each patient to determine: blood glucose, lipid profile tests total serum cholesterol (TC), serum High density lipoproteins cholesterol (HDL-C), serum triglycerides (TG).The sample analysis was performed using standard biochemical analytical methods. Plasma CRP levels was measured using latex particle-enhanced immunoassay with the mephelometry (Roche Swiss). Consistent with recommendations from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention[7] (a CRP cutpoint of 3.0mg/L), was used to differentiate high-risk and low-risk group.
Exclusion criteria, included a diagnosis of dementia senilis, secondary hypertension, serum creatinine level >2mg/dl, age under 18 years and over 79 years.
MetS was defined according to the harmonized definition of the International Diabetes Federation and other organizations [8], that three or more out of five following criteria are considered as MetS: (1) central adiposity {Waist circumference (WCi)} >102 cm in men and >88cm in women [9]); (2) serum HDL-C < 50 mg/dL in women or < 40 mg/dL in men; (3) serum triglyceride levels > 150 mg/dL; (4) SBP ≥ 140mmHg or DBP ≥ 90mmHg or use of antihypertensive drugs;(5) the presence of diabetes mellitus(DM) or use of anti-diabetic drugs. A standardized case report form was used to collect data from medical record and was send to the central data management unit.
The study is in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All patient that participated in this study were written informed, consent was obtained from all participating patients before they were enrolled into the study.
Results are expressed as mean and ±SD, or as percentage. A simple descriptive analysis was performed for the general characterization of the sample and distribution of variables. The distribution of variables was tested for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and the heterogeneity of variances was evaluated by Levene's test. To compare baseline characteristics and echocardiographic findings between groups, we used Student,s unpaired t test for continuous data, Mann-Whithey U -test for continuous data with abnormal distribution, and X2-test for categorical data. The association between variables were analyzed using logistic regression. Odds ration (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated by logistic regression. A, p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant for a confidence interval of 95%.Data were coded, entered and analysed using SPSS software package (SPSS 19.0).
A total of 420 subjects with MetS enrolled in our study, stratified in two groups:209 participans (47.5% females and 50.2% males) with level of CRP < 3mg/l, and 211 participans (47% females and 53% males) with level of CRP > 3mg/l, completed the survey and had data for 1-year medical record review. A mean of 3.4 BP recordings were obtained for each participans.
Baseline demographic, anthropometric and laboratory, characteristics by group are displayed in (Table 1)
Values are mean ± SD;y=year; BMI:body mass index;SBP:systolic blood presure;DBP:diastolic blod presure;T2DM(p: presence of diabetes mellitus type 2;serumHDL-C(p)-high.density cholestero ppresence;serum Triglicerides;hs-CRP: C-reative protein;WCi:presence of increased weist circumference;BPH-presemnce od artrial hypertension;glic:glicemia controll;
No significant differences in: age, gender. Diastolic BP, were observed between groups. Participans with level of CRP >3mg/l had significantly higher means: SBP (140.7 ±14.5 vs. 132.3±18.5 p= 0.000), BMI( 31.1 ±4.7 vs. 25.6±4.2 p=0. 000), WCi (102.3 ±3.8 vs. 95.8 ±7.8 p=0.00); uncontrolled glycemia(6.8±0.6 vs. 6.4±0.8 p=0.003) and number of risk factors for MetS {frequency of presence five risk factor for MetS was higher among participans with level of CRP > 3mg/l (18 % vs. 6.7%; p= 0.000)}.
(Table 2), presens the frequency of controlled BP in participans with MetS and different level of CRP. Among those with level of CRP > 3mg/l (N=211) controlled BP according to evidence and current guidelines, was achieved in 23.6% of participans,whereas among those with level of CRP< 3mg/l(N=209) controlled BP was achived in 48.3%; p=0.000).The diference was found to be statistically significant.
Table 2. Frequency of controlled BP among patients with MetS stratified by CRP levels (No.420).
Over all frequency of controlled BP (in all participans enrolled in present study), was 38%.
In a logistic regression (Table. 3), there was independent association of CRP levels >3mg/l with uncontrolled BP (OR=3.1, 95%CI 2.06 - 4.75). There were signi-fiacant association of uncontrolled BP with: uncontrolled glycemia (OR =1.4,95%CI 0.97-1.84); increased BMI (OR=4.4; 95%CI 3.02-4.05) and five risk factors for MetS. (OR=2.3, 95%CI 1.93-2.81).
Table 3. Logistic Rgresion Model: Association of uncontrolled BP with: CRP levels (>3.0mg/L), uncontrolled glycemia, increased BMI and five risk factor for MetS.
BP:blood presure;MetS-RF n.5-:five risk factors for MetS;DM:Diabetes Mellitus and BMI:Body mass index. OR* >1.
In this study we found that patients with MetS and higher levels of CRP had significantly higher prevalence of uncontrolled BP than did those with MetS and lower levels of CRP. Results that confirmed our hypothesis. Low-grade inflammation is now a recognized hallmark of hypertension, and ther is an expanding literature regarding the role of inflammation and inflammatory cells in hypertension, in particular T lynphocites are now thought to have a central role in the development of hypertension and related organ injury [10] Based on the cenral role played by the cytokine milieu in determining lymphocyte differentiation and activation, differences of cytokines levels likely contribute to observed difference on the prevalence of uncontrolled BP in present study, and will impact the overall physiological outcome of an inflammatory response. The CoLaus Study reported that serum CRP, interleukin-6 and THF-α levels were positively associated with BP [11,12] Also, Grundy SM et all, suggests a significant association among inflammation, hypertension, and the metabolic syndrome[13]. Nevertheless, despite an association between high CRP levels and hypertension, a causal relationship has not been demonstrated. In fact, Smith et al.used a Mendelian randomization approach to examine a possible causal relationship analyzing the association of the 1059G/C polymorphism in the human CRP gene with hypertension, the work failed to confirm a causal relationship between CRP and blood pressure [14].
In our study, BP was controlled at 38% patient only. This result is consistent with previous findings that patients with hypertension and MS have an elevated prevalence of uncontrolled BP [15,16]. The study results allow evaluating the effetivity of hypertension treatment as for drug choise, decrease of sBP and dBP associated with a certain drug, a drug combination, and therapeutic inertia in these patients.
We also found that BP control was worse among patients with MetS and higher CRP levels in the presence of more MetS risk factors. It appears that there is an interaction between hypertension and metabolic disorder factors, although the mechanisms that are involved in this interaction remain unclear. Results in present study are consistent with previous findings[17]. It has been suggested that metabolic disorder factors have additive effects on BP control and cardiovascular disease. Arcucci et al. have reported that BP control worsens in the presence of more metabolic disorder factors [17] These data sugest that presence of more metabolic disorder factors, decrease the probability of BP control. We found association of number of risk factors of MetS and higher levels of CRP. However, it is unknown whether the number of MetS risk factors can influence the levels of CRP. Previeous study demonstrated that number of risk factors did not influence the levels of CRP in patients with MetS [18]. Also in present study we found association of highe levels of CRP in patient with uncontrolled BP and elevated levels of triglycerides, low HDL levels, obesity and uncontrolled glycemia. Results in present study are consistent with previous findings [19-21].
The study employed a cross-sectional design, and as such, the results could show only factors associated with uncontrolled hypertension. Study design limited to make causal inferences regarding increased CRP levels and control of arterial hypertension in patient with MetS. A larger sample would certainly increase the statistical power of the study, and probably some differences would therefore become more expressive. Despite some methodological limitations, this study clearly demonstrated a relationship between increased CRP levels and control of BP in patient with MetS.
Clinical Implications
These data provide further evidence that poor BP control is common in patients with MetS, and further investigations on the immune reactivitiy in hypetension may result in the identification of new strategies for the treatment of the disease. Therapeutic interventions to reduce activity of immunity may prove beneficial in reducing consequences of hypertension including: myocardial infarction, heart failure, renal failure and stroke.
We think, we brought some good evidence, in our present study, that patients with MetS and higher CRP level have a higher prevalence of unconrolled BP. These results indicate that presence of an subclinical inflammatory process in the natural history of MetS, through presence of high CRP levels, negatively affect BP control in patients with MetS. Measurement of this inflammatory protein may help to determine individuals cardiovascular risk and activity of immune system, it might be a novel therapeutic target for the treatment of high blood pressure in these individuals.
Materials- Agim Zeqiri;Dali Lala, Fatmir Ferati;Arben Mirto;Data collection/pro-cessing-Sotiraq Xhunga;Artur Serani;Ylber Jani; Analysis/interpretation-Ylber Jani;Ahmet Kamberi;Atila Rexhepi; Bekim Pocesta;LiteratureSearch- Ylber Jani;Agin Zeqiri;Dali Lala; Fatmir Ferati;Artur Serani. Critical Reviews-Ahmet Kamberi.
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors reported no conflict of interest and no funding has been received on this work.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
