Research article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2642-973X/070
*Corresponding Author: V. Stepanenko, Research Center of Psychotherapy, Russia.
Citation: V. Stepanenko, D. Stepanenko, (2023), Risks of Multiple Sclerosis Research Center of Psychotherapy Saint Petersburg, Russia. J. Brain and Neurological Disorders. 6(5): DOI:10.31579/2642-973X/070
Copyright: © 2023, V. Stepanenko. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 15 July 2023 | Accepted: 26 July 2023 | Published: 01 August 2023
Keywords: multiple sclerosis; cognitive abnormalities; radiologically isolated syndrome
In recent years, in everyday clinical practice, more and more often in patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination with contrast enhancement of gadolinium of the brain and spinal cord, foci of demyelination that meet the criteria of dissemination in space are detected. In these patients, when studying the anamnesis, it is not possible to establish the presence of symptoms, neurological disorders characteristic of multiple sclerosis (MS). Thus, a radiologically isolated syndrome is recorded (FIG. The issue of prognostic markers of possible clinical manifestation of MS (if we consider RICE to be an early stage of MS) and the creation of an algorithm for their determination remains relevant. This strategy is very important to clarify the risks of developing a severe, disabling, currently incurable disease, as well as to resolve the issue of the timing of the appointment of pathogenetic treatment. Goal. To assess the risks of developing reliable MS in RIS based on the study of mental, including cognitive disorders.
For 10 years, 25 patients with RIS were observed in our center according to the results of MRI diagnostics of the brain and spinal cord (cervical region) with gadolinium contrast enhancement (15 women, 10 men), they were included in the first observation group. The average age of the patients was 41±5.23 years. 25 patients with clinically isolated syndrome (12 women, 13 men), whose average age was 41±5.23 years, were included in the second observation group. The control group included 25 healthy individuals, comparable in gender and age. The following methods were used for the study: Spielberger – Khanin test, MFI-20 Asthenia Scale (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory), MS-FSS Fatigue Assessment Scale (Multiple Sclerosis – Fatigue Severity Scale), MMSE Cognitive Function Test (Mini Mental Scale Examination). The diagnosis of depression was established according to ICD-10, the severity of depression was assessed using the Beck scale. The quality of life was studied using the EuroQol-5D questionnaire (health-related quality of life). All patients underwent clinical and neurological examination; anamnesis was studied in detail. In 32% of cases, the conversion of RICE to MS occurred, these patients additionally underwent a retrospective assessment of the survey data to clarify risk factors. MRI examination of both the spinal cord and the brain with contrast enhancement (gadolinium) in T1, T2, FLAIR modes were carried out according to the standard technique on a Siemens high-field tomograph, the magnetic field power of 1.5 T. The degree of disability was not assessed by EDSS, since using this scale it is impossible to quantify accurately the level of mental disorders. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Statistica 6.0 program, correlation analysis was carried out using the nonparametric Spearman criterion. The threshold level of statistical significance was considered to be p less than 0.05.
In patients with RIS with conversion to MS, compared with patients with CIS, a significantly higher level of anxiety of 45 points and higher (p less than 0.05)was revealed, a strong correlation was established between the average score of anxiety indicators with the degree of fatigue severity according to MS-FSS. Which is consistent with the literature data, since a number of studies have established a relationship between psychoemotional disorders andneurochemical processes in the central nervous system [1,2]. A third of patients with RIS with conversion to MS had clinically significant depression, from 17 to 26 points on the Beck scale, which is three times higher than in patients with CIS. Studies by a number of authors have noted that a high level of inflammatory cytokines (TNF α (TNFa) and interferon alpha) correlates with symptoms such as fatigue, decreased concentration and memory, anxiety and depression, which contributes to the development of chronic progressive diseases[3,4].In patients with RICE with conversion to MS, significant stressful events (SSSS) were more often noted in the anamnesis, which confirms the opinion that SSSS lead to a pronounced load on the immune system and contribute to the potentiation of demyelination processes and the subsequent development of MS [5,6]. The prevalence of cognitive impairment in RIS was the same as in CIS, with the exception of one indicator: in patients with the conversion of RIS to MS, the information processing speed (SOI) was lower than in patients with CIS (p less than 0.05). In addition, the quality of life of patients with RIS with conversion to MS was lower than in patients with RIS without transition to MS (p less than 0.05). In healthy people, affective disorders, a decrease in SOY, and an increase in anxiety levels were not found.
Thus, the data obtained confirm the need to monitor and study mental, including cognitive disorders in patients with RIS, as possible risk factors for the conversion of RIS to MS.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,