AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2637-8876/006
1 The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research 2-1 Hirosawa,Wakoshi Saitama Japan .
*Corresponding Author: Shoichiro Ozaki, The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research,Wakoshi Saitama, Japan.
Citation: Shoichiro Ozaki, Stop of NOx elimination and stop of wast water purification are easy methods to protect global warming, J Immunology and Inflammation Diseases Therapy. 2 (2); Doi: 10.31579/2637-8876/006
Copyright: © 2018 Shoichiro Ozaki. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Received: 05 May 2018 | Accepted: 12 June 2018 | Published: 19 June 2018
Keywords: NOx; NOx elimination; waste water purification; global warming; plankton
Fossil fuel burn releasing CO2 and heat. If we can compensate the generation of CO2 and heat of burning with the absorption of CO2 and heat by CO2 assimilation, global warming will be protected. To promote CO2 assimilation, supply of nutrient N and P is essential. 14.4 billion tone NOx is produced when 140 billion fossil fuel is burned. Many governments are eliminating NOx and NP in drainage as pollution substances. But NOx and NP in drainage are promotor of CO2 assimilation, fertilizer of plant growth, promotor of CO2 fixing. By elimination of these promotors, CO2 assimilation is retarded and CO2 fix is retarded. Fish production is retarded. 142 billion tone CO2 is increasing each year. NOx elimination is giving bad effect on electricity price, fish production , GDP growth rate. We must stop elimination of NOx and stop wast water purification, to protect global warming .
Much carbon dioxide is released by the burning of much fossil and global warming is progressing. Reduction of carbon dioxide is most important for the protection of global warming. To reduce carbon dioxide, promotion of carbo dioxide assimilation is best method to reduce carbo dioxide.
To promote carbon dioxide assimilation, supply of nitrogen fertilizer and phosphorous fertilizer is essential. About 14.4 billion tone nitrogen oxide NOx ( 1/25 of produced carbon dioxide 360 billion tone )is produced in the world . Therefore NOx is most abundant nitrogen fertilizer. About 50 billion tone excreta is produced in the world., Excreta is most abundant nitrogen and phosphorous fertilizer. These NOx and excreta are promotors of carbon dioxide assimilation. NOx and excreta promote the growth of plant and plankton.Plankton is playing most important role for fixing of CO2.(Ref 1)
Many official of developed country consider NOx and excreta as pollution substance and established very strict law to eliminate NOx and to eliminate excreta.. Then CO2 assimilation is retarded and CO2 fix is retarded and CO2 is increasing and global warming is progressing. I am insisting NOx elimination should be stopped. Wast waser purification should be stopped (Ref 2-15)
CO2 assimilation and CO2 cycle 140 billion tone fossil is burned and 360 billion tone CO2 and 14.4 billion tone NOx ia produced in 2015. CO2 concentration increased 2ppm in 2015.
Amount of CO2 in the world is 28300 billion tone. CO2 increasing 2 ppm every year.
Increase of CO2 is 28300x 2/400= 142 billion tone. 360-142 = 218 billion tone CO2 is fixed in one year.
If we can fix 142 billion tone CO2, we can protect global warming.
I wish to propose my plan that if NOx elimination is stopped and if waste water purification is stopped global warming can be stopped.
NOx is promotor of fish production
When I was a professor at Ehime University, in 1990, Ehime newspaper reported that waste water purification reducing Nori (sea weed) and fish production.at Seto inland sea.
I wrote papers that NOx elimination and waste water cleaning should be stopped to promote fish production. Because fish contain much protein, nitrogen. Nitrogen must be supplied from NOx, and waste water (Ref 2-5)
NOx and excreta are hated as pollution substances. Many develop country like USA, Japan, Germany, United Kingdom France set up law to inhibit the release of NOx in the air. Then CO2 assimilation is reduced remarkably CO2 fix is reduced remarkably plant and plankton growth are reduced remarkably. Fish production of such country reduced remarkably. Some other country welcomed NOx and excreta as promotor of CO2 assimilation. At these country plankton growth, grain growth are promoted .Fish production increased.
I will tell these at this paper
. I have strong opinion that NOx elimination should be stopped.
Thousand papers are presented about toxicity of NOx and no paper indicating that NOx is fertilizer .
When we look at plankton. Thousand papers including 20 nature paper teach us that plankton and supply of NP are playing significant role for the control of climate, CO2 assimilation, fish production. Plankton reduced 95 % CO2 concentration to 250ppm in 30 billion years
I am insisting NOx elimination should be stopped, NOx elimination law should be eliminated. NOx should be released to air as it is. Waste water should be released as it is to ocean, field and forest to promote CO2 assimilation to help fix of CO2
When we look at fish production of world (Ref 6-15). China produced 79.38 million tons fish and Indonesia produced 22.21million tons fish. India 18.11 Vietnam 6.21 million t fish. They use NOx and excreta as it is for production of plankton and fish. Therefore fish production increased remarkably. China industry is promoted. As the result production of CO2 and NOx increased rapidly and production of fish increased rapidly.
Fish production of Japan
Japan was producing 12 million tone fish in 1970. Top in the world. But fish production decreased to less than 5 million tone. Since NOx elimination law, waste water purification law were set up.
Fish Nori production at Seto Inland Sea (Ref 2-5)
I was born at sea side of Seto inland sea at Kurashiki in 1930. Seto inland sea is surrounded by Chugoku, Shikoku and Kyushu. This district is famous as no thunder district. Supply of NOx by thunder(Ref 16,17) is not done. Seto inland sea was filled with fish and small fishing boat. This sea provided 0.5 million tone fish and 100 billion sheets of Nori( sea weed to make norimaki). These fish and Nori were main protein source of 20 million persons around this district. But since NOx elimination law was established at 1980, fish production decreased to 1/10, 0.05 million tone. Nori production stopped. The bottom of sea was filled with eel grass (amamo) before 1970. But the bottom of the sea become desert and no sea weed now. No plankton assimilation, No heat absorption. Seto inland sea can fix 7 million tone CO2 if NOx elimination and waste water purification are not carried out.
Phosphorous is essential for fixing CO2
Phosphorous P is important atom constituent of plants and animals.(Ref 18) Phytic acid (inositol hex phosphate)calcium salt is contained in every surface of grain such as rice, wheat and corn about 30 % . Plant makes glucose by photosynthesis from CO2 and water. Some of glucose is converted to inositol. Inositol is converted to phosphoinositide’s (PIP2) and phytic acid. PIP2 is converted to IP3 and diacylglycerol. These two compounds are essential for signal transduction of plant (Ref 22), because P is an essential atom to make DNA. The seed store phosphorous atom as a store so that even when seed germinate at no phosphorous land. To make this phytic acid, plant absorb corresponding phosphorous at harvest time. Lack of phosphorous give poor harvest.
How phosphorous is supplied. There are two routes to supply phosphorous to plant.
1. Phosphorous in drainage: About 60 thousand tone phosphorous was contained in drainage in Japan. By using this phosphate, 60 thousand x 25 = 1500 thousand tone CO2 can be fixed. And 1500 thousand tone plankton can be produced and fish 160 thousand tone will be produced. Animal eat food containing P and exclude excreta containing P. When toilet disposal and drainage are sent to excreta disposal treatment plant. P in water was made to water insoluble mass, mixed with cement and made to concrete and buried in soil. Plant cannot use P any more. This process use huge electricity and consume much fossil fuel. Around two hundred thousand tone fossil and producing five hundred thousand CO2. For the elimination of one phosphorous, about 25 carbon fossil is used and about 25 CO2 is produced. One phosphorous can fix 25 CO2 the phosphorous elimination process should be avoided. Because excreta is best food for plant. Ocean dumping, field dumping and forest dumping of excreta are recommended to increase the concentration of nutrient phosphorous
2. Phosphorous: Ideal concentration for cell growth experiment P 88 μg is in 1 little sea water. Concentration of N(nitrogen and P(phosphorous) of surface sea water at 100km south of Muroto(South corner of Shikoku) is 1 μ g/l, 0.3 μg/l. respectively. These value are 1/ 20000, 1/2000000 of ideal concentration for cell growth experiment. N 33 μg /l , P 2.9 μg /l at 1000m deep sea, water are 30 times and 10 times rich in nutrition than that of surface sea water at the same spot. Global warming produce high temperature of sea water, evaporation of water and consequent many typhoon, hurricane. These typhoon and hurricane agitate surface sea water (poor nutrient) with deep sea water (rich nutrient). Plankton growth infinitely if enough nutrient N and P are present. Many hurricane attacking east south part of United State producing nutrient rich surface sea water and this sea current goes up to north producing much plankton and much CO2 and heat absorption and producing much fish. . Coral bleaching is reported at Sekisei Reef Lake at Okinawa, Japan in Sept 2016. And Great Barrier reef in June 6 2016. Because no typhoon approach at this district, agitation was not enough to replace nutrient deep sea water (contain much nutrient nitrogen, phosphorous) with poor nutrient shallow sea water causing the no growth of zooxanthella.
NOx elimination should be stopped
Influence of NOx elimination on GDP growth rate (Ref 14) CO2 assimilation is most important reaction for all biology on earth. NOx is a promotor of plant growth, CO2 assimilation. Therefore NOx elimination give great damage on growth of plant. Plankton. Production of fish, grain, grass and tree and GDP (Ref 15) the elimination reaction of NOx is a reaction of NOx with ammonia. By this reaction, precious fertilizer is destroyed by other precious fertilizer. This is tremendous loss.
1. The country who do not do NOx elimination like China (NOx c= 1.6g/kWh,GDP =6.92%), India NOxcon=1.6 g/kWh,GDP=7.10%,) S Korea (NOx c=1.6g/kWh, GDP= 2.8%) can boost high GDP growth rate
2.The countries who do this reaction NOx elimination like USA(NOxc=0.5g/ hWh,GDP= 1.38%),Japan (NOxc=0.1g/kWh. GDP= 1.01%) Germany,(NOxc=1.0g/ kWh, GDP=1.85%),UK(NOxc=1.3g/kWh,GDP=1.8%),Italy (NOxc=0.5g/kWh, GDP=0.88%)are consuming much fossil fuel for elimination of NOx. Therefore electricity price is higher than no NOx elimination country. And CO2 assimilation is retarded. Agriculture and fish industry are retarded. Japan did no NOx elimination before 1970, GDP was 8.0 in 1970 .Japan started NOx elimination in 1980, then plankton production was destroyed and 13 million tone fish was not produced. About 1 million fisherman lost job. As fish price is 3000 dollar /t. Then 3000x 13 million dollar= 390 billion dollar were lost. Fish price increased 5 times. Average life in Japan: male is 80.50 (third), female is 86.83 (top in the world). The author believe that long life of Japanese come from the habit to eat fish containing glucosamine , hyaluronic acid and chondroitin as a main protein source (Ref 19,20). Japanese cannot eat fish as before. Fish/Meat ratio of Japanese changed from 99/1 in 1945 to 30/70 in 2017. Therefore Japanese may lose long life record soon.
Effect of NOx elimination on electricity price, fish production and GDP is shown in table 1
Some country USA, Japan, Germany UK Italy hating NOx as pollution gas and eliminating by ammonia
4NO + 4 NH3 + O2——-> 4N” + 6H2O
To kill one fertilizer with one other fertilizer is tremendous waste of natural resources. This elimination process gives tremendous damage on plant growth, production of grain, fish, economics, electricity price and DGP. Grain production is retarded. Electricity price increased. DGP increase rate become low.
Many countries like China welcome NOx as fertilizer. CO2 assimilation is promoted. CO2 fix is promoted. Plankton growth is promoted. Fish, grain production are promoted. Electricity price is low. DGP increase rate is high In the process of burning, nitrogen oxide is formed. Amount of nitrogen oxide is around 1/25 of carbon dioxide. 360/25 = 14.4 billion ton. NOx is produced. Effective use of this NOx is key point. Fish production increased dramatically at the country who use NOx. On the contrary, about half of the country who eliminate NOx and only 280 billion tone CO2 is fixed. 142 billion Tone CO2 is remaining and Global warming is progressing.
If elimination of NOx is stopped at all country, 14.4x 25= 360 billion tone CO2 can be fixed. And global warming will be stopped.
Japan is emitting 12.5 billion tone CO2 and 0.5 billion tone NOx. CO2 res is 4.95 billion tone. 1 billion tone CO2 is emitting for waste water purification. If these treatment is stopped, emission of 2 billion tone CO2 is saved. And concentration of N, P increase and CO2 assimilation is accelerated and 5 billion tone CO2 will be fixed by 0.5 billion tone NOx. Therefore 1+1+ 5= 7 billion ton CO2 can be decreased. 7 billion tone CO2 is 2.05 over the responsible 4.95 billion tone. To fit Paris agreement.
By stopping of NOx elimination and by stopping of waste water purification, we can protect global warming
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
