Research Article:Lung Ultrasound: An Initial Bedside ''Spirometry'' Tool in Diagnosing Obstructive Syndrome Echographic findings in chronic bronchitis – part two

Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/982

Research Article:Lung Ultrasound: An Initial Bedside ''Spirometry'' Tool in Diagnosing Obstructive Syndrome Echographic findings in chronic bronchitis – part two

  • Prof. Perlat Kapisyzi, FCCP 1,2*
  • Eritjan Tashi 2
  • Ornela Nuredini PhD 2
  • Loreta Karaulli PhD 2
  • Juliana Gjoni PhD 2
  • Holta Tafa PhD 2
  • Iris Luca MD 2
  • Dhimitraq Argjiri PhD 2
  • Olvis Petre PhD 2
  • Vjola Selmani MD 2
  • Franc Rrumbullaku MD 2
  • Esmaralda Nushi MD 2
  • Arben Tanka MD 2
  • Armela Çuko MD 2
  • Laert Gjati MD 2
  • Valentina Hima MD 2
  • Alma Teferiçi MD 2
  • Marsel Broqi MD 2
  • Klara Ziu MD 2
  • Ana Jano MD 2
  • Geisa Risto MD 2
  • Haki Rugeja 2
  • Silva Tafaj PhD 1,2
  • Fadil Gradica 1,2

1 University of Medicine Tirana Albania.

2 Regional Hospital Center “Shefqet Ndroqi” Tirana, Albania.

*Corresponding Author: Prof. Perlat Kapisyzi FCCP, University of Medicine Tirana Albania.

Citation: Perlat Kapisyzi, Eritjan Tashi, Ornela Nuredini, Loreta Karaulli, Juliana Gjoni, et al, (2025), Lung Ultrasound: An Initial Bedside 'Spirometry' Tool in Diagnosing Obstructive Syndrome, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, 31(2); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/982

Copyright: © 2025, Perlat Kapisyzi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 07 October 2025 | Accepted: 21 October 2025 | Published: 01 November 2025

Keywords: lung ultrasound; COPD; chronic bronchitis; emphysema; twinkling white area; rib shadows

Abstract

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) includes two key phenotypes—chronic bronchitis and emphysema—whose differentiation is essential for targeted therapy. Traditional diagnostics like spirometry and imaging often lack bedside applicability and regional specificity. Lung ultrasound (LUS), particularly through assessment of the Merlin space, Twinkling White Area (TWA), offers a novel non-invasive method for real-time evaluation of pleural and subpleural, peripheral abnormalities.

Objective: To assess the diagnostic utility of TWA morphology (length, width, density), rib shadow characteristics (W, W2), and rib-to-pleural line distance (“high of ribs”) during rest, inspiration, and expiration, in distinguishing normal lungs from emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

This study is first of three approaches: the first examines the echographic characteristics of emphysema compared to normal subjects; the second compares chronic bronchitis with normal subjects; and the third focuses on the echographic features that differentiate emphysema from chronic bronchitis.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on 105 individuals (25 controls, 40 emphysemas, 40 bronchitis), using a 2–5 MHz handheld Clarius ultrasound probe. Four thoracic regions were scanned. Quantitative measurements were analyzed via PCA, ANOVA, ROC analysis, and logistic regression.

Results: ANOVA identified five ultrasound variables—Length TWA inspiration, Length TWA, Length TWA expiration, width of TWA, W2 ribs shadow inspiration as the most significant discriminators between Bronchitis and Normal groups (all FDR‑adjusted p < 0.001), with Length TWA inspiration showing the largest effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.86, η² = 0.15). PCA explained 71.0% of the total variance (PC1 37.0%, PC2 17.7%, PC3 16.3%). Heatmap loadings indicated that positive loadings (red) reflect parameters increased in Bronchitis, while negative loadings (blue) identify reduced parameters characteristic of the disease. Youden analysis ranked Length TWA inspiration (AUC 0.706, >54.5 mm) and Length TWA (>61.5 mm) as top performers (specificity >95%). A logistic model combining the five Youden‑selected variables achieved a training AUC of 0.769 (10‑fold CV AUC = 0.755) with specificity 95.8% and sensitivity 61.4% at the optimal threshold.

Discussion: Findings converge on a coherent, phase‑sensitive sonographic pattern: inspiratory TWA length and rib‑shadow geometry show positive associations with bronchitis, whereas selected widths—particularly TWA width and expiratory TWA width —are reduced, yielding the bidirectional loading structure seen in PCA/heatmap, ANOVA and Youden index. 

Conclusion: Chronic bronchitis shows a consistent sonographic pattern characterized by increased Length of TWA (quiet breathing and inspiration) and rib-shadow width, together with reduced Width of TWA and Width of TWA expiration. This bidirectional, phase-dependent signature supports a practical phase-aware scanning protocol, offering high rule-in specificity and improved diagn+ostic discrimination at the bedside.

Key Learning Points

  • Lung ultrasound provides a practical bedside tool for distinguishing chronic bronchitis from normal lungs within the COPD spectrum.
  • TWA length (quiet breathing and inspiration) and rib-shadow width are strong positive markers of chronic bronchitis.
  • TWA width and TWA width in expiration consistently decrease in bronchitis, forming complementary negative markers.
  • This phase-dependent, bidirectional sonographic pattern reflects underlying pleural–subpleural remodeling and altered thoracic mechanics.
  • A phase-aware scanning protocol enhances diagnostic specificity and may serve as a surrogate to spirometry in COPD phenotyping.

 

Introduction

Lung ultrasound (LU) has recently gained recognition as a widely adopted imaging modality in emergency and critical care medicine. Its use in the point-of-care setting allows rapid, bedside diagnosis or exclusion of several pulmonary conditions, including pulmonary edema, acute interstitial syndrome, pleural effusion, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, and other pathologies predominantly affecting the peripheral lung regions. Despite this growing clinical utility, no studies to date have specifically investigated the role of LU in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis between emphysema and chronic bronchitis—two major phenotypes of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) whose distinction carries significant implications for patient management and prognosis [1]. Therefore, the present study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of LU in chronic bronchitis in patients with obstructive lung disease. Recent advances suggest LUS can extend diagnostic capabilities to the peripheral lung. Among novel markers, the Twinkling White Area (TWA) — reflecting pleural–sub pleural dynamics [2,3] — together with rib shadow geometry (W, W2), rib-to-pleural distance (“high of rib”), and their inspiratory–expiratory variations, may offer critical diagnostic insights. To date, ultrasonography has explored diaphragm motion, A-lines, and air trapping [4–16], but no study has evaluated the diagnostic utility of LUS through targeted assessment of Merlin space dimensions. To our knowledge, this is the first investigation addressing that gap.

Objective:

To assess the diagnostic utility of TWA morphology (length, width, density), rib shadow characteristics (W, W2), and rib-to-pleural line distance (“high of ribs”) during rest, inspiration, and expiration, in distinguishing normal lungs from chronic bronchitis.

This study is second of three approaches: the first examines the echographic characteristics of emphysema compared to normal subjects; the second compares chronic bronchitis with normal subjects; and the third focuses on the echographic features that differentiate emphysema from chronic bronchitis.

Methods

Study Design and Population

This was a prospective observational study including 105 individuals: 25 controls, 40 patients with emphysema, and 40 with chronic bronchitis. All underwent standardized LUS examinations performed with a handheld curved-array Clarius transducer (2–5 MHz, lung preset mode, imaging depth 18–20 cm). Four thoracic regions were scanned in each subject: two anterior and two posterior (apical and lower posterior right lung), corresponding to regions 1, 2, 5, and 6 defined by the BLUE protocol.

Ultrasound Protocol

In each region, the pleural line was examined for morphology and continuity, and the Twinkling White Area (TWA) was assessed for length, width, and density. Rib shadow geometry was evaluated, including width at the level of the pleura (W) and at the distal end of the TWA (W2), as well as the vertical distance from the lower rib margin to the pleural line (“rib height”). All measurements were obtained during three respiratory states: quiet breathing, deep inspiration, and deep expiration, allowing assessment of dynamic changes across phases. All examinations were performed by a single experienced sonographer to minimize inter-operator variability. Images were analyzed using standardized LUS software to ensure consistent quantification of echographic variables. Quantitative data, including TWA dimensions, rib shadow widths, and pleural distances, were expressed as means ± standard deviations.

Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was performed using the Python environment. Statistical approaches included principal component analysis (PCA) to reduce dimensionality, ANOVA to identify discriminative variables, ROC analysis with Youden index to determine optimal thresholds, and multivariable logistic regression to assess combined diagnostic performance.

Study Structure

The overall project is structured in three complementary parts: (1) echographic features of emphysema compared with normal subjects, (2) chronic bronchitis compared with normal subjects (the focus of the present manuscript), and (3) emphysema versus chronic bronchitis. Representative examples of measurements by region, together with pictograms, are presented to illustrate the methodology.

The methodology for quantifying regional variables in normal subjects and bronchitis patients is illustrated with pictograms and representative examples

Results

Across analyses, rib shadow and Twinkling White Area (TWA) measurements—particularly during inspiration—emerged as the most informative ultrasound parameters distinguishing Bronchitis from Normal subjects.

ANOVA highlighted five variables with robust between‑group differences after false discovery rate correction (all adjusted p < 0>

Length TWA inspiration demonstrated the largest effect (Cohen’s d = 0.86; η² = 0.15), with the remaining variables—Length TWA, Length TWA expiration, W2 ribs shadow inspiration, and High inspiration—showing moderate effects (Cohen’s d ≈ 0.36–0.59). For all five variables, mean values were higher in the Bronchitis group, supporting a consistent directional pattern [Table 1].

VariableMean (Bronchitis)Mean (Normal)Mean difference (B–N)Cohen’s dANOVA F-valuep-valueEta squared(η²)Direction (by mean)p-FDR adjustedSignificant after FDR
Length TWA inspiration63.8444.2519.590.86289.06<0>0.149Positive (Bronchitis > Norma)<0>True
Length TWA67.9855.4412.540.59439.92<0>0.075Positive (Bronchitis > Norma)<0>True
Length TWA expiration66.1553.8512.300.46826.99<0>0.049Positive (Bronchitis > Norma)0.000001True
W2 ribs shadow inspiration25.8022.513.280.45025.060.0000010.046Positive (Bronchitis > Norma)0.000003True
High INSPIRATION7.746.930.810.36516.500.0000560.031Positive (Bronchitis > Norma)0.000168True

Table 1: ANOVA – Top 5 discriminative variable

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) explained 71.0% of the total variance (PC1 37.0%, PC2 17.7%, PC3 16.3%). PC1 was driven primarily by W2 ribs shadow inspiration and TWA length metrics (positive loadings), alongside negative loadings for Width TWA measures—indicating that increases in TWA length and decreases in specific TWA widths jointly characterize Bronchitis. PC2 captured rib height dynamics (positive loadings for inspiratory and expiratory rib height; negative for resting height), while PC3 reflected phase‑dependent rib shadow width patterns (positive in rest/inspiration, negative in expiration). [Table 2]

Principal Component Explained Variance Top variables (sign) 
PC137.0%W2 ribs shadow inspiration (+); Length TWA inspiration (+); Width TWA inspiration (–); Width TWA (–); Length TWA expiration (+) 
PC217.7%High of rib (–); High of rib inspiration (+); High of rib expiration (+); Width of rib shadow (+); Length TWA inspiration (+) 
PC316.3%Width of rib shadow (+); Width of rib shadow inspiration (+); Width of rib shadow expiration (–); Width TWA expiration (–); W2 of rib shadow (+) 

Table 2: PCA summary (PC1–PC3)

Heatmap interpretation aligned with this structure: red (positive) loadings denoted parameters increased in Bronchitis, whereas blue (negative) loadings marked parameters reduced in Bronchitis—i.e., characteristic narrowing in selected respiratory phases. Overall, inspiratory measurements contributed most strongly to group separation.

Figure 1: PCA loadings heatmap

Note: Red = positive loading (increased in Bronchitis); Blue = negative loading (reduced in Bronchitis).

Receiver‑operating analysis using the Youden Index identified practical thresholds with high rule‑in performance. Length TWA (>61.5 mm) yielded the highest Youden value (0.482; specificity 97.1%), and Length TWA inspiration (>54.5 mm) achieved the highest AUC (0.706; 

specificity 95.3%). Width TWA expiration (<20>14.62 mm) each reached specificity 95.5%, while Width TWA (<21>

VariableAUCYoudenThresholdDecision ruleSensitivitySpecificity
Length TWA0.5860.48261.500Bronchitis if value > 61.50.5110.971
Length TWA inspiration0.7060.47354.500Bronchitis if value > 54.50.5200.953
Width TWA expiration0.5940.31820.330Bronchitis if value < 20>0.3620.955
Width of ribs shadow0.6170.31014.620Bronchitis if value > 14.620.3540.955
Width TWA0.5520.29821.670Bronchitis if value < 21>0.3970.900

Table 3: Youden Index – Top 5 variables and thresholds

Bar Plot of Top Discriminative Variables

The bar plot below shows the top five discriminative variables for distinguishing bronchitis from normal cases. Positive values indicate variables that increase in size in bronchitis, while negative values indicate which variables decrease in size in bronchitis:

Variables with positive signs reflect increased structural alterations linked to chronic inflammation, whereas negative values indicate dimensional reductions suggestive of airflow obstruction. Together, these markers provide complementary discriminatory power across thoracic regions. [Figure 2]:

The cut-off values for Length TWA show regional variation. The highest positive threshold is observed in region 4, while the lowest positive threshold is observed in region 3 [Table 4, Figure 3].

The cut-off values for Width TWA show regional variation. The highest negative threshold is observed in region 2, while the lowest negative threshold is observed in region 1 [Table 5, Figure 4].

The cut-off values for Width TWA expiration show regional variation. The highest negative threshold is observed in region 3, while the lowest negative threshold is observed in region 1 [Table 6, Figure 5]. 

The cut-off values for Length TWA inspiration   show regional variation with highest positive threshold in region 2, while the lowest positive threshold is observed in region 4 [Table 7, Figure 6].

The cut-off values for Width of ribs shadow show regional variation. The highest threshold is observed in region 3, while the lowest threshold is observed in region 1[Table 8, Figure 7].

The cut off values of top five variables indicates that diagnostic performance may depend on regional lung characteristics in normal and diseased conditions [Figure 3-8].

                                                                                                                                           Table 4

                                                                                                                                        Table 5

                                                                                                                              Figure 3

                                                                                                                                 Figure 4

                                               

                                                                                                                                       Table 6

                                                                                                                                                 Table 7

                                                                                                                                   Figure 5

                                                                                                                                Figure 6

                                                                                                                                        Table 8

                                                                                                                                    Figure 7

                                                                                                                                 Figure 8

Table 8, Figure 70A multivariable logistic model combining these five Youden‑selected parameters provided improved discrimination: AUC (train) 0.769 and 10‑fold cross‑validated AUC 0.755. At the optimal probability threshold (0.651), sensitivity and specificity were 0.614 and 0.958, respectively (Youden 0.572), indicating excellent rule‑in capability with moderate sensitivity. 

Figure 9: ROC curve – Logistic regression (top 5 Youden variables)

Model performance: AUC (train) = 0.769; AUC (10‑fold CV) = 0.755; Optimal threshold = 0.651; Sensitivity = 0.614; Specificity = 0.958; Youden = 0.572.

Discussion

The integrated analysis delineates a coherent sonographic signature of chronic bronchitis. Across complementary statistical and comparative methods, two recurring features emerge: (i) inspiratory TWA length and rib-shadow metrics show positive loadings and higher means in bronchitis, while (ii) selected widths—especially TWA width and expiratory rib-shadow widths—exhibit negative loadings, indicating a phase-dependent narrowing pattern.

Ultrasound markers and discriminative value

The comparative bar-plot analysis underscores the discriminative performance of top ultrasound-derived variables across thoracic regions. Width of TWA (expiration) and Width of TWA (quite breathing) consistently demonstrate negative contributions, reflecting their reduction in bronchitis compared with normal subjects. Conversely, Length of TWA during quiet breathing displays a strong positive contribution, aligning with the structural elongation of the twinkling white area in bronchitic patients. Rib-shadow width variables reveal region-specific behaviors, mirroring the interplay between hyperinflation and rib spacing.

Together, these findings confirm that dimensional changes of the TWA and rib-related measurements offer complementary diagnostic information. Particularly, the inclusion of quiet-breathing TWA length emphasizes the sensitivity of bronchitic lungs to subtle inspiratory mechanics, providing a practical, reproducible bedside marker [17].

Pathophysiological underpinnings and imaging correlates

Chronic bronchitis involves peribronchial inflammatory processes that progressively extend into the subpleural and interlobular interstitium via lympho-vascular conduits, longitudinal spread along bronchovascular bundles, extracellular-matrix remodeling with perifocal fibrosis, and cytokine/chemokine-driven recruitment. The cumulative effect is pleural interface thickening and increased subpleural density [18,19,20,21].

The sonographic features that distinguish emphysema from chronic bronchitis reflect their fundamental pathophysiological differences. In chronic bronchitis, increased echogenicity of the pleural line and subpleural structures, particularly during expiration, likely corresponds to peribronchial and interstitial inflammation [20]. Histological studies have shown that inflammation in chronic bronchitis can spread from peribronchial regions to subpleural areas via vascular and lymphatic pathways [21], leading to increased tissue density and thickening of the pleural line visible on ultrasound [22].

In emphysema, however, the dominant mechanism is destruction of the alveolar-capillary membrane and elastic fibers, resulting in air trapping and hyperinflation [17,23]. 

These histopathological alterations provide a coherent rationale for the sonographic signature observed. Inspiratory elongation of the TWA (positive loadings, higher means in bronchitis) is consistent with enhanced acoustic backscatter from a roughened pleural–subpleural interface affected by airway wall edema, mucus accumulation, and small airway inflammation. Conversely, the reduction in TWA width and expiratory rib-shadow widths (negative loadings) likely reflects phase dependent airway narrowing/closure and altered impedance, generating elongated, slender echogenic densities rather than broadening.

Rib-to-pleura distances and rib-shadow geometry further indicate subtle modifications in chest-wall/pleural mechanics. Prolonged inspiratory effort and early expiratory flow limitation alter acoustic angles and window thickness, amplifying inspiratory length signals while attenuating expiratory widths. These mechanisms explain the bidirectional loading pattern captured by PCA/heatmaps and support the phase-aware acquisition strategy proposed here. 

Some control subjects showed localized sonographic signs of small airway obstruction—paradoxical TWA shortening during expiration and increased width—despite normal spirometry but abnormal flow–volume curves. These findings highlight spirometry’s limitations in detecting early disease and support ultrasound as a screening tool for latent dysfunction [24,25]. In addition, overlapping emphysema and bronchitis patterns were detected within individual patients, underscoring COPD’s heterogeneity and the clinical value of regional LUS in identifying both distribution and subtype of disease involvement.

Clinical implications

Clinically, single cut-off thresholds (e.g., Length TWA inspiration > 54.5 mm; Length TWA > 61.5 mm; length TWA expiration > 66.5mm) demonstrate high specificity, favoring a rule-in role. The multivariable model (AUC = 0.769; CV-AUC = 0.755) preserves high specificity (0.958) while achieving moderate sensitivity, strengthening discrimination between bronchitis and normal lungs. A phase-aware scanning protocol—leveraging inspiratory frames for TWA length and rib-shadow geometry, and expiratory frames for width reductions—offers a pragmatic diagnostic workflow.

Future research should address inter-rater reliability, probe/device variability, and integration with spirometry and clinical indices in prospective diagnostic pathways. Validating these sonographic features in multicenter cohorts would consolidate their role as rapid, bedside markers for obstructive lung disease.

Strengths, Limitations, and Conclusion

This study is among the first to systematically characterize chronic bronchitis using quantitative lung ultrasound. Its strengths include a prospective design, standardized multi-region scanning, and integration of robust statistical methods. Limitations include operator dependence of ultrasound measurements, variability in breathing effort, and age imbalance between groups, though these factors are unlikely to bias intergroup comparisons. The consistent identification of positive markers (TWA length in quiet breathing and inspiration, rib-shadow width) and negative markers (TWA width and TWA width in expiration) establishes a phase-dependent diagnostic framework. This bidirectional signature supports a phase-aware scanning protocol with high specificity, and, with further validation and dedicated software for TWA density quantification, lung ultrasound may serve as a reliable bedside surrogate for spirometry in COPD phenotyping.

Conclusion

Chronic bronchitis shows a consistent sonographic pattern characterized by increased Length of TWA quiet breathing expiration and inspiration) and rib-shadow width, together with reduced Width of TWA and Width of TWA expiration. This bidirectional, phase-dependent signature supports a practical phase-aware scanning protocol, offering high rule-in specificity and improved diagnostic discrimination at the bedside. Lung ultrasound no longer describes illusions; it translates function. It speaks of air where air moves, of tissue where life circulates. It measures obstruction not by breath alone, but by geometry. It is the moment when sound becomes structure, the image begins to breathe and a visual physiology.

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova