AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2578-8965/012
Department of obstetrics and gynecology Ain Shams University,Egypt
*Corresponding Author: Mohamed Ibrahim Taema, Department of obstetrics and gynecology Ain Shams University,Egypt Email: Ayman_gamal007@yahoo.com.
Citation: Mohamed Ibrahim Taema, Rania Ali Ammar Abd El Hakim, CA125 serum levels in Correlation with Preeclampsia severity .J. Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, 2(2). doi.10.31579/2578-8965/012
Copyright: © 2018 Mohamed Ibrahim Taema et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation: Mohamed Ibrahim Taema, Rania Ali Ammar Abd El Hakim, CA125 serum levels in Correlation with Preeclampsia severity .J. Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, doi.10.31579/2578-8965/012
Received: 03 June 2018 | Accepted: 19 June 2018 | Published: 25 June 2018
Keywords: preeclampsia,CA125 serum level ,gestation, PET
Back ground: PET a disease of theories of unknown particular cause characterized by hypertensive disorder, protein excretion in urine that additionally could be accompanied or not by organ dysfunction. CA125 is an antigen measured by radioimmunoassay. Its physiological and molecular significance in obstetric diseases is not fully clarified most research trials are made on this antigen in obstetric research field to explore and investigate its role as a marker in various diseases.
Aim:
The current research was performed to evaluate and correlate the correlation between CA125 serum level in normal gestations and gestations affected by PET.
Methodology: The current research study is composed of 300 singleton gestations. The study subjects were divided into 3 research groups: control research group (n = 100), mild PET research group (n = 100) and severe PET research group (n = 100). The three research groups were statistically alike as regards variables such as maternal age, gestational age and BMI.The research study was conducted at a private hospital in Jeddah, KSA, United Doctors Hospital. over 3 years from April 2014 to April 2017.
Results: The current research study results displayed that no statistical significant difference existed between the research study groups concerning age, BMI, parity, smoking, GA and serum creatinine. On the other hand SBP, DBP, serum urea, serum CA125, urine protein, and NICU admission were statistically significantly lowest in control research group followed by mild PET research group and statistically significantly highest in severe PET research group. Interestingly it has been revealed in the current research findings that platelets count was statistically significantly lowest in severe PET research group with no statistically significant difference between control and mild groups. The current research study have evaluated in addition diagnostic performance of laboratory investigations performed between research study groups displayed the following Serum BUN, serum CA125 and proteinuria had statistically significant high diagnostic performance and features in discriminating between PET from normal (highest in urine protein).On the other hand Serum BUN had statistically significant moderate diagnostic performance and features , whereas serum CA125 and urine protein had statistically significant high diagnostic performance and features in discriminating severe from mild PET (highest in urine protein).
Conclusion: Our research group came to the conclusion that serum CA125 level in maternal serum is directly correlated to PET presence and its degree of severity i.e CA-125 is a Biological marker mirroring the disease severity .Additionally it has the privilege of being. More readily available and considered less costly in comparison to other biological markers, It could be used as a screening tool for PET. However larger sample size should be considered in future research studies and consideration should be made for ethnic and racial difference that could aid in future met analysis performance.
Hypertensive disorders of gestation is one of the common issues leading to maternal mortality globally. It is responsible for around 12% of maternal mortalities worldwide . Roughly 5% of gestations develop PET, Which makes it one of the chief gestational medical Disorders . The WHO statistically guessed that above 100,000 females pass away from PET every year all over the world, the issue is more prominent in developing countries in comparison to developed countries [1-5]. Maternal and fetal morbidity is great , particularly in developing nations having a prevalence range around 2% to 17%. As preseclampsia is a disease of theories having no well demarcated etiology Featured clinically by hypertensive disorder, protein excretion in urine, +/- Organ function affection. In vast majority of case scienarios , pathological examination reveales Microscopic evidence of placental vascular insufficiency correlated with Other pathological developments such as placental inflammatory decidual vasculopathy, placental diffuse thrombosis, and/or abnormal invasive trphoblastic activity to the endometrial lining [6-10 ].
The pathophysiological pathways of PET are not well settled , although the chiefly accepted theoretical pathway is that of deficient trophoblastic Invasive action of the placenta to deciduas causing endothelial cell insult, reduced intravascular volume, chronic inflammatory process, and affected vascular responsiveness [11-15].
The consecutive maternal adaptive pathway to gestational abnormal immunologic response to pregnancy is an immunological response against placental tissue and paternal derived antigens causing fetal hypoxia and inflammatory mediators secretion that have a negative impact on endothelium . A prominent inflammatory mediator secreted is the CA125 antigen. Clinically used in practice as a sensitive but nonspecific tumor marker in management protocols of ovarian malignancies . The value of CA125 in obstetric related diseases is not fully clarified as most research trials performed investigating its applicability are experimental in fashion[16-20]. In gestation, the fetal chorionic villi, amniotic fluid and decidua are possible biological sources and origin of CA125 antigen during the first trimester of gestation and during the period of puerperium with serum concentrations of CA125 elevating during the first gestational trimester and falling back to normal non-gestational range of values during the 2nd and 3rd gestational trimesters . Damage in decidual lining of cells due to chorionic villi invasive action during early gestation causes the CA125 originated from the decidual lining adittionally that occurs during placental separation at delivery. Consequently, considering decidual destruction and trophoblastic seperation from the decidual lining are cellular mechanisms for rise of CA125 in PET gestations[21-23].
Previous performed research came to a conclusion that the hypoalbuminemia occurring in PET gestations is considered contributing factor in rising serum CA125 concentration levels since reduced levels of albumin is correlated to clinical and subclinical edema and ascites in PET gestations . Another research group additionally displayed a rise in binding activity of CA125 antigen on immune cells of pregnant females and gestations with PET. The current research study aimed to assess and investigate the serum levels of CA125 in patients with and without PET and values its clinical applicability in the diagnosis pathway and prognostic power in PET[24,25].
The current research study is a prospective research study conducted at private hospital in Jeddah, KSA,United Doctors Hospital after ethical approval from hospital ethical committee , over 3 years from April 2014 to April 2017. The research study was conducted on 200 singleton gestations having PET ( Research study groups involving mild PET ,severe PET ). Cases clinically diagnosed with PET after 32 gestational weeks have been enrolled for the research study group. While for the research control group(n=100), the gestations visiting the outpatient clinic the hospital for routine
antenatal care visit after 32 gestational weeks were recruited. The 32nd gestational week was randomly used by the research group as an inclusive criterion. PET clinical diagnosis and classification as the bulletin of the ACOG. Hypertension was featured as an absolute blood pressure measrement [140/90 mmHg after 20 gestational weeks
by at least two blood pressure 4 hours apart measurements. Protein in urine have been featured as 0.3 g protein excretion in urine. Exclusive research criteria have been presence of DM, chronic hypertensive disease, clear history of peripheral vascular disorder and/or antihypertensive medication and a BMI <19> 30 kg/m2. Study Subjects were Divided into 3 research groups: control research group (n = 100), mild PET research group (n = 100) and severe PET research group (n = 100). The 3 research study groups were displayed and revealed as statistically Alike as regards maternal age, gestational age and BMI. Maternal blood samples for CBC, serum creatinine, Serum uric acid and serum CA-125 levels have been obtained by consistent phlebotomy withdrawal procedure from all study subjects after being recruited to the research study and control categorical groups . Obtained blood samples for CA-125 have been collected into anticoagulant-free glass test tubes, centrifuged instantaneously at 6,420 g (4 degree celcius) and stored without delay at -70 degree Celcius. Additionally ,24-hours urine have been gathered from each study subject to investigate the quantity of protein excreted in urine . Levels of CA 125 in serum have been measured by electrochemoluminescence immunoassay , however CBC indices have been obtained by an automated blood counter machine .Serum creat. and uric acid levels were assayed by an automatic chemical analyzer machine, TBA 40FR . The intra- and inter-assay statistical coefficients of variation (CVs) were reported to be 4 and 2%, consecutively for serum CA-125 assays obtained . The normal range was rated as 0–35 IU/m as regards CA-125 serum levels. Patient age, parity, BMI, gestational age, SBP,DBP, treatment protocols, CBC indices and serum concentrations of uric acid, creatinine and CA-125, the expected fetal weight, the occurence of intrauterine growth restriction and intrauterine fetal death for all study subjects were recorded.
The obtained data have been coded, tabulated, and statistically analyzed by using IBM SPSS statistics (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) software version 18.0, IBM Corp., Chicago, USA, 2009.Descriptive statistics were done for quantitative data as minimum& maximum of range in addition to mean±SD (standard deviation) for quantitative normally distributed data, whereas it was done for qualitative data as number and percentage.
Inferential analyses was performed for quantitative variables using independent t-test in cases of two independent groups ANOVA test with post hoc Tukey test for more than two independent groups. In qualitative data, inferential analyses for independent variables were done using Chi square test for differences between proportions with post hoc Bonferroni test. The level of significance was taken at P value < 0>
^ANOVA test with post hoc Tukey test, #Chi square test with post hoc Tukey test, *Significant, HG: Homogenous groups by post hoc test have the same letter (a,b,c)
Table (1) and figures (1) : reveal and display that: No statistical significant difference between the research study groups as regards age, BMI, parity, smoking, GA and serum creatinine. However SBP, DBP, serum urea, serum CA125, urine protein, and NICU admission were statistically significantly lowest in control group followed by mild PET research group and significantly highest in severe PET research group. Fetal birth weight was statistically significantly highest in control research group followed by mild PET research group and statistically significantly lowest in severe PET in comparison to control group. Platelets count was statistically significantly lowest in severe PET research group with no statistically significant difference between control and mild groups. Expected fetal weight was statistically significantly highest in control group with no statsistically significant difference between mild and severe PET research groups.
Pearson correlation, *Significant
Table (3) and figures (2) show that: Only CA125 had significant negative correlation with platelets in severe group
^Independent t-test
CA125 was significantly higher in cases with IUFD in mild and severe groups
AUC; Area under curve, SE: Standard error, CI: Confidence interval, *Significant
Table (4) and figures (3,4) display that: Serum BUN, serum CA125 and urine protein had statistically significant high diagnostic performance and characteristics in differentiating PET from normal (highest in urine protein).On the other hand Serum BUN had statistically significant moderate diagnostic performance and characteristics, whereas serum CA125 and urine protein had statistically significant high diagnostic performance and characteristics in differentiating severe from mild PET (highest in urine protein).
Various priorly conducted research studies have investigated the correlation between maternal CA 125 serum levels and PET, but these researches are mainly experimental, widely unapproved and the results are debatable showing great deal of conflict [1,3,5,7]. The current research study displayed that no statistical significant difference existed between the research study groups concerning age, BMI, parity, smoking, GA and serum creatinine. On the other hand SBP, DBP, serum urea, serum CA125, urine protein, and NICU admission were statistically significantly lowest in control research group followed by mild PET research group and statistically significantly highest in severe PET research group. Fetal birth weight was statistically significantly highest in control research group followed by mild PET research group and statistically significantly lowest in severe PET research group. Interestingly it has been revealed in the current research findings that platelets count was statistically significantly lowest in severe PET research group with no statistically significant difference between control and mild groups. Expected fetal weight was statistically significantly highest in control research group with no statistically significant difference between mild and severe PET research groups. Additionally when statistically comparing and contrasting between IUFD and live birth in correlation to serum CA 125 levels have shown that CA125 was significantly higher in cases with IUFD in mild and severe groups. The current research study have evaluated in addition diagnostic performance of laboratory investigations performed between research study groups displayed the following Serum BUN, serum CA125 and proteinuria had statistically significant high diagnostic performance and features in discriminating between PET from normal (highest in urine protein).On the other hand Serum BUN had statistically significant moderate diagnostic performance and features , whereas serum CA125 and urine protein had statistically significant high diagnostic performance and features in discriminating severe from mild PET (highest in urine protein). In a similar research approach fashion Schröcksnadel et al research group investigated the correlation between serum CA125 levels in cases with gestational hypertensive disorders ,normally healthy gestations and normal non-gravid research control groups however did not find statistical significant difference between the three research categories [4-15 ]Another research group additionally mentioned that although CA125 levels in maternal serum are revealed to be greater during the first and third gestational trimesters but did not show a correlation with PET but another research study, investigated serum CA125 levels in gestations with normal blood pressure and gestations that developed PET [17-24]. Revealing That serum CA125 levels did not vary as regards gestational outcome however they implied and observed a liability to elevation in serum CA125 levels for gestations that develop PET. Our current research, on the other hand, had findings in harmony with the Cebesoy et al. research group displaying a statistically significant greater levels of serum CA125 in gestations that developed PET. On the other hand it was suggested that the rise in CA125 levels in PET is due to ascites present in PET gestations due to hypoalbuminemia. The current research study displayed in a clear fashion that elevation of CA125 serum levels in PET gestations in comparison to gestations with normal blood pressure levels and in addition statistically significantly greater in cases suffering severe grade of PET, these observations are similar and inharmony with observations obtained by Karaman et al. research group [12-25] .A priorly performed research study studied 54 PET gestations/and 56 healthy gestations. The serum CRP and CA-125 serum levels.
were displayed to be statistically significantly greater in gestations with PET in comparison to healthy gestations . Additionally CRP and CA-125 serum levels in gestations with severe PET and eclampsia were statistically significantly greaterr than gestations with mild PET. Furthermore, statistical significant correlations have been revealed between CRP levels, serum albumin concentration, CA-125 serum levels and mean arterial blood pressure. The research group in that study concluded that CRP and CA-125 are potential biological markers in PET .This reveals the possible value of CA125 antigen as a biological marker or for uncovering of the prognosis of illness severity. Various priorly performed research studies reveal that sFlt-1, PIGF, and sFlt-1/PIGF ratio as biological markers are not considered clinically simple, and are not of low-cost, due to financial and practical issues . While CA-125 is more readily available and considered less costly form of testing, therefore it is considered a promising biological marker for screening PET. The current research study has various limitations such as the sample size is small and the research should consider racial and ethnic differences that could have an influence on the disease severity [4,9,12].
Our research group concluded that raised levels of maternal serum CA 125 is correlated with the development of PET and that it have a role in reflecting disease severity. Therefore, our research group recommends future research to be performed on wider scale to confirm the findings of the current research study performed .to reveal and uncover the clinical predictive value as a biological marker for PET in addition to determining a suitable cut-off level value particularly within cases having severe disease presentation. More prospective research is needed to reveal and clarify the precise pathological pathway of raised CA-125 serum levels in gestations with PET and to reveal the clinical value of CA-125 in PET.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
