Reprint-Internal breast reduction surgery

Reprint | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1919/047

Reprint-Internal breast reduction surgery

  • Aristides Arellano-Huacuja 1*
  • Anja Arellano-Montalvo 2
  • Dafne Arellano-Montalvo 2

*Corresponding Author: Aristides Arellano-Huacuja, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mexico.

Citation: Aristides Arellano-Huacuja, Anja Arellano-Montalvo and Dafne Arellano-Montalvo (2020) Internal breast reduction surgery. J Clinical Research and Reports, 3(2); DOI:10.31579/2690-1919/047

Copyright: © 2020 Aristides Arellano-Huacuja. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 17 February 2020 | Accepted: 25 February 2020 | Published: 28 February 2020

Keywords: height reposition; pectoral muscle; thick dermis layer; breast; histoacryl glow

Abstract

Nowadays, some people regret having a breast augmentation surgery, considering their implants oversized and not natural looking. However, the decision of having a reduction procedure is not easy, since it implies more skin scaring.

Some patients would like to reduce their implant dimensions about one or two sizes without having a new scar. Considering the skin and muscle previously involved, this represents a problem for the surgeon, who must perform a technique without long or bigger scars.

Therefore, we have developed a new technique, which allows us to perform an easy and efficient implant volume reduction avoiding the scar consequences of a breast lift surgery.

Introduction

Patients

To achieve this procedure, we require that the patient fulfils the following requirements:

  • The implants must have been placed behind the pectoral muscle.
  • The patient´s skin should have a thick dermis layer.
  • Pregnancy or drastic weight change might affect surgery´s results.
  • The nipple-areola complex may require a certain height reposition depending on the breast characteristics.
  • The technique won´t be helpful if the reduction is above two sizes.

Technique

To initiate, the breast area involved is infiltrated with a dilution of adrenaline and physiologic solution (1:10, 000). The next step is to perform an incision right at the same place where the previous scar has been made, allowing us to remove the previous scar completely.

The tissue is dissected up to the implant until the implant is released, removed and exchanged for a smaller size. All the extra space left from the previous implant is sutured together in a circular fashion with Vicryl 1-0. Hemostasis is reviewed, and a smaller implant is inserted.

Continuing to close the pectoral muscle´s fibrosis capsule with the superficial fascia of the chest wall. There is no need to perform a capsulotomy.

Sometimes we create a pocket under the breast tissue, over the fascia muscle.

The nipple-areola complex is repositioned 1-2 cm above the original place in order to live it higher. When needed, we suture the nipple-areola complex at the central or side level with Monocryl 3-0.

At least, the skin is closed with Histoacryl glow [1-3].

Discussion

Aftercare

The use of post-surgical bra for 30 days is recommended, also back sleeping, general care of mammoplasty and avoiding any type of strength effort (Figures).

Conclusion

The proposed technique allows breast reduction with smaller implants without increasing the number and size of scars, which is very pleasant for the patients, and requires less recovery time.

It also allows to relocate the crease of the breast and maintain the implant and tissue in the right position.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

None

Source of funding

None

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova