Reno Cardiologist Confirms FMTVDM – Opening New Opportunities for Nuclear Cardiologists

Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-8794/001

Reno Cardiologist Confirms FMTVDM – Opening New Opportunities for Nuclear Cardiologists

  • Richard M. Fleming 1*
  • Matthew R. Fleming 2
  • Tapan K. Chaudhuri 2
  • William C. Dooley 3

*Corresponding Author: Richard M. Fleming, FHHI-OmnificImaging-Camelot Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Citation: Richard M., Matthew RF, Tapan KC, William CD. J Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports, 1(1); DOI: 10.31579/2690-8794/001

Copyright: © 2019 Richard M. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 27 November 2019 | Accepted: 04 December 2019 | Published: 10 December 2019

Keywords: FMTVDM; Breast Cancer; Nuclear Cardiology

Abstract

Background: A quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and oncologic - including molecular breast imaging (MBI) - utility patent (FMTVDM*) previously validated at experienced MPI and MBI centers was independently tested for clinical application at a private practice Reno, Nevada cardiologists office.

Methods: Using FMTVDM, a private practice cardiologist independently investigated forty-four regions of interest (ROI) in 12-women with varying transitional levels of breast changes – including breast cancer.

Results: Using FMTVDM, a nuclear cardiologist without prior experience in MBI was able to easily measure changes in women’s breast tissue differentiating inflammatory and cancerous breast tissue from normal using the same camera used for MPI. These measured changes provided diagnostically useful information on cellular metabolism and regional blood flow changes (RBF) – the same properties which differentiate ischemic coronary artery disease (CAD) on myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). 

Conclusions: Quantitative MBI using FMTVDM allows differentiation of tissue types through measurement of enhanced regional blood flow and metabolic differences. Nuclear cardiologists have previously reported cases of breast cancer while conducting MPI studies. This investigation demonstrated that nuclear cardiologists can independently conduct MBI in addition to MPI studies using the nuclear cameras they currently use for MPI.

Introduction

Qualitative mammography for screening and diagnostic purposes has proven to have little value in women with dense breasts and according to the Canadian National Breast Screening Study [1], provided no survival benefit for women in general. Accordingly, efforts to quantify changes in tissue – including breast - associated with cancer and inflammation have resulted in the patented development of a method for quantitatively measuring changes in regional blood flow and metabolism, associated with these different types of tissue [2,3].

Following more than 1000 women and men previously studied using FMTVDM [2-4], an independent, private practice cardiologist, with no prior experience in molecular breast imaging (MBI) investigated if - using the same equipment used for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) –it was possible to measure changes in breast tissue using FMTVDM.

Methods

Patient enrollment: Twelve women, all previously identified as having breast irregularities, volunteered to undergo FMTVDM testing, the results of which were compared with the information already known about the extent of breast changes. All components of FMTVDM are already FDA approved - including the enhancement of regional blood flow (RBF) and metabolic differences, isotopes and camera. Each woman signed an informed consent agreeing to participate in the nuclear imaging using the FMTVDM protocol. All personal identifying information was redacted to protect patient identification. 

FMTVDM: Prior to imaging, the nuclear technologist, who was familiar with MPI, but unfamiliar with MBI, calibrated the Siemens’ Orbiter camera according to patent instructions to guarantee quantitative calibration of the camera in addition to customary qualitative controls.

Patients arrived in the overnight fasting state and were prepared for imaging with placement of an intravenous catheter through which a vasodilator (enhancement) was given, followed by the imaging isotope as previously described [2,4].

Patient records: Patients provided inter alia detailed medical records, including prior biopsy results, mammography results, family history of cancer, any prior false positive or false negative (FPFN) results from prior testing including but not limited to mammography, smoking history, current medications, and any diagnosis of dense breasts.

Measurement of Maximal Count Activity (MCA): An individual with no prior medical or technical training, received instructions on how to draw regions of interest (ROI) around the acquired breast images and obtain the measured scintillation activity used for diagnosis following completion of the imaging.

Results

The diagnostic information obtained from these 12-women and 44-regions of interest based upon imaging and patient medical records/information are shown in Table 1.

This included one woman who smoked and another woman taking hormone treatment. Four (one-third) had breast implants and four (one-third) had dense breasts. Only one of the women with dense breasts had breast implants. Four of the women (one-third) had incorrectly been told they had breast cancer (false positives - FP), two of which were told they had dense breasts.

Table one provides specific details for each region of interest (ROI) measured, along with the patient number and breast involved. The maximal count activity (MCA) for each ROI is shown, along with tissue information, the presence or absence of breast implants, dense breasts and FP mammography results.

Figure 1 shows an example of MBI and measurements obtained at a nuclear imaging lab with experience in MBI (top) and the results obtained in this independent laboratory without (bottom) prior MBI experience.

(Top) – Experienced MBI Center (Bottom) – Nuclear Cardiologist’s Center without prior MBI experience.

</>

Discussion

While the sample size was relatively small, it provided more than adequate information to demonstrate the use of FMTVDM by Nuclear Cardiologists. In this group of women, multiple ROIs were obtained matching the available medical information provided by the women and their medical records including tissue, false positive (FP) mammograms, use of hormone therapy, smoking, and family history.

The study demonstrated that nuclear cardiologists can also conduct MBI studies - using the same nuclear cameras they already use for MPI – given the use of FMTVDM to calibrate and measure differences in breast tissue metabolism and RBF differences using ROIs to obtain FMTVDM measurements.

While the appearance of imaging results were not as eloquent (Figure 1) as those obtained in centers with MBI experience, the calibration of the nuclear cameras and the ability to quantify the tissue based upon drawn ROIs, demonstrated that the utility patent makes possible accurate measurement of breast tissue health, independent of human skill or qualitative interpretation – thereby removing the human error element.

Conclusions

With little or no additional training, nuclear cardiologists are able to independently conduct MBI using FMTVDM using the same equipment they use for MPI, increasing the potential role of nuclear cardiologists.

*FMTVDM = The Fleming Method for Tissue and Vascular Differentiation and Metabolism

Acknowledgment

FMTVDM is a utility patent issued to first author. All figures reproduced with expressed consent of first author. The authors wish to thank David L Prothro, MD of Nevada Arrhythmia Services Inc. in Reno, Nevada for independently conducting these patient studies and providing the results.

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova