AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Chat with us
Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2694-0248/083
1 Al-Hadi University College, Baghdad, Iraq.
2 Department of Biochemistry, Science Faculty, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt.
3 MLS ministry of health, Alexandria, Egypt. - MLS ASCP, USA.
*Corresponding Author: Tamer A. Addissouky, Al-HADI University College, Baghdad. Iraq. - Department of Biochemistry, Science Faculty, Menoufia University, Egypt. - MLS ministry of health, Alexandria, Egypt. - MLS, ASCP, USA; tedesoky@gmail.com; tedesoky@science.menofia.edu.eg,
Citation: Tamer A. Addissouky, Ibrahim El Tantawy El Sayed, and Majeed M. A. Ali. (2024), Regenerating Damaged Joints: The Promise of Tissue Engineering and Nanomedicine in Lupus Arthritis, J Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma Care, 6(2); DOI: 10.31579/2694-0248/083
Copyright: © 2024, Tamer A. Addissouky. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 24 January 2024 | Accepted: 09 February 2024 | Published: 19 February 2024
Keywords: lupus osteoarthritis; systemic lupus erythematosus; inflammation; joint damage; precision medicine; biomarkers
Background: Lupus osteoarthritis is a disabling complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) caused by persistent inflammation and biomechanical factors. The complex pathogenesis and heterogeneous clinical course pose management challenges.
Purpose: To review the etiology, clinical features, treatment, and prognosis of lupus osteoarthritis.
Main body: Lupus osteoarthritis stems from immune complex deposition, autoantibodies, and cytokines that damage joint tissues. Mechanical insultscoupled with altered joint biomechanics accelerate degeneration. The hands, wrists, and knees are most frequently involved, causing pain, stiffness, and reduced mobility. Radiographic hallmarks include joint space narrowing, periarticular osteopenia, and erosions. Composite tools like SLEDAI are used to quantify disease activity. Cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, and infections are common comorbidities. Despite improved therapies, many patients develop disabling erosive arthritis within years of lupus diagnosis. Treatment entails lifestyle modification, analgesics, antimalarials, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, injections, and surgery as needed. Emerging biologics, regenerative strategies, and precision medicine approaches tailored to molecular profiling offer promising directions to improve long-term outcomes. However, more research is required to halt joint damage and restore mobility in this challenging complication of SLE.
Conclusion: Lupus osteoarthritis remains a major contributor to morbidity in SLE warranting further research into pathogenetic mechanisms, predictive biomarkers, and personalized therapies to prevent irreversible joint damage.
Lupus osteoarthritis is a type of secondary osteoarthritis caused by systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). SLE is an autoimmune disease that can damage multiple organ systems, including the joints. The prevalence of lupus osteoarthritis varies globally, with rates ranging from 0.2% in Caucasian populations to 6.1% in Chinese populations. Women are 9 times more likely to develop lupus osteoarthritis compared to men. Onset is typically between ages 20-40 [1, 2]. Several risk factors for developing lupus osteoarthritis have been identified as depicted in table 1. Having a longstanding history of SLE significantly increases risk, as ongoing inflammation can damage joint tissues. The use of corticosteroids to treat SLE also elevates risk. Joint trauma, obesity, and older age are additional risk factors. Genetic factors may also play a role, as lupus osteoarthritis disproportionately affects non-Caucasian racial groups [3-5]. Lupus osteoarthritis imposes a substantial burden on patients and healthcare systems. Pain, stiffness, deformity, and disability are common consequences and negatively impact quality of life. Depressive symptoms are also more prevalent in those with lupus arthritis compared to healthy controls or even those with non-lupus arthritis. Estimates suggest 20-30% of lupus patients will develop erosive arthritis. Treatment costs for lupus osteoarthritis remain high due to medications and surgeries required to manage symptoms [6].
Table 1: Risk factors for developing lupus osteoarthritis.
| Risk Factor | Description |
|---|---|
| Long disease duration | Ongoing inflammation from SLE damages joints over time |
| Corticosteroid use | Impairs cartilage repair and alters joint biomechanics |
| Joint trauma | Can trigger localized inflammation and cartilage breakdown |
| Obesity | Excess mechanical loading on joints |
| Older age | Accumulation of joint damage with aging |
| Genetics | Higher risk in non-Caucasian populations suggests genetic factors |
II. Pathogenesis
The underlying mechanisms driving the development of lupus osteoarthritis are complex and involve both inflammatory and biomechanical factors. Persistent inflammation stemming from systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is central to the pathogenesis. SLE leads to increased production of autoantibodies and cytokines that damage joint tissues, activating degradative enzymes and hindering cartilage repair [7-9].
Autoantibodies implicated in lupus osteoarthritis pathogenesis include anti-dsDNA, anti-collagen, anti-C1q, and rheumatoid factor. These can form immune complexes that deposit in the synovium and cartilage, triggering inflammatory cascades. Cytokines shown to have destructive effects in lupus arthritis include TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, IL-6, and IL-17. The resulting inflammation disrupts cartilage homeostasis and accelerate breakdown [10].
Abnormal joint mechanics also contribute by increasing stresses on damaged joint surfaces. Tendon ruptures and ligamentous laxity from corticosteroid use alter joint biomechanics. Muscle weakness and joint deformities like subluxation further disturb normal mechanics. These mechanical insults coupled with inflammation drive rapid joint deterioration [11]. Advances in systems biology and omics methodologies are providing new insights into disease mechanisms. Genomics, epigenomics, and proteomics are identifying molecular signatures and networks specific to lupus osteoarthritis. Integrative analyses will help delineate complex interactions between inflammatory mediators, biomechanical factors, and joint tissues that lead to irreversible damage. This knowledge promises to uncover new therapeutic targets and personalized strategies.
The clinical presentation of lupus osteoarthritis is driven by progressive joint damage and inflammation. Patients typically experience pain, swelling, tenderness, and stiffness in affected joints. The hands, wrists, and knees are most commonly involved, but any diarthrodial joint can be impacted. Joint symptoms are often asymmetric. Morning stiffness lasting over 30 minutes and severe fatigue are also frequently reported. Various extra-articular manifestations may accompany the arthritis. Anemia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia are common hematologic abnormalities. Serositis, pulmonary disease, and neuropsychiatric symptoms can also occur as part of the underlying systemic lupus erythematosus [12-14]. Radiographic findings include periarticular osteopenia, marginal erosions, and progressive joint space narrowing as depicted in table 2. Advanced imaging like MRI reveals synovitis, tenosynovitis, and bone marrow lesions. Ultrasound can detect earlier erosive changes. Repeated imaging allows quantification of structural damage progression over time. Composite tools like the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) are used to assess current disease activity. Specific joint counts and serum biomarkers like ESR, CRP, and complement levels inform scoring [15, 16].
Table 2: Molecular Mediators of Synovial Inflammation in Knee OA.
| Radiographic Finding | Description |
|---|---|
| Periarticular osteopenia | Reduced bone density around inflamed joints |
| Joint space narrowing | Loss of cartilage leads to narrowing of joint space |
| Marginal erosions | Breakdown of cartilage and bone at joint margins |
| Joint subluxation | Misalignment of joint surfaces due to ligament laxity |
IV. Comorbidities and complications
Lupus osteoarthritis does not occur in isolation, but rather in the context of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and associated comorbid conditions. Patients with lupus arthritis face elevated risks of cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, and infections stemming from both the underlying lupus and its treatments. Multi-omics profiling techniques are being applied to disentangle the complex molecular interconnections between lupus, arthritis, and co-occurring conditions. Cardiovascular disease is a leading driver of early mortality in lupus. Accelerated atherosclerosis stems from overlapping risk factors and immune-mediated arterial damage. Chronic inflammation promotes endothelial dysfunction, while corticosteroid therapy compounds hyperlipidemia, diabetes, hypertension, and obesity. Antimalarials like hydroxychloroquine help reduce cardiovascular risk but many patients still suffer myocardial infarction, stroke, or peripheral vascular disease. Ongoing arthritis activity itself acts as an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic progression. Management requires vigilance for cardiovascular risk factors through regular EKG, lipid panel, and blood pressure monitoring [17-19]. Osteoporosis and increased fragility fracture risk also accompany lupus osteoarthritis. Underlying lupus can directly impair bone health, while corticosteroids induce further bone loss. Chronic arthritis limits mobility, decreasing bone strength over time. Damage to joint structures alters biomechanical forces, contributing to focal osteopenia adjacent to inflamed joints. Early detection of osteopenia using DEXA scanning guides treatment with calcium, vitamin D, and bisphosphonates if needed. Addressing risk factors including vitamin D deficiency, smoking, alcohol use, and low BMI helps mitigate complications. Due to immunosuppression, infections represent another major concern in lupus arthritis. Herpes zoster, urinary tract infections, respiratory infections, salmonella, and listeria disproportionately affect those with lupus receiving corticosteroids and other immunosuppressants. Septic arthritis can arise, especially with intraarticular injections. Screening and vaccination against influenza, pneumococcus, HPV, hepatitis B, and COVID-19 are recommended. Prompt antibiotic treatment of suspected infections is key. Biologic agents require special caution due to higher serious infection risks [20-22]. Multi-omics approaches can provide molecular insights into comorbidity development in lupus osteoarthritis. Genomic analyses uncover genetic variants linked to cardiovascular, skeletal, and infectious complications. Epigenomics reveals chromatin modifications driving aberrant gene expression. Transcriptomics identify cytokine, growth factor and microRNA profiles underlying comorbid conditions. Proteomics detects biomarkers like autoantibodies that mediate organ damage. Metabolomics quantifies metabolic shifts contributing to accelerated atherosclerosis and bone loss. Integrating multi-omics data through systems biology networks will further unravel the complex biology connecting lupus, arthritis, and co-occurring illnesses [23-28].
V. Management of lupus osteoarthritis
Management of lupus osteoarthritis centers on relieving symptoms, maintaining function, and slowing joint damage identified as depicted in table 3. A multimodal approach is typically needed as no single treatment confers complete disease control. Initial management emphasizes lifestyle modifications and conservative therapies. Pharmacologic treatments, injections, surgery, and complementary medicine approaches may be utilized for patients with ongoing disease activity and progression. Emerging nanotechnology, regenerative medicine, precision medicine and pharmacogenomics strategies aim to repair joint structures and provide customized treatment based on biomarker profiles [29]. Lifestyle measures represent important foundations of lupus osteoarthritis management. Low-impact aerobic exercise helps maintain joint mobility and muscle strength without overloading damaged joints. Physical therapy under an occupational therapist or physiatrist can optimize exercise regimens. Weight loss reduces mechanical stress on weight-bearing joints. Assistive devices like splints, braces, and canes protect joints from further damage. Applying alternating heat and cold therapies and distraction techniques can alleviate pain during flares. Avoiding excess joint-straining activities, pacing activity throughout the day, and scheduling planned rest periods are also recommended [30-33]. If conservative lifestyle approaches prove inadequate for controlling symptoms, pharmacologic treatments are initiated. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) like ibuprofen and naproxen help relieve pain and inflammation by inhibiting cyclooxygenase enzymes. NSAIDs carry gastrointestinal and cardiovascular side effect risks with long-term use. Selective COX-2 inhibitor NSAIDs like celecoxib offer slightly improved safety profiles. Analgesics like acetaminophen and narcotics can be used adjunctively for pain relief. Low-dose oral corticosteroids such as prednisone suppress inflammation but side effects include osteoporosis, diabetes, and susceptibility to infections. Antimalarials like hydroxychloroquine have immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects. Hydroxychloroquine has demonstrated efficacy for controlling lupus arthritis symptoms and is considered an anchor treatment. Immunosuppressants like methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine may be prescribed for patients with resistant disease. Biologic response-modifiers that target specific inflammatory mediators are emerging options but require further study for lupus osteoarthritis [34-46]. Intraarticular corticosteroid injections provide localized anti-inflammatory effects but should be used judiciously to limit joint damage. Repeated injections spaced 3-4 months apart are sometimes utilized for persistent synovitis in larger joints like the knees, ankles and elbows. Hyaluronic acid injections may supplement pharmacological treatment by restoring the lubricating properties of synovial fluid, but evidence for efficacy in lupus arthritis is limited. Nutraceuticals like chondroitin, glucosamine and avocado-soybean unsaponifiables have demonstrated benefits for osteoarthritic pain and may have adjunctive effects [47-49]. When joint damage is severe and unresponsive to other measures, surgical interventions may be warranted. Synovectomy removes inflamed synovial tissue. Tendon repairs can address tendon rupture secondary to corticosteroid use. Osteotomies realign joints to shift loading forces away from damaged cartilage. Total joint replacements provide pain relief and restore function in end-stage arthritis but outcomes are best when inflammation is well-controlled pre-operatively. Due to high failure rates, joint replacement surgery is often delayed as long as possible in lupus patients [50-52]. Some patients utilize complementary and alternative medicine approaches for lupus osteoarthritis management. Acupuncture may alleviate pain but supporting evidence is limited. Herbal remedies like thunder god vine andTripterygium wilfordii have anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive properties in early research. Components of Traditional Chinese Medicine formulations like Duhuo Jisheng Wan have shown chondroprotective effects in vitro but require further study. More research is needed to establish the safety and efficacy of these complementary modalities. Caution is warranted with herbal remedies due to potential toxicity and drug interactions [53-57].
New frontiers in nanomedicine and regenerative medicine aim to repair and regenerate damaged joint tissues. Hydrogels, nanoparticles, and scaffolds fabricated from natural and synthetic biomaterials show promise for localized drug delivery and tissue engineering but are still early in development. Stem cell therapies like mesenchymal stem cell injections may have immunomodulatory and cartilage regenerating effects. Platelet-rich plasma provides growth factors that could stimulate healing. These novel biological treatments offer exciting potential but currently lack sufficient supporting evidence. Their long-term impacts and ideal methods of application remain uncertain. Carefully conducted clinical trials are needed to evaluate efficacy and safety [58, 59]. Looking ahead, pharmacogenomics and precision medicine approaches tailored to individual genetic profiles and biomarkers could transform treatment. Gene expression patterns, autoantibody specificities, cytokine levels, and synovial pathobiology vary across lupus osteoarthritis patients and may predict response to therapies. Matching treatments to pathogenic mechanisms identified through molecular profiling promises improved outcomes while minimizing treatment burdens. As science uncovers more connections between genetic makeup and disease phenotype, treatments can become more targeted and personalized. While still largely aspirational, precision medicine strategies offer hope for the future.
Table 3: Emerging treatments for lupus osteoarthritis
| Treatment | Description |
|---|---|
| Biologics | Target specific cytokines and immune pathways driving inflammation |
| Nanoparticle drug delivery | Localize therapies directly to joint tissue |
| Tissue engineering | Use scaffolds, cells, and growth factors to regenerate cartilage |
| Stem cell therapy | Mesenchymal stem cells have regenerative and anti-inflammatory effects |
| Platelet rich plasma | Provides growth factors that may stimulate joint healing |
| Pharmacogenomics | Match treatments to patient's genetic profile |
There is a critical need to identify distinct molecular subtypes through unbiased omics profiling and machine learning approaches. Gene expression profiling, proteomics, metabolomics, and synovial histopathology may reveal distinct subsets with unique biomarker signatures. These molecular subtypes could be linked to clinical trajectory and treatment response, facilitating precision medicine. Developing predictive multi-biomarker panels for prognosis, damage accrual, and comorbidities through integration of multi-omics and deep learning represents a key future priority. Novel therapeutics targeted to specific pathogenic pathways hold promise to transform lupus osteoarthritis treatment. Small molecule inhibitors, biologics, and nanotherapies targeting cytokines, B and T cells, osteoclasts, and angiogenesis pathways should be evaluated. Optimal treatment may require combination strategies based on an individual's molecular profile. To enable precision medicine, biomarkers and algorithms to predict therapeutic response must be refined through multi-omics screens and artificial intelligence. Additionally, new chemical entities discovered through computational drug design can be optimized using high throughput screening and structure-activity analyses [59-62]. Regenerative medicine and tissue engineering have potential to reverse existing joint damage in lupus osteoarthritis. Mesenchymal stem cells, growth factors, bio scaffolds and hydrogels could stimulate cartilage and bone regeneration. Optimizing scaffold biomechanics, cell sourcing, and bioactive compound delivery will be critical. Combining regenerative approaches with advanced gene editing tools like CRISPR could enable durable joint tissue restoration. Rigorous clinical trials are required to demonstrate safety, efficacy and long-term impacts of these emerging biologics. Monitoring repair tissue integration and mechanics using advanced imaging will provide valuable insights [63-66]. Human and animal model studies should further delineate interactions between biomechanical stress and inflammatory pathways in lupus osteoarthritis progression. Elucidating mechanisms by which altered joint kinematics and muscle forces impact synovial inflammation, cartilage breakdown, and periarticular bone loss remains an important goal. This knowledge promises to reveal new targets for interrupting degenerative pathways amplified by biomechanical forces. Developing personalized biomechanical models of joint loading through integration of musculoskeletal imaging, gait analysis, and finite element modeling represents a fruitful research direction [67-68]. Leveraging big data science, sensors, and digital health tools could enable improved disease monitoring, treatment adherence, patient education and self-management in lupus osteoarthritis. Wearable devices and smartphone apps that capture real-world disease activity data can be integrated with electronic health records and clinical decision support systems to optimize treatment. Machine learning applied to multimodal data sources may uncover new predictive and prognostic indicators. Telemedicine and mobile health technologies have potential to improve access and quality of multidisciplinary care. Further research should evaluate the impact of digital health technologies on patient-reported outcomes [69-72].
Lupus osteoarthritis is a severe complication of systemic lupus erythematosus associated with pain, disability, and reduced quality of life. The complex interplay between ongoing inflammation, altered joint mechanics, and tissue damage drives disease progression. While treatment has improved, many patients still develop erosive arthritis and accrue joint damage over time. A systems medicine approach leveraging multi-omics technologies and computational models holds promise to unravel disease heterogeneity, predictive biomarkers, and molecular targets for personalized therapy. Advances in tissue engineering, nanotechnology, and digital health innovation may transform future management. However, lupus osteoarthritis remains a challenging condition warranting further research to improve long-term outcomes and restore joint health.
Further studies should evaluate efficacy and safety of novel biologics and small molecule inhibitors targeting pathogenic pathways identified through omics profiling of synovial tissue and circulating cells. Combination treatment strategies matched to molecular disease signatures require exploration. Regenerative medicine therapies aimed at durable joint tissue restoration should be rigorously tested in progressively larger randomized controlled trials. Development of predictive algorithms integrating multi-omics data and machine learning may enable precision medicine approaches. Digital health technologies that enhance disease monitoring and patient self-management deserve evaluation in lupus osteoarthritis populations. Multidisciplinary care and patient support systems are crucial to optimize outcomes.
SLE - systemic lupus erythematosus ESR - erythrocyte sedimentation rate CRP - C-reactive protein SLEDAI - Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index SLICC - Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics DMARD - disease-modifying antirheumatic drug NSAID - nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug | TNF - tumor necrosis factor IL - interleukin MRI - magnetic resonance imaging DEXA - dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry BMI - body mass index HPV - human papillomavirus COX - cyclooxygenase |
Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not Applicable
Consent for publication: Not Applicable
Availability of data and materials: all data are available and sharing is available as well as publication.
Competing interests: The authors hereby that they have no competing interests.
Corresponding author supplied all study materials. There was no further funding for this study.
The authors completed the study protocol and were the primary organizers of data collection and the manuscript's draft and revision process. Tamer A. Addissouky wrote the article and ensured its accuracy. All authors contributed to the discussion, assisted in designing the study and protocol and engaged in critical discussions of the draft manuscript.
The authors thank all the researchers, editors, reviewers, and the supported universities that have done great efforts on their studies. Moreover, we are grateful to the editors, reviewers, and reader of this journal.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
