AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2578-8868/241
1 Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine, Orange CA
*Corresponding Author: Amit Chaudhari, Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine, Orange CA.
Citation: Sophia Angelides, Amit Chaudhari, Tigran Khachatryan, Wengui Yu, (2022). Recurrent Ischemic Strokes in the Territory of Recurrent Artery of Heubner Presenting in Relation to Facial Swelling and Weakness. J. Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. 11(4); DOI:10.31579/2578-8868/241
Copyright: © 2022 Amit Chaudhari, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Received: 18 March 2022 | Accepted: 04 April 2022 | Published: 11 April 2022
Keywords: huebner; stroke; neurology; ischemic stroke; case report
Strokes involving the Recurrent Artery of Huebner are quite rare and are often asymptomatic. Here, we describe a rare case of recurrent infarctions involving the right Recurrent Artery of Heubner, likely due to small vessel disease. Our 32-year-old patient presented to the emergency department with sudden onset right-sided facial weakness, numbness, and difficulty with eye closure. A non-contrast head computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging revealed an incidental subacute infarct in the territory of the right Recurrent Artery of Heubner. He was discharged on valacyclovir and prednisone for suspected Bell’s palsy, as well as aspirin, atorvastatin, metformin, and antihypertensives for secondary stroke prevention. Unfortunately, he was noncompliant with medications and lost to follow-up until he presented again more than one year later with a complaint of isolated right facial swelling and ipsilateral weakness. Imaging revealed an incidental new subacute infarct in the territory of the right Recurrent Artery of Heubner. Close follow-up of the patient and guidelines for appropriate management of secondary risk factors are discussed.
The Recurrent Artery of Huebner has been discussed as having many variations in its origin, its course, and the areas which it supplies. It most commonly arises from the anterior cerebral artery within 2 mm of the anterior communicating artery and is known to reliably supply the head of the caudate nucleus, the anterior inferior limb of the internal capsule, the external globus pallidus, the nucleus accumbens, the hypothalamus, the uncinate fasciculus and olfactory regions [3]. Infarctions of the RAH are rare and not often documented, but are classically known to cause contralateral hemiparesis, predominantly in the upper extremity with facial involvement [5]. Other documented symptoms have included abulia, change in affect, delusions, disinhibition, disorientation, dementia, or patients may be asymptomatic [2,7-9]. Here, we describe a rare case of recurrent infarctions involving the right Recurrent Artery of Heubner, likely due to small vessel disease.
This is a case report describing neuroimaging findings from a 32-year-old man who presented to the University of California Hospital System. A typical stroke MRI protocol was used with diffusion, T2/FLAIR and susceptibility-weighted images. All images were acquired on a 1.5T MRI scanner. The patient consented to publication of non-identified data for research purposes, and all research activities were in accordance with the strict guidelines put forth by the University of California Irvine Institutional Review Board.
A 32-year-old man presented to the emergency department with sudden onset right-sided facial weakness, numbness, and difficulty with eye closure. His past medical history was significant for poorly-controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension, as well as similar presentation to the emergency department with sudden onset right facial weakness in 2013. At the time, a head computed tomography (CT) scan was unremarkable. His symptoms resolved completely within a few hours and the patient was discharged home without further workup. In September 2019, the patient again presented to the emergency department, this time with bilateral facial swelling and weakness. A routine non-contrast head CT showed striatocapsular encephalomalacia (Figure 1).
Subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed corresponding diffusion restriction and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) changes, suggesting a subacute infarct in the right Recurrent Artery of Heubner (RAH) territory (Figure 2).
Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the brain and neck was unremarkable.He was discharged on prednisone, valacyclovir for suspected Bell’s palsy, as well as started on aspirin 81mg, atorvastatin, metformin, and antihypertensives for secondary stroke prevention. However, he remained noncompliant with medication use and was lost to follow-up. In January 2021, the patient presented again with sudden onset right sided facial weakness, numbness, and difficulty with eye closure. His glycosylated A1c on arrival was 12.4 and systolic blood pressures were in the 160s. Neurological examination revealed bilateral eye pain without vision loss or diplopia, right sided decreased sensation in the V1, V2 and V3 regions, and right sided upper and lower facial motor weakness. The remainder of the exam was within normal limits and did not identify any left sided deficits. Head CT showed an area of striatocapsular encephalomalacia that was more extensive that the one seen in 2019 (Figure 1). MRI also showed additional areas of diffusion restriction with FLAIR changes, suggesting a second subacute infarct in the same right Recurrent Artery of Heubner territory (Figure 3).
CT angiogram of the head and neck was unremarkable. He was again started on prednisone, valcyclovir, metformin, and anti-hypertensives. He was started on Aspirin 81 daily and Plavix 75 daily for 21 days, with instructions to continue Plavix monotherapy in accordance with the 2013 CHANCE [10] clinical trials. The patient has remained noncompliant with medications and has not responded to two follow-up appointment requests thus far.
Our case describes recurrent infarcts in the Recurrent Artery of Huebner territory, each time presenting with unrelated symptoms of right facial weakness and isolated facial swelling. The MRI in 2019 showed chronic right RAH territory stroke. The location of the infarct does not correspond to the symptoms of ipsilateral facial swelling or weakness [2,5,7-9]. Full metabolic and infectious investigations were unrevealing and the etiology of the facial swelling is not known. This patient’s strokes were considered asymptomatic and were found incidentally when he sought medical care for facial swelling of unknown origin.The etiology of the strokes is most likely due to small vessel disease secondary to uncontrolled diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Given the unremarkable MRA in 2019 and the unremarkable CTA in 2021, the infarct was considered less likely due to large vessel disease or a proximal occlusion, though he did not undergo an angiogram. The exact causes of recurrent strokes are not well understood, but it has been suggested that diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia increase risk of recurrent strokes [6,1].With asymptomatic stroke, management focuses on modifying risk factors to reduce risk of recurrent stroke. The 2013 CHANCE study [10] and 2017 POINT study [4] investigated the use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for secondary prevention after a minor ischemic stroke and revealed a benefit of DAPT for 21 days before continuing with long term therapy with a single antiplatelet agent. SPS3 Investigators suggested a benefit of tight blood pressure control with a systolic blood pressure goal less than 130 compared to 130-149 [11]. After presentation in 2019 this patient was started on aspirin 81 mg. However, despite extensive counseling, he continues to be non-compliant with all medications, placing him at risk for more recurrent lacunar infarcts.There are several limitations of this study, the biggest one being that it is a case report with a sample size of one. Recurrent infarcts in the same vascular territory, without vascular or structural abnormalities, are exceedingly rare. Neuroimaging at the time may incidentally discover these infarcts, though for the most part they may occur unnoticed. Future neuroimaging may be biased towards considering them all as one infarct, though clinicians must always remain aware of the possibility that what they visualize is a culmination of several prior recurrent infarcts in the same vascular distribution. Due to the low sample size, the true incidence of these recurrent infarcts cannot be estimated by this study.
Recurrent infarcts of lacunar arteries, like the recurrent artery of Huebner, are often asymptomatic and missed on imaging. At minimum, a CT-guided angiogram and an MRI should be considered to rule out any vascular or structural abnormalities. If none are present, management should focus on optimization of risk factors of hypertension, diabetes, and others. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) may be considered in the short term, with Aspirin to follow for life-long secondary stroke prevention.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
