Recent Advances in Foot and Ankle Surgery

Editorial | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2694-0248/042

Recent Advances in Foot and Ankle Surgery

  • Nithin Sunku *

Department of Orthopaedics University/Organization: Global Hospital Trauma Centre, India.

*Corresponding Author: Nithin Sunku, Department of Orthopaedics University/Organisation: Global Hospital Trauma Centre, India. Email: drsnithin@gmail.com

Citation: Nithin Sunku, (2022), Recent advances in foot and ankle surgery, J Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma Care, 4(4); DOI: 10.31579/2694-0248/042

Copyright: © 2022, Nithin Sunku. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 28 July 2022 | Accepted: 19 August 2022 | Published: 30 August 2022

Keywords: foot and ankle surgery; treatment; joints; cutting edge technology; imaging modalities; FAAM; FAOS; metatarsus adductus; PROMs; FFI

Abstract

Foot and Ankle has in itself developed as a subspeciality of importance. With growing advance in technology and imaging modalities the treatment and surgery has grown enormously in the field of foot and ankle joints. From simple bony fractures to ankle replacement to arthroscopy it’s a fast pace through which we are able to treat the patients with the use of cutting-edge technology.

Summary

Foot and Ankle has in itself developed as a subspecialty of importance. With growing advance in technology and imaging modalities the treatment and surgery has grown enormously in the field of foot and ankle joints. From simple bony fractures to ankle replacement to arthroscopy it’s a fast pace through which we are able to treat the patients with the use of cutting-edge technology.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) is the most used PROMs in foot and ankle evaluation. At present this is used widely and has been translated into several languages. It is applicable in many conditions and has proven validation across multiple foot and ankle diseases hence FAOS is the preferred PROM by many specialists.

In a study by Hansen et al. [1] took into consideration about various scores later on summarized them. Totally there were 17 patient reported outcome measures in the setting of ankle instability, including commonly used measures such as the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), Foot Function Index (FFI), and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS).  Their analysis among these for ankle instability showed only 3 scales to be valid enough. Of these scales, only the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) had been rigorously validated for construct validity using modern psychometric methods.

Hallux Valgus

Hallux valgus surgery in patients already having metatarsus adductus is a challenging problem in foot. In a study by Choi et al. [2] they took 173 feet sample with hallux valgus and compared those with metatarsus adductus (42 feet) and those without metatarsus adductus (131 feet) after proximal chevron and Akin osteotomies. At a median follow-up of 32 months, no difference in the improvement of the hallux valgus angle and the intermetatarsal angle between groups. Recurrence rate was significantly higher in the metatarsus adductus group (28.6% compared with 6.1%) [3]. 

Trauma

In RCT done by White et al. [4] in which fibula fracture fixation by different methods in young patients (mean age, 42 years) either by fibular nail (63 patients) or by plate osteosynthesis (62 patients). They found no difference in the Olerud and Molander Score (p = 0.621) between the groups at 1 year and no significant difference in the quality of radiographic reduction, rate of complications, and rate of reoperations between the groups.

Another prospective study by Del Balso et al. was done in which radiographic and functional outcomes were compared. These were patients who underwent either closed reduction - syndesmosis with screw fixation (29 patients) or open reduction syndesmosis with repair of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AiTFL) and screw fixation (21 patients). They reported better syndesmotic reduction in the AiTFL group on postoperative CT scans. But no difference was there between groups in overall functional scores. Nonetheless, 12 months, the AiTFL group had better Maryland Foot Shoe subscore and FAOS Quality of Life subscore. They opined that it might be a product of improved reduction.

Arthroscopy

Ankle arthroscopy (AA) is now a well-established treatment method and important armamentarium of the foot and ankle surgeon. It can be used both as a diagnostic tool and also has therapeutic applications in the same sitting using a minimally invasive technique. Many conditions such as high incidence of chondral lesions and other intra- articular abnormalities following ankle fractures can be treated well with scopy. Almost 80% were treated in this manner by study done on 288 patients [5]. 

Arthroscopy allows for clear visualization and assessment of associated syndesmotic and ligamentous injuries. Chronic ankle instability is such a condition where pathology likely due to contribution of medial ankle ligament damage, which lead to better understanding & refinement of our treatment strategies. Further progress in ligament injury treatment has led to the development of arthroscopic reconstructive procedures of the anterior tibiotalar ligament portion of the deltoid ligament [6,7].

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova