AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2578-8868/243
1 Professor of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
2 Resident Physician in Adult Neurology University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
3 Resident of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
*Corresponding Author: Mohammad Faraji-Rad, Department of Neurosurgery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Citation: Mohammad Faraji-Rad, Elnaz Faraji-Rad, Shahab Mahmoud-Nejad, Saman Mohazzab-Torabi, (2022). Rare Primary Neuroendocrine Neoplasm (NENs) Brain Tumor, Case Report and Literature Review. J. Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. 12(1); DOI:10.31579/2578-8868/243
Copyright: © 2022 Amit Chaudhari, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Received: 06 May 2022 | Accepted: 20 May 2022 | Published: 31 May 2022
Keywords: neuroendocrine neoplasm; brain tumor; central nervous system
Rare Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are malignancies rarely involving the central nervous system. A 42-year-old man was referred to our clinic with chronic intermittent frontal headache and left hemiparesis. After an initial assessment with CTs and MRIs, proper basal ganglia involvement with a heterogeneous brain tumor was found. The patient underwent brain tumor resection, and pathology showed Neuroendocrine neoplasms. Surprisingly, tumor manifestation was similar to metastatic NENs. It is essential that the prognosis between primary NENs and metastatic NENs to the brain is utterly different, and treatment options are not identical. The patient was discharged concession with left hemiparesis and referred to a neuro-oncologist for further treatment.
The Central Nervous System (CNS) contains multiplex cells competing to bring out neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). [1] neuroendocrine cells are distributed all around organs and are well represented throughout the respiratory system, gastrointestinal tract, and CNS. [2] NENs are developing in all previous systems, and rare reports discussed NENs derived primarily in the brain. [3] These tumors are still sporadic, and they count for only 4%–6% of all extracranial malignancies. While there has been an increasing incidence of NENs over these years, they are diagnosed as secondary due to extra-CNS origin. [4] When NENs are diagnosed as the primary tumor, the extra-cranial source should be assessed on further diagnostic imaging. Brain metastases are correlated with a poor prognosis, with overall survival of 8 months from CNS involvement to diagnosis. [5,6] The incidence of patients with NENs having brain metastases is <5>
Here, we describe a case of a 42-year-old previously healthy man who presented with symptoms of intracranial hypertension such as early morning headache and continuous blurred vision. Initial imaging showed an intracranial heterogenous brain tumor. An MRI of the brain demonstrated a heterogenous 2 cm lesion in the right thalamus, which entered lateral ventricle near the foramen of Monro. (Figure-1) He has undergone surgery, and diagnostic pathologic tests reported neuroblastoma. (Figure-2) But referral pathologic center had the positive test of synaptophysin and chromogranin, that neurofilament staining was positive, either. Pathology reported high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma, with a Ki-67 of 45%-50% positive. Epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neuronal nuclear antigen (NeuN), S-100, thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF1), CDX2, and a pancreatic battery including insulin, gastrin, somatostatin, glucagon, vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) were all negative. While the patient was assessed by PET/CT scan and whole-body MRI, which all were harmful for any evidence of extracranial sources of NENs brain tumor.
Subsequently, after surgery, the patient developed mild left hemiparesis and worsening mental status with a Glasgow Coma Scale of 14. After initial brain tumor surgery, GCS was about 12-13. The left-sided hemiparesis improved with physical therapy. The decision was made to proceed with further treatment with referral to radio-oncologist.
Based on our knowledge, rare reports discussed NENS in literature. Neuroendocrine cells are available in different organ systems, and initial NENs can develop in all organs. [7] The setting of the primary brain tumor inside the thalamic area also present notable importance. The thalamic and pre-ventricular nucleus is a group of neuroendocrine cells isolated next to the ventricles in our patient’s primary NEN area. NENs can be classified clinically as functional or nonfunctional if increased hormone production is needed. [8] In addition, articles categorized NENs as their anatomical location and Ki-67 presenting. [8] Ki-67 marker uses as a functional degree of proliferation because it is secreted by active cells. [9]
Research suggested a possible primary CNS NEN in a 77-year-old woman with overall survival of 1.5 years with confirmed histology. Regarding our case, other cases demonstrated non-CNS primary NENs. Secondary NENs manifested in the pineal gland, pituitary, and along the meninges, which surprisingly thalamic, are was rare. [10]
In our case, several indications reinforce the speculation that a brain tumor was indeed a primary NEN. First, tumor location is in an area with known neuroendocrine cells. [11] secondary, most metastatic brain mass most commonly demonstrated in the location of the gray-white junction. [11] thirdly, extensive workup with CT and PET/CT imaging showed no other extra-cranial sources. This strongly suggests that the brain was the primary and only disease site.
The gold standard protocol for assessing NENs, both CTs and FDG PET/CTs. Which has a sensitivity of 95% for assessment of a primary NENs brain tumor. [12] similar to our case, if NEN is diagnosed as high grade, FDG PET/CTs have magnificent sensitivity in finding primary sources. Our patient had multiple PET-CTs around his brain tumor course that was negative to find another primary location.
More research are required on the exact treatment of primary brain NENs. As a common idea, in metastatic brain NENs, reports has demonstrated radiation therapy plus surgery are more effective. In addition, platinum-based chemotherapy such as cisplatin is suggested in high-grade primary NENs. Consequently, in primary NENs brain tumors, brain tumor resection and chemo-radiotherapy should be considered for treatment.
Finally, although many diagnosed NENs tumors originate from other organs such as respiratory tracts, gastro-interstitial and supra-renal, in rare conditions, NENs are manifested as primary brain tumors. In This situation, precise pathologic evaluation with a whole organ assessment is needed to rule out metastasis. Furthermore, based on the patient’s condition, open brain tumor resection with other chemo-radiotherapy is effective for most excellent outcomes.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
