Rare Case report of Amyand's Hernia in a Premature Infant

Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/160

Rare Case report of Amyand's Hernia in a Premature Infant

  • Zohra Ashraf Siwji 1
  • Alya Talib AlBlooshi 2
  • Moustafa Hamchou 2
  • Aiman Rahmani 1*

1 Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
2 Pediatric Surgery Department, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.

*Corresponding Author: Aiman Rahmani, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.

Citation: Zohra A Siwji, Alya T AlBlooshi, M Hamchou, A Rahmani. (2021). Rare Case report of Amyand's Hernia in a Premature Infant. International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. 8(5); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/160

Copyright: © 2021 Aiman Rahmani, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 03 August 2021 | Accepted: 30 September 2021 | Published: 09 October 2021

Keywords: Amyand hernia; inguinal hernias; vaginalis; premature infants

Abstract

Although inguinal hernias are a common finding in premature infants, it is usually caused by the protrusion of the bowel through a persistent patent processus vaginalis. However, acute appendicitis in association with an inguinal hernia in this age group is a rare finding. This type of hernia is referred to as an Amyand hernia.

Introduction

Although inguinal hernias are a common finding in premature infants, it is usually caused by the protrusion of the bowel through a persistent patent processus vaginalis. However, acute appendicitis in association with an inguinal hernia in this age group is a rare finding. This type of hernia is referred to as an Amyand hernia [1].

Amyand’s hernia is a term used to describe an inguinal hernia containing either a normal or inflamed vermiform appendix in an incarcerated inguinal hernia. It was first described in 1735 & subsequently named after Claudius Amyand, after he successfully performed an appendectomy on an 11-year- old boy with the above presentation [1]. 

The incidence of finding a normal appendix within the inguinal hernia sac is narrated to be approximately 1% [3]. While to find an inflamed appendix is even less common & accounts for only 0.08–0.13%. Such cases are extremely rare in neonates & infants due to the lack of detail available with only about 20 cases being reported so far in the literature [3]. 

Clinical presentation of this hernia can mimic that of an incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernia therefore making it uncommon to be diagnosed preoperatively. 

When looking at the cases of appendicitis, it is also extremely rare in the neonatal period with only 0.1% of cases being detected & has only been reported to occur in around 2% of the pediatric patients under the age of 12 months [1]. Of the 0.1% of the neonatal appendicitis, it has been noted that 1/3 of such cases are associated with Amyand’s hernia [1].

In this article, we are reporting a case of a premature baby, part of twin, with Amyand’s hernia, with an inflamed & necrotic vermiform appendix within the sac of the right inguinal hernia. 

We present this rare occurrence of Amyand Hernia in a 2-month old male, part of twin, born prematurely at 26 weeks’ gestation, due to maternal placental abruption.  The infant presented at the age of 5 weeks with a one-day history of abdominal distention, tenderness in addition to scrotal edema. There were no signs of peritonitis. 

Radiologic studies of abdominal X-Ray (Figure 1) showed distended bowel with no free air & non contractile loops. 

Abdominal ultrasound was performed & reported to have evidence of right inguinal hernia seen reaching the right hemi-scrotum, containing bowel loops with evidence of Doppler flow seen. The right testicle is not obviously seen. Unremarkable appearance of the left testicle (Figure 2). 

The systemic examination was grossly normal. The clinical assessment made was that of a strangulated inguinoscrotal hernia. Sepsis screen was carried out & patient was started on piperacillin/tazobactam & Flucloxacillin; The blood test results showed a white cell count of 10.59/L, a haemoglobin of 136 g/L & platelet count of 281. The urea & electrolyte were within normal limits & blood gas showed a normal lactate level. 

The patient underwent Right groin exploration and diagnostic laparoscopy through the right hernia sac. The intraoperative findings included: strangulated right Inguinal hernia with necrotic appendix (Figure 3). Fortunately, there was no signs of intra-abdominal necrotic bowel. However, contralateral left indirect inguinal hernia was noted. Therefore, the patient underwent bilateral inguinal herniotomy & appendectomy.

The infant had an uneventful postoperative course with no further complications. Initially was started on TPN & was commenced on feeds by post op day 5, which the patient tolerated well with no complications. Patient completed a total of 5 days of antibiotics due to the intraoperative findings of incarcerated hernia with necrotic appendix, despite all inflammatory markers being benign.

The histopathology report (Figure 4) confirmed that the tissue is extensively necrotic and replaced by hemorrhage.  Given the ghost of cord/tubular structure with focal lumen-like formation; the tissue may represent markedly congested and necrotic appendix.

Figure 1: The small bowel loops are distended with air with colonic residue in the large bowel loops and air seen in the rectum. No pneumatosis intestinalis or portal venous gas. No pneumoperitoneum
Figure 2: USG of the Right inguinal canal showing thickened appendix
Figure 3: Right inguinal hernia with incarcerated necrotic appendix
Figure 4: Section shows extensively necrotic cord/tubular like tissue (left image), on higher magnification there is extensive necrotic congested & hemorrhagic tissue (right image).

Discussion

tissue or through a wall of the containing cavity in which it is normally enclosed. The contents of an inguinal hernia usually include small bowel and omentum. The incidence of a normal appendix in an inguinal hernia is 1% and this drops further to 0.1% when looking at cases of inflamed or perforated appendices [2].

Although inguinal hernia is a common finding in premature neonates, with an incidence reaching up to 18%, acute appendicitis in this age group is very rare. Acute appendicitis in infants occurs in 2% of pediatric appendicitis cases [3]. Neonatal appendicitis is extremely rare and represents 0.1% of all infantile cases [3]. It has been estimated that 50% of such cases are premature neonates, and in one-third of these the inflamed appendix lies within a hernia sac [3].

An Amyand’s hernia has been implicated as a cause for neonatal appendicitis in 25–30% of all cases reported in the literature [2]. The pathophysiology of Amyand’s hernia is unknown and the relationship between incarceration and inflammation of the appendix has not been clarified. Some have raised the idea that Amyand’s hernia with acute appendicitis could be an incidental finding while others suggest that there is a possible relationship between the incarceration of the appendix & the subsequent inflammation [3]. Other theories that have been suggested were that the appendix becomes susceptible to trauma once it has entered the sac. Once in the sac the blood supply may be subsequently cut off or dramatically reduced stemming to the development of inflammation & bacterial overgrowth. This can further be exacerbated with any increase in intra-abdominal pressure that would subsequently cause compression of the appendix, ischemia, bacterial overgrowth & the final inflammation & the complications that may arise [3].

The presence of the appendix within the hernial sac is often an incidental finding during surgical intervention, because pre-operative diagnosis is extremely difficult with accepted imaging modalities in the setting of strangulated hernia and testicular torsion [1]. In addition, the diagnosis of Amyand’s hernia is rarely on the differential for most clinicians due to lack of awareness of the condition [1].

The common clinical presentation of an Amyand’s hernia is often of an incarcerated or strangulated hernia & the diagnosis is usually confirmed intraoperatively [2]. Preoperative diagnosis is usually challenging & difficult; imaging with ultrasound or even computed tomography scan can suggest the diagnosis but of course is not definitive [2]. However, due to the acute presentation & clinical findings patients are usually taken to the OR for emergency surgery2. In premature neonates, a painful swelling of the inguinoscrotal region, especially when accompanied by inflammation of the surrounding soft tissues, should lead to suspicion of Amyand’s hernia [3]. 

Management

The main stay of management is urgent surgical exploration of the inguinal region. Laparotomy may be considered in cases of possible peritoneal contamination [2].

Mortality rates in neonates & infants are low as inguinoscrotal induration & inflammation would usually lead to early surgical intervention [3].  Recent studies have demonstrated that laparoscopic surgery has become a preferred approach. This allows for a superior visualization of the entire abdominal cavity & therefore become both diagnostic & therapeutic2. Other benefits of laparoscopic versus open Amyand’s hernia repair includes decreased postoperative pain & earlier discharge [4]. 

Conclusion

In conclusion, appendicitis within Amyand’s hernia is extremely rare in neonates. It may be misdiagnosed as strangulated inguinal hernia, which is also managed in the same way of a surgical emergency. Therefore, it should also be considered as a differential diagnosis of strangulated inguinal hernia in premature neonates. The most optimal treatment is the urgent surgical exploration of the inguinal region. Appendectomy & hernial repair can be carried out concurrently through the inguinal exploration.

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova