AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1919/035
1 Department of Surgery, Morristown Medical Center, Morristown, NJ, USA.
2 Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadephia, PA, USA.
*Corresponding Author: Poya Pourghaderi, Department of Surgery, Morristown Medical Center, Morristown, NJ, USA
Citation: Poya Pourghaderi, Sara E. Chapin, Andrew M. Nouri, Zubin M Bamboat (2020) A Rare Case of Recurrent Phyllodes Tumor of Bilateral Breasts with Metastasis to the Retroperitoneum and Duodenum. J Clinical Research and Reports, 2(5); DOI:10.31579/2690-1919/035
Copyright: © 2020 Poya Pourghaderi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 31 January 2020 | Accepted: 11 February 2020 | Published: 18 February 2020
Keywords: metastatic; phyllodes; retroperitoneum; intraperitoneum; duodenum
Phyllodes tumors are uncommon fibroepithelial tumors of the breast. These tumors are graded based on the World Health Organization criteria into benign, borderline, and malignant subtypes. While benign phyllodes tumors are by far the most common presentation, borderline and malignant tumors have important clinical implications, as they are more likely to locally recur and metastasize. The most common sites of distant metastasis include the lung, bone, heart, and liver. Rare spread to the small intestines, kidney and pelvis have also been reported. We report a case of a 71 year-old woman with a history of locally recurrent phyllodes tumor of the breasts found to have retroperitoneal and intraperitoneal metastases. The retroperitoneal mass was just below the left kidney, extending into the pelvis, and overlying the psoas and iliacus. The second mass involved the second portion of the duodenum, the proximal transverse colon, and the overlying mesentery. This case of delayed metastatic spread of phyllodes tumor to two sites, seventeen years after first presentation, represent a rare case.
Phyllodes tumors are rare fibroepithelial neoplasms of the breast, representing just 0.2-2% of all breast cancers [1-4]. These tumors typically present in older women as mobile, multinodular, non-painful masses, with a median age at diagnosis of 40 to 45 years-old [4,5]. Characterized by their leaf-like appearance on microscopy, phyllodes tumors are currently graded histologically by the World Health Organization (WHO) into benign, borderline, and malignant subtypes based on specific features including the degree of stromal cellular atypia, stromal overgrowth, mitotic activity, and presence of infiltrative margins [1,6]. The grade of phyllodes tumors has significant clinical implications as risk of local recurrence as well as hematogenous metastases increases from benign to borderline to malignant phyllodes tumors [7,8]. Most phyllodes tumors behave in a benign manner. However, in the case of metastatic spread of the disease, the most commonly involved sites include the lung, bone, heart and liver [4,9,10]. In addition, there are a number of reports in the literature of rare, metastatic sites to the small intestine, kidney, and pelvis [9-13]. We report a case of a 71 year-old woman with history of locally recurrent phyllodes tumor of both breasts presenting with several weeks of left back pain and found to have two large metastases. This case highlights a unique location of a rare, aggressive tumor.
Our patient is a 71 year old woman with a history of hypercholesterolemia and osteoporosis who was diagnosed with a phyllodes tumor of the left breast in 2002. The breast mass was resected via lumpectomy with subsequent re-excision of positive margins. Her surgical history is also notable for laparoscopic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for an expanding benign tumor of the left ovary and excision of basal cell carcinoma of the skin overlying the left mid-abdominal region. She was disease-free for twelve years. In 2014, a small palpable subcutaneous nodule was noted at the left breast circumareolar scar. The mass was excised and pathology revealed atypical spindle cell proliferation concerning for recurrent low grade phyllodes.
Three years later, in 2017, the patient developed a palpable left axillary mass with left axillary lymphadenopathy. MRI revealed a lobulated nodule in the left axilla, foci of enhancement in the lower outer quadrant of the left breast and an enhancing nodule in the right breast retroareolar region. Biopsy of the left axillary mass revealed atypical spindle cell proliferation, suspicious for metastatic phyllodes tumor to the axillary lymph nodes. Staging workup did not reveal any evidence of distant metastasis outside of the left axilla.
Left axillary lymphadenectomy and right breast lumpectomywere performed. Pathology of the axillary specimen revealed atypical spindle cell neoplasm, consistent with borderline- and intermediate-grade phyllodes tumor and twenty-nine benign lymph nodes. It was difficult to determine whether this single mass represented a separate parenchymal phyllodes tumor or lymph node metastasis with complete architectural obliteration. Supporting the diagnosis of phyllodes tumor, immunohistochemical stains were negative for CK5/6, HWMCK, p63 and myogenin. Right breast lumpectomy pathology resulted in probable but not definitive diagnosis of benign phyllodes tumor. This diagnosis was based on the presence of a benign spindle cell lesion with surrounding fat necrosis.
The patient presented again in 2019 with complaint of left back pain, loss of appetite and weight loss of approximately ten pounds. She did not have lower extremity neuropathy, sensory or motor loss and did not experience nausea, vomiting, hematemesis or hematochezia. MRI revealed a left retroperitoneal mass approximately 8cm x 8cm in size, extending from below the inferior pole of the left kidney into the pelvis (Figure 1 and 2; horizontal arrow). A 4cm x 5cm mass was noted involving the second portion of the duodenum extending to the hepatic flexure (Figure 1 and 2; vertical arrow). Physical exam was unremarkable; the abdomen was soft, nontender and nondistended without evidence of any palpable masses or ascites.
Horizontal arrow pointing to the left retroperitoneal mass extending from below the inferior pole of the left kidney into the pelvis. Vertical arrow pointing to the mass involving the second portion of the duodenum extending to the hepatic flexure.
Horizontal arrow pointing to the left retroperitoneal mass extending from below the inferior pole of the left kidney into the pelvis. Vertical arrow pointing to the mass involving the second portion of the duodenum extending to the hepatic flexure.
The patient received endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsies of the masses which were consistent with metastatic phyllodes tumor similar to left breast lesion excised in 2002. Imaging did not reveal evidence of disease outside the abdomen including the lungs. Given the patient’s presentation of debilitating back pain, surgical resection was pursued.
The patient underwent an exploratory laparotomy with radical resection of the left retroperitoneal mass located below the inferior pole of the left kidney, sitting on the psoas and iliacus muscles, and extending into the pelvis. The mass was removed en bloc with grossly clear margins. The second mass in the right upper quadrant was mobile but found to be involving the anterior and lateral wall of the second portion of the duodenum as well as the mesentery and serosal layer of proximal transverse colon. In order to achieve clear margins, a right hemicolectomy with ileocolic anastomosis, partial duodenal resection with primary closure, and omental flap over the duodenal repair was performed. A right hemicolectomy with ileocolic anastomosis was chosen instead of a segmental transverse colectomy with colo-colonic anastomosis in order to minimize risk of postoperative bowel leak
Phyllodes tumors of the breast make up a small portion of all breast cancers, with roughly 500 women in the United States diagnosed each year [4]. Phyllodes tumors represent a spectrum of disease, ranging from benign to borderline to malignant grade tumors. Benign phyllodes tumors make up 60 to 75% of cases and resemble fibroadenomas of the breast [4]. More closely resembling sarcomas, malignant tumors (10-20% of cases) are characterized histologically by marked stromal cellularity and atypia, high mitotic activity (>10 per 10 HPF), stromal overgrowth, and infiltrative tumor borders [4,14]. The distinction between borderline and malignant tumors is sometimes difficult to make due to their overlapping pathologic features, but overall a borderline designation (13-26% of cases) is assigned to tumors of an intermediate presentation [7,14]. The histologic grade of phyllodes tumor guides clinical prognosis as borderline and malignant tumors are much more likely to locally recur or metastasize [8]. The poor pathologic features of malignant tumors are associated with worse clinical outcomes, including a 66% ten year survival compared to a 100% ten year survival of patients without poor features [15]. A recent review of the literature found pooled local recurrence rates for benign, borderline, and malignant tumors of 8%, 13%, and 18%, respectively [8]. Moreover, local recurrence of a phyllodes tumor serves as one risk factor for metastatic disease [16]. Tumor metastasis typically occurs within the initial two years of diagnosis, and tumors of a malignant grade have the highest rates of distant metastasis (22-40)% [4,9,17]. Metastatic phyllodes tumors are known to spread hematogenously, with the most common sites of metastasis including the lung (66%-84.5%), bone (28%-39%), brain and liver [4,9,10,12]. Unusual sites for distant metastases have also been described in the literature, including case reports of disease involving the adrenal gland, small intestine, kidney, pancreas, and pelvis [9,13].
Our patient presented with rare sites of metastasis of phyllodes tumor into the retroperitoneal and intraperitoneal spaces, including involvement of the proximal transverse colon, mesentery, and duodenum. There are a limited number of reported cases of phyllodes tumors involving the gastrointestinal tract. To our knowledge, there are two case reports in the literature, one of a gastrointestinal bleed due to tumor involvement of the duodenum and another case of small bowel obstruction related to tumor metastases to the ileum [9,11]. Moreover, our patient had tumor involvement in the retroperitoneum, from below the kidney into the pelvic cavity. One other case report has described similar tumor involvement of the pelvis [13]. Of note, our patient did not have any metastatic involvement of the lungs, the most common area of involvement for metastatic phyllodes tumors. The patient reported in this case also presented with tumor metastases almost twenty years after her initial diagnosis. Whereas most metastatic disease occurs in the first two years of diagnosis, there have been other reported cases of a delayed rather than synchronous presentation of up to thirteen years after diagnosis [10,18]. Our patient presented with metastatic disease seventeen years after her initial diagnosis. Finally, the current patient’s tumor progressed from borderline presentation at initial diagnosis to malignant grade tumor at the sites of distant metastases. This worsening of pathologic features with local recurrence of disease has been previously described in the literature [8]. While locally recurrent tumors most often present as the same grade as the original tumor, one systematic review of 54 retrospective studies found 26% of benign and 21% of borderline tumors locally recur at a higher grade (borderline or malignant) [8]. For the treatment of phyllodes tumors, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend wide excision with one centimeter margins, without axillary lymph node dissection [3,4,15,19]. There are currently no randomized controlled trials studying the efficacy of adjuvant radiation therapy. However, the NCCN guidelines recommend consideration of adjuvant radiation, especially in the treatment of borderline and malignant tumors [1,3,4,19,20]. Currently, the success of chemotherapy has not been well shown in the literature. Mitus, et al. found doxorubicin and ifosfamide-based chemotherapies to have some efficacy in the treatment of metastatic disease, but more literature is needed to determine a role for chemotherapy in the treatment of phyllodes tumors [21]. Based on current guidelines, the patient in this case may have benefitted from adjuvant radiation therapy on her initial presentation or during her first local recurrence. Ultimately, the prognosis for patients with distant metastases is very poor, with few patients surviving a year after diagnosis.10 For borderline and malignant phyllodes tumors, the importance of negative margins is paramount, as excess surgical margins has been shown to be a risk factor for local recurrence as well as distant metastasis [20]. Therefore, complete tumor excision with mastectomy if needed should be considered [20]. This case presents an unusual presentation of metastatic spread of a phyllodes tumor seventeen years after initial diagnosis as well as a rare site of metastasis in the retroperitoneal and intraperitoneal spaces, without metastatic spread to the lungs. This case highlights the need for clear guidelines for the use of adjuvant radiation therapy in the initial treatment of or in the management of local recurrence for borderline and malignant phyllodes tumors. Metastatic malignant phyllodes tumors represent a group of aggressive neoplasms where complete surgical excision with wide margins and proper follow-up are vital to treatment of the disease.
None to report.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
