Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2767-7370/156
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,
2 Department of Pediatrics and 3 Health Science Research.
3 Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Amrita Vishwavidyapeetham, Kochi 682041, India.
*Corresponding Author: Krishnan Krishnan Nair, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Amrita Vishwavidyapeetham, Kochi 682041, India.
Citation: Vinita Murali, Jananee Subramanian, Sheena P. Kochumon, Radhamany K and Krishnan Nair CK, (2025), Rare but Relentless: The Leiomyosarcoma Enigma, J New Medical Innovations and Research, 6(5); DOI:10.31579/2767-7370/156
Copyright: © 2025, Krishnan Krishnan Nair. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 08 April 2025 | Accepted: 26 April 2025 | Published: 10 May 2025
Keywords: LMS-Leiomyosarcoma; Myoma; hysterectomy
Uterine sarcomas comprise less than 1% of gynaecological malignancies and 2-5% of all uterine malignancies. Leiomyosarcoma accounts for less than 1% of all uterine malignant mesenchymal tumour. As there is no specific pattern of symptoms to differentiate leiomyosarcoma from leiomyoma,the diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma is usually made postoperatively. MRI is a useful mode of investigation for detection of LMS and helps in determination of appropriate management. LMS is commonly seen in perimenopausal women, hence preoperative imaging with MRI and in bag morcellation may be considered in such cases.
Leiomyosarcoma is a rare mesenchymal uterine malignancy. It is a aggressive tumour with high mortality and morbidity. Preoperative diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma is still a real challenge.
63 yearold Multipara, has been married for 47 years and had 4 normal child birth. Last child birth was 39 years back. Postpartum sterilisation was done. She had attained menopause at 45 years of age. She came for consultation with complaints of abdominal pain and dribbling of urine for 4 weeks duration. She was on homeopathic medication for 2 weeks. She was admitted in view of urinary retention, relieved by bladder catheterisation. MRI showed a large lobulated T2 hypo-intense mass in the pelvis measuring 9.5 x 8.8 x 10.9 cm, as can be seen in Fig1. The mass shows T2 hyper-intense areas of cystic degeneration within. Anteriorly, it is causing significant compression of the urinary bladder. Posterolateral, it is reaching up to the lateral pelvic wall on the left side abutting the obturator internus and the pyriformis muscle, suggestive of broad ligament fibroid. She was taken up for total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo oophorectomy with unilateral DJ stenting.

Figure 1: MRI Findings: Large lobulated T2 hypointense mass in the pelvis measuring 9.5 x 8.8 x 10.9 cm with T2 hyperintense areas of cystic degeneration within,causing significant compression of the urinary bladder anteriorly
Intra operative Findings
A large lobulated mass of 10 x 9cm seen anterior to the uterus and bladder stretched over the myoma, extending through the anterior vaginal wall upto the level of external cervical os and has extension into left broad ligament. The mass was friable with high vascularity. The mass was found to have extension into vagina, which was dissected with finger and pushed the mass pervaginally above and the mass bulk of tumor removed. Capsule of left broad ligament opened and mass enucleated.
Histopathology revealed Leiomyosarcoma
Immunohistochemistry confirmed Leiomyosarcoma. Cells are positive for Caldesmon, SMA,negative for Cyclin D1,CD10,p53(wild)
Post operative CT done showed Residual lesion
Per vaginal and per rectal examination showed fixed mass in left side of vault Tumour board discussion done, planned for chemotherapy followed by reassessment for radiation therapy
She was started on Inj Gemcitabine 675 mg/m2 Day 1 and 8 with Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 day 8 only Q 3 weekly for 4 cycles followed by reassessment with CT and MRI for further treatment.

Uterine sarcomas comprise less than 1% of gynaecological malignancies and 2-5% of all uterine malignancies. Leiomyosarcoma accounts for less than 1% of all uterine malignant mesenchymal tumour[1], which spreads through intraperitoneal and hematogenous pathways. Malignant pure mesenchymal uterine tumour/uterine sarcomas encompass endometrial stromal sarcoma(ESS), Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) and undifferentiated sarcoma[1].
It is more common in perimenopausal women with median age of 50 years(5). Clinical picture is fairly similar to leiomyoma which includes Abnormal uterine bleeding, pelvic pain or pelvic mass[2]. Regional lymphnode positivity and distant metastasis are rare [3].
It is often diagnosed post operatively following hysterectomy or myomectomy following a benign disease by histopathology [4].
Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment, hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo oophorectomy is the surgery of choice, ovarian preservation can be considered in young women.
Adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy is not beneficial
Chemotherapeutic drugs like Gemcitabine, Docetaxel and Doxorubicin are the treatment of choice in advanced or recurrent disease.
Broad gynecological complaints such as abnormal uterine bleeding,pelvic pain or pelvic mass.High clinical suspicion of LMS should be there in fibroids diagnosed in perimenopausal women.MRI is a good assessment tool. Pre operative imaging with MRI and in bag morcellation may be considered in such cases.
Source of support: Nil
Conflict of interest: None declared
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,