AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/173
1 Department of General Surgery, Altınbas University School of Medicine Bahcelievler Medical Park Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
2 Department of Radiology, Prof Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
*Corresponding Author: Berrin Erok, Department of Radiology, Prof Dr Cemil Tascıoglu City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Citation: H Akyol, B Erok. (2021). Quality of Information Available on YouTube Videos Pertaining to Bariatric Surgery. International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. 9(2); DOI: 10.31579/2690-4861/173
Copyright: © 2021 Berrin Erok, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 07 September 2021 | Accepted: 29 November 2021 | Published: 09 December 2021
Keywords: bariatric surgery; hospital; disadvantages; gastrectomy; surgical technique
YouTube is one of the most frequently used online sources providing easy access to health information with a large, diverse, and searchable video library. However, an unregulated policy and lack of peer-review process are important disadvantages. Accordingly, while based on thousands of surgical, animated, oral presentation and patient-experience videos, the information provided by YouTube videos is considered questionable in terms of quality, accuracy and credibility.
YouTube is one of the most frequently used online sources providing easy access to health information with a large, diverse, and searchable video library [1-3]. However, an unregulated policy and lack of peer-review process are important disadvantages [1-3]. Accordingly, while based on thousands of surgical, animated, oral presentation and patient-experience videos, the information provided by YouTube videos is considered questionable in terms of quality, accuracy and credibility [4-7].
Obesity has become a serious public health problem worldwide and is one of the most searched topics about health issues on the internet [5,6,8]. Bariatric surgery, the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in particular, has increasingly been performed as the only long-standing effective treatment method of morbid obesity [5-7,9]. Accordingly, there is an increased popularity of bariatric surgery as well as the improved desire to have a rapid access to information through related YouTube videos, necessitating the evaluation of the quality of videos that can be found on that platform [6,7,10]. However, there are limited number of studies regarding quality of YouTube videos on bariatric surgery or sleeve gastrectomy and most of them were focused mainly on educational quality of surgical technique videos [5-7,11].
We have hypothesized the likelihood of lower quality of information provided by YouTube videos pertaining to bariatric surgery if were uploaded by sources other than academic institutions and physicians, as well as the likelihood of a discordance between video quality and user engagement, depending on the consideration of usefulness rather than optimal quality and accuracy of video content as the criteria for favorable public response.
This study was designed to assess the quality of information available on YouTube videos pertaining to bariatric surgery, based on well-recognized quality scoring systems and entire context available.
A search of YouTube (http://www.youtube.com) was performed on the June 20, 2020 using the search term “bariatric surgery”. The first 100 videos that appeared on each search were reviewed. Videos were independently analyzed by two authors. Video characteristics including the publishing source of upload (doctor, hospital, commercial), continent of origin, content (surgical technique, information, patient experience) and video statistics including the video length (min), number of views, number of likes, number of dislikes and days since upload were recorded. The quality of information was assessed using the Global Quality Scale (GQS) [12], DISCERN [13] and Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark [14] scores, while video power index (VPI) was also calculated using the formula: “Number of likes / (Number of likes + dislikes) x 100”
The quality assessment scores were compared according to video source and content, while the correlations between descriptive parameters (scale scores and video statistics) were also analyzed.
The GQS is a subjective measure of overall quality of information, graded on a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 representing poor quality (most information missing, not all useful for patients) and 5 representing excellent quality (very useful for patients) [12].
The DISCERN is an instrument to evaluate written consumer health information that comprises of 16 questions scored from 1 to 5. The total score ranges from 6 to 80, with higher scores indicating a better quality [13]. Although DISCERN was developed to assess written health information, it is considered applicable online quality tool and several studies confirmed its use as an in a variety of settings including evaluation of YouTube videos [14-18]
The JAMA benchmark evaluates the quality of online information using four distinct criteria including authorship (authors, contributors, affiliations, and credentials), attribution (references and sources used for the content, copyright information), disclosures (sponsorship, advertising, commercial funding, potential conflicts of interests), and currency (dates of posted and updated information). Each criterion is scored 1 if present and the total score ranges from 0 to 4, with 4 indicating better quality [19].
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was made using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Average distributions of quantitative data were tested with the Shapiro-Wilk test. The Kruskal-Wallis test and post hoc Dunn’s test were used for two-way intergroup comparisons of quantitative variables with no normal distribution. Spearman correlation analysis was used to evaluate the relationships between quantitative variables according to the results of normality test. The ICC (intra-class correlation coefficient alpha) was calculated to evaluate the compliance between the observers with consideration of α< 0>
Video characteristics
Overall, most of the videos (59.0%) were uploaded by hospitals, as followed by commercial uploads (26.0%) and videos uploaded by doctors (8.9%). The continent of origin was America in all videos. Video content was related to general information on disease or surgery in 53.0% of videos, while related to patient experience and surgical technique in 32.0% and 15.0% of cases, respectively (Table 1).
Descriptive statistics for YouTube videos
Average duration of videos was 3.44 (0.17-59.04) min. Median number of views was 12965, number of likes was 52 and the number of dislike was 4. (Table 1).
The median video power index was 8.7 (range, 0.25 to 1047.73) (Table 2).
GQS score was median 3 (range, 1 to 5) for both reviewer 1 and reviewer 2, along with a high level of concordance between reviewers (90.3%, ICC: 0.904;
Our findings revealed most of the YouTube videos pertaining to bariatric surgery to be hospital-sourced videos related to information on disease or patient experience rather than the surgical technique. Overall JAMA, GQS and DISCERN scores were consistent with moderate quality (mean scores: 2.33, 3.22 and 53.42, respectively) of information provided.
Data from past studies indicate the unreliability and poor quality of YouTube videos related to various diseases [3,18,20-23]. In a systematic review of 18 studies regarding the health-care information available on YouTube, only 17% to 61% of videos were reported to be useful in terms of content and accuracy of health-care information [24].
In the current study, majority of videos reviewed were related to information on disease/surgery or the patient experience, and only 15% of videos were related to the surgery technique. The average scores for DISCERN, JAMA and GQS in the current study were slightly higher than scores reported in previous studies that have mainly addressed the educational value of surgical technique videos [5-7,11]. This seems to emphasize the likelihood of slightly higher informative quality of bariatric surgery YouTube® videos that provide general information on disease/surgery or patient experience rather than the educational videos on surgical technique.
In the current study, videos uploaded by the doctors were associated with the highest VPI, while hospital-sourced videos and videos related to patient experience were associated with the lowest GQS scores. Past studies revealed the superiority of academic institution and physician websites over websites of commercial and unspecified groups in terms of quality of information provided [18,23,25]. Identification of higher VPI scores for videos uploaded by more reliable sources (i.e. doctors or hospitals) in our study seems to indicate high popularity of videos with increased likelihood of providing correct information. However, given that less than 10% of videos reviewed in this study were uploaded by experts, our findings emphasize the need for a more active participation from surgical professionals, professional organizations and/or governments as a source of higher quality information [3,6,18,26].
Notably, in a past study on YouTube sleeve gastrectomy videos, the videos uploaded by a university-affiliated physician (vs. those uploaded by patients) and the surgical technique videos (vs. patient experiences and advertisement videos) to have significantly higher DISCERN, JAMA and GQS scores, whereas a lower VPI [7]. The authors also reported a negative correlation of VPI both with JAMA and GQS scores, indicating that YouTube users to have a favorable response to less optimal or less educational videos and less desire to watch long run time videos with higher chance of providing more accurate and reliable information [7].
The association of longer videos with lower JAMA and DISCERN scores, and thus the lower likelihood of higher quality of information provided via longer duration videos in our study seems interesting, given that long run time videos are considered to have potential to be more accurate and reliable [7]. Nonetheless, it should be noted that the actual view duration of YouTube health videos of variable lengths was considered to be 6 minutes on average [27,28], and there was no significant correlation between VPI and duration of the video in our study.
Overall, GQS score seems to be more comprehensively describing the quality of information provided by the YouTube videos on bariatric surgery reviewed in this study, given that this score was lowest for hospital-sourced and patient experience-related videos, while positively correlated with VPI, video length, and the number of view, dislike and likes. However, given the negative correlation of JAMA scores both with VPI and GQS scores, our findings indicate higher chance of videos that were considered to be useful, to be viewed and commented, despite their potential to offer poor quality information. The positive correlation between GQS scores and VPI in our study emphasizes the likelihood of videos published in accordance with GQS scoring scale to enable a greater user engagement, while neither usefulness nor the frequent view of a video does guarantee its accuracy or reliability. Likewise, past studies also reported a discordance between video quality and user engagement to optimal videos with even a greater user engagement for inaccurate videos [29-31]. In fact, supporting the likelihood of lower quality videos to be more commonly viewed, the JAMA scores were also correlated negatively with the number of views and the number of dislikes in the current study.
Notably, in a past study on YouTube videos related to bariatric surgery, authors concluded that majority of videos were useful or very useful, particularly those were uploaded by doctor or hospital or medical web site, with no significant difference in the number of likes, dislikes and views as well as in the length of videos according to usefulness [6]. In addition, in a study on surgical technique videos related to sleeve gastrectomy, authors reported no relationship between the reliability of videos and likes, dislikes and duration [5].
Inclusion of the first 100 videos that appeared on search term in our study seems consistent with the public viewer characteristics that most people take the time to look at search results for a few pages [2,18]. Thus, limiting the page number and search rank of videos provides an accurate representation of what the public is viewing [2,18]. However, since trustworthiness is not a criteria for YouTube ranking, there is a likelihood of videos from trustworthy sources to appear lower in the ranked list, whereas that of misleading and incorrect videos to be popular with a high ranking [20,31]. Notably, use of a new YouTube algorithm based on the number of visualization minutes of a video instead of the use of number of clicks or likes was reported to provide a better ranking system allowing higher user acceptance and trusted videos to remain stable in the top positions [20].
Certain limitations to this study should be considered. First, use of ‘snap shot’ approach in selection of videos seems to be the major limitation of this study given that results might vary with use of different search terms as well as according to the search date and time. Second, while inclusion of only the first 100 videos for each search is consistent with actual view characteristics, it is possible that more popular videos with higher likelihood of being posted by non-expert sources to be analyzed. Nonetheless, providing data on quality of information provided by YouTube videos pertaining to bariatric surgery, our findings seem to contribute raising the public, patient and physician awareness on reliability and accuracy of YouTube videos.
Our findings revealed moderate quality of information provided by YouTube videos pertaining to bariatric surgery based on GQS, DISCERN and JAMA scores. The videos uploaded by the doctors were associated with the highest VPI, while hospital-sourced videos and videos related to patient experience were associated with the lowest GQS scores. GQS scores were positively correlated with VPI, video length, and the number of view, dislike and likes. However, given the negative correlation of JAMA scores both with VPI and GQS scores, and negative correlation of JAMA scores with the number of views, our findings indicate higher chance of videos that were considered useful to be viewed and commented, despite their potential to offer poor quality information. Future studies are needed to develop optimal assessment criteria in predicting the accuracy and reliability of information provided by YouTube videos on bariatric surgery that would help in implementation of a filtering process to healthcare information videos through increased public, patient and physician awareness.
Conflict of interest: none
Funding: none
Ethical Approval: not required
Availability of data and materials: we confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
