Short Communication | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2640-1045/238
Member of ISOAD / LA-DOHaD, PhD in Biochemistry, Santa Maria – RS, Brazil.
*Corresponding Author: Viktor I. Goudochnikov, Viktor I. Goudochnikov, member of ISOAD / LA-DOHaD, PhD in Biochemistry, Santa Maria – RS, Brazil.
Citation: Viktor I. Goudochnikov, (2026), Proportionality of Hormonal Secretion and Related Functional Parameters: An Underestimated Topic of Research, J. Endocrinology and Disorders, 10(1); DOI:10.31579/2640-1045/238
Copyright: © 2026, Viktor I. Goudochnikov. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 09 March 2026 | Accepted: 24 March 2026 | Published: 10 April 2026
Keywords: hormonal secretion; somatic growth; proportions
This short communication aims at calling for much more attention to proportions in secretion of various hormones, comparing them with proportionality of several functional parameters including somatic growth. The overview of our own data on proportions of human and animal growth is performed, outlining important role of some irrational numbers (Φ and S) in their interpretation.
At present it is already well known that hormonal secretion in general occurs in pulsatile or episodic manner designated also as homeokinetic or homeodynamic mode constituting ultradian hormonal rhythms, i.e. with the period of oscillations less than 24 h (see discussion in [1]). However, there exists great variablility of such rhythms. For example, pulsatility of pituitary hormones takes place approximately every 1-3 h, whereas for insulin the episodic secretion is much more frequent, about several minutes for each cycle.
The logical question emerges: what exactly governs the adjustrment of several ultradian hormonal biorhythms with each other, and is this adjusting process can be decoded in some sort of ruling? In order to approach the solution of this rather complicated problem, we shall employ some rather scarce data on proportionality of hormone-dependent processes, focusing primarily on proportions of somatic growth, since we have already been involved in their exploration for some time.
Proportionality of human and animal growth:
What is the explanation for it via hormonal control?
In order to perform such investigation, since 1996 [2, 3] we have elaborated the protocol for evaluation of human linear growth, using the system of acupuncture channels (meridians) and points [4, 5]. The study occured in two phases: at first we evaluated human growth from 4 to 20 y of age, and thereafter from birth to 4 y [6]. The system of linear measurements focused principally on body members (or extremities), since it was possible to perform evaluation along 3 parallel channels on each member [7, 8].
It is important to outline three essential advantages of such protocol:
Previously we were able to establish that relations between different segments of human body tend to be close to derivatives of irrational numbers characterizing golden section (Φ=1.618...) and some others (S=1,324...) [12, 13]. What about hormonal regulation?
Proportionality of hormonal secretion
For a long time the only principles governing hormonal regulation were based on negative and positive feedback functioning. However, the evaluation of pulsatile secretion of several hormones clearly shows the sequential release of, e.g., adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and cortisol in hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, thus complicating enormously the conventional explanation of such data via feedback principles only.
Therefore, we propose that much more attetion should be attracted to proportions between the release of several hormones, for example, growth hormone (GH) and glucocorticoids that respectively stimulates and inhibit somatic growth [14]. Of course, such evaluation should be performed in various periods of human and animal ontogeny [15, 16].
Conclusion
Pulsatile hormonal secretion suggests saltatory human and animal growth (see discussion in [1]), but their proportionality continues to be poorly understood. The main problem to be solved, on our opinion, is the necessity of simultaneous evaluation of several hormones, together with measurements of various functional parameters at the same time, with subsequent mathematical modeling and computer simulation of both hormonal and functional entities in rhythmic mode.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,