Review | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-8794/236
1Former, Associate Professor, S. D. N. B. Vaishnav College for Women, Chennai, India
2 Former Director Grade Scientist, Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India
*Corresponding Author: Purshottam Das Gupta, Former Director Grade Scientist, Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India.
Citation: Purshottam Das Gupta, Kamalammal Pushkala, (2024), Promising role of Fecal microbiota transplantation in Stroke management, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports; 6(8): DOI: 10.31579/2690-8794/236
Copyright: © 2024 Purshottam Das Gupta, this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 21 October 2024 | Accepted: 28 October 2024 | Published: 04 November 2024
Keywords: Stroke; Gut-Brain axis; dysbiosis; risk factors; FMT
Stroke, a cerebro-vascular disease presents a major global health problem, rated as the world's second-leading cause of death and the third most common cause of disability. Although in recent years there have been remarkable achievements in prevention, treatment, and recovery of post-stroke complications still, there is not a definite solution to overcome for this global problem. Differential transcription of certain gene segments are implicated in the location of stroke, which imbalances the proteome. Protein IL-1β anticipated to be the main culprit for the epigenetic modifications. Link between faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and Stroke management has been tried in rat model which gave promising results. In the recent past, several studies have indicated the key role of the gut microbiota composition and its alterations in the pathophysiology of stroke similar to many other diseases. In the present review, the alteration of gut microbiota due to the disease as well as dysbiosis of the microbiota as a causal factor for the development of the disease is discussed. The results of FMT trials in animal models and few human trials are summarised.
Stroke, a cerebrovascular disease presents a major global health problem rated very high in terms of disability and death. Ischaemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke are the two types, and ischaemic stroke accounts for 85% of all strokes. Neuronal damage due to stroke induces series of complex pathophysiological processes, including neuroinflammation, excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, and apoptosis. Ischaemic stroke caused by sudden occlusion of cerebral blood vessels resulting in cerebral hypoperfusion and neuronal damage. If left untreated promptly, ischaemic stroke will lead to serious consequences [1].
Certain gene segments are transcribed differently there, after the stroke, which imbalances the proteome. These epigenetic modifications occur most frequently in the heart, where they can cause scarring and impair pumping function. [2] identified that protein IL-1β is the main culprit for the epigenetic modifications which affect immunological memory after a stroke [2].
Although in recent years there have been remarkable achievements in prevention, treatment, and recovery of post-stroke complications till now, however, there is not a definite solution to overcome for this global problem [3],[4] in their systematic review to understand the link between Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and Stroke management. FMT from healthy or ischemic donor to other ischemic recipient was found to affect brain infarct volume and survival rate, neurological and behavioural outcomes, and inflammatory pathways. In the recent past, several studies have indicated the key role of the gut microbiota composition and its alterations in the pathophysiology of stroke [4,5].
Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis
However, evidence suggests that bidirectional communication exists between the gut and its microbiota and the brain designated as the microbiota-gut-brain axis. The initial dose of microbes from mother, multiply and the grown up human body contain in a range of 30 to 40 trillion in numbers. Among the many chemicals they produce, some are beneficial to the host and others are harmful. Hundreds of neuro-chemicals produced by the gut microbes after the gut-brain axis is established regulate basic physiological processes as well as mental processes such as learning, memory and mood. In turn the dysbiosis and inflammation of the gut are responsible for anxiety and depression which are prevalent in society today [6].
Signalling between the brain and the gut occurs through both neuronal and non-neuronal mechanisms. The top-down signalling (brain→gut) from brain to gut wall is a direct communication via parasympathetic and sympathetic nerve fibers, or indirectly following stimulation of the enteric nervous system located in the submucosa and myenteric plexi of the gut wall. These neuronal signals influence gut motility, gut permeability, microbiota makeup, and resident immune cell activation.
Bottom-up signalling (gut→brain) is thought to occur through several different mechanisms. 1. The vagus nerve, composed of 80
Bottom-up signalling (gut→brain) is thought to occur through several different mechanisms. 1. The vagus nerve, composed of 80
The impact of dysbiosis of the gut microbiota as a causal factor for the prognosis of stroke rely solely on studies conducted in laboratory animals and hardly be translated to the human disease state without human trials. In addition, dysbiosis or an unhealthy shift in the gut microbiota is likely not an alteration in one or a few bacterial species. The altered gut microbiome needs to be viewed as an ecological community acting together to affect the host in a beneficial or detrimental manner.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,