AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2578-8868/175
1,2Paediatric Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Enugu State University Teaching Hospital, Park lane, Enugu, Enugu State, Nigeria
*Corresponding Author: KE Chukwubuike, Paediatric Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Enugu State University Teaching Hospital, Park lane, Enugu, Enugu State, Nigeria
Citation: Ozor I. Ikemefuna., Chukwubuike K. Emeka., Enyi Nnenna., (2021) Profile of Neurological Congenital Anomalies in the Two Teaching Hospitals in Enugu, Nigeria. J. Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. 9(1); DOI:10.31579/2578-8868/175
Copyright: © 2021 KE Chukwubuike, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Received: 29 March 2021 | Accepted: 12 April 2021 | Published: 16 April 2021
Keywords: central nervous system; congenital anomalies; neurological; teaching hospital
Background: Congenital anomalies of the central nervous system (CACNS) are birth defects of the physical structure of the brain or spinal cord that occur during intrauterine growth. The purpose of study was to obtain the incidence, types and risk factors of congenital anomalies of the central nervous system in the 2 teaching hospitals in Enugu, Nigeria.
Materials and Methods: This was a hospital based observational study carried out on infants delivered at University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (UNTH) and Enugu State University Teaching Hospital (ESUTH), Enugu during the periods of January 2013 and December 2018. Diagnosis of neurological congenital anomaly was made through clinical examination by a pediatrician and a neurosurgeon. Stillborns were excluded.
Results: During the study period, 15,820 were delivered in the 2 teaching hospitals, out of which 79 infants had CACNS, which gave an incidence of 0.5%. Neural tube defect was the most common neurological anomaly. A significant number of the mothers took herbal concoctions during pregnancy. About one-fifth of the neurological anomalies were diagnosed prenatally.
Conclusion: This study showed an incidence of CACNS of 0.5% in the two teaching hospitals in Enugu, South East Nigeria. Neural tube defect was the most common anomaly.
Short title: Neurological Congenital Anomalies
Congenital anomalies of the central nervous system (CACNS) are birth defects of the physical structure of the brain or spinal cord that occur during intrauterine growth. Other terms synonymous with CACNS are central nervous system abnormalities/anomalies; brain and spinal cord birth defects. They refer to any morphological abnormality of the central nervous system that dates to the embryonic or fetal period, regardless of the mechanism of its origin [1]. CACNS is a common cause of emotional, economic and physical stress for both the child and the family. It encompasses a wide range of anomalies from minor to major abnormalities [2]. Neural tube defects results from failure of neural tube to close between the 3rd and 4th week of embryonic development and is one of the most common type of CACNS [3]. Advances in investigations such as amniocentesis, fetoscopy, ultrasound, computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging have improved the diagnostic accuracy of CACNS [2]. A combination of maternal serum alpha fetoprotein and maternal sonography has almost 100 percent accuracy with regards to prenatal diagnosis [4]. CACNS may be associated with anomalies of other systems such as cardiac malformation [1]. The incidence of CACNS may vary over time or with geographical location [5,6]. The exact etiology of CACNS is unknown but is most likely multifactorial involving genetic and environmental factors. The timing of an insult to the fetus is more important than the nature of the insult in determining the type of resulting anomaly. Maternal diabetes mellitus, maternal age over 35 years, multiple pregnancy, oligohydramnion, maternal hyperthermia, use of valproate by epileptic women during pregnancy are some of the risk factors associated with the development of CACNS [7]. The aim of study was to obtain the incidence, types and risk factors of congenital anomalies of the central nervous system in the 2 teaching hospitals in Enugu, Nigeria.
This was an observational study carried out at the two teaching hospitals in Enugu, namely: University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (UNTH) Enugu and Enugu State University Teaching Hospital (ESUTH), Enugu, South East, Nigeria. The hospital serves the whole of Enugu State, which according to the 2016 estimates of the National Population Commission and Nigerian National Bureau of Statistics, has a population of about 4 million people and a population density of 616.0/km2. The hospitals also receive referrals from its neighboring states. Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics and research committees of the 2 teaching hospitals and informed consent was obtained from the patients’ mothers. For the purposes of this study, our interest was on clinically obvious and observable abnormality of structure of the brain or spinal cord which was present at birth or noticed a few days/weeks after birth. All the live babies born in UNTH and ESUTH during the period of this study were included. Stillborns were excluded from this study. This study covered a period of 5 years, from January 2013 to December 2018.
Protocol
The protocol conforms to the declaration of Helsinki. All the consecutive children who were born in both teaching hospitals during the study period had a thorough physical examination (general and systemic) performed by a pediatrician and a neurosurgeon at birth and at 6 weeks postnatal visit respectively. This 2-stage physical examination minimized the error of missing any CACNS. Diagnosis of CACNS was based only on clinical evaluation of the babies by the pediatrician and neurosurgeon. Investigations such as radiography, ultrasonography, and computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging of the spine and spinal cord were not performed. For each patient, the following data were collected: sex, age of the baby at the time of diagnosis, maternal age, gestational age of the pregnancy before delivery (term/preterm), baby’s birth weight and mode of delivery. Baby’s birth weight greater or equal to 2.5 kilograms (kg) were considered to be normal while birth weight less than 2.5 kg were considered as low birth weight. Babies born at less than 37 completed weeks, calculated from the first day of last menstrual period, were considered preterm while babies born at or after 37 completed weeks were considered term. Other data collected include family history of congenital anomaly, maternal comorbidities and use of drugs and herbs.
Data Analysis
Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) for Windows version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) was used for data entry and analysis. Data were expressed as percentages, medians and means.
3.1 Patents’ demography
There were 15,820 babies were born in the 2 teaching hospitals during the study period. 10,547 babies were delivered in ESUTH (55 babies had CACNS) while 5,273 babies were delivered in UNTH (24 babies had CACNS). 284 babies had one congenital anomaly or the other which gave an overall incidence of all congenital anomalies of 1.8% or 18 babies per 1000 live births. Out of the 15,820 babies delivered during the study period, 79 babies had CACNS. This gave an incidence of 0.5% or 5 babies per 1000 live births. Considering the congenital anomalies system by system, CACNS accounted for 27.8% of all the systems. Other demographic features are shown in Table 1.
3.2. Distribution of Central nervous system congenital anomalies
These are shown in Table 2.
3.3. Associated risk factors of CACNS
Possible associated risk factors are depicted in Table 3.
3.4. Prenatal diagnosis of CACNS
Seventeen (21.5%) patients had their central nervous system anomaly diagnosed prenatally using maternal ultrasound scan. Neural tube defect was the most commonly diagnosed, prenatally.
In utero, normal development of the central nervous system involves the following stages: Induction; neural tube formation; regionalization and specification; proliferation and migration; connection and selection [8]. CACNS can occur at any stage of this development and represent an important factor of morbidity and mortality. Autopsy reports have shown that CACNS are among the most common birth defects [9]. CACNS can occur singly (isolated) or as part of syndromes and can be associated with other congenital anomalies [8].
In the present study, 0.5% incidence of CACNS recorded is similar to the reports of other authors [1,7]. The incidences of CACNS vary widely and may depend on geographical variations, cohort of patients studied such as livebirths, stillbirths or autopsy series [9,10,11]. Prevalence of CACNS is higher in stillbirths [12]. CACNS in the present study accounted for 27% of all the anomalies which is lower than what was reported by other researchers [13,14]. The reason for this discrepancy could lie in the thorough search for congenital anomalies through investigations such as computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging which were not performed in the present study.
The male predominance reported in the current study is consistent with the report of Eke et al [10]. However, there is a report of female predominance [15]. The reason for the gender difference is not known. The median age at diagnosis of CACNS may be related to the degree of severity of the anomaly. For instance, encephalocele is obvious at first glance but spina bifida occulta may not be instantly obvious. There were more CACNS in preterm babies than in term babies in present study. Brown in his research reported a strong association between preterm birth and brain malformation. He stated that the brain defects themselves or the underlying cause of the defects may be inducing preterm birth [16]. In the present study, majority of the babies who had CACNS had a low birth weight. Other researchers also found low birth weight as a significant risk factor for congenital anomalies [7,17]. Most of the mothers whose babies had CACNS were aged 20 years to 35 years. Howbeit, other series reported maternal age of above 35 years [1,10]. Guardiola documented young maternal age as a risk factor for CACNS [7]. These differences are difficult to explain. In the current study, majority of the babies were delivered vaginally. Guardiola et al also reported vaginal delivery in most of their patients [7]. Some researchers have reservations about vaginal delivery of these babies with CACNS because of the risk of neurological trauma [10]. Birth injury can occur through any route of delivery and caesarian section should be based on obstetric indications [18].
Neural tube defect is consistently the most common congenital anomaly of the central nervous system as attested to by several studies [1,7,10,11]. Neural tube defects, which include spina bifida and anencephaly, result from failure of complete closure of the neural tube during embryonic development. Macrocephaly and microcephaly are birth defects where the baby’s head circumference is bigger (greater than 2 standard deviations) or smaller (less than 2 standard deviations) than expected when compared to babies of the same sex and age respectively [19]. Problems of macrocephaly/microcephaly include seizures, delayed developmental milestone, intellectual disability, balance, vision and hearing problems [20].
Two (2.5%) mothers had a history of previous birth of a child that had congenital anomaly. One (1.3%) mother accepted marrying her relative (consanguinity). Mosayebi and Movahedian reported that congenital anomalies are 3.5 times more common in consanguineous marriages [21]. In the index study, about one-twentieth of our patients were diabetic or hypertensives. Maternal diabetes mellitus and hypertension predisposes the baby to congenital anomalies with up to 9-fold increase in congenital anomalies when compared with the rate seen in non-diabetic, non-hypertensive mothers [22]
A significant number of mothers whose children had CACNS accepted taking native medications (herbal concoction) during pregnancy. Other studies on CACNS in Nigeria also reported the use of herbs by the mothers during pregnancy [10,13]. Folic acid is required for the synthesis, repair and methylation of DNA. Herbal concoctions are anti-folate and interfere with the functions of folic acid [10]. In the current study, about half of the mothers were not regular with the intake of the folic acid prescribed at the antenatal clinics. Periconceptional folic acid supplementation has been shown to decrease the incidence of neural tube defects [23].
Diagnosis of CACNS can be made prenatally at about 20 weeks gestation. However, some CACNS may be detected at the first trimester or early second trimester of pregnancy [24]. About one-fifth of the mothers had prenatal diagnosis of the CACNS in the present study. Poverty and lack of expertise required for interpretation of the results may be responsible for this low prenatal detection rate of CACNS.
Limitations of this study
This study was limited by the small number of birth defects. A larger number of cases would have availed better analysis.
Only obvious and observable birth defects were assessed for this study. Investigations were not performed. Stillborns were excluded from this study.
Conclusion: This study showed an incidence of CACNS of 0.5% in the two teaching hospitals in Enugu, South East Nigeria. Neural tube defect was the most common anomaly. Future studies should community based so that babies delivered in the maternity homes and private hospitals can be captured.
Our gratitude goes to the resident doctors who assisted with logistics.
Conflict of interest:None
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
