AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1919/267
1 ème Pavillon A, Hôpitalnational de Niamey/Niger
2 èmé Service pédiatrie, HôpitalNational de Niamey/Niger
3 èmé Cardiologie, Hôpital Amirou Boubacar Diallo Niamey/Niger
4 eme Chirurgie Cardiovasculaire, Hôpitalgénéral de référencede Niamey/Niger
5 eme Service médecine interne,Hôpital général de référence deNiamey/Niger
*Corresponding Author: Hama Idrissa. ème Pavillon A, Hôpital national de Niamey/Niger
Citation: H Idrissa, I Adehossi, AM Maliki, Amadou H L, Amadou D, et al. (2022). Profile of Congenital Cardiopathies in Paediatric Departments A and B of the National Hospital Niamey National Hospital, J. Clinical Research and Reports, 11(4) DOI:10.31579/2690-1919/267
Copyright: © 2022 Hama Idrissa. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 12 August 2022 | Accepted: 25 August 2022 | Published: 25 September 2022
Keywords: congenital heart disease; national hospital of niamey; Niger
Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the extent of congenital heart disease in the population of children, for a better management and prevention strategy.
Materials and Methods: This was a descriptive and cross-sectional study over a period of 4 years 10 months from January 2016 to October 2020 (retrospective over 4 years and prospective over 10 months) at the National Hospital of Niamey; Were included in our study all patients aged 0 to 21 with congenital heart disease confirmed by cardiac ultrasound who were hospitalized or monitored externally. Our data were analyzed by Epi Info software in version 7.2.2.6. 24. Descriptive and analytical statistics were used: the mean with standard deviation (SD) (for normal distributive variations), odds ratio (OR) and the median (Me) for the description of asymmetric distributive values. The comparison of the proportions was also carried out; to do this we used the statistical test of chi2. The test is significant if p <0.05
Results: The gender ratio was 1.005 in favour of men. The median age of our patients was 16.8 months with extremes ranging from 0 months to 247 months, the most represented age group is 29 days to 24 months with 81.1%. The majority of our patients (62.4%) came from urban areas, parental consanguinity was present in 42.2% of cases.
55.3% of our patients had reported a notion of recurrent respiratory infection. Respiratory distress was found in 29.5% of cases, followed by fatigue during feedings (16.7%). Tachycardia was found in 72.2% of our patients, 49.6% were undernourished. Heart murmur was found in 80.3% of our patients, 4.4% had Down's syndrome.
Cardiomegaly was found in 64.4% of our patients, 15.7% had pulmonary hypervascularization.
CIV was found in 27.03% followed by T4F, CAV, and CIA with 20.39 respectively; 17.20 and 16.95%. Surgery was indicated in 68.3%.
Anemia was found in 55% of our patients, 49.6% had hyperleukocytosis. Antibiotic treatment was started in 72.7% of cases, 31.2% had benefited from diuretics, 23.8% from iron supplementation, 10.3% was on beta blockers. 18.7% had received surgical treatment, PAH and endocarditis were found in 1 and 0.73% of cases, respectively. 34.1% were awaiting surgery. The recorded death rate was 27.3%.
Conclusion: Congenital heart disease is becoming more and more frequent and constitutes a very important health problem in our pediatric departments. They are dominated by CIVs and T4s.
The diagnosis and their management are still difficult due to the lack of diagnostic and therapeutic means.
Congenital heart disease (CHD) is a very common cardiac abnormality that occurs during the formation of the heart during intrauterine life. These conditions have been defined as malformations of the heart and/or vessels present at birth related to a developmental abnormality. Also included are malformations related to the abnormal persistence after birth of structures present only during fetal life. They range from simple anomalies compatible with the growth of the child without major problems to severe malformations making it impossible for the new born to survive. [1].
The prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide is estimated at 8 cases per 1000 live births, making it the most common malformation in children. In Europe, there are an estimated 5,000 new cases per year per 800,000 births. [2]
In Niger, CC is also very common. However, it should be noted that several factors hinder the diagnosis and management of these CCs, including the absence of obstetrical check-ups for various reasons (financial, material or cultural), and there is no national health programme concerned with the prevention of this defect which remains a public health problem in Niger [11].
Nowadays, in NIGER, cardiac malformations are better and better known thanks to the availability of Doppler ultrasound, which constitutes the basis of diagnosis.
The objective of this study was to determine the epidemiological and clinical profile of childhood CC in our paediatric department in Niamey.
The study took place in the paediatric wards of the National Hospital of Niamey. It was a retrospective, descriptive cross- sectional study over 4 years from 01 January 2016 to 31 December 2019 and a prospective cross-sectional study over 10 months from 01 January 2020 to 30 October 2020. We performed an exhaustive sampling; that is, we considered all patients diagnosed with congenital heart disease during the study period and meeting the inclusion criteria. The exclusion criteria were non malformative abnormalities. Pre-established survey form was used as a data collection tool. Our data were analysed Epi info 7 and Excel 2013 software. The statistical analysis used the chi2 test; the significance level of p was 0.05. The writing of our document and the making of our figures were carried out by the office software Excel and Microsoft office WORD 2013.
In 4 years and 10 months, 50238 consultations had been made, including 407 cases of congenital heart disease, i.e., a hospital frequency of 0.81%.
There was a slight male predominance with 50.1% of cases (gender ratio 1.005). Figure 1 shows the gender distribution. The median age of the patients was 16.8 months with extremes ranging from 0 months to 247 months. The most represented age group was 29 days to 24 months with 81.1%. The majority of patients (62.4%) came from urban areas.
Figure 1: Distribution of patients by gender
Consanguinity was present in 42.2% of cases. The pregnancies from which the children were born were full term in 94.1% of cases. The birth weight was between 2500 and 3999 in 37.3% of our patients. Repeated respiratory infections were reported in 55.3% of our patients.
The main reason forconsultation was respiratory distress (70.5%). Table 1 shows the distribution accordingto the different reasons for consultation.
Table 1: Distribution of patients by reason for Consultation
Table2: Distribution by type of shunt
On clinical examination, respiratory distress was the most common functional sign in 29.5% of cases, followed by fatigue during feedings (16.7%). Tachycardia was found in 72.2% of our patients and 49.6% had acute malnutrition. Heart murmur was the most common physical sign (80.3% of our patients). Trisomic facies was found in 4.4% of patients.
Radiological cardiomegaly was found in 64.4% of our patients and 15.7% had pulmonaryhypervascularisation. The left-right shunt accounted for 71%. Table 2 shows the distribution according to the type of shunt. VIC was the most represented ultrasound diagnosis in 27.03% followed by T4F, CAV, CIA with 20.39, 17.20 and 16.95% respectively. %. There was a statistically significant relationship between male sex and tetralogy of Fallot (P value: 0.01), female sex and atrioventricular canal (P value: 0.02).
On the haemogram, anaemia was found in 55% of patients and 49.6% had hyperleukocytosis. Antibiotic treatment was instituted in 72.7% of cases; 31.2% had received diuretics, 23.8% iron supplementation and 10.3% beta-blockers. Tables 3 and 4 illustrate the different treatments received. Four patients or 18.7% had received surgical treatment. PAH and endocarditis were found in 1% and 0.73% respectively. Most of the patients (34.1%) were awaiting surgery, the death rate recorded was 27.3%.
Table 3: Distribution of patients by specific medical treatment
Table 4: Distribution of patientsby other treatments
Table 5: Frequency of different types of CC according to the literature
Congenital heart disease is very common in paediatric hospitals. During the study, the prevalence was 0.81%. These results are close to those of Kinda George [3] in Burkina Faso in 2015 and Benbahia [4] in Morocco in 2018, but much lower than that reported by Oulhabib [5] in Morocco who found 7.7% in a neonatology department. These differences could be related to the following factors: difference in patient selection criteria, neonatal paediatric series in some studies [6] and finally ultrasound series [3].
Socio-Demographic Aspects:
Both sexes were involved with a slight male predominance of 50.1% with a sex ratio of 1.005. This result is similar to those of Benbahia [4] and Kinda G. [3]. On the other hand, Daou H. [7], Boubacar Z. [8] and Banou N. [6] found a female predominance. Despite this male predominance observed in the study and in most authors, there is no clear gender predominance.
The age range of 29 days to 24 months represented 81.1% which is close to that of Rantotiana R. [9] who found 84.31%, but higher than that of Kinda G. [3] who reported that most of the heart diseases (55%) were revealed at an early age (0 to 30 months). This high rate of CC in this age group could be explained by the fact that some CCs such as IVC, IAC, and PCA often have a spontaneous evolution towards closure; CCs of late discovery are most often benign and compatible with a quasi-normal life, which means that these patients do not consult and are often not recorded
The majority of our patients (n=254) came from urban areas, i.e. 62.4%. The same observation was made by Benbahia A. [4] and Boubacar Z. [8] with respectively 66% and 63.7%.
Parental consanguinity was found in 42.2% of our study, this rate is higher than those of Z Boubacar [10], Benbahia A. [4] and Banou N. [6] with respectively 26.97%;20.3%; 19%.
The age of the mothers was between26 and 35 years in 44.6% of the cases, which is lower than those of Benbahia A. [4] (52.40%) and Banou N. [6] (63%).
Pregnancy was not followed in 12.8% of our cases, which is lower than those of Daou H [7] in Mali (23.52%) and Oulhabib [5] in Morocco (54.50%).
A history of death in siblings was reported in 31.7% of cases. These deaths were not documented, but some occurred during the neonatal period in a context of respiratory distress according to the mothers. This result is higher than that of Z Boubacar. In Niger who reported a rate of 8.55% of cases. [10]. The literature reports that if a child has CC, the risk of recurrence in siblings is 2 to 3%. This risk can be as high as 10% if two previous children have a heart defect.
The patients were born by vaginal delivery in 86% of cases, a figure similar to that of Daou H[7] in Mali (82.35%).
The birth weight was between 2500 and 3999 g in 37.2% of the patients, which is lower than the result of Daou H. [7] (76.47%). Thisdifference could be explained by the fact that the birth weight was not determined in 48% of the patients.
Ninety-two (92) patients, i.e. 22.6%, had a delay in psychomotor development, a result similar to that of Rantotiana R. [9] who found 19.61%.
It should be noted that 55.3% of our patients had a history of repeated respiratory infections, which is higher than that of Rantotiana R. [9] in Antananarivo (23.53%).
Respiratory distress was the main reason for consultation with 70.5%, which was higher than the results found by Benbahia A. [4] in Morocco and Daou H. [7] in Mali who found 55 and 49.1% respectively, but lower than that of Rantotiana R. [9] in Antananarivo (96.08%).
Fatigue during breastfeeding was 16.7% which is lower than that of Benbahia A. [4] who found 67%. Excessive sweating was found in 6.9% of patients, which is similar to that of Rantotiana R. [9] (5.88%).
The heart rate was above 120 beats per minute in 72.3% of cases, which is higher than that of Benbahia A [4] in Morocco (56.3%).
Oxygen saturation was low (below 96%) in 39.8% of patients, which is close to that of Oulahbib [5] in Morocco (44%).
Acute undernutrition was found in 49.6%, which is higher than the result of Rantotiana R. [9] in Antananarivo (11.10%).
Heart murmur was the most common physical sign found in 80.3%, this result is close to those of Daou H.[7] in Mali; Rantotiana R. [9] in Antananarivo; and Z Boubacar.[10] in Niger who found respectively 84.31%; 86.70%, and 88.16%.
The trisomic facies was noted in 4.4% of cases, this rate is lower than those of Daou H. [7] (25.49%) and Banou N. [6] (23%).
On radiography, the cardiothoracic index was greater than or equal to 0.55 in 56.3% of cases, this result is superimposed on that of Daou H. [7] in Mali who found 54.91%. Pulmonary hypervascularisation was found in 15.7%, higher than those of Benbahia A. [4] in 2018 and
Oulahbib [5] in 2017 in Morocco who had respectively 6.55 and 2.5%. Pneumopathy was found in 13.5%, this result is lower than that of Noel B. [6] in Mali in 2020 (40%).
Ventricular septal defect was the most common cardiac anomaly found in 27.03%. This result is slightly higher than those of Zalika B [10] in Niger (23.68%) and Benbahia A. [4] in Morocco (25.80%). If studies are unanimous on the predominance of ventricular septal defects in congenital heart disease, they are less so on the frequency classification of the others [4, 10, 11]. Table 5 shows the frequency classification of heart disease in the literature. The left- right shunt was the most frequent with 71%, this rate is higher than that of Kamdem F. [12] in Cameroon who found 57.9%, but lower than that of Banou N. [6] in Mali (90%).
Anemia was found in 55% of the blood tests, higher than those of Boubacar Z. [8] in Niger and Banou N. [6] in Mali, who found 24% and 12% respectively.
The patients had benefited from a treatment based on diuretics, beta- blockers and antibiotics, these results are superposable those of Banou H.[6] Rantotiana R. [9] Benbahia A.[4]
Surgical treatment was performed in 18.7% of patients, this rate is lower than those of Rotantiana R. [9] in Antananarivo and Benbahia A. [4] in Morocco who found 37.26 and 23% respectively.
The complications found after medical treatment were PAH (1%) and infective endocarditis (0.73%). These results are lower than those of Benbahia A. [4] in Morocco (PAH: 15.67%; endocarditis: 1.42%).
A death rate of 27.3% was recorded during the study, which is higher than that of Benbahia A. [4] in Morocco who reported 13.70% was recorded during the study, which is higher than that of Benbahia A. [4] in Morocco who reported 13.70%. deaths.
The postoperative evolution was favourable in 68.9% of patients, against 20% of deaths; these results are similar to those of Benbahia A. [4] in Morocco who found 33% of deaths and 67% of favourable evolution after surgery.
Congenital heart diseases are increasingly diagnosed in our country. They are dominated by VICs but also by cyanogenic cardiopathies represented mainly by T4F. Diagnostic means are limited and rely essentially on echocardiography.
They pose a problem of surgical management especially in our developing countries, their evolution is therefore unpredictable, and more often than not marked by complications with a high mortality. The development of cardiac surgery in our country will be a giant step forward in the management of this sub-group of the population
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
