Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9562/063
Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery,Hospital Pedro Hispano, Oporto.
*Corresponding Author: Pedro Marques Gomes, Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery,Hospital Pedro Hispano, Oporto.
Citation: Pedro Marques Gomes, Ana Isabel Gonçalves, Delfim Duarte, Paula Azevedo (2022). Primary Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Parotid Gland: A Case Report and Literature Review J. Clinical Otorhinolaryngology 4(3); DOI: 10.31579/2692-9562/063
Copyright: © 2022, Pedro Marques Gomes. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 14 June 2022 | Accepted: 28 June 2022 | Published: 02 July 2022
Keywords: primary squamous cell carcinoma of the parotid; peripheral facial palsy; arotidectomy
Salivary gland tumors represent about 3% of all head and neck tumors, with the vast majority occurring in the parotid gland. Squamous cell carcinomas rarely are primary in the salivary glands, representing less than 1% of all parotid malignancies.
A 76-year-old man was referred to Otorhinolaryngology due to a right preauricular swelling that had progressively increased in size. Physical examination revealed a painful, firm lesion in the right parotid region, with right peripheral facial palsy. Remaining ENT examination was normal. The biopsy showed a squamous cell carcinoma. CT scan showed a heterogeneous nodule, with peripheral contrast enhancement, in the deep lobe of the right parotid gland. No cleavage plane with the right masseter. No bone or
perineural invasion and no signs of ganglionic or organic involvement. No lesions in another areas. Primary parotid squamous cell carcinoma is a rare, aggressive, high-grade salivary gland neoplasm, with worse prognosis than conventional ENT squamous cell carcinoma.
Salivary gland tumors represent approximately 3% of all head and neck tumors [1]. The estimated incidence is 0.9 per 100,000 persons in the United States of America, increasing with age, with a peak between 65 and 74 years old of all salivary neoplasms, benign and malignant, the vast majority occur in the parotid gland. In a study with 2410 salivary gland neoplasms [3], 73% occurred in the parotid gland and, of these, 15% were malignant. Most patients with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the parotid present between the sixth and eighth decade of life, sometimes with a history of previous radiotherapy.
Features suggestive of malignancy include a fast increase in size, pain, neck adenopathy, attachment of the lesion to deep structures or the skin, and facial nerve palsy [3, 4]. Since 80 to 90% of the parotid tissue is located lateral to the facial nerve, a similar proportion of neoplasms arise in the superficial lobe. Primary parotid squamous cell carcinomas are typically diagnosed at an advanced stage. Squamous cell carcinomas are rarely primary in the salivary glands, representing less than 1% of all parotid malignancies [5]. In addition to primary parotid squamous cell carcinoma, the differential diagnosis of any neoplasm with squamous differentiation should include high-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma, metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (scalp, ear, and face), or a distant primary [5]. The incidence of this type of lesions is higher than the incidence of primary squamous cell carcinoma of the parotid [5].
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most reliable complementary diagnostic test in the evaluation of salivary gland neoplasms [6]. Computed tomography (CT) with intravenous contrast is also widely used to evaluate salivary gland masses, mainly due to its high accessibility [7]. CT is particularly useful in the assessment of bone invasion and isalso superior to MRI in the visualization of small salivary duct stones (useful in the differential diagnosis of obstructive causes of glandular swelling). The parotid gland, in its architecture, has a high fat content, which results in a lower radiodensity compared to neoplastic tissue [7]. However, in general, MRI is superior to CT, provides finer details of the soft tissues and allows more accurate delineation of the extension to adjacent soft Tissues [6].
Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is an important tool in the diagnosis of salivary neoplasms. It is safe, has low morbidity and is a reasonably accurate way of differentiating malignant from benign neoplasms [8-11]. The performance of FNAB with ultrasound guidance not only helps in the diagnosis of the primary lesion, but also helps in the neck evaluation [12]. To improve diagnosis by BAAF a new classification system was developed: "Milan system"[13-14]. Microscopically, primary squamous cell carcinoma of the parotid is identical to squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract, although it tends to be better differentiated (most are moderate to well differentiated, with abundant keratinization [15-17].
Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the parotid are aggressive carcinomas, with 5-year survival rates of approximately 20% to 50% [18].
Treatment usually involves radical parotidectomy, neck lymph node dissection, and adjuvant radiation therapy. Facial branches should only be resected when the facial nerve is paralyzed or invaded/surrounded by tumor in the perioperative period. There is consensus that microscopic residual disease localized to nerve structures can be controlled through adjuvant radiotherapy [18]. The main complication of parotidectomy is temporary/permanent facial paralysis. Other complications include hemorrhage, infection, skin necrosis, Frey syndrome and salivary fistula [18].
Primary radiotherapy is only indicated in unresectable disease or in patients who refuse surgery [18]. The use of chemotherapy is currently limited to palliative treatment of unresectable, recurrent and/or metastatic disease [18].
A 76-year-old male, non-smoker, was referred to ENT due to a painful swelling in the right pre-auricular region, with progressive growth over the last three months. No prior history of head and neck cancer. Physical examination revealed a right peripheral facial palsy, grade III on the House-Brackmann scale (figure 1 and 2). Palpation of the right pre-auricular region showed a lesion measuring 3 cm in longest axis, hard, painful, adherent to the deep planes. Neck palpation did not demonstrate another lesion. Remaining ENT examination was normal


The patient had arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, coronary heart disease and heart failure. He never smoked. Denied alcohol abuse and drugs. FNAB, guided by ultrasound, demonstrated isolated and grouped malignant cells, withdense cytoplasm and enlarged nucleus, with coarse chromatin and visible nucleoli, compatible with squamous cell carcinoma (figure 3).

Contrast-enhanced CT scan showed a heterogeneous nodule, with peripheral contrast enhancement in the upper lobe of the right parotid gland, measuring 24 x 22 mm, with irregular contours, without a cleavage plane with the right masseter, without apparent bone or perineural invasion (figures 4, 5 and 6). No suspicious lesions in another areas (neck, thorax and abdominal). The imaging findings were consistent with a T3N0M0 clinical staging.
After reviewing the case in multidisciplinary group consultation, the patient was sent to the IPO (Instituto Português de Oncologia) in Oporto, where a total parotidectomy was scheduled, with sacrifice of the superior division of the facial nerve. After the surgical procedure underwent adjuvant radiotherapy.



Squamous cell carcinomas are only rarely primary in the salivary glands, representing less than 1% of all malignancies in this site [15]. Metastases to intraparotid lymph nodesfrom primary skin cancers of the head and neck—particularly those of the scalp, ear, and face—are much more common than primary tumors, as is direct invasion from tumors arising in adjacent tissues. The diagnosis of primary squamous cell carcinomas is restricted to the major salivary glands because those that arise in the minor salivary glands cannot be distinguished from primary squamous carcinoma of the surrounding mucosa. Of these, 80% to 90% arise in the parotid gland, and 10% to 20% arise in the submandibular gland15,16.
These tumors typically are high stage at the time of diagnosis. In general, they appear as firm, white, infiltrative, and nonencapsulated masses. Microscopically, they are identicalto squamous cell carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract, although they tend to be better differentiated (most aremoderately to well differentiated with abundant keratinization) [15,17]. Usually, fibrous reaction of the surrounding tissues is prominent, as is perineural invasion, with extension of tumor into periglandular soft tissue [15,17].
Primary squamous cell carcinomas are aggressive tumors with 5-year survival rates of approximately 20% to 50% [18]. Histologic tumor grade does not correlate well with behavior. Treatment involves radical surgery, neck dissection, and radiotherapy [18].
Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the parotid is a rare tumor, accounting for less than 1% of all salivary gland tumors. It is an aggressive, high-grade salivary gland neoplasm with worse prognosis than conventional ENT squamous cell carcinoma. Patients over 60 years of age, skin ulceration, facial nerve involvement and lymphatic dissemination have a worse prognosis. Due to its accessibility and lower cost, CT with intravenous contrast is widely used. It remains essential in the evaluation of the involvement of the skull base. Treatment typically involves radical parotidectomy, neck lymph node dissection, and adjuvant radiation therapy.
Not applicable.
No conflict of interest was declared by the author.
The study has been approved by the appropriate ethics. The pictures were taken with consent of the patient.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,