AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/020
1 MBBS, M.Phil Research Fellow (Histopathology) Lecturer, Department of pathology, DMC, Dow university of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
2 MBBS, FCPS, PhD Research Fellow (Histopathology) Professor, Department of pathology DIMC, Dow University of Health Sciences Karachi, Pakistan.
*Corresponding Author: Yusra Shafique, MBBS, M.Phil Research Fellow (Histopathology) Lecturer, Department of pathology, DMC, Dow university of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Citation: Yusra S, Uzma B. (2020) Primary Squamous cell carcinoma of prostate: A diagnostic dilemma. International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. 2(4); DOI: 10.31579/2690-4861/020
Copyright: © 2020 Yusra Shafique, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 14 March 2020 | Accepted: 18 June 2020 | Published: 24 June 2020
Keywords: squamous cell carcinoma; prostate; diagnostic dilemma
Prostate squamous cell carcinoma is a rare entity with poor prognosis and it should be considered in patients with normal PSA ranges and symptoms of urinary obstruction.
Prostate carcinoma is the most common malignancy among male population. [1] Majority of cases are diagnosed as adenocarcinoma. Pure squamous cell carcinoma is a rare entity representing less than 1% of prostate carcinoma.[2, 3] It usually occurs in 7th decade of life with symptoms of urinary obstruction and bone pain in case of bone metastasis.[1, 4] About half of the cases arise post hormonal or radiation therapy to prostate adenocarcinoma, however de novo cases with no history of prostate disease have been reported in patients.[5] These findings suggest multiple etiologies for this disease. There are many hypothesis such as squamous differentiation in prostate cancer originates from urothelial lining of prostatic urethra or urothelial ducts. Other suggests that pluripotent stem cells being multi directional can give rise to it.
Morphologically squamous differentiation in prostate cancer can be encountered in pure form or in association with adenocarcinoma, urothelial carcinoma or sarcoma. Due to its multiple possible origins it is difficult to determine whether the squamous component develops through divergent differentiation from adenocarcinoma following treatment, represents squamous differentiation of transitional cell carcinoma or is a pure prostate malignancy.
As this is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis than adenocarcinoma and it metastasizes early to bone, liver and lungs so understanding the biology of this tumor might help to develop more efficient therapies.[2]
We discuss our findings for this case to help pathologists encountering the same problem.
An 80 years old male presented in our institution hospital with clinical sign and symptoms of acute urinary retention complaining of voiding difficulties for 3 months. Patient had past history of hemorrhoidectomy with no co-morbids. Physical examination was unremarkable. Digital rectal examination demonstrated an enlarged, fixed prostate, firm in consistency. On cystoscopy urinary bladder appeared normal. No lesion was seen. No history of radiation, hormonal therapy or tumor was given on any other site.
MRI scan shows low signal intensity mass lesion in left peripheral and transition zone. (Figure 1)
Serum PSA and PSAP levels were in normal range (1.2ng/ml). TURP- guided biopsy of prostate was performed due to urinary obstruction, in which 20gm of prostatic tissue was removed and sent for histopathology.
Histopathological findings:
Grossly specimen was in form of multiple grey white prostatic chips measuring in total of 20gm. Microscopic sections from prostatic tissue revealed an infiltrating neoplastic lesion arranged in clusters and nests. Cytologically individual tumor cells were large and cohesive with vesicular nuclei, prominent nucleoli, abundant glassy eosinophilic cytoplasm and well defined cell borders. Individual cell keratinization and keratin pearl formation was seen. Perineural invasion was noted. No other differentiation was seen. (Figure 2)
Prostatic squamous cell carcinoma is a rare pathologic and clinical entity accounting for 0.6-1% of all prostate malignancies. Its histiogenesis is not well understood. In more than 50% of cases it occurs post radiation and post hormonal treatment for adenocarcinoma of prostate. [4, 5]
Several theories have been proposed to explain histiogenesis of primary squamous cell carcinoma. It may arise from squamous metaplasia developing due to metaplastic transformation of adenocarcinoma, collision tumor arising from metaplastic foci post radiation or post hormonal therapy and possible deviation from pluripotent stem cells capable of multidirectional differentiation.[6, 7] It has been postulated squamous component arises from squamous metaplasia of basal or reserve cells of acini and ducts which can be due to different causes including chronic prostatitis, infarction, post radiation and post hormonal prostate or urothelial carcinomas.[1, 7, 8]
Strict criteria proposed by Mott indicates that in order to diagnose a prostate biopsy as pure squamous cell carcinoma that includes clear malignant features (such as disorganized growth pattern, cellular aplasia, invasion) features of squamous differentiation including keratinization, squamous pearls and distinct intercellular bridges, lack of glandular/ acinar component, absence of primary squamous cancer elsewhere particularly within the bladder.[9]
Clinical features pointing towards diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma includes low serum PSA and acid phosphatase levels so they have limited value in diagnosis.[3]
We report a case of pure squamous cell carcinoma of prostate and unlike most of the cases previously reported our case lacked pre-existing history of hormonal or radiation therapy. Primary squamous cell carcinoma has poor prognosis so in cases where PSA levels are not significantly raised and have obstructive urinary symptoms it should be considered in differential diagnoses.