AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-8794/169
1 Assistant Professor, Neurosurgery Upums Saifai Etawah (u.p) India.
2 Assistant Professor Rmc Jalaun.
*Corresponding Author: Sajag Kumar Gupta, Assistant Professor, Neurosurgery Upums Saifai Etawah (u.p) India.
Citation: Sajag K. Gupta, Pankhudi Gupta and Ameer Hamza (2023), Presentation and Outcome of CSDH in Hospit Sajag Kumar Gupta, Pankhudi Gupta, (2023), Presentation and Outcome of CSDH in Hospital, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports, 5(5); DOI:10.31579/2690-8794/169
Copyright: © 2023, Sajag Kumar Gupta. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 12 July 2023 | Accepted: 24 July 2023 | Published: 03 August 2023
Keywords: chronic subdural haematoma; markwalder; glasgow coma scale
Aim:To analyse the outcomes of surgical management in patients of chronic subdural hematoma. Study design: prospective
Place of study: Department of Neurosurgery, in tertiary care centre
Methodology: 65 patients of both genders with ages >18 years presented with chronic subdural hematoma were included. Patients detailed medical histories including age, sex and residence were recorded. Patients were categorized according to the Markwalder Grading System. CT scan was done before and after surgery and the discharge time. Outcomes were recorded according to the Glasgow coma scale.
Results: There were 57 (87.6%) male patients and 8 (12.3%) female patients. majority of them presented with headache (61.5%), followed by extremity weakness/paresis (52.3%). As Per, Markwalder grade on admission, 33 (50.7%) patients were in grade 1, 30 (46.1%) patients were in grade 2. The clinical picture at discharge was evaluated according to the Markwalder grade: 52 patients (80%) were grade 0, 2 patients (3%) grade 1, 9 patients (13.8%) grade 2
Conclusion: Headache and limb weakness are the most predominant presenting symptoms. The outcome correlates with the patient’s pre-operative neurological status, Glasgow Coma Scale and associated systemic diseases.
Chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) is an encapsulated collection of old blood between the dura mater and arachnoid caused by tear of bridging veins. Chronic subdural haematoma is considered when the blood is more than three weeks old. It is fairly common disease, especially in the elderly with incidence ranging 1.72 to 7. 35 per 100,000 population with male predominance.1,2,3. Elderly population is associated co- morbidities that can impact on immediate postoperative outcome and overall survival. Although history of trivial trauma is present in majority of cases but some cases may be secondary to coagulation defect, intracranial hypotension, and use of anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents. It commonly presents with headaches, confusion, drowsiness, vomiting, and seizures. On examination, the patient has various neurological deficits, including a low Glasgow coma scale, hemiparesis/hemiplegia, ocular palsy, and other deficits. Diagnosis is usually confirmed by NCCT scan head however MRI are indicated for better visualisation of, multiloculated, intrahaematoma membranes.
This condition is mostly treated with surgery, but some patients have also been managed conservatively with steroids. Steroids have been used in patients with minor headaches and patients who are unfit for surgery 4.
Materials And Methods
Study Population
The study population comprised of all > 18-year age group patients who were operated for chronic subdural hematoma in Neurosurgery Department of tertiary care center.
Study Design
The study design was prospective cohort study. Patients who met inclusion criteria, post-operative outcomes were assessed at discharge, then at one month and three months afterwards in the neurosurgery OPD.
Sample Size
Sample size (n) was obtained using following formulae for prevalence-
Where:
Where n = required sample size
p = estimated prevalence set at between 1.72 to 7.35/100,000 based on previous studies
m = Precision with which to measure prevalence of the study (margin of error) (confidence interval), set at ± 5%
The Z value is 1.96 for 95% confidence interval. Substituting in the above formula, the sample size ranged 26-104 and since the local incidence was unknown, we used the average sample size of (26+104)/2=65. All patients who fulfilled the criteria of the study were recruited until the number of sample size was achieved.
Inclusion Criteria
Patients of chronic subdural hematoma who were more than 18 years of age, as per radiological and clinical presentation and who had undergone surgery.
Methodology
It included a detailed history, clinical examination, and CT scan/MRI scans were done to confirm the diagnosis. Consent before enrolling patient in the study, written informed consent was obtained in / English/ Hindi/ from the patient, or from the blood relative preferably the first degree relative in patients who were comatose or were unable to give consent, explaining both the treatment options i.e., BHC and Mini craniotomy as required as per CT scan or MRI findings. Ethical approval was taken from the Institutional Ethics Committee.
Detailed history including history of trauma within last 3 months or earlier, use of anticoagulants or antiplatelet drugs in last 1 week, alcoholism, history of hypertension and diabetes were obtained. Complete clinical examination and neurological examination including Glasgow coma scale (GCS) and Markwalder’s Grading Scale (MGS) of the patients was done.
Routine blood investigations and coagulation profiles were obtained. Any coagulopathy correction and need of blood or blood product transfusion were noted. CT details of the following parameters: maximum thickness of hematoma, density, midline shift and septation in the haematoma. MRI was done when there was doubt of septation on CT brain.
All patients underwent surgical evacuation under General Anaesthesia OR Monitored Anaesthesia Care (MAC).
All patients were followed in the outpatient department at 1 month and 3 months after discharge. Markwalder Neurological Grading System for CSDH was used for comparing preoperative, postoperatively, 1 month and 3 months.
A total of 65 patients were admitted to the Neurosurgery Department at the tertiary care centre. All patients underwent surgery for chronic subdural haematoma.
Results
Demographic Characteristics Out of 65 patients, the majority of them were in 8th decade, (71-80) (30.7%) followed by 7th decade (61-70) (23.0%) (Table-1, Figure- 1). There was male gender predominance with majority of the cases being men (87.6%), which translates to male to female ratio 9:1 (Table -2).
Table 1: Age distribution
Figure 1: Bar chart showing age distribution
Table 2: Gender Distribution
Clinical Presentation
Out of 65 patients, majority of them presented with headache (61.5%), followed by extremity weakness/paresis (52.3%). Other presenting symptoms were confusion (38.4%), nausea/vomiting (29.2%), speech disturbance (21.5%), convulsions (6.15%), blurring of vision (1.5%) respectively (Table-3, Figure- 2).
Table 3: Presenting Complaints
Figure 2: Bar chart showing incidence of symptoms
Risk Factors
Out of all the risk factors that were associated with CSDH, trauma was commonest with (38.4%) history of trivial trauma in recent past, followed by, use of anti-platelet agents (36.9 %) in which aspirin and clopidrogrel were mainly used, history of alcohol consumption (32.3%),anticoagulant use, mainly warfarin was found in (7.6%) range of INR from 2 to 5.5, history of CVA (7.6%), history of seizure disorder (4.6%), previous head surgery (4.6%), previous severe head injury (4.6%) and VP shunting (1.5%) respectively (Table- 4, Figure-3).
Table 4: Risk Factors
Figure 3: Bar chart risk factors for CSDH
Duration of trauma
Duration of trauma in chronic subdural haematoma varied from the 4-20 weeks, majority of patient had duration of trauma in between 4-12 weeks (Table- 5, Figure- 4).
Table 5: Duration of trauma in chronic subdural haematoma (n= 26)
Figure 4: Bar chart duration of trauma in CSDH
Comorbidities
In terms of other underlying medical conditions, hypertension was highest at 46.1% followed by Diabetes was 38.4%, CAD was 12.3%, renal disease was
6.1%, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was 4.6% and lastly Liver disease was 1.5% (Table-6, Figure 5).
Table 6: Comorbidities
Figure 5: Bar chart showing co morbidities in CSDH
On admission neurological state
Majority of the patients 54 (83.0%) had Glasgow Coma Scale of 15/15, 9 patients were in altered sensorium and 2 patients were in coma. (Table- 7)
Table 7: on admission GCS score
Markwalder grading on admission
As Per, Markwalder grade- no patient (0%) was grade 0, 33 (50.7%) patients were in grade 1, 30 (46.1%) patients were in grade 2, 1(1.5%) patient was in grade 3 and 1 (1.5%) patient was in grade 4 (Table- 8, Figure - 6).
Table 8: Markwalder grading on admission
Figure 6: Bar diagram showing Markwalder grading on admission.
Markwalder grading on discharge
The clinical picture at discharge was evaluated according to the Mark walder grade: 52 patients (80%) were grade 0, 2 patients (3%) grade 1, 9 patients (13.8%) grade 2, one patient (1.5%) grade 3 and no patient (0%) grade 4. (Table-9, Figure- 7)
Table 9: Markwalder grading on discharge
Figure 7: Bar diagram showing Markwalder grading at discharge
In assessment of pre operative neurological status, it was found that 54 (83.0%) of the patients, had Glasgow coma scale score of 15/15. 33 of our patients presented with the MGS 1 and 30 were MGS 2 at the time of admission and 1 patient was having MGS of 3 and 1 patient of MGS 4. On post operative outcome, we had 52 patients (80%) with favourable outcome of MGS 0 at discharge. Improvement up to MGS 0 in MGS progressed to 63(96.9%) patients at 3 months follow up. One patient expired and one had mild neurological deficit at 3 month follow up.
Chronic subdural haematoma frequently encountered in the neurosurgical practice. It predominantly occurs in elderly people and so we will see a continuous increase in incidence due to aging of the population.2–4 The reason for its major occurrence in older people lies within the increasing brain atrophy and the correlated increased baseline stretch on the bridging veins which makes them more vulnerable to minor head trauma, which is one of the most frequently encountered causes for CSDH. 5,6,7 Due to the age of patients and their increasingly existent co-morbidities it is important to find a surgical method that provides optimal efficacy in reducing the potentially life-threatening hematoma-related mortality and morbidity and simultaneously shows a low rate of recurrence and surgery-related complications. But on the other hand, is as gentle and safe as far as possible for the often-comorbid patients. 8
In our study, the mean age of the study sample was 66.73 years, which corresponds to earlier published studies. 9,10,11,12,13 Male predominance
(87.6%) is seen in our study which is similar to previous publications. 9,11,14,15
In our study, out of 65 patient’s majority of the patients presented with headache (61.5%) followed by extremity weakness/paresis (52.3%), other presenting symptoms were confusion (38.4%), nausea/vomiting (29.2%), speech disturbance (21.5%), convulsions (6.15%), blurring of vision (1.5%) respectively. According to Santarius et al., 16 the most frequent presenting symptoms are gait abnormalities (57%), disturbed conscious level (35%), hemiparesis (35%), and headache (18%). In literature, the most common presentation in the elderly (50%–70%) was altered mental state.17,18 Hemiparesis was found in 58% of cases in one series.19 The incidence of headache varied in different studies ranging from 14% to 50%.20,21 Epilepsy is a rare presentation and is reported in up to 6% of cases as an initial symptom.19 Our study also conforms to the same. The incidence of CSDH presenting with transient neurologic deficits (TND) varies from 1% to 12 %.22 We did not have TND features in our group of patients.
Trivial trauma which was most important risk factor (40%) was mostly minor and remote. The duration to onset of symptoms from trauma range was mean 7.9 weeks (4 to 20 weeks). The history of trauma could even be higher keeping in mind the recall bias as significant patients presented with confusion; trauma was remote and often minor especially in elderly. Minor head insult has been confirmed by different authors 23,24,25,26,27 to be a major predisposing factor. Stroobandt 28, in his study of 100 patients, found it be as high as 80%, compared to taking aspirin (16%), coagulopathy (6%) and alcoholism (11%). In our study, also trauma is the highest at 40% followed by antiplatelet agents (35.3%) and alcohol consumption (32%). Although incidence of anticoagulant was 7.6% and antiplatelet agent use was 35.3% in our study. Chronic alcoholic abuse causes coagulation dysfunction due to the hepatic harm.29 Other factors that have an increased risk of developing a CSDH, are kidney disease, haemodialysis, liver dysfunction, epilepsy and chemotherapeutics agents, as described by Sim et al. 29.
INR was deranged in 5 patients which was corrected before surgery but 1 patient (1.5%) had persistent coagulopathy, and he had recurrence post operatively. Though some series have reported high incidence of coagulopathy, which ranged from 10% to as high as 42% 30,31. In a multivariate analysis of risk factors in intracranial haemorrhage carried out by Berwerts and Webster 32 oral anticoagulation, hypertension, INR >4.5 and duration of anticoagulation were found to be significant predisposing factors.
Neurological picture, upon arrival as well as at discharge, was evaluated with the Markwalder grading. Comparative analysis of our study with the series of Ernestus et al 33, Kotwica et al 34, Drapkin et al 35 and Richter et al 36, who also adopted the same method of evaluation our study matches with results of Drapkin et al 35. (Figure -8, 9)
Figure 8: Markwalder grading on admission comparison of present series with other series
Figure 9: Markwalder grading at discharge comparison of present series with other series
Conclusion
•Headache and limb weakness are the most predominant presenting symptoms.
•Possible predisposing factors include diabetes mellitus, hypertension, antiplatelet agent, and anticoagulant.
•The outcome correlates with patient’s pre-operative neurological status, Glasgow Coma Scale and associated systemic diseases.
Conflicts of Interest-No
Funding and support – No
Ethical consideration- approval was taken from institutional ethical committee
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
