AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2642-973X/018
1 Internal Medicine II and Stroke Unit, San Giuseppe Hospital, Empoli, Italy.
2 Neurology, San Giuseppe Hospital, Empoli, Italy.
3 Cardiology, San Giuseppe Hospital, Empoli, Italy.
*Corresponding Author: Luca Masotti, 1Internal Medicine II and Stroke Unit, San Giuseppe Hospital, Empoli, Italy
Citation: Luca Masotti. (2022). Predicting Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (Esus) In the Real-World Practice: Comparison Between Brown-Af, As5f And Cha2ds2-Vasc Scores. Brain and Neurological Disorders. 5(3); DOI:10.31579/2642-973X/018
Copyright: © 2022, Luca Masotti, this is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 25 February 2022 | Accepted: 30 May 2022 | Published: 23 June 2022
Keywords: ESUS; stroke; atrial fibrillation; score; ECG monitoring
Introduction: Searching paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is fundamental and strongly recommended in patients suffering from cryptogenic stroke or embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). In the latest years some prediction scores for detecting post-stroke PAF have been proposed, such as Brown-AF and AS5F. However, external validations lack. The aim of the present study was to analyze the predictive power of AS5F and Brown-AF scores and compare them with the CHA2DS2-VASc score.
Materials and Methods
We analyzed demographic, clinical, trans-thoracic echocardiography and brain computer tomography characteristics of patients with ESUS undergone to two weeks external ECG monitoring after hospital discharge. PAF was considered detected when any evidence of AF and/or atrial flutter occurred at monitoring. For each patient we calculated the Brown-AF, AS5F and CHA2DS2-VASc scores and we analyzed and compared their predictive power by using area under the Receiver Operating Curve (AUROC).
Results: Eighty-two consecutive ESUS patients with mean age ± SD 72 ± 10 years were the study population. Overall, PAF was detected in 43.9% of patients. PAF detection increased from 18.75% of patients with Brown ESUS-AF score 0 to 54.3% of patients with Brown ESUS-AF score ≥ 2. PAF was detected in 37.2% of patients with AS5F < 67.5 and 51.2% of patients with AS5F score ≥ 67.5. AUROC of Brown ESUS-AF score in predicting AF detection was 0.642 (95% CI: 0.528-0.745), while AUROC of AS5F was 0.618 (95% CI: 0.504-0.723)(p=0.6872). No difference between predictive power of Brown ESUS-AF and AS5F scores with CHA2DS2-VASc (AUROC 0.671, 95% CI: 0.559-0.771) was found.
Conclusion:
Both Brown ESUS-AF and AS5F scores could be used as a screening tool for selecting ESUS patients requiring prolonged ECG monitoring aimed to detect PAF. However, in our study their predictive power was quite low and not superior to that of CHA2DS2-VASc score.
Occult paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) represents one of the main causes of embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). Therefore, searching PAF is fundamental in the diagnostic work-up of ESUS and strongly recommended by international experts who suggest that patients with ESUS should have continuous electrocardiogram (ECG) after stroke for at least 72 hours [1]. In the latest years, some prediction score has been proposed to detect post-stroke PAF and better identify patients requiring prolonged ECG monitoring. In 2018, Ricci B. et al proposed a new simple score named Brown ESUS-AF score aimed at predicting PAF detection on prolonged ECG monitoring in post ESUS outpatients [2]. The protocol by Ricci B. and colleagues consisted of a 30-day external ECG monitoring followed by an implantable device if the first monitoring was negative. PAF was considered detected when any evidence of PAF or atrial flutter including brief episodes occurred at ECG monitoring. Age ≥ 75 years (2 points), age 65-74 years (1 point), moderate-severe left atrial enlargement (2 points) were the variables they found as independent predictors of AF detection. The predictive power of the Brown ESUS-AF score was good with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.725. PAF detection increased from 4.2% in patients with Brown ESUS-AF score of 0 to 55.6% in patients with a score of 4. In a study comparing 68 patients with first ever AF with 123 patients with cryptogenic stroke, Muscarine A et al found an AUROC of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.62-0.78) for the Brown ESUS-AF score [3]. Recently Mendez B. et al. showed that the Brown ESUS-AF score is also a good prognosticator of stroke recurrence in ESUS patients [4]. In 2019 Uphauls T et al. proposed the AS5F score for predicting PAF in cryptogenic stroke [5]. Age (0.76 x year) and NIHSS ( 5 9 points; > 5 21 points) were the variables included. Cut-off 67.5 defines low and high risk of PAF. The Authors found an AUROC of 0.780. The protocol of AS5F foresees a 72 hours long ECG monitoring [5]. Accordingly, Ghoshal S. et al confirmed an AUROC of AS5F score of 0.751 (95% CI 0.724-0.778) in more than one thousands of stroke patients. In this study the Authors found that combining AS5F with an automated software analyzing the first hour of 72-hours ECG monitoring could significantly increase the predictive power of AS5F reaching an AUROC of 0.789, 95% CI 0.763-0.814; difference between the AUC P = 0.022 [6].
Despite both scores are very simple and interesting tools, external validations lack. Thus, the aim of our study was to analyze the predictive power of Brown ESUS-AF and AS5F scores in a cohort of real-world patients suffering from ESUS and compare them with CHA2DS2-VASc score.
Study population encompasses 82 consecutive ESUS patients (48 females) defined according to standardized criteria [7], admitted to our Stroke Unit and undergone to 15-day external ECG monitoring by using an event recorder (Spider Flash-tTM, Sorin Group) after hospital discharge. For all the patients demographic characteristics (age, sex), modified Rankin scale (mRS) at hospital discharge, risk factors for AF, CHA2DS2-VASc score, Brown-AF score, AS5F score, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at stroke onset, brain infarct size (<2>2.5 cm), location (cortical, cortical-subcortical, subcortical, supra- or sub-tentorial) and number (single or multiple) of the ischemic lesions, left atrium size (with left atrial enlargement, defined as diameter ≥40 mm or area ≥20 cm2), were analyzed. We compared patients whose PAF was detected with those whose PAF was not detected.
For statistical analysis continuous variables were reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or as median and interquartile range (IQR) as appropriate. Categorical variables were analyzed using the χ2 test and Fisher's exact test when appropriate. To evaluate the predictive power of CHA2DS2-VASc, Brown-AF and AS5F scores, the AUROC of each score was calculated. A p value of <0>
General characteristics of patients are shown in Table 1.
Mean age ± SD was 72 ± 10 years. Fourty-one patients (50%) were 75 years old and older, 24 (29.3%) were 65-74 years old, and 37 patients (45.1%) had left atrial enlargement defined as left atrial diameter > 40 mm or left atrial area > 20 cm2. PAF was detected in 36 patients (43.9%). Median CHA2DS2-VASc, Brown-AF and AS5F scores in patients with PAF detection were significantly higher compared with patients without PAF detection. Distribution of Brown-AF, AS5F and CHA2DS2-VASc scores are shown in
The AUROC of Brown ESUS-AF score in predicting AF detection was 0.642 (95% CI: 0.528-0.745, specificity 54.3%, sensitivity 69.4% for Brown ESUS-AF score > 1), while AUROC of AS5F was 0.618 (95% CI: 0.504-0.723, specificity 43.4%, sensitivity 80.5% for AS5F score > 62) (p=0.6872). No difference between predictive power of Brown ESUS-AF score and AS5F score with CHA2DS2-VASc score (AUROC 0.671, 95% CI: 0.559-0.771, specificity 60.8%, sensitivity 72.2% for CHA2DS2-VASc > 3)) was found (Table2, Figure 4).
Identifyng predictors of PAF detection in post ESUS patients is of the main importance to choose the appropriate treatment and reduce the risk of stroke recurrence. Systematic reviews showed that the rate of stroke recurrence in ESUS patients is 4.5% [8]. Randomized clinical trials found no advantage in the use of direct oral anticoagulants compared with antiplatelets in ESUS patients for preventing stroke recurrence (9,10), while in AF-related strokes direct oral anticoagulants are now recognized as the first choice in secondary prevention due to the best efficacy/safety profile compared with vitamin K antagonists or antiplatelets [11].
In the latest years, scores for predicting post-stroke PAF in cryptogenic and ESUS patients have been proposed, but external validations lack [2,5,12-15]. Therefore, we performed the present study aimed to analyzed retrospectively the predictive power of some of the proposed scores and compared them with CHA2DS2-VASc score which is a score mainly used for predicting stroke and/or systemic embolism in patients with AF. We were able to analyze performance of Brown-AF and AS5F scores. Our study confirms that the Brown ESUS-AF score and AS5F could be used as screening tools for identifying PAF in ESUS patients confirming that these scores may be useful to select patients with priority for searching PAF by prolonged ECG monitoring. However, in our study population, both scores showed a quite low predictive power for PAF detection and not different when compared with that of the most widespread CHA2DS2-VASc score.
We recognized that our study has limitations, mainly due to its retrospective design and difference in length of ECG monitoring (two weeks in our study while it was one month in the study of Ricci B. et al and 72 hours in the study of Uphauls T. et al) [2,5].
Brown ESUS-AF and AS5F scores could be used as screening tools for selecting ESUS patients requiring prolonged ECG monitoring aimed to detect PAF. However, in our study both Brown ESUS-AF than AS5F scores seems to bring no advantage compared with CHA2DS2-VASc score as PAF prognosticator. Further evidence is warranted.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
