AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Chat with us
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2642-973X/091
*Corresponding Author: Suresh. K, Family Physician & Public Health Consultant Bengaluru, India.
Citation: Suresh. K, (2024), Post- Non-Haemorrhagic Stroke Hypersensitivity - A Case Report and Brief Review, J. Brain and Neurological Disorders. 7(1): DOI: 10.31579/2642-973X/091
Copyright: © 2024, Suresh. K. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 14 December 2023 | Accepted: 21 December 2023 | Published: 02 January 2024
Keywords: non-haemorrhagic stroke; central poststroke pain; thalamic pain; central pain; post-stroke thalamic pain; cerebral ischemia; right thalamus; right parietal; right temporal and occipital lobes infarct; neuroprotection
It is well documented that stroke patients seeking care in critical period recover almost fully from their paresis/paralysis, but minimal awareness is there about experiencing reduced and/or altered sensation because of stroke. After a stroke your sensation can be affected. The pathways from the brain to areas of the body are complicated and sensory problems are different for everyone. Sensory deficits include reduced or exacerbated ability to feel touch, pain, temperature, position, or the ability to recognise objects one is holding. Some people experience feelings such as tingling, prickling, numbness, aching, burning or ‘pins and needles. With altered sensation, movements may lack precision and control or even blow of air (direct or Coolers or Air conditioners) may appear painful.
Sensory re-education may have to be used to retrain or stimulate sensory pathways, through touching different textured objects, massage, vibration, pressure, determining joint position, identifying different temperatures. Sensory re-education can start from day one post stroke. Commonly recommended first- and second lines of pharmacotherapies like antidepressants, anticonvulsants, opioid analgesics, and lamotrigine, are more effective than others. Nonpharmacological interventions, such as transcranial magnetic or direct current brain stimulations, vestibular caloric stimulation, epidural motor cortex stimulation, and deep brain stimulation, are recommended in the management of therapy-resistant PS-TP. Interestingly, the stimulation to other areas, e.g., the motor cortex, periventricular / periaqueductal grey matter, and thalamus/internal capsule, show more effect than the stimulation to the thalamus alone. This article is based on Post stroke hypersensitivity case being managed currently and review of available literature and management practices.
Material & Methods: This article is based on case study a 51-year male software engineer, diabetic and hypertensive, having stroke in Mid-September 2023, who started getting sensory shock with fine touch of filaments of cloths since Mid-October 2023. He had non-Haemorrhagic infarct in the Right Thalamus, Right Parietal, temporal and Occipital lobes. Currently he is managing with exercises, relaxation methods like Meditation. Therapy with tapering cortisone has been suggested but not yet started.
It is well documented that stroke patients seeking care in critical period recover almost fully from their motor functions like paresis/paralysis (Hemiplegia or Paraplegia), but minimal awareness is there about experiencing reduced and/or altered sensation because of stroke. Up to 80% of people who have a stroke experience sensory loss in their affected arm. This sensory loss puts the arm at risk for injury and impacts functional use of the arm and the survivors' level of independence during daily activities. Central imbalance, central disinhibition, central sensitization, other thalamic adaptative changes, and local inflammatory responses have been considered as its possible pathogenesis. There are very few studies and reports about recovery from sensory loss or hypersensitivity. Multiple interventions for upper limb sensory impairment after stroke are described but there is insufficient evidence to support or refute their effectiveness in improving sensory impairment, upper limb function, or participants' functional status & participation. Poststroke thalamic pain a type of central poststroke pain, has been a hurdle to improve the rehabilitation outcomes and quality of life after a stroke. Its prevalence has been reported in 10–25% of stroke survivors. Most of the patient’s failed to manage the pain and hypersensitivity effectively [4]. Despite the different pharmacotherapies and invasive interventions, the understanding about the effects of such interventions used to address such impairments is limited and there is a need for more well‐designed, better reported studies of sensory rehabilitation. [1,4].
A stroke occurs when blood flow in the brain is obstructed and brain cells are deprived of oxygen-rich blood, they begin to die and lose function. When brain cells are damaged after a stroke, that area of the brain has difficulty directing nerves and cells that control motor functions. A stroke damages the way the nerves control our muscles, leading to muscles contracting for long periods or going into spasm, which will be painful. As stroke occurs due to reduced perfusion to a brain region, resulting in death or temporary or permanent neurological deficits including hemiplegia, hemiparesis, numbness, loss of sensory and vibratory sensation, balance problems, ptosis, decreased reflexes, visual field defects, apraxia, and aphasia [2]. More than half of stroke survivors suffer from sensory impairments of their affected upper limb (UL), which are characterized by reduced sense of touch, temperature, proprioception, and pain [1,2, 3]. They tend to have trouble processing sensory receptors, leading to numbness in the limbs in people who have had a stroke. Since every stroke is different, everyone recovers at different rates.
While the Numbness, tingling starts from the tips of the fingers and toes, giving a feeling of slits, between fingers and toes, itchy, uncomfortable stinging and later spreading to the arms and legs. Numbness after a stroke is different from other types of anaesthesia because the problems originate in the brain, not the local tissues.
Every stroke is different, everyone recovers at different rates. While the motor deficit’s recovery is assessed using Brannstrom’s seven stages of stroke recovery, which are i) flaccidity, ii) spasticity appears, iii) spasticity increases, iv) spasticity decreases, v) complex movement combinations, vi) spasticity disappears, and vii) normal function returns. The best progress is indicated by becoming more Independent, can cross Legs, sleep more, find the need to compensate less with technique and Spastic Muscles are twitching [3].
Sensory loss (Numbness) recovery is done using Fugl-Meyer Assessment—upper extremity (FMA-UE) sensory section [5]. This measures light touch and proprioception of the UL after stroke. The score ranges from 0 to 4 points for each subtest with a maximum score of 8 points per hand. While the focus after stroke is often on recovery of neurologic function and reducing the risk of recurrence, the emergence of comorbid conditions like poststroke Central Post-Stroke Pain and chronic headache is often overlooked and undertreated. The overall prevalence suggests that approximately 14% of adult patients with ischemic stroke have headache at the time of or shortly following their stroke diagnosis.
Hypersensitivity after a stroke, is not a rare phenomenon, where after reduction in sensation (numbness) during the attack and first 3-4 weeks until the progresses get stabilized, sudden change may be observed and complained, when even a slight touch irritates or gives electrical stimulation to the patient along with the process of recovery of motor functions of the affected limbs. Studies have shown that mechanisms like apoptosis, necrosis, inflammation, immune modulation, and oxidative stress and mediators such as excitatory amino acids, nitric oxide, inflammatory mediators, neurotransmitters, reactive oxygen species, and withdrawal of trophic factors may lead to the development of the ischemic cascade of hypersensitivity. All these agents have been shown to improve neurological outcome after ischemic insult in experimental animals suggesting that these will aid in preventing long-term morbidity and mortality associated with ischemic stroke [1,2].
Biomarkers have recently begun to be used in clinical diagnosis of ischemic stroke, especially in the acute phase. It is still very difficult to identify specific biomarkers for a particular neuroreceptors, that trigger or affect pathological processes in ischemic stroke and the mechanism underlying each receptor's involvement in the disease's development is not yet fully understood. However, target-based drug design and discovery for treatment of ischemic stroke could be a good starting point to work on addressing hypersensitivity too!
Pain is common after stroke, with an estimated 30 to 40% of stroke patients experiencing some form of pain. If person is recovering from stroke and experiencing pain, it’s important to first understand the underlying cause of the pain. Stroke patients can be encouraged to practice coping techniques at home also.
Case of Ravi who developed hypersensitivity after 4 weeks of Stroke:
Ravi, a 51-year male software engineer, stared getting sensory shock even with fine touch of filaments of cloths in Mid-October 2023. He had a stroke on the morning of 16 September 2023 after short period of a Parieto- occipital headache since the morning of 15/09/2023. His main complaint apart from hypersensitivity is feeling of left Upper extremity heavy. On physical examination his sensory appreciation of fine touch and temperature was highly exaggerated especially when these happened without his knowledge or him seeing. He scored 15 points (maximum=25) in Monofilament &18 points (maximum=36) in Shape and Texture test. Surprisingly firm holding of arm, pinching or pin prick did not bother him much.
History: A known hypertensive and diabetic over 15 years, measured BP at home which was 185/110, took some home Paracetamol tablet and rest. Next day too he had mild headache, therefore was resting most of the day. Around early morning of 16 September 0200AM midnight (16 &17 September midnight) headache increased, and he found left sided hemiparesis, that made the family to take him to an emergency admission in private Hospital, in Yeshwanthpur Bengaluru.
On admission the general examination recorded a Pulse rate of 98/minute, BP-215/88. The patient was conscious, well oriented, with left sided parathesis and numbness with reduced sensation, ataxia, and muscular strength of 4/5. Blood biomarkers down were 1) Hb1Ac=8.1% 2) Estimated average Blood sugar=186mg /Dl,3) Total Cholesterol=179, 4) Triglycerides=190, 5) HDL Cholesterol=36 mg/Dl, 6) LDL Cholesterol=127 mg/Dl, 7) VLDL=38 mg/Dl 8) Serum B 12 level= 30pg/ml (as against180-900 normal) 9) Plasma Homocysteine = 47.57mic.mol/L 10) Serum LFT biomarkers were all in normal limits. Pulmonary function test showed mild restriction. An MRI brain showed right territory acute infarct. MRA showed right vertebral artery occlusion and an old right MC A-ACA watershed infarct.
He was treated with dual antiplatelets, Statins and physiotherapy. At the time of discharge on 20/09/23 his BP was fully stables, left hemi-sided sensory loss with left sided ataxia. He was advised to take i) Ecosprin 150mg once in the afternoon) Clopilet 75 mg 1 tab in the afternoon iii)Rozat (Statin) tablet 20 mg in the night iv) Tab Homin ( for treatment of deficiency of vitamin B6, B9, & B12) 1 at in the morning and night, v) Tab. Trivolib2 (combination of Glimepiride, Metformin and Voglibose) one tab in the morning, vi) Novomix 30 Flexpen 100IU/ml - 1mg, 12 units a day, vii) Tazloc 40mg (anti-hypertensive) in the morning.
Diagnosis:
His involvement in ISCON’s Bhajans (chanting Hare Krishan, Hare Krishan, Krishna Krishna Hare Hare, Hare Ram, Hare Ram, Ram Ram Hare Hare, and Meditation has helped him to cope with hypersensitivity in the last 2 weeks.
Stroke recovery takes a toll on mental health. Experiencing pain or hypersensitivity in recovery adds to stress level and increase sensitivity. More than half of stroke survivors suffer from sensory impairments of their affected upper limb (UL) initially, which are characterized by reduced sense of touch, temperature, proprioception, and pain, but as the sensory recovery begins spontaneously on its own, sometimes with hypersensitivity within the first few months of recovery. Sensory impairments significantly limit the ability to use the upper limb after stroke. Like the loss of motor function in limbs (Hemi paresis) after a stroke, numbness occurs because the part of the brain that controls that limb has been damaged, and the brain works to compensate for the lost signal, or even send mixed signals. People experience many different types of sensations during this process, depending on where and how much the stroke has occurred. Two brain regions that determine post-stroke numbness or hypersensitivity are: thalamus and occipital lobe. The thalamus is responsible for 98% of all sensory input and the occipital lobe distinguishes this input from the five senses, including touch. Therefore, post-stroke numbness is often seen after a hippocampal or occipital stroke because these brain regions play a large role in sensory function [6].
Figure: 1. (a) Anatomical and (b) functional classification of the thalamus
Source: The role of thalamus. Mult. Scler. J. 2019; 26:6–16.
There are four types of sensory deficits reported [3,4]:
Monitoring the Progress: Sensory recovery is assessed by following tests [2,6]:
Semmes-Weinstein monofilament: This is to assess touch detection thresholds of the hand and fingers. The short version with five filaments from 0.07 to 279 g are used. The touch detection thresholds are scored on a 0 to 5-point scale, where 5 represents the thinnest filament and 0 represents the largest filament. Five different positions of the hand are tested: the fingertip on digits I, II, and V and the thenar and hypothenar regions, yielding a total sum score of 25 points.
Secondary outcome measures:
Treatment: Here are some treatments used for central neuropathy/central poststroke pain:
It is well documented that stroke patients seeking care in critical period recover almost fully from their motor functions like paresis/paralysis (Hemiplegia or Paraplegia).
There is minimal awareness about experiencing altered sensation because of stroke.
Multiple interventions for upper limb sensory impairment after stroke are described but there is insufficient evidence to support or refute their effectiveness in improving sensory impairment and upper limb function.
Sensory re-education, relaxation methods often help. Medical treatment of acute or subacute hypersensitivity is dependent on oral corticosteroids therapy.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
