AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-8808/080
Department of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.
*Corresponding Author: Wang Xiaoying, Department of Radiology, Peking University, Beijing 100034, China.
Citation: Wang Xiaoying (2021) Plicae Palmatae on MR in Uterus Didelphys: the Incidence and Morphological Characteristics J. Clin Case Rep and Stu 2(6); DOI: 10.31579/2690-8808/080
Copyright: © 2021 Wang Xiaoying. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
Received: 31 May 2021 | Accepted: 10 August 2021 | Published: 09 October 2021
Keywords: plicae palmatae, uterine cervix, uterus didelphys, magnetic resonance imaging, incidence
Objective: To investigate the incidence of plicae palmatae in uterus didelphys and its morphological characteristics on MR imaging.
Methods: We retrospectively collected 37 consecutive female pelvic MR images diagnosed with uterus didelphys between August 2012 and November 2020. Patients with the following conditions were excluded: (a) repeated examination; (b) poor image quality; (c) cervical disease. Axial and coronal T2-weight images and axial three-dimensional (3D) volumetric isotropic T2-weighted acquisition (VISTA) were used to evaluate the ridge of plicae palmatae (RPP). A multiplanar reformation of the cervical axis from 3D-VISTA sequence was performed to measure the height and width of RPP. Non-normal variables based on the Kruskal-Wallis H test was used for statistical analysis. A two-tailed test where P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: Twenty-six cases were finally included in the statistics. The average age was 25.7±9.0 years (range, 10-45 years). RPP was observed on both cervices in 16 patients (61.5%), only on the left cervix in 3 patients (11.5%), and only on the right cervix in 4 patients (15.4%). There were 3 cases with no RPP observed in any of their cervix (11.5%).All RPP appear symmetrically on the anterior and posterior walls of the cervix. There was no statistically significant difference in height, width, and height/width of the RPP in the left and right cervix (p＞0.05).
Conclusions: RPP is encountered in 88.5% patients with duplicated uterine cervices in our cohort. This incidence is similar to that reported in women with normal uterus of reproductive age.
Abbreviations
3D = three-dimensional
VISTA = volumetric isotropic T2-weighted acquisition
RPP = the ridge of plicae palmatae
RA = the anterior wall of the right cervix
RP = the posterior wall of the right cervix
LA = the anterior wall of the left cervix
LP = the posterior wall of the left cervix
SW = Shapiro-Wilk
ADC = apparent diffusion coefficient
DWI = diffusion-weighted imaging
High resolution MRI helps to visualize the zonal anatomy of the uterus. On T2WI MR images, the cervix shows a distinct four-layer structure [1]. The bright intensity in the center represents cervical mucus and the lower intensity adjacent to it represents cervical epithelium. The inner cervical fibrous stroma shows low signal intensity, and the outer loose connective tissue exhibits slightly increased intensity.
Plicae palmatae are cervical folds on the anterior and/or posterior wall, consisting of a median longitudinal ridge and many folds diverging laterally and upward (Figure 1) [2]. The ridges of plicae palmatae (RPP) at the midline are more distinct than the other oblique folds and easier to be observed on MR imaging. The median longitudinal ridges show low intensity on T2WI images, with a frequency of 27-44.5% on MR imaging in the normal uterus [3-5].
Plicae palmatae of cervix. Plicae palmatae are cervical folds on the anterior and/or posterior wall, consisting of a median longitudinal ridge and many folds diverging laterally and upward.
The sign of low intensity at cervical canals could mimic an anomalous uterine septum, so RPP is also called pseudo spectrum [5]. Which indicates their clinical significance. The uterine septum extends from the fundus and extends to the cervix, whereas RPP is limited to the cervical canals. Also, a neonatal case of RPP with a tumorous appearance has been reported [6]. Therefore, it's important for radiologists to accurately distinguish the RPP from the uterine septum or neoplastic lesion to avoid unnecessary hysteroscopy and other invasive procedures.
Currently, there are a few studies on RPP in normal uterus and even less on uterus didephys [7]. This study aims to investigate the incidence of plicae palmatae in uterus didelphys and its morphological characteristics on MR imaging.
Study sample
We retrospectively collected 36 consecutive female pelvic MR images diagnosed with uterus didelphys between August 2012 and November 2020. Patients with the following conditions were excluded from the study: (a) repeated examination of the same patient (n=3); (b) poor image quality (n=1); (c) cervical disease (n=6, 2 cases of cervical hematoma, 1 case of cervical dysplasia, 1 case of endometrial polyp, 2 cases of Nabothian cysts). Figure 2 illustrates the patients' enrollment.Diagram shows the patients' enrollment flow.
MR data acquisition
Patients were scanned on 3.0-Tesla systems (Achieva; Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) using body phased-array coils for signal reception. The protocol in this study included: (1) Axial and coronal T2-weighted fast spin-echo images (TR/TE, 3000–33760/90-100 msec; ST, 5 mm; intersection gap, 1 mm; FOV, 24–30 cm; 512 × 512 matrix), with or without fat saturation; (2) Axial three-dimensional (3D) volumetric isotropic T2-weighted acquisition (VISTA) (TR/TE, 1500/150 ms; ST, 0.8 mm with no intersection gap; FOV, 18 cm, matrix 180 × 147).
Methods of observation and measurement of the RPP
All of the images were analyzed on PACS workstations. The observation and measurement were conducted by one radiologist (Z.S. with more than 3 years of expertise) in consensus with a senior radiologist (X.W., with more than 30 years of experience in genitourinary interpretation). RPP was defined as linear low-intensity structures at the midline of the cervix on MR imaging. The tumorous appearance of RPP is defined as a width greater than or equal to height. To verify the angulated cervix was well observed, axial T2-weighted images, coronal T2-weight images were comprehensively observed regarding the existence of the RPP in each cervix. In case of doubt, reconstruction of the cervical axis from the axial 3D-VISTA was used to observe when necessary. A reconstructed maximum cross-section of the RPP from the axial 3D-VISTA was also performed to measure the height and width. Four sites were measured respectively: the anterior and posterior wall of the right cervix (RA and RP) and the anterior and posterior wall of the left cervix (LA and LP).
a) and b) Axial 3D-VISTA image and coronal T2-weighted images in a 30-year-old woman with uterus didelphys. Longitudinal ridges show distinct linear low signal intensity on the anterior and posterior walls of both uterine cervix (arrows). c) An example of measurement method for the ridge of plicae palmatae (RPP) on the anterior wall of the left cervix. A reconstructed maximum cross-section of the RPP from the axial 3D-VISTA was performed to measure the height and width. RA: the anterior wall of the right cervix; RP: the posterior wall of the right cervix; LA: the anterior wall of the left cervix; LP: the posterior wall of the left cervix.
Statistical analysis
A Shapiro-Wilk (S-W) test was conducted to test the normality of all measurements. Continuous variables were expressed as mean±standard deviation or median (interquartile range). Categorical variables were summarized as counts (percentage). Non-normal variables based on the Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to compare the measurements of the RPP in the left and right cervix. Statistical analysis was performed with programming language (python version 3.5.0; Python Software Foundation; https://www.python.org) and IBM SPSS Statistics version 24.0. A two-tailed test where P < 0>
The incidence of the RPP on MR
Twenty-six cases were finally included in our study. The average age of the 26 patients was 25.7±9.0 years (range, 10-45 years). RPP is encountered in 88.4% patients with duplicated uterine cervices in our cohort. The number of RPP observed on both cervices, left cervix only, and right cervix only were 16 (61.5%), 3 (11.5%), and 4 (15.4%), respectively. There were 3 (11.5%) cases with no RPP observed in any of their cervix.
The morphological characteristics of the RPP
All RPP appeared symmetrically on the anterior and posterior walls of the cervix. In 23 individuals with RPP visible in unilateral or bilateral cervices, the mean height, width, and height/width of RA, RP, LA, and LP were summarized in table 1, Figure 4. There isn’t a statistically significant difference of the measurements between the left and right cervix (p＞0.05). In all the 26 uterus didelphys included in the study, only one case of RPP showed tumor-like structure (Figure 5), the rest were line-like structures with height greater than width (Figure 3).
a), b) and c) are Box plots indicating the height, width, and height/width of the ridge of plicae palmatae in four locations of the cervical canal, respectively. RA: the anterior wall of the right cervix; RP: the posterior wall of the right cervix; LA: the anterior wall of the left cervix; LP: the posterior wall of the left cervix. RPP: the ridge of plicae palmatae. The whisker lengths are limited to a maximum of 1.5 times the interquartile range. Each box represents the 95% confidence interval near the median.
The ridge of plicae palmatae (RPP) showed tumor-like structure in a 28-year-old woman. a) and b) Axial 3D-VISTA image and coronal T2-weighted fat saturated image. The RPP at the anterior wall of the left cervix shows a tumorous appearance (arrow) with height, width of 8.3mm and 8.5mm. The width of RPP is greater than the height but it is still low signal density; c) and d) Axial contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fat saturated images during the equilibrium phase (2 min 30 s after the injection) and delayed phase (10 min after the injection) show the presence of iso-enhancement (arrow); e) and f) No restricted diffusion (arrow) is observed on diffusion-weighted imaging (high b value of 1000 s/mm2) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. RA: the anterior wall of the right cervix; RP: the posterior wall of the right cervix; LA: the anterior wall of the left cervix; LP: the posterior wall of the left cervix. RPP: the ridge of plicae palmatae.
The mean height, width, and height/width of the ridge of plicae palmatae NA=not available, RA: the anterior wall of the right cervix; RP: the posterior wall of the right cervix; LA: the anterior wall of the left cervix; LP: the posterior wall of the left cervix. Data are presented as the median (interquartile range) and mean ± standard deviation. * P values for non-normal variables are based on the Kruskal-Wallis H test.
In this retrospective study, we searched MR studies of female patients in our institution and detected 23 RPP in 26 cases with uterus didelphys. Embryologically, bilateral Mullerian tubes fuse to form a normal uterus. Failure of the intervening septum regression can result in anomalous uterine septum or other Mullerian duct anomalies. Uterus didelphys is a typical situation of Mullerian anomalous. Due to the RPP are located at the midline of the cervical canal, they were once hypothesized to be a remnant of a developmental Mullerian ductal fusion. Recently, Takahata et al.[7] Reported on a case of uterus didelphys observed with RPP, the observation of the RPP on the duplicated uterine cervices indicates the plicae palmatae is an inherent structure of the cervical canal, not a remnant of fused Mu ̈llerian duct. This report refuted the previous hypothesis. The goal of this study was to observe the relationship between RPP and Mullerian anomalous. Based on our observations, we favor the theory of the RPP was not a remnant of Mullerian ductal fusion, and we found they can be observed in either one or both cervix.
Previous studies have found that RPP is more frequently visualized in normal uterus of reproductive age, with a rate of 58.4% for those under 45 years of age [8]. The study also found that women in their 30s had the highest frequency (71.4%) of visualization of RPP on MR. Our study summarized a frequency of 88.5% in RPP of uterus didelphys on MR, which was higher than that of a normal uterus but was close to the group of 30s. This may be due to the fact that the age of our participants was concentrated around child-bearing age (25.7±9.0 years). Previous studies on RPP have been conducted on axial and/or coronal T2-weighted images. To date, measurements of the RPP are absent. We used axial 3D T2WI to observe more detail and measure the height and width of the RPP by using multi-planar reformation to provide anatomical data on MR images.
In our study cohort, only one RPP that mimics a tumor has been observed. The width of RPP is greater than the height but it is still low signal density and with no restricted diffusion on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). A neonatal case of tumorous RPP has been reported and described the sonographic and DWI findings [6]. We believe that the width of the RPP can appear greater than the height under the premise that the signal characteristics are consistent with the cervical folds.
One distinct limitation of our study is that our diagnosis was not identified histologically. The findings that restricted to the cervix without extending to the uterine fundus, low T2WI signal density, and does not traverse the entire cervix could be confirmed that the structure is RPP. Another limitation is the measurement error due to the small size of the RPP. We adopted the measurement plane jointly confirmed by two radiologists in consensus and tried to magnify the image during the measurement to reduce the measurement error. A third limitation is that the number of patients included in our study is small and the mean age is mostly around child-bearing age, which limits age-stratified studies based on hormonal state. The fourth limitation is lack of RPP frequency comparison between uterus didelphys and normal uteri over the same period, this may be another study in the future.
RPP is frequently encountered in duplicated uterine cervices, and most of them appear symmetrically on the anterior and posterior walls without any difference in height, width, and height/width from one another. It seems that RPP might be an inherent structure of the uterine cervical canal, instead of a remnant of fused Mu ̈llerian ducts.
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors [2].
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
