Phage Therapy, The Best Choice To Overcome Antibiotic Resistance, But Can Never Replace Antibiotics

Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1919/061

Phage Therapy, The Best Choice To Overcome Antibiotic Resistance, But Can Never Replace Antibiotics

  • G. Sunil Paul *

* Department of clinical pharmacy, Aditya Pharmacy College, East- Godavari District, Andhra-Pradesh, India

*Corresponding Author: G. Sunil Paul, Department of clinical pharmacy, Aditya Pharmacy College, East- Godavari District, Andhra-Pradesh, India

Citation: G. Sunil Paul, Phage Therapy, The Best Choice To Overcome Antibiotic Resistance, But Can Never Replace Antibiotics. J Clinical Research and Reports, 4(2); DOI:10.31579/2690-1919/061

Copyright: © 2020 G. Sunil paul. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 27 February 2020 | Accepted: 10 April 2020 | Published: 06 May 2020

Keywords: bacteriophages; replicate; superbugs; resistant; lytic phase; antimicrobial; therapy

Abstract

Phages are also known as bacteriophages which are normally viruses that infect and replicate within the bacteria. Phages were first discovered by Frederick W. Twort (1915) and also by Félix d' Hérelle (1917). In 1920 some scientists and physicians used phages in humans for treating various bacterial infections when antibiotics were not yet discovered. Later phages therapy was promoted by F. d Herelle who used to travel many countries and helped others on how to use phage therapy in humans. In 1940 phages have lost their importance due to the discovery of antibiotics. [18] G. ELIAVA institute of bacteriophages in Georgia has never lost its interest on phage therapy, they never quit their research on phages till now. The researchers used to collect phages from Environment sources and store them in phage bank. This collection of phages by the ELIAVA institute has provided information on which phages can be selectively used against bacteria isolated for personalized therapies.

Introduction

[1] Phages are also known as bacteriophages which are normally viruses that infect and replicate within the bacteria. Phages were first discovered by Frederick W. Twort (1915) and also by Félix d' Hérelle (1917). In 1920 some scientists and physicians used phages in humans for treating various bacterial infections when antibiotics were not yet discovered. Later phages therapy was promoted by F. d Herelle who used to travel many countries and helped others on how to use phage therapy in humans. In 1940 phages have lost their importance due to the discovery of antibiotics. [18] G. ELIAVA institute of bacteriophages in Georgia has never lost its interest on phage therapy, they never quit their research on phages till now. The researchers used to collect phages from Environment sources and store them in phage bank. This collection of phages by the ELIAVA institute has provided information on which phages can be selectively used against bacteria isolated for personalized therapies. However data from a single institute is not sufficient to approve medicines all over the world. Due to wide spread in antibiotic resistance, it became very hard for the healthcare provider to treat bacterial infections, so the rest of the world along with G. ELIAVA institute has kept their interest in utilizing phage therapy for treating infections in humans caused by superbugs[18].but there is a misconception that phage therapy can be a best alternative to antibiotic therapy. We cant completely replace antibiotics with phages, instead we can use them as adjavunt therapy. To approve phage therapy in clinical practice more data is needed which can be obtained by conducting more clinical trails. Studies which were conducted years ago do not provide enough data to approve phage therapy for clinical use. So, phage therapy will not be approved by the FDA until it clears all the stages of clinical trials. However, there are very few situations that phage therapy was very effective where antibiotics failed to do so. These are abundant in nature and are present wherever the bacteria are found like soil, water, deep within the earth's crust [4]. Oceans are a large source of phages it is estimated about 1030 bacteriophages in this world [4].

Why phages can’t replace antibiotics?

  1. Phage are cleared rapidly from the bloodstream and provoke a response from the immune system. Using them for a systemic infection would be challenging, and you couldn’t use them a second time on a patient [24].
  2. Phage are intrinsically narrow spectrum agents. Not only are they restricted to a single bacterial species, but usually to a subset of strains within that species. Dozens of phage strains are thus needed to cover the likely sources of any given infection. The same level of coverage can be attained with 1–2 antibiotics.
  3. The phage efficacy data from Russia and elsewhere is very little. Most infections resolve even without treatment. Placebo-controlled antibiotic trials are rarely done now, due to ethical concerns. But trials from the 1930s and 1940s show 40–80% resolution of infections in the control arm.
  4. Supportive care (these were mostly pneumonia patients) is much better now, so that these numbers are lower bounds. A convincing demonstration of efficacy requires very careful trial design, and no one has come close to meeting a modern standard of proof with phage therapy[24].
  5. Antibiotics work most of the time. And they are cheap. This means that the market is small (phage would be used only as second- or third-line therapy) and pricing power would be low. There is not much hope of making money in phage therapy[24].

Disadvantages of phage therapy

  1. Narrow host range [25].
  2. Bacteria can also become resistant to phages.
  3. Some phages can’t conquer the bacterial immune system.
  4. Infections whose agents are hidden in the human cells may be inaccessible to phages.
  5. One type of phage can only me used once for intravenous use.
  6. The self life of phages varies greatly.
  7. Requires regular monitoring.
  8. Phages are more difficult to administer than antibiotics which needs special training[24].

When and how these phages destroy the bacteria?

Lytic phase is a part of phage life cycle, during which these phages produces specialized protein-based enzymes called lysins and send them into bacterial cytoplasm that are capable of degrading the bacterial cell wall and finally causes the lysis of bacteria [19].

How phages destroy the bacteria: phages after invading the bacteria undergo following steps [19]:

  1. Attachment
  2. Entry of phage DNA and degradation of host DNA
  3. Synthesis of viral (phage) genomes and proteins
  4. Assembly
  5. Release

With their tail fibers these phages get attached to the bacterial cell wall. After the process of attachment these phages release their DNA into the host cell or bacterial cell, which causes the degradation of bacterial DNA after being incorporated into it. Then these phages their own viral genomes and proteins, all these genomes and proteins are assembled together to form a new phage. All these steps takes place during the lysogenic phase of phage life cycle [19,4].

After producing enough phages, these phages produces some proteins called lysins which causes the lysis of bacterial cell wall and are released out of the bacterial cell to attack other cell. This happens in the lytic phase of phage life cycle [19].

Figure

Reasons for antibiotic resistance? [11] 

Bacteria are becoming resistant due to improper use of antibiotics. These bacteria have been developing different defence mechanisms to protect them from antibiotics. 

  • Restrict access to the antibiotics: By limiting the number or reducing the size of poresin cell-walls, bacteria are inhibiting the entry of sufficient amount of antibiotic into their cytoplasm [20].
  • Get rid of antibiotics: Some bacteria can uses active pumps present in their cell walls to flush out antibiotic that is being entered into it.
  • Degradation of the antibiotic: Some bacteria uses enzymes to break down the antibiotic drug and make them inactive. Eg: beta-lactamase.
  • Alter the antibiotic: Some bacteria uses enzymes to alter the antibiotics and make them inactive.
  • Bypass the effect of antibiotic: some bacteria changes the composition or the structure of target in them, this can stop the antibiotics from binding with the target and makes the antibiotic ineffective [20].

Due to these reasons there is a need to find an alternative way to get rid of these resistant bacteria (superbugs) [11,14]. Examples of some lytic enzymes produced by phages and their specific hosts [1]:

Table

These are few phage enzymes that infect and lyse the host cell [1].

Measures to be taken to prevent antibiotic resistance:

  1. Judicious antibiotic use [14].
  2. Use of specific antibiotics. 
  3. Surveillance and infection control [14] 
  4. Only use antibioticsfor bacterial infections. Antibiotics will not treat viral infections like colds, flus, and bronchitis. 
  5. Don’t use antibiotics if you don’t need them. 
  6. Don’t pressure your doctor to prescribe antibiotics for you or your child. 
  7. Take all antibiotics exactly as prescribed. 
  8. Complete the full dosage of antibiotics, even if you feel better. 
  9. Don’t take expired antibiotics. 
  10. Throw away expired or unused antibiotics.

These measures are helpful in controlling the further resistance but can’t treat infections caused by bacteria which are already resistant to antibiotics [14]. So the world is focussing on different methods to treat infections caused by superbugs [11]. 

So the only weapon that we have now to overcome antibiotic resistance is phage therapy but this can not be used more than once in a patient.

When and how to use phage therapy in humans?

The phage therapy involves the use of bacteriophages, which are perfect weapons to kill the bacteria. These superbugs are dangerous to human body cells which make the person ready to die [19].

  1. We should start the antibiotics as usual. 
  2. Follow up the patient for improvement of symptoms. 
  3. If the symptoms are still worsening, then go for microbial sensitivity test. 
  4. If the microbe is sensitive to a particular antibiotic but the symptoms are still there, increase the dose of antibiotic. 
  5. If still the symptoms are there or the microbe is not sensitive to any antibiotic then go for phage therapy with caution

Note : always choose antibiotic therapy as 1st line therapy

If any other alternative is available, consider it as 2nd line therapy. 

If there is no option and the patient is about to die then consider phage therapy as 2nd or 3rd line therapy.

Discussion

In almost all cases where phage therapy was used, the scientists tried these phages only when the patient is about to die, this shows us that how danger the phage therapy is to humans. Apart from that we only have case reports which were successful. Phages are very dangerous when compared to antibiotics, [25]One of the best described disease-specific alterations in the gut phagobiome is associated with inflammatory bowel disease, where phages have pathogenic effects by inducing dysbiosis and microbiota disease[25]. So we should not use phages for treating infections which can be treated by antibiotis. We can use phages therapy as a last line therapy when there is no choice. Apart from that we can help to prevent antibiotic resistance by increasing awareness among the people.

Conclusion

So we conclude that phage therapy can only be a last choice for treating infections and can also be used as a supportive therapy but will never replace antibiotics.

References

Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.

img

Virginia E. Koenig

Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.

img

Delcio G Silva Junior

Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.

img

Ziemlé Clément Méda

Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Mina Sherif Soliman Georgy

We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.

img

Layla Shojaie

The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.

img

Sing-yung Wu

Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.

img

Orlando Villarreal

Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.

img

Katarzyna Byczkowska

Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.

img

Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo

Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.

img

Pedro Marques Gomes

Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.

img

Bernard Terkimbi Utoo

This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.

img

Prof Sherif W Mansour

Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.

img

Hao Jiang

As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.

img

Raed Mualem

International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.

img

Andreas Filippaios

Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.

img

Dr Suramya Dhamija

Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.

img

Bruno Chauffert

I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!

img

Baheci Selen

"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".

img

Jesus Simal-Gandara

I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.

img

Douglas Miyazaki

We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.

img

Dr Griffith

I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.

img

Dr Tong Ming Liu

I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.

img

Husain Taha Radhi

I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.

img

S Munshi

Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.

img

Tania Munoz

“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.

img

George Varvatsoulias

Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.

img

Rui Tao

Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.

img

Khurram Arshad

Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.

img

Gomez Barriga Maria Dolores

The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.

img

Lin Shaw Chin

Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.

img

Maria Dolores Gomez Barriga

Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.

img

Dr Maria Dolores Gomez Barriga