AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/376
1 Division of Regenerative Sciences & Periodontology, Department of Advanced Specialty Sciences, James B. Edwards College of Dental Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston SC, USA.
2 Division of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus OH, USA.
3 Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus OH, USA.
4 Woody L. Hunt School of Dental Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso TX, USA.
*Corresponding Author: Hua-Hong Chien, DDS, PhD, Professor and Chief Division of Regenerative Sciences & Periodontology, Department of Advanced Specialty Sciences, James B. Edwards College of Dental Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 173 Ashley Avenue, BSB 119C, Ch
Citation: Hua-H. Chien, Jungweon V. Park, John R. Kalmar, Sehrish Javaid, (2024), Peripheral Ossifying Fibroma: A Case Report Highlighting Clinical Features and Management Strategies, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, 16(5); DOI: 10.31579/2690-4861/376
Copyright: © 2024, Hua-Hong Chien. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 05 January 2024 | Accepted: 17 February 2024 | Published: 12 March 2024
Keywords: peripheral ossifying fibroma; clinical feature; periodontics; gingiva
Peripheral ossifying fibroma (POF) is a common and non-neoplastic gingival growth thought to arise from the periodontal ligament. Clinically, it presents as a firm, smooth or slightly pebbled, pink to red, and occasionally ulcerated mass. The lesion occurs frequently in the maxillary anterior region of young adults, with the most common age of occurrence in the second and third decades. POF comprises about 9.6 % of all gingival lesions, with a strong female predilection (73%). We present a 17-year-old male with a painless gingival swelling between the maxillary central incisors who underwent excisional biopsy of the lesion under local anesthesia. Following excisional biopsy, a diagnosis of POF was confirmed by histopathological examination. A comprehensive review of the literature was also conducted to analyze the clinical and pathological characteristics of POF.
Peripheral ossifying fibroma (POF) presents as a pedunculated or sessile nodular mass and is one of the most common localized gingival growths, often affecting the interdental papilla. Overall, POF represents 3.1% of oral tumors and 9.6% of gingival mass lesions [1, 2]. Lesions typically enlarge slowly, but growth can be variable, making a histopathologic diagnosis mandatory. Clinically, POF usually measures less than 2 cm in diameter, but lesions greater than 6 cm have been reported [2, 3]. The surface mucosa is generally smooth or slightly ulcerated and pink to red in color, often nearly identical to that of the adjacent gingiva [4, 5]. POF is known to occur mainly in the 2nd and 3rd decades of life with a higher incidence between 10 to 19 years of age [1]. It occurs more commonly in females, possibly due to hormonal factors [6]. Alternative names for POF in the literature include: peripheral cementifying fibroma, peripheral fibroma with cementogenesis, peripheral fibroma with osteogenesis, peripheral fibroma with calcification, calcified or ossified fibrous epulis, and calcifying fibroblastic granuloma [3, 7-9].
The etiology and pathogenesis of POF are still unknown. Some studies suggest that POF is a reactive process, whereas others consider it as a neoplasm [10]. The lesion is thought to originate from cells of the periodontal ligament. Trauma, such as from orthodontic treatment, masticatory forces, ill-fitting denture/restorations, or local irritants, such as dental plaque, calculus, microorganisms, have been suggested in the etiology of POF [2, 7, 10-11].
The recurrence rate of POF is relatively high (8 to 20%) [7]. Several factors likely contribute to its recurrence, including: (a) incomplete removal, (b) failure to eliminate local irritants, and (c) difficulty in accessing the lesion during surgical manipulation due to the complicated interdental anatomy [7]. Therefore, it is critical to ensure that the initial surgical removal is thorough and complete, and close clinical follow-up is highly recommended [2].
Radiographic studies usually reveal no alterations in the alveolar bone, however, soft tissue radiopacities may be identified, particularly in larger lesions [12]. Microscopically, POF is characterized by a cellular proliferation of plump, spindle-shaped to ovoid mesenchymal cells within a fibrous to fibromyxomatous stroma [13-14]. Infiltration, patchy or diffuse infiltrate of chronic inflammatory cells, mostly lymphocytes and plasma cells, is usually present. A distinctive feature of POF is the presence of calcified material, such as bone (mature or immature) or cementum, although a mineralized product is not required for diagnosis.
The standard treatment for POF is complete surgical excision [2]. Due to the high recurrence rate, the excision of the lesion should include the periodontal ligament and periosteum at the base of the lesion. Furthermore, the elimination of local irritants is essential. A definitive diagnosis of POF is important and ultimately rests on histological examination. This article presents a case of a 17-year-old male presenting with POF in the anterior maxillary gingiva. Furthermore, a literature review focusing on POF has been included to provide a comprehensive overview.
A 17-year-old male patient with a large painless swollen gum between his maxillary central incisors was referred to our clinic for treatment. The lesion was first noticed eight months prior to the patient’s initial visit. No bleeding or pain was experienced from the overgrowth gingival tissue. The patient’s medical history and family history were not contributory. The patient’s dental history included placement of orthodontic brackets 2 years prior to the patient’s initial visit. At the time of the patient’s initial visit, the maxillary arch wire had been removed for periodontal consultation and easy of performing biopsy if needed.
Extraoral examination revealed no significant findings, whereas intraoral exhibited a solitary, sessile, pedunculated, pale pink swelling mass with erythematous, ulcerated margins (Figure 1). The lesion measured about 12 x 7 x 5 mm in size and was extending out from the labial gingiva of the upper central incisors (Figures 2 a and b). The lesion was firm in consistency and non-tender on palpation. The patient had fair oral hygiene with moderate to severe plaque around the maxillary anterior teeth.
Figure 1: Clinical appearance of the lesion in the upper central incisor region.
Figure 2: A 15-mm UNC periodontal probe was used to measure the length (A) and width (B) of the lesion.
An intraoral periapical radiograph was taken, revealing no significant involvement of the alveolar ridge (Figure 3) with intact lamina dura in relation to the upper central incisors. After clinical and radiographic examination, the differential diagnosis included fibrous hyperplasia, pyogenic granuloma, peripheral ossifying fibroma, and peripheral giant cell granuloma.
Figure 3: Periapical radiograph examination of the lesion area showed no significant findings. Open root apex was found at the apex of the upper central incisors, which is a common finding for the patient’s age.
Because of the size of the lesion, an excisional biopsy was performed by a periodontist (Dr. Jungweon V. Park) under local anesthesia (Figure 4). The biopsy specimen (Figure 5) was submitted to the oral pathology service at The Ohio State University for histopathological examination. Microscopic evaluation of the specimen (Figure 6) showed an ulcerated surface epithelium, a fibrinous pseudomembrane and acute inflammatory cells at the site of ulceration. The fibromyxomatous connective tissue contained plump spindleshaped cells, surrounded by dense collagen, bone and calcifications with patchy aggregates of chronic inflammatory cells. A final diagnosis of POF was reported. Regular follow-up appointments at 2-week (Figure 7) after excisional biopsy revealed an unremarkable wound healing with no significant issues or complications to report. At the 11-month follow-up examination (Figure 8), there were no evidence of recurrence or other abnormalities.
Figure 4: Clinical picture showing the site of the excised lesion after surgical excision.
Figure 5: Photograph showing surgically excised tissue.
Figure 6: Histopathological features of peripheral ossifying fibroma under hematoxylin & eosin staining. (A). Low power (2X) micrograph of the lesion showing ulcerated epithelium, fibrinous, pseudomembrane, and inflammatory cells (black arrow) overlying the lesional tissue. (B). Medium power view (10X) exhibiting calcified bone (black arrows) surrounded by plump spindle shaped cells in loose fibromyxomatous connective tissue. (C). Medium power view (10X) revealing plump spindle shaped cells (black arrow) in loose fibromyxomatous connective tissue. (D). High power view (20X) displaying plump spindle shaped cells (black arrow) in the fibromyxomatous matrix. (E). High power view (20X) demonstrating plump spindle shaped cells in the fibromyxomatous matrix (black box) and calcified bone (black arrow).
Figure 7: Clinical view at 2-week after excisional biopsy. Wound healing at the surgical site is unremarkable with no significant issues or complications to report.
Figure 8: Clinical view at 11-month follow-up examination with no sign of recurrence.
Two types of ossifying fibroma, central and peripheral, have been reported in the literature [15]. The central ossifying fibroma (COF) arises within the jaw bones, whereas the POF arises on the surface alveolar or gingival tissues. The POF was first described by Eversole and Robin in 1972 as a relatively uncommon, solitary, nonneoplastic gingival growth [16]. The POF is not considered the soft tissue (extraosseous) counterpart of COF, as the latter is viewed as an osteogenic neoplasm [17].
POF is a benign gingival growth with a higher incidence among female patients, particularly during the second and third decades [5]. Approximately 60% of POF lesions occur in the anterior maxilla. The size of the POF in this case was 12 x 7 x 5 mm, which is consistent with the study conducted by Kfir et al. [18] who concluded that the size of POF is generally smaller than 1.5 cm in diameter.
Although the etiology and pathogenesis of POF is uncertain, some studies have suggested that it is a neoplasm, whereas others argue that it is a reactive process secondary to repeated injury or chronic inflammation [1, 3, 9, 19]. Most studies agree that this lesion originates from cells of the periodontal ligament because it occurs exclusively in gingival tooth-bearing tissue.
With a recurrence rate of up to 20%, the recommended treatment strategy should include the excision of the entire lesion and debridement of the underlying teeth and bone [2, 19-20]. Several surgical procedures such as subepithelial connective tissue graft, free gingival graft, and coronal advanced flaps with enamel matrix derivatives have been reported to augment the soft tissue defect after excisional biopsy [21]. Our patient has been followed up for 11 months and there was no evidence of recurrence or defect.
Histopathological examination is required to differentiate POF from other reactive gingival lesions including pyogenic granuloma, peripheral giant cell granuloma, traumatic fibroma, and peripheral odontogenic fibroma [3, 8]. Not all lesions of POF demonstrate radiographic foci of calcification. In the present case, an intra-oral periapical radiograph was acquired with no abnormal findings in the bone and no flecks of calcification.
Histologically, POF reveals a fibrous proliferation associated with 23% to 75% mineralized components including bone (woven/lamellar), dystrophic calcification, and/or cementum [14, 19]. In the case reported here, the histopathological feature is characterized by the presence of ulcerated epithelium, fibrinous, pseudomembrane, and inflammatory cells under low power view. The existence of calcified osseous or cementum-like calcifications surrounded by plump spindle shaped cells in a loose fibromyxomatous connective tissue was evidenced under medium- and high-power views. The following features are usually identified under microscopic examination of a biopsy specimen: 1). intact or ulcerated stratified squamous epithelium; 2). fibrous connective tissue containing numerous plump fibroblasts; 3). Mineralized components consisting of mature or immature bone, dystrophic calcifications, or cementum-like material; 4). chronic inflammatory cells comprise mostly of lymphocytes [7, 22]. In the microscopic findings presented in this report confirmed the diagnosis of POF. Although POF in nature is a benign lesion, early diagnosis and treatment with regular follow-ups is important as they can become more destructive if left untreated.
POF is considered a type of gingival overgrowth lesion and may be associated with ill-fitting or degenerating restorations, local irritants, and trauma to the gingival tissues. The formulation of a differential diagnosis for POF is essential to facilitate accurate patient management. The excision of the entire lesion and thorough debridement of the underlying teeth and bone are critical to avoid recurrence.
POF: Peripheral ossifying fibroma
PDL: periodontal ligament
COF: central ossifying fibroma
The authors ascertain that written informed consent was obtained from the patient.
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
