Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-8808/025

Perception of Space & Dementia

  • Paul T E Cusack 1*

BScE, DULE, 23 Park Ave., Saint John, NB E2J 1R2, Canada 

*Corresponding Author: Paul T E Cusack, BScE, DULE, 23 Park Ave., Saint John, NB E2J 1R2, Canada.

Citation: Paul T E Cusack, (2020) Perception of Space & Dementia. J Clinical Case Reports and Studies, 1(5): Doi: 10.31579/2690-8808/025

Copyright: © 2020. Paul T E Cusack. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 01 September 2020 | Accepted: 07 September 2020 | Published: 10 September 2020

Keywords: Space; AT Math; Energy; time; Mass; Dementia; Brain.

Abstract

This paper is mainly a mathematical paper on how human perception of space is altered from the normal brain to the dementia brain. The results of all the calculations are summarized in Table 1. We see that there are 7 layers of consciousness in normal humans.  The Dementia patient slowly looses it layers of consciousness yet the mind continues to function at a rudimentary, unconscious way.

Introduction

In this paper, we consider the mathematics behind what humans call three-dimensional space.  We begin by considering the normal brain; then we shift to the abnormal (Dementia) brain.  The paper results are summarized in Table 1 where we see the results compiled from the mathematical analysis above.  We begin with the normal brain.

1. Normal Brain

t=√3=eigen vector

Universal Signal=1/√3=E

s=Et sin θ

(1/√3)(√3) sin 60°

s=sin 60°

Timing signal =1/√3

1/√3=10 msec

1/√3 x 20msec=115.47=1/sin 60°=E

s=Et sin θ

s/sin 60°=Et

s=t=1

1/sin 60°=E(1)

E=1/sin 60°

E=t/sin 60°

sin 60° ×E=t=s

s=E t sin 60

s=E sin 60° (1)

=(1/sin 60°)sin 60° (1)

=1

s=1

The window of Consciousness runs from t=1-π from AT Math.

E=1/1=1; E=1/π

=1; 0.3183

s1=Et sin θ

=(1)(√3) sin θ

=114.77=√3 sin θ

θ=6.626 =h =Planck’s Constant.

θ=724

s2=Et sin θ

114.77=(1/π)(√3√) sin θ

θ=208

θ=0.2095

Δθ=724-208= 514.4= Energy of the window.

TE=M(1592)

514.4=M(1592)

M=323

M=Ln t

M=1/209

t=1.381

E=724

 Cf θ

v=d/t

1/7=125/t

t=7(125)

=875

E=114.28

=8/7=tv=d

1. Planck’s Constant

h=E × freq

h=Et

6.626=sin θ=Et

6.626=724t

t=915

s=E t Sin θ

(724 (915)6.626

=4389

=1/2278

1/228

s=t

t²-t-1=E

4389²-4389-1=926

E=(1-Ln t)7

=(1-Ln 0.4389)7

=67.0

=1/149~1/G

For the mind:

y=y’

y²/2=y=G

y²=2G

t=115.41=1/sin60°=E

E=(1-Lnt)7

E1/7=1-Lnt

1-E1/7=Lnt

e1·e1/7=t

s/(4/3)·eV=t

Aside:

s=Etsinθ

=(0.00925)(-0.614)sin60°

=0.00495

=4.95msec~5msec

5/413·1.15356=t

t=4.282delay

x2(Upanddown)=0.856=R

V=iR

=105(i)(0.856)

i-1.226

t²=i

t=11.07Delay(10-20msec)

t=d/v=125/(1/7)=0.825

0.825²-0.825-1=-1.4437

-1.4437=(1-Lnt)7

t=102

t=√3L=Lnt+c³

=Ln√3+27

=2.754

2.755/251.5=0.0095=1/91.3

E=(1-Lnt)7

=(1-√3)7

=985

s=Etsinθ=(985)(√3)sin60°

=14473.5

s=t

E=(1-Ln(4/3))7

=0.09302

=932

s=Etsinθ

=(931)(√3)sin60°

=1396~14

1.AbnormalBrain

V=iR

=(4/3)(0.85)increasingresistanceinAlzheimer’spatients.

=113.333

ΔV=0.8333=1/12

E=(1+Lnt)7

1/12=(1-Lnt)7

t=1.4244=√2

v=d/t

12.5/√2=8.838

1/v=113.73

1.1373/105=935=1/106.9~1/V+

Δt=945-935=10

t=(1-Ln10)7=251.5=PeriodT

945/7=1.350x2(downandback)=270=10c³

L=[Lnt+c³]χ

Ln[(945)+27]χ

χ=0.00588

=5.88msec=t

E=(1-Lnt)7

0=(1-Lnt)

t=2.71828=e1

E=1/t=e-1

i=t²

=e²

=7.389

V=iR

=105=7.389R

R=√2=tR=t

R=√2/7

=202perlayerofconsciousnessintheMultipleDraftmodelofthebrain.

√2/14=2886

L=Lnt+c³

=Ln(202)+27

=27.202

L=2χ=27.202

χ=136.01

E=136e-.202

=111.12=1/9=M

E=M

Δt=ΔR=0.8-√2

=-0.614~-0.618rootoftheGoldenMean.

t²=i

R=s=t

R=√2

V=iR

=t³

=(√3)³

=28.28

E=(1-Lnt)7

=(1-Ln√2)7

=0.0508~50msec

s=Etsinθ

=(0.0508)(√2√)sin60°

=6.228~623=1/1605~1/e-Coulombs.

t²-t-1=E

(-0.614)²-(-0.614)-1=0.009~0

s=t=R

V=iR

=t²R

=t³

=(-0.614)

=-2.3147

1/V=1/E=t=432.01

E=(1-Lnt)7

=[1-Ln(-0.614)]7

=0.00925

~0

s=|E||t|sinθ

=(0.00925)(-0.614)sinθ

=492

(4/3)/492=271~e1

Ln0.271=150=1/G

√2/7=202=1/495

8/7=114.28=1/875

ΔR=202-114.28

=0.8772

=1/114

V=iR=105=t²(1/114)

t=1.09407

1. Abnormal vs. Normal

s=Etsinθ

(1/12)(√2)sin60°

=102

snorm.=0.866

102/0.866=117.85=Mass

=17.85%

FV=PV(1+i)N

102=0.866(1+17.85%)N

N=1=t

E=(1-Lnt)7

0=(1-Lnt)

t=2.718=e1

(4/3)/492=2.718=e1

Δs=sAbnorm/snorm=102/14473.5=0.7047~1/√2=1/R=1/t=E=1/s

ΔE=EAbnorm/Enorm=1353/985=137.4

Δt=Δtabnorm/tnorm=2.718/√3√=156.9~π/2

For the Abnormal Mind in comparison to the Normal mind, we have the following equations:

SE=SE’=Mind=Mind’=t²-t-1

Abnormal Mind

t²-t-1=

(-0.614)²-(-0.614)-1=0.009004=MassM

Normal Mind t=eigenvector=√3

t²-t-1=

(√3)²-(√3)-1=27=c³

Abnormal-Normal=1.628-0.5775=105.1mV(HumanNervousSignal)

CivilizationofHomospaiensbeganabout150, 000yearago.ThisItheorizeiswhenconsciousnessbegan.Itledtocooking, language,artetc.

t²=i

i=√150,000=387

Normal

V=iR

=387(0.85)

=329Cf.323

=1/304

Abnormal

V=iR

105=387(R)

R=3.686=1/2.713~1/e

Astheresistanceofthebraindropped,whenitreached0.85,thenConsciousnesshappenedsinceE=1/7.

R=1/e=e-t=0.85

-t=234

E=(1-Lnt)7

=(1-Ln234)7

=1438

=1/695~1/7

One layer of consciousness

1/7x7=1=E

t²-t-1

=7²-7-1

=41

i=t²

=234²

=5.475

V=iR

41=5.45R

R=0.748~0.75=1/s

M=Lnt

=Ln234=5.455

L=Lnt+c³

5.455+27

=324Cf.323

FromTable1:

Sum:

Ln23.479x21.06=6.67=G

Product:

TE=42=M(1592)

M=264

Ln44.781x1.0962=416/6.626=2Pi

416=125/3=d/v=t

FV=PV(1+i)^t=1/984

E=(1-Ln984)^7=1

We have space and energy. Now let us obtain time

E=(1-Lnt)7

=(1-Ln(4/3)7=931

s=Etsin60°

=(931)(√3)sin60°

=1396~14

s=Etsin60°

=4/3=(1)t(0.866)

t=153.9

1.539xh=153.9x6.626=43=R

V=iR

106.1=2.4673

R=43

Δt²=i

t=√i=√(π/2)=2467

E=1353MassofBrain

t=√2

E=(1-Lnt)6(Notepower6forAlzheimer’s;not7)

1353=(1-Lnt)6

t=2862

s=Etsin60°

=(1353)(2.862)).866=353

Δs=1396-335

=106.1=V+

t=L+V+

2+1.061=3.06

M×v=L=P̅=cosθ

1400×1/7·(416.67)=L=P̅=cosθ

θ=2.98=c

v=d/t

1/v=t/d=7

M/v×L=Lnt+c³

M=Lnt

M/v-M+c³=L

7M-M+c³=L

6M+c³=L=2

M=416.67

M=d/v=125/3

Now,touch=4

t=KE=1/2Mv²=1/2M(1/√2)²=1/2(4)(1/2)=1

s=Etsin60°

=(1)(1)sin60°

=0.866

=sin60°=t=1/E

s=(d/t)²=(125/t)³=0.866

t³=443

t=763

E=(1-Lnt)7

1.1547=(1-Lnt)7

t=102.09

=102

=sab

s=Etsinθ

1/√2=(137.4)(π/2π)sinθ

θ=0.00327=1/305

=1/t=E

E=1/sinθ

t=L+V+

=2+106=3.06

V=iR

105=(4/3)(R)

R=1/126.9

1/126.9/{0.404/2}=102.5

=sAb.

snorm=1.1477

102.5/11477

=111.9

=1/c²

This is the current of the input and output of the black box brain.

1/7=v=d/t=s/t=102/t

t=7(102)

=714

E=14.00=7x2Downandback.

s=Etsinθ

1/7=14(102)sinθ

θ=π/2

s=1=t=R

V=iR

105=(4/3)R

R=0.7875=1/126.9

126.9/π=404=Re

Re=IF/VF=Mv/Ma=1/7/(1/√2)=202=Re/2=Re/L

202/126.9=1/2π=1rad.

FV=PV((1+i)N

=0.866(10209)N

N=sqrt3=t=eigenvector

i=0.20109

i7=1329.6~1330Internalclock.

0.020109x7=14.07~14=2x7Downandback.

FV=PV(1-i)N

Alzheimer’si=-2.0109%

=0.866(1-0.020109)√3

=0.866(965)

=0.836=E

t=1/E=1.19608

t²-t-1=E

E=765

t=1.306

E=(1+-Lnt)7

(2.669)7

=S.F.7

=965=(1+i)N

t²-t-1-2t-1

t=3

v=d/t=125/3=416

416msecisintherangeof300-500msecreactiontime.

TheSoul:

Consider:

LetSoul=Mind

SE=SoulEnergy=Mind

t²-t-1=L=Lnt+c³

Derivative:

2t-1=ℂ=1/t+ℕ

2t-1/t-1+ℕ=ℂ

[2t²-1-t]/t+ℕ=2ℂ

2t²-1-t+ℕ=2tℂ

t²-0.5-0.5t+ℕ/2=ℂt

Letℕ=-1&ℂ=0.5

t²-t-1=0=SE

SoSE=SE’=Mind

Figure1: SevenInductorsmodelthe7layersofconsciousness.

ApersonwithDementiaisgraduallylosingconsciousness.Theystillhaveabrainandreaction, although lessening everyday, but they lose their consciousness mind.

Thenervoussystembeganwithasodiumchloridepump.Thesodiumisapositiveion; thechlorideionisanegativeion.Thisistheunderlyingmechanismofhowelectricalsignaltravelaloneanerveaxon.

So the mass of NaCl (Salt)is:

Na=23

Cl=35.4

Σ58.44

PE=Mc²

=58.44c²=518.7

KE=1/2Mv²

=1/2(58.44)(1/√2)²

=141.6

TE=518.7+146.1=66.5~G

V=iR=66.5=i(0.85)

i=0.788

t²=i²

t=0.8876~0.888⇒workingmemory..

Sowe’vegonefromNaCltoaworkingmemory.

t²-t-1=E

(0.888)²-0.888-1=-10./99~-11

E=(1-lnt)7

=111/7=(1-Lnt)

t=1335=Spaces

This ishowtheworkingmemoryperceivespace.InAlzheimer’spatients, theyarenotcognitiveofspace.Therememorycellsaredying.

Conclusion

We have seen a mathematical comparison of space as perceived by Dementia patients and healthy people.

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova