AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Chat with us
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2694-0248/023
Department of Orthopaedics, Grant Government Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
*Corresponding Author: Jayesh Mhatre, Department of Orthopaedics, Grant Government Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Citation: Neetin Mahajan, Jayesh Mhatre, Ravikumar dadhaniya, Pritam Talukder (2022). Peculiar Periprosthetic Fracture Involving Trochanteric Region Along with Shaft of Femur in a 68-Year Male Treated with Locking Plate Fixation and Additional Augmentation with Cable – A Case Report And Review of Literature. J. Clinical Orthopedics and Trauma Care, 4(1); DOI:10.31579/2694-0248/023
Copyright: © 2022 Jayesh Mhatre, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 14 December 2021 | Accepted: 29 December 2021 | Published: 10 January 2022
Keywords: spinal tuberculosis; modern era; percutaneous pedicle screw
Tubercle bacilli has been known to live in symbiosis with mankind since centuries. Tubercle bacilli mainly causes pulmonary disease but extra pulmonary manifestations are fairly common with spine being the most common site
Periprosthetic fractures continue to increase in frequency. This is due, in part, to the increasing number of primary and revision arthroplasties performed annually and to the increasing age and fragility of patients with such implants [1]. All types of periprosthetic fractures can present unique and substantial treatment challenges. In each situation, the presence of an arthroplasty component either obviates the use of, or increases the difficulty of, standard fixation techniques. In addition, these fractures often occur in elderly patients with osteoporotic bone making stable fixation with traditional techniques even more problematic. The difficulty in management of periprosthetic fractures regardless of location is evidenced by the array of treatment options described in the literature without a clear consensus emerging on the most appropriate method [2]. Treatment of the most common periprosthetic fractures, those of the femoral shaft and those of the femoral supracondylar region, has focused on open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or revision arthroplasty procedures with or without supplementary autologous or allogeneic bone grafting [2, 3]. Most recently, treatment strategies to accelerate weight bearing have suggested benefits about mortality. Successful application of these strategies can be extrapolated to periprosthetic fractures in other anatomic locations but must also consider the fracture location relative to the arthroplasty component, the implant stability, the quality of the surrounding bone, and the patient’s medical and functional status [4, 5]. Given the predominance of low-energy injury mechanisms associated with periprosthetic fractures, associated injuries are relatively uncommon. Of course, careful assessment is required to avoid missing the occasional associated injury. The purpose of this paper was to show the outcome of peculiar Vancouver type- A1 with B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture treated with open reduction and internal fixation, using a locking compression plate and cable augmentation, in an older patient.
A 68-year-old male was unfortunate to sustain trauma due an accidental fall from a height. The patient referred left groin and thigh pain along with pain over his left wrist, clinical examination showed inability to actively move the legs and pain on passive movement along with pain and swelling over his left wrist, patient also had severe stiffness of his right elbow which was operated previously for distal humerus fracture in outside hospital. The radiographic studies showed a fracture of the greater trochanter and femoral shaft, in cemented hemi arthroplasty and comminuted left distal ulna and radius fracture. The bone lesions over hip were outside the classified definition with two different fracture types, Vancouver type- A1 (greater trochanter) and -B2 (periprosthetic femoral fracture) in a same occurrence (Figure 1).
Surgical procedure:
The fractures were treated with open reduction and fixation (Figure 2) with a proximal femur locking compression plate (LCP®), with a combination of 3.5 mm nonlocking and locking screws. The greater trochanter fracture was fixed with two cortical (non-locking) screws to gain bi-cortical purchase and a single locking screw to achieve uni-cortical purchase of the fragments. The femoral stem was not perforated because of the previous implant and cement in the peri-implant femoral cavity. Thus, the fractures sites were augmented with circumferential cable (three cerclage wires) in three screw position in which there was hindrance to pass screws due to pre-existing. The cerclage wire augmentation was also suited in this case due to spiral orientation of the femoral shaft fracture line; the distal plate was fixed with locking screws. The surgery was performed in the lateral decubitus without the use of a pneumatic tourniquet, and duration of surgery was 3 hours with blood loss of 300 cc. the surgery went uneventful, for left distal ulna and radius fracture suave kapandji procedure was done to salvage wrist joint function, with an attempt to reduce multiple surgeries over the wrist for which patient was non-complaint and No complications were reported in the perioperative course or during the hospitalization period. The postoperative course showed no problems with respect to the hips. The patient was submitted to an intensive rehabilitation protocol included early mobilization and walking with two crutches as patient had difficulty in holding walker due to fracture of left wrist and stiffness of his right elbow joint. At 3-months follow-up, the patient presented stable hip and the radiographs showed signs of bone union of the fractures. He reported moderate pain, and some limitation of ordinary activity. At 9-months follow-up, the patient presented an asymptomatic hip and sense of satisfaction with surgery outcome. The follow up radiograph showed union at the sites of fracture. The patient was clinically able to walk without any pain and without any external support.
Periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures are increasing in frequency because of the increasing number of patients with hip arthroplasties. The incidence of periprosthetic femur fracture after primary hip arthroplasty has been considered to be less than 1%, but has been reported to be as high as 2.3%5.A recent survivorship analysis on 6,458 primary cemented femoral hip prostheses revealed a fracture incidence of 0.8% at 5 years and 3.5% at 10 years. Another series of 354 hips in 326 patients all treated with the same uncemented, straight, collarless tapered titanium stem and followed for a mean of 17 years showed a cumulative incidence of periprosthetic fracture of 1.6% at 10 years that increased to 4.5% at 17 years [6]. The rate of fracture was low in the first 8 years after THA then increased into the second decade. In a comparison to the rate of aseptic loosening, the cumulative occurrence of periprosthetic fracture became equivalent to aseptic loosening at 17 years indicating the relative importance of periprosthetic fracture in the long term [6].
After revision arthroplasty, the incidence of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures climbs to between 1.5% and 7.8%.The risk further increases after an increasing number of revision surgeries. The lapsed time period from an index primary hip arthroplasty to periprosthetic femur fracture averages 6.3 to 7.4 years46, and is reduced to an interval of 2.3 years after a third revision procedure. Risk factors for periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures about hip arthroplasty femoral stems are related to the age of the patient, gender, index diagnosis, presence, or absence of osteolysis, presence or absence of aseptic loosening, primary or revision status, the specific type of implant utilized, and whether cemented or non-cemented technique was utilized. Identifying risk factors can both improve patient counselling and potentially improve efforts at fracture prevention. Age, although commonly cited as a risk factor for periprosthetic femur fracture, is not clearly an independent risk factor. Coexisting medical comorbidities, osteoporosis, increased activity level, and fall risk also contribute. A recent report revealed a doubled risk of fracture in patients with higher medical comorbidities. Furthermore, the number of years after arthroplasty must be considered as each year after arthroplasty has been associated with a 1.01 additional risk ratio per year. Although a higher proportion of periprosthetic femur fractures among female patients (52% to 70%) has been reported in many series, associated osteoporosis and a higher percentage of procedures being performed in female patients makes gender less clear as an independent risk factor. Accordingly, reports that account for such biases indicate no or even reduced risk for females. The index diagnosis leading to arthroplasty may also be a risk factor with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and arthroplasty for hip fracture each being identified as having increased risk ratios
for fracture: RA having an increased ratio of 1.56 to 2.181, and hip fracture having a reported risk ratio of 4.4. Patients with periprosthetic femur fractures have increased mortality. In multiple recent series, 7% to 18% of patients with periprosthetic fractures died within 1 year following surgical treatment.6, 18,302 In one study, this mortality rate approached that of hip fracture patients (16.5%) treated during the same time period and was significantly higher than the mortality of patients undergoing primary joint replacement (2.9%). Data from the New Zealand National Registry indicated the 6-month mortality after revision THA associated with periprosthetic fracture (7.3%) was significantly higher than in a matched cohort undergoing revision for aseptic loosening (0.9%). Although current surgical treatment guidelines, commonly suggest open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) solely for fractures with a stable femoral stem in our patient we considered the osteosynthesis of the fractures as the most optimal treatment route [7]. The implantation of long revision hip prostheses is a prolonged and major operation for an older patient with pre-existing health condition and other co-existing injuries, which can contribute to higher risk of medical and prosthetic complications, and difficulties at early rehabilitation and physiotherapy [8, 9]. Modern internal fixation is frequently achieved with locking plates, which provide relative fracture stability, and do not impede the periosteal blood supply to the fractured bone10. Patients treated with ORIF had a significant shorter skin-to-skin surgical time and fewer perioperative blood transfusions. There were more complications reported in the revision arthroplasty cohort compared to patients that were treated with ORIF [11]. In the other hand, open reduction and internal fixation utilizing locking compression plates (LCP®) might be an effective treatment with a reduced surgical time and less complex procedure in a typically elderly patient with multiple comorbidities. Rigid fixation for periprosthetic femoral fractures with screws and plates is challenging due to interference of a pre-existing femoral stem [11]. In our case, it was not possible to perforate the implant, and bi-cortical fixation of the stem was obtained cerclage wire passing through screw holes of the locking plate. The distal part of the plate was fixed with at least eight cortices as recommended by other authors. encerclage wires associated with metallic plate can reduces stress shielding, increases the probability of fracture consolidation, makes the system more stable, reduces complications, and improves patient quality of life due to a shorter functional recovery, compared to internal fixation with a simple plate.
In older patient with multiple injuries where early mobilization is of essence along with definitive fixation, the use of locking plates is a valid treatment of atypical Vancouver A1-B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture combination. The key-points to a successful outcome are anatomical fracture reduction, stable fixation, early mobilisation and appropriate implant, and the preservation of the hip joint avoiding the risk of prosthesis dislocation. Our patient showed favourable outcome and we conclude that in similar cases, combination construct which was used by us can provide optimal results.
Conflicts of interest
All authors declare that there are not any competing interests.
Funding
There is no source of funding.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
