Summary | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2640-1053/226
*Corresponding Author: Hilary Denis Solomons, P.O. Box 64203, Highlands North, 203, South Africa.
Citation: Hilary Denis Solomons (2025), Pathology of Rectal Biopsy in Hirschsprung’s Disease, J. Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics, 9(1); DOI:10.31579/2640-1053/226
Copyright: © 2024, Hilary Denis Solomons, this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 18 December 2024 | Accepted: 02 January 2025 | Published: 13 January 2025
Keywords: rectal biopsy; Hirschsprung’s disease
Hirschsprung's disease is characterized by aganglionosis of the enteric neural plexuses and failure of migration of fetal neuroblasts from the cephalic neural crest down the alimentary tract is the most likely embryonal basis for this condition.

Histopathology of Hirschsprung’s Disease
We analyzed acetylcholinesterase histochemistry results of rectal biopsy specimens obtained from 85 children. The indications for biopsy were suspicion of Hirschsprung's disease in neonates and infants (Group 1; n=21) and older children (Group 2; n=17); megarectum (Group 3; n=44); and colostomy (Group 4; n=3). Specimens were taken at 5 and 10 cm using endoscopic forceps or excised with scissors at 2.5 cm above the dentate line. Acetylcholinesterase activity was evaluated using Karnovsky-Roots method. RESULTS: The diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease was confirmed in 17 children of the first group and in 3 of the second group. In the third group, 2 children were diagnosed with ultrashort-segment Hirschsprung's disease and 3 children with intestinal neuronal dysplasia. In one case, acetylcholinesterase reaction was false positive. Hirschsprung's disease was diagnosed in 2 children with colostomies; in one case acetylcholinesterase activity caused false-positive results. Colonic dysganglionoses were diagnosed in 78% of infants and in 14% of children over 1 year of age. The diagnostic specificity of acetylcholinesterase in Hirschsprung's disease was 92%.
1) The analysis of acetylcholinesterase activity in children's rectal biopsy specimens is a reliable method for diagnosing Hirschsprung's disease, especially in infants; 2) This method of examination is irreplaceable in diagnosing ultrashort-segment Hirschsprung's disease and remains the only method to confirm the diagnosis of this disease; 3) Acetylcholinesterase histochemistry is not sufficiently informative in diagnosing intestinal neuronal dysplasia type B, because authors applying other neurohistochemical investigation methods have reported higher incidence of this disease.

Calretinin immunohistochemistry: a simple and efficient tool to diagnose Hirschsprung disease:
(a): Rectal suction biopsy for suspicion of Hirschsprung disease (HD) showing a total absence of staining after calretinin immunohistochemistry either in submucosae, muscularis mucosae or lamina propria. Insert shows an unstained abnormally large nerve fiber. Original magnification 400 and 600 (insert). This pattern diagnosis HD. (b, c and d): Calretinin immunohistochemistry on a rectal suction biopsy for suspicion of HD shown in (b) and (c), positive staining easily detectable at low magnification in submucosae (in b, 250), in muscularis mucosae (in c, 400) or sometimes extended to the lamina propria (in d, 400).


This pattern excludes HD. (e): Calretinin immunohistochemistry on a rectal suction biopsy for suspicion of HD showing positivity in Schwann cells and nuclear expression by ganglion cells (insert) in nerve plexus (1000). This pattern excludes HD. (f): Calretinin immunohistochemistry on a rectal suction biopsy for suspicion of HD showing a similar pattern than in Figure 1a but with a slight positivity in large nerve fibers (insert).
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,