Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2578-8949/080
Dermatology Unit, Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy
*Corresponding Author: Alexandra Maria Giovanna Brunasso, Dermatology Unit Galliera Hospital Mura delle Cappuccine, 14 Genoa, Italy
Citation: A M G Brunasso, C Massone. (2021) Paradoxical Psoriasis during IL-17 blockage: two memorable patients. Dermatology and Dermatitis. 6(2); Doi:10.31579/2578-8949/080
Copyright: ©2021 Alexandra Maria Giovanna Brunasso, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons. Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 19 July 2021 | Accepted: 23 July 2021 | Published: 29 July 2021
Keywords: old man; uvb photherapy; corticosteroids; biopsy
47 year-old man who suffered for plaque psoriasis since 2013 was previously treated with topicals, UVB photherapy, acitretin, methotrexate and adalimumab (Imraldi®) with scarce response. Brodalumab (IL-17 receptor chain A blocking antibody) at 210 mg sc day 0, week-1, week-2 and every 2 weeks was initiated (baseline PASI of 16) with fast improvement of psoriasis (PASI-90 at week 4) and new onset of erythema, pustules and pain in the palmoplantar area after each subcutaneous Brodalumab administration and progressive improvement after 5-8 days.
Case 1
47 year-old man who suffered for plaque psoriasis since 2013 was previously treated with topicals, UVB photherapy, acitretin, methotrexate and adalimumab (Imraldi®) with scarce response. Brodalumab (IL-17 receptor chain A blocking antibody) at 210 mg sc day 0, week-1, week-2 and every 2 weeks was initiated (baseline PASI of 16) with fast improvement of psoriasis (PASI-90 at week 4) and new onset of erythema, pustules and pain in the palmoplantar area after each subcutaneous Brodalumab administration and progressive improvement after 5-8 days (Fig. 1a, 1b). Diagnosis of palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) was made, blood laboratory diagnostics were in the normal range. The patient denied consensus for a skin biopsy. Due to the discomfort associated to the onset of PPP after each Brodalumab injection a switch to Guselkumab (IL-23 neutralizing antibody, 100 mg sc at week 0, week-4 and every 8 weeks) was decided, with complete improvement of both PPP and plaque psoriasis after 14 weeks.
Case 2
79-year-old female affected by plaque psoriasis since 1970, previously treated with topicals, UVB phototherapy, methotrexate with scarce response-initiated adalimumab (Humira®) 4 years before and withdrew therapy after 2 months because of the new-onset of Dermatomyositis (DM), prednisone 0.5 mg/kg per o.s was given for 2 years and during tapering psoriasis returned. The patient was reluctant to biological therapy and only after 2 years she accepted to initiate Secukinumab 300 mg sc at weeks, 0, 1, 2, 3 ,4 and every month thereafter for a diffuse plaque psoriasis (PASI: 19.2). Complete response with PASI-100 was observed at week-12, but she developed eye-lid lesions never seen before, denying pruritus, use of eye-drops or cosmetics and no other therapies were conducted. (Fig 1c) A skin biopsy was not performed because of dissent of the patient. Topical corticosteroids and thereafter pimecrolimus cream were required to control the eye-lid psoriasiform-eczema.
A paradoxical adverse event (PAE) is defined as the unexpected new onset or worsening of a condition during biologic therapy, when that particular condition otherwise responds well to the biologic agent involved [1]. New development of plaque or pustular psoriasis and psoriasis onset in anatomical sites never compromised before are the most common reported PAE [1,2]. Herein, we report two different psoriasis-PAE during anti-IL-17 therapy: PPP and eye-lid psoriasiform-eczema; interestingly in the second case a prior PAE was reported during adalimumab (DM) [3,4]. TNF-α blocking agents may aggravate/trigger the onset of DM as demonstrated in a systematic literature review, in contrast to the proposed action as potential steroid-sparing agents in DM and polymyositis [3,4].Psoriasis-PAE appears in 2-5% of anti-TNF-α treated patients and is driven by an ongoing type-I IFN innate immune response in the absence of T cell driven inflammation in contrast to chronic plaque psoriasis [1,2-5]. It has been postulated that psoriasis-PAE are seen exclusively during TNF-α blockade, but few cases have been reported during anti- IL-17 therapies, even if the underlying mechanism still needs to be elucidated [6-8]. The low-frequency of presentation (less than 5%) indicates that other factors such as genetic predisposition or trigger factors influence the abrupt onset [1,5]. Noteworthy, epidermal trauma (Koebner phenomenon) which induces antimicrobial peptides (AMP)-expression by keratinocytes and attracts plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) into the skin, enhances the production of type-I IFN and the new onset of psoriasis [4]. We hypothesize that chronic trauma (Koebner phenomenon) in the palms and soles might trigger such condition as in our first patient [4]. The new onset of eye-lid psoriasiform-eczema in our second case, affecting an area usually spared by plaque psoriasis (involved only erythrodermic-psoriasis) has been previously reported in other three patients [8]. In both cases the rapid-onset of psoriasis-PAE suggests also a genetic predisposition (mean 2.5 weeks). We highlight that in our first case, anti-IL-23 therapy resulted in complete resolution of both the classical and paradoxical psoriasis.
The authors have no conflict of interest.
The content of this paper has not been previously presented
We did not receive funding sources for this project
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,