AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Chat with us
Mini-Review | DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.31579/2639-4162/039
1 Pediatric Surgeon, 2116 27th St. NE Renton, WA, USA.
*Corresponding Author: Igor Klepikov, Pediatric Surgeon, 2116 27th St. NE Renton, WA, USA.
Citation: I Klepikov. (2020) Pandemic and modern medicine: time to recognize and correct previous misconceptions. General medicine and Clinical Practice. 3(4) DOI: 10.31579/2639-4162/039
Copyright: ©2020 Igor Klepikov. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 24 September 2020 | Accepted: 23 November 2020 | Published: 07 December 2020
Keywords: Keywords
Abstract
A year ago, few people doubted the scientific validity and practical feasibility of existing approaches to the treatment of acute pneumonia (AP). Even the use of a single antibiotic as the main treatment for completely different and disparate diseases was a common situation, the contradiction of which to the basics of clinical medicine was not questioned. The activity of antibiotics only against bacterial pathogens without additional effects on other manifestations of the disease did not prevent them from achieving the image of an almost panacea.
The gradual decrease in the effectiveness of antibiotics with the biologically natural appearance of resistant bacterial strains was regularly compensated by the release of new, more active drugs. Decades of close attention to the suppression of pathogens have formed a persistent infectious ideology of the causes of AP, and the disease itself has become classified as infectious. However, this terminology did not correspond to the actual situation, since in practice patients with AP were not subject to mandatory isolation and other strict anti-epidemic measures. At the same time, during the period of antibacterial therapy, the number of patients in need of additional medical care steadily increased, but the infectious interpretation of the nature of the disease suggested the choice of methods tested for other inflammatory processes. The specifics of pulmonary inflammation faded into the background and no longer determined the specifics of treatment.
The hypnotic effect of infectious distortion of the AP ideology affected its diagnosis and control assessment. Various methods for determining the pathogen for the targeted use of antibiotics in AP did not bring the expected results. Throughout the entire period of use of antibiotics, their choice in AP remained empirical, that is, based on General recommendations, assumptions and experience of doctors. In the vast majority of cured patients, the causative agent of the disease remained unknown, and experts eventually concluded that attempts to make a microbiological diagnosis of AP did not affect the results of treatment (1). However, the uncertainty of the bacteriological diagnosis and the known probability of involving a whole galaxy of microorganisms in this inflammation led to a broad explanation of treatment failures (without convincing arguments) by the presence of particularly virulent strains.
The primary [1] diagnosis of AP is also not directly related to infectious disease assessments. Treating doctors do not wait for the response of bacteriological tests, but are guided by the results of x-ray studies, which allow you to determine the degree of inflammatory changes, but not the pathogen and its type, right? The bacterial pathogen of inflammation acts like a burning match, but the" fire " that has started (the inflammatory process) develops further according to its biological canons, which have long been known to medical science and these materials are included in its classic Fund. Therefore, the course of treatment with "antibiotics alone" leaves the extinguishing of this "fire" to the body itself.
At the present time, when scientific developments and research have allowed us to reach the genetic, subcellular and molecular levels, it is unlikely that anyone will find the question of our individual uniqueness debatable. The ability of the body to adapt to sudden functional deviations is one of its unique features, along with many other personal characteristics that we habitually and automatically use in everyday life. Compensatory capabilities in inflammatory diseases depend on the rate of development of the local process and its localization.
For example, when a boil occurs, we lose some or all of the activity of the corresponding area of our body, although some people do not pay much attention to this abscess and irritation. Inflammation of the middle ear is accompanied by an infinite number of individual hearing disorders. Similar examples can be given for any tissue or organ of our body, since functional disorders are a classic sign of inflammation, and their manifestation depends on the violation of the function of a particular organ, and not on our assumptions and analogies with other inflammatory processes caused by a similar pathogen.
When acute inflammation occurs in the lungs, it is usually considered a respiratory disaster, which is quite logical and corresponds to the functional characteristics of the affected organ. However, this ignores the fact that the lungs are an integral part of the circulatory system and its regulation. Representing one of the halves of the entire circulatory system in the body, the vessels of the lungs are functionally the complete opposite of the vessels of organs and tissues on the periphery. Blood pressure in the lungs is several times lower than in the large circle of blood circulation, and this proportion is regulated autonomously, in particular, by the baroreceptors of the pulmonary vessels. A persistent violation of this ratio is incompatible with the synchronous operation of the cardiovascular system and the preservation of the body's viability, and direct analogies between AP and other inflammatory diseases based on identical blood circulation tests are obviously doomed to incorrect conclusions.
Recording blood pressure in patients with AP is one of the simplest and most widely available methods for monitoring their condition. At the same time, when deciding on corrective therapy, one should take into account the fact that the cause of the disease is in the pulmonary vessels and the decrease in peripheral pressure may be no more than a reflection of compensatory shifts.
The above information is necessary to understand why modern approaches to the treatment of patients with AP suddenly stopped working with the onset of the coronavirus pandemic. Yes, this infection, unlike bacterial pneumonia, is characterized by its contagiousness and the ability to spread quickly, repeating the scenario of annual viral epidemics. Yes, COVID-19 has led to the need for strict compliance with anti-epidemic measures and the introduction of quarantine regimes. Yes, since the beginning of the pandemic, the number of patients with viral pneumonia has increased significantly, and practical medicine has lost antibiotics as a treatment, but lung damage in patients with coronavirus infection is one of the options for AP, and inflammatory changes affect the same lung structures as bacterial processes [2, 3]. A new term "COVID-19 pneumonia" has already appeared in the literature [4].
In the previous period, the annual number of cases of AP in the world was estimated at about 450 million, with the number of deaths being about 4 million [5.6]. If we compare these statistics with current estimates of COVID-19, the impartiality of the figures shows that the pandemic is significantly inferior to previous indicators. In the recent past, the negative dynamics of AP against the background of antibacterial therapy had its own explanations, and the existing treatment principles were supported and approved by specialists. The usual traditions were destroyed almost suddenly, and the reason for this fiasco of all complex AP therapy was the loss of only one type of medication.
The invasion of the coronavirus clearly showed that the scientifically based complex of AP treatment turned out to be an illusion and was, in fact, represented by a single group of drugs that do not have a specific effect on this disease. Simply, the pandemic has made its own adjustments to this problem and made it easier to check and evaluate the real therapeutic potential of modern medicine in patients with AP. Many specialists have already realized that there is no balanced medical care specific to AP, but the long-instilled and dominant image of the leading role of the pathogen prevents a panoramic assessment of the problem, justification and use of other directions in treatment [7, 8].
The lack of reliable and effective treatment methods for AP subconsciously supports the use of antibiotics, which are meaningless in viral infection, but which are currently received by 71 to 82.9% of patients with coronavirus pneumonia [9-11]. Modern specialized literature and mass media today are filled with expectations of the release of a vaccine for the prevention and reduction of morbidity and hopes for the development of effective antiviral drugs. All these hopes and expectations for the future cannot really help those who are already ill at the moment, and professional discussions are mainly focused on replacement and supportive methods, such as oxygen supply and auxiliary breathing options [7, 8, 12].
For many years, textbooks and manuals identified bacteria and viruses as the leading pathogens of AP, and the mention of the latter was more declarative than practical, since the proportion of such patients was small, and the proposed therapy was not focused on this option. Today, the importance of viral pneumonia has increased significantly, which requires a review of approaches and solutions. The explanation of the severity of the disease by the special virulence of its pathogen can no longer be considered as a serious argument. For example, observation and analysis of morbidity in the unique conditions of large isolated groups shows that infection with coronavirus as one identical pathogen is asymptomatic in more than 80% of cases and does not lead to disease [10, 11]. These indicators reflect not only the features of the epidemiology and spread of infection, but also the importance of individual characteristics of patients in the development of the disease.
The long period of use of antibiotics was marked not only by their undoubted benefits, but also by negative phenomena. The biological consequences of using these drugs in the form of transformation of the microcosm around us are not yet fully evaluated, but the growth of viral diseases observed in recent years can be considered as one of the long-term results of such therapy. Viral pneumonia has become a growing problem over the past couple of decades. The same coronavirus has already manifested itself in at least two epidemics (SARS, MERS). In addition, an exaggerated perception of the therapeutic properties of antibiotics played a negative didactic role and led to the forgetting of the scientific foundations of the unique nature of AP.
The need to reduce the functional load on the affected organ has long been known to medicine and is used as an important condition for helping patients with various diseases. Previous empirical experience of AP treatment has shown an adaptive effect of such procedures as, for example, cupping therapy or short-term cooling of the patient's body. Today, modern technical capabilities of medicine allow us to conduct objective testing of such methods and evaluate their therapeutic qualities at a new level. However, currently such methods are used everywhere, including in fitness clubs and beauty salons, but not in emergency pulmonology, where they are most needed.
In order to make a real step in solving the problem of AP, it is necessary first of all to change the system of views, which should be based on facts and classical scientific materials, and not on assumptions and declarations. This step has already been taken, and it is expected that its impressive results will continue and be further developed. A more detailed description of this material and the first results of its successful clinical testing can be found in Igor Klepikov's recently published monograph “Acute pneumonia. New doctrine and first treatment results " - ISBN (978-620-2-67917-6) > {https://www.cheapesttextbooks.com/IM/?keyval=ISBN+%28978-620-2-67917-6%29}.
Many materials and facts accumulated on the topic of acute pneumonia do not correspond to or even contradict existing ideas about the nature of the disease, which has long required a thorough and comprehensive analysis of the entire set of problems. The beginning of the pandemic has left medicine with a choice - to continue the fight against the new pathogen of AP, repeating the already passed scenario with antibacterial therapy and hoping for possible success in the future, or, recognizing the mistakes made, to start a new stage of treatment of patients today. Such an audit is necessary not only to avoid repeating mistakes and improve previous achievements at a qualitatively new level, but also to determine the reasons for the complication of the situation, assess the actual level of danger and future prospects, as well as to choose the rational way to further solve the problem.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
